The City Council decided in a closed session Tuesday to extend City Manager Russell Allen’s contract by a year and give him about a 5 percent raise.
The increase will bump Allen’s annual salary from $210,000 to $220,000. Allen’s pay has risen 57 percent since he was hired in 2001 at an annual salary of $140,000.
The council voted on the raise after discussing Allen’s job performance behind closed doors, as state law allows.
Mayor Charles Meeker said after the closed session that the council believes that Allen continues to do an outstanding job and is a key reason Raleigh is recognized as one of the best places to live in the country.
Councilor Mary-Ann Badwin said today that the council did consider how Allen's raise would look given the wider economic crisis that is resulting in layoffs and reduced pay in many industries and some government agencies. But she said Allen has done a very good job, and that his salary remains below what other top managers make in cities of similar size to Raleigh. Here are her comments on the raise:
"We did talk about that. What the perception would be. But we also weighed the fact that he has done what we feel is an extremely good job managing our finances and managing the city. Part of the issue is his pay is actually pretty low compared to his peers in other cities of similar size. What we’ve struggled with over the years is trying to get his pay up a little higher. We did look at the fact that we are in an economic crisis, but we felt that we needed to reward him for his efforts and also get his pay up a little more so he gets more in line with other peers. Also, when someone doesn’t get a raise when they work very hard it’s de-motivating."
Allen had one year left on his existing contract.
Although Raleigh has had a hiring freeze in effect since July 1, 2008, the city has not frozen pay or benefits of its employees. City employees are eligible to receive merit raises up to 5 percent each year.
Allen is scheduled to present his proposed 2009-2010 budget to the City Council on May 19. He warned the council in March that Raleigh could face a budget shortfall of $18 million to $22 million next fiscal year in its general fund.
Allen said Thursday that he has reviewed employee pay and other benefits as well as all programs and services offered by the city. But he declined to share his recommendations in those areas until he presents his proposed budget to council.
Allen has already said he will not recommend any increases in the property tax rate, or any increases in the privilege license fee, the stormwater fee or the solid waste fee.
Allen also proposes reducing the number of general fund employees by not filling vacant positions in an attempt to avoid the need for layoffs.
The city will continue to fill police, fire and other critical service positions that become vacant but likely won’t be creating any new positions in those areas next fiscal year.
Business reporter David Bracken came to the N&O in 2004. He covers commercial and residential real estate. Contact David at 919-829-4548 or
Comments
Typical News
Sun, 08/23/2009 - 13:30 — tonygreeneWhat do most people think will happen with these types of people?
113Tidbits | link directory |currency investments
Five percent is enough as we
Thu, 08/06/2009 - 01:27 — ninaninaFive percent is enough as we all know the country is facing low inflation rate. I hope that motivates the city manager to devote more. classified ads |part time jobs |steam shower
Bad judgement
Fri, 05/08/2009 - 23:24 — bu11durmSomeone compared this to the AIG execs. I believe a better analogy is to the auto industry execs taking private jets to Washington to beg for money. While the jets may be practical, you have to understand the public perception.
Par for the course
Fri, 05/08/2009 - 21:57 — FireStormThe people in power get the money- the workers get the shaft. Raise the City Manager's paycheck, and fire a policeman or two the get the money to do it. Meeker and the rest of them are all inca-hoots together, and state workers get furloughs and rifed; and city jobs get cut. Raise the boss and fire the slaves!
Unbelievable. We are in the
Fri, 05/08/2009 - 21:36 — RoroCAUnbelievable. We are in the worst recession since the Great Depression, foreclosures, inability to balance budgets but this guy gets a raise.
It is bad enough having our property taxes raised every year but this is an absolute insult.
I will campaign hard to get the members of city council out of office over this slap in the face.
Yeah this isn't good
Fri, 05/08/2009 - 20:29 — TomHanningsThis really isn't good, another raise. Common.
It's just stupid
Benidorm
Benidorm Hotels
lol, the optics of this will
Fri, 05/08/2009 - 18:20 — dsspr1lol, the optics of this will not be good....
And so what?
Fri, 05/08/2009 - 17:18 — TomHanningsIn my opinion these news don't matter at all and I don't see why this is in the news.
So what and who cares?
Self Cert Mortgages
Raises??????
Fri, 05/08/2009 - 17:02 — dseligmannYou are kidding me! He is already earning more than most of the City's employees! and if we are going to have a shortfall in the budget why are we not treating this like any other budget? and pulling back on spending? This is amazing! We are being charged more for water - and we have the monies to spend on a raise for a person already earning more than 200K a year! This City needs to start running itself more like a business with a profit and loss statement that they have to adhere to!
Queen41.....The Gov.
Fri, 05/08/2009 - 17:00 — PATRICIA8Queen41.....The Gov. probably already has stepped in and said something about this like go ahead give him a raise, he is a good Democrat and we need him. I remmeber what my Dad told me many years ago. Put the Democrats in office and the poor get poorer and the richer get richer, well it wasn't his exact quote but thats what I gathered from it.
Was this vote legal?
Fri, 05/08/2009 - 16:47 — JFranksThe state's open meetings law allows the city manager's performance and contract to be discussed in a closed session, and the public body (city council) can reach consensus during the closed session, but voting must take place in OPEN session. Voting is not allowed in closed session. Either the reporter got it wrong, or the city council violated state law.
pay cut
Fri, 05/08/2009 - 16:34 — TOPASSISTANTHis pay should be cut 5 percent along with all supervisors. Lead by example I say. None of us is as smart as all of us.
Pay raise?
Fri, 05/08/2009 - 15:35 — vance203Our state is short a few billion bucks, AFTER the federal government gave the state $6 billion. So we justify a raise by saying he will continue to do an outstanding job. Unfortunately, most of us are working for the same pay, if not less, as last year. I, for one, continue to do an outstanding job because, well, I want a job to go to tomorrow and the next day. We all have to do more with less, unless you work for the state. Scratch that...unless you work for the government. How should teachers feel, who make a fraction of $220k a year, and who are facing mandatory pay cuts and furloughs. How about leading by example?! I'm sure there are plenty of qualified people who could do the job for less money and do it just as well, if not better.
Telling comments...
Fri, 05/08/2009 - 16:23 — deansmithOk comrade...let's put it another way. For illustrative purposes, let's say you have a sales mgt position.
Your goal is to increase your revenue by 10%. Year-end comes and you've increased your revenue by 25%. The other departments at your company...with the same goals, have posted declining revenue.
You are over it all and have a pool of $100K to increase salaries. Do you give all the managers the same raise? Surely not! You reward the good performers so 1) they continue to do a good job and 2) they STAY!
If you were the one that did a good job, why in the holy h e double-hockey-stick would you want to be rewarded the same. If you want to give back, put it in the offering plate on Sunday but don't pontificate to others about what they "deserve".
This class-envy "why does he get one...I didn't" stuff is absurd. As my grandad said, "Keep your eyes on the road ahead of you".
Since 2001
Fri, 05/08/2009 - 15:30 — chevyliftHis salary has really increased. He's been getting better than 5% raises since 2001 when he started at $140,000. Who gets raises like this? Rihanna Photo Leaked
Congratulations to the Manager, Mayor, and Council
Fri, 05/08/2009 - 15:05 — robryantCongratulations of a salary commensurate to your awesome responsibilities. I’m sorry that there is so much class envy out there but you didn’t become successful listening to the nay-sayers, hate mongers, and self righteous bigots. Keep up the good work and keep Raleigh on top in North Carolina.
In short this s u c k s
Fri, 05/08/2009 - 14:31 — ladyknowallIn short this s u c k s
Whatever
Fri, 05/08/2009 - 14:30 — deansmithPersonally, I'm much more concerned with the culture that will spend $10K on sending a member of the sanitation department to Florida than I am about spending $10K to retain/protect someone that appears to be doing their job and doing it well. Isn't that what we all want, an opporunity to differentiate ourselves and improve our lives by doing a good job? Well, this guy is one of the few that has recently.
a good manager knows when
Fri, 05/08/2009 - 14:58 — tboard47a good manager knows when to lead by example this is probably as bad as the bonuses at AIG
just ugly
Closed session
Fri, 05/08/2009 - 14:21 — TheLibertineReason #1,394 (and counting) why Meeker should never hold the office of mayor again!
city employee
Fri, 05/08/2009 - 14:13 — LovelyncI guess I should be working for the city instead of the state. Wonder if his benefits are being cut like the rest of us?
insane
Fri, 05/08/2009 - 13:49 — tboard47your city council are all a bunch of idiots. This is arrogance at work folks---- absolutely out of bounds in this day of layoffs
Typical arrogance of a liberal mayor
Fri, 05/08/2009 - 12:41 — PaulTerrellMayor Meeker and the Democrats on the Raleigh City Council are giving the city manager a payraise on the backs of fixed income elderly and families in North Carolina.
Wow, I am not even a Wake
Fri, 05/08/2009 - 12:35 — NotLiberalWow, I am not even a Wake county resident and I am surprised by the payraise. Does the guy deserve it? Probably, but so do a lot of state and local government employees. Giving this guy a raise when many of them are facing pay and time cuts is a slap in the face.
If Russell Allen took a 5% pay cut I would be more understandable. At least he wouldn't lose any pay (the two would cancel each other out) and when times are better he could enjoy the payraise in good conscious.
I hope Meeker is ready for the polictical backlash this is going to cause, because I am sure there will be some.
WOW. Don't ask me for an
Fri, 05/08/2009 - 12:28 — Steven252525WOW. Don't ask me for an additional dime on my water bill, the city clearly has plenty of money. As a democrat, I will not ever vote for Meeker and hope someone steps up to defeat him this November. Simply wrong.
Queen41
Fri, 05/08/2009 - 12:25 — queen41In these days and times and with the economy and the state in such dispair, how can Mayor Meeker authorize this with a straight face? I should not be surprised because they never feel as though they should bare some of the burden like the rest of North Carolina.
Gov. Perdue should step in and say something about this.