Wake NCAE President Jennifer Lanane is in damage control mode after having sent an e-mail message accusing the new school board members of not caring about children and teachers.
As noted in today's article, Lanane sent an apology letter on Monday to the new board members, who weren't happy about the tone of an earlier message sent to Wake NCAE reps. She says that the first message was a draft that was never meant to be sent, pointing to the multiple grammatical errors.
Lanane is in a difficult spot as she wants to try to get along with the new board majority. The problem is Wake NCAE didn't endorse any of the new members.
Let's start from the beginning of this e-mail exchange.
The initial e-mail message was sent Oct. 27 to urge Wake NCAE reps to lobby the new board members to keep the Wednesday early dismissals. She said she had heard the new board was going to drop "Wake Wednesdays" effective Dec. 2, which she said would mean "throwing teachers and students under the bus so that they can show how powerful they are."
"They don’t care about children and it in now clear that they don’t care about teachers…WE HAVE PLANT OUR FLAG IN THE SAND HERE AND NOW," Lanane wrote in the first message.
The message wasn't meant to go outside the group as it includes the disclaimer that "WakeReps is a list serv for Wake NCAE Association Representatives and other members -- Do not forward to non-members."
But the message got into the hands of new school board member Deborah Prickett, who fired a response back at Lanane. She also forwarded her response to the leadership of the N.C Association of Educators, saying she was concerned about "the damage this [Lanane's message] may have done."
"Various teachers and WCPSS staff members have communicated to me that they have felt suppressed and stifled by the existing Wake NCAE leadership’s slanted focus," Prickett writes. "Freedom of speech has been muffled for some for fear of retaliation."
Here's the Oct. 27 message from Lanane:
From: Jennifer Lanane <wakepresident@bellsouth.net>
Subject: [WakeReps] Urgent
To: wakereps@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, October 27, 2009, 4:50 PM
All,
I have it on good authority that the new school board is going to do away with Wake Wednesdays effective at the Dec. 2. It is going to be their first order of business to show their strength! What it is, is their throwing teachers and students under the bus so that they can show how powerful they are. The newly elected board does not what to talk about it, see how it is working, see how it is improving education, they are not even concerned about the disruption this will cause in the middle of the year. If we allow this to happen, just think what might next. They don’t care about children and it in now clear that they don’t care about teachers…WE HAVE PLANT OUR FLAG IN THE SAND HERE AND NOW. Plan to send emails, call, send letters and show up at the school board meeting on Tuesday, November 2 to speak during public comment. Tell them your story, tell them how hard you work and that Wake Wednesdays need to be given a chance. This is just the beginning guys we need to start fighting NOW
Ron Margiotta needs to hear form us load and clear…everyone needs to email…spread the word
Mr. Ron Margiotta
7800 Secluded Acres Road
Apex , NC 27523
850-8872/office
290-2043/residence, fax
rmargiotta@wcpss. net…
New members…I don’t have all the emails but will get them too you as I get them
John Tedesco 850-9772
Deborah Prickett 293 0235
Debra Goldman 637 9292
Chris Malone 395 4903
They all campaigned on the premises that they will listen, let see if that is true.
Thanks for all you do, Jennie
Here's Prickett's response:
In reference to the recent email sent by Jennifer Lanane, President of the Wake NCAE, to membership (approximately 5,000), I feel it is important to reveal this information to the public and other teachers and staff members that may not be participants in Wake NCAE in order to draw their own conclusions. My newly elected office to the Board of Education representing District 7 is one that I take seriously and respectfully. In addition, my stance has always been and will continue to be supportive of teachers and WCPSS staff members as they are the foundation of our school system. Having been a teacher and counselor with the WCPSS for 22 years, I personally recognize the dedication and commitment that staff members demonstrate in working and interacting with students. Make no mistake in knowing that I absolutely support educators and care about providing excellent educational opportunities for all children.
As you know, the Wake NCAE chose not to endorse me or any of the newly elected Board members as they seemed to be politically motivated using the same, rigid, narrow-minded focus boxing staff members into a politically decorated container. Even though the container was nicely packaged, the contents did not deliver results. The community said different on their ballots. Furthermore, various teachers and WCPSS staff members have communicated to me that they have felt suppressed and stifled by the existing Wake NCAE leadership’s slanted focus. Freedom of speech has been muffled for some for fear of retaliation.
This is a new day for WCPSS. I will be listening, watching, and participating as I go forth in doing the best possible job I can of representing the views of the public as well as WCPSS staff members involving the issues surrounding education. The Wake NCAE can be an important advocate for staff members in building the requested priorities and visions, but a partnership must exist with community associates in lieu of the present leadership fixation with stringent, outside political agendas.
Deborah Prickett
Board of Education Member Elect
District 7
Here's Monday's apology letter from Lanane:
From: Jennifer Lanane <wakepresident@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:50 PM
Subject: letter to incoming school board members
To: jtedesco@4wakekids.com
Jennifer Lanane
Wake NCAE, President
919.782.8908
3900 Merton Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
Dear Incoming School Board Members,
Today, I had a conversation with Mr. Tedesco about the email I sent to Wake NCAE's Association Representatives (AR's) on October 27th. Much to my dismay, the email you received was a first draft that was sent inadvertently (as you can clearly see by the spelling and grammar errors). It was the first of what was intended to be several drafts before being officially sent out to all the ARs. With the barrage of distressing calls I had been receiving that day from upset, angry, and frustrated members, uncertain and disturbed by the changes reported to be on the way, so I quickly reacted. My email was obviously composed in anger but it certainly was not meant to be sent in that form. I apologize. I very quickly sent out a second and then later even a third e-mail to inform the AR's of my mistake, but you likely did not receive those.
This unfortunate episode is a clear example of why it is vitally important that we have regular, on-going conversations. You will find that at times we will be on the same "side" despite the times we will not; however, it would be dangerous to everyone for there to be no communication between an elected school board and the educators it employs - the very backbone and foundation of our entire educational system. If we fail to communicate, no one will win and, sadly, the children of WCPSS will lose.
We believe professional judgment the individuals working most closely with students on a day to day basis should matter greatly. Parents clearly play an equally vital role in their child's educational attainment, but a failure to acknowledge and utilize the knowledge and experience of those who have studied, trained and devoted their lives to teaching seems unthinkable.
I attempted to reach out to each you all numerous times in the last two weeks so that we can begin to establish the kind of relationship that we all know is in the best interest of students. Please contact me so that we can start on the right foot. Anger and frustration grows for the employees as each newspaper article is written and we hope that the voice of the educator is not being lost. As much as I regret the inadvertent distribution of a draft of my communication to our school representatives, it did reflect the views of many of our members. We need to talk for many reasons, but it is important for educators to know who you are and believe that you honestly value the significance of their contributions to Wake County students and our entire society.
I look forward to hearing from you as soon as possible and to future conversations focused on doing what is right for children.

Comments
http://www.uggbootszone.info/ugg-classic-crochet-c-1423.html C
Mon, 01/04/2010 - 04:54 — snj19Never treat a dried shrimp not as seafood.
Status?
Mon, 11/16/2009 - 12:10 — woodstockWhere are the 2nd and 3rd emails to the NCAE members that were intended to override the insulting and extremely unprofessional "draft email' that Lanane sent?
Also, any new status of when Lanane will resign or be asked to resign by the hopefully more professional and competent state-level NCAE president?
Thanks...
Mon, 11/16/2009 - 22:33 — louiselee44I asked Keung the same question about emails 2 and 3 in an earlier post. Also, who specifically received these emails? Not many regular teachers, I'm finding out.
I don't have the 2nd and 3rd
Tue, 11/17/2009 - 01:02 — KeungHui (author)I don't have the 2nd and 3rd emails. The listserv is for the Wake NCAE reps at each school, not all the members.
When will she resign?
Mon, 11/16/2009 - 08:39 — woodstockHas Jennifer Lanane scheduled a press conference to announce her resignation yet?
I'd like to know
Sat, 11/14/2009 - 12:29 — louiselee44Was it the NCAE reps at every school that got the email from Lanane? Also, can we see the text of the 2 emails referenced in her quote below? Keung, can you get that for us?
"I very quickly sent out a second and then later even a third e-mail to inform the AR's of my mistake, but you likely did not receive those."
Each additional second
Fri, 11/13/2009 - 11:34 — woodstockEach additional second Lanane stays in her position, the more irrelevant the NCAE becomes. If the NCAE is just hoping this blows over, they are demonstrating that they agree with Lanane's message and simply wish to weather this storm.
Irony
Fri, 11/13/2009 - 09:45 — louiselee44I wonder how many of the NCAE teacher members that Ms. Lanane emailed actually voted for the 4 winners, thus aiding in their election? A lot, I'll bet.
I campaigned next to her
Fri, 11/13/2009 - 10:17 — J8307200We were both working the polls in October in Wake Forest. She was handing out postcards with the names of the candidates that NCAE was endorsing. I was working for Chris Malone. Every time someone walked up she said, "Wake County Teachers are supporting Rita Rakestraw". I found it very amusing as several of my friends are teachers and members of NCAE and I knew darn well they were voting for Chris. When one teacher stopped to talk before she went in to vote, she asked me where Chris stood on several issues. As I began to talk she (Jennifer Lanane) started rolling her eyes and then in the middle of my sentence she (Jennifer Lanane) interrupted me very loudly and rudely. She told the teacher that Chris Malone did not have any children in Wake County schools. I quickly jumped in and had to correct her. She asked me "How did I know?" I told her I knew Chris and all his children and knew exactly where they went to school. I have never in my life met a more rude, arrogant, and egotistical women in my life. She had it all figured out and those of us pushing for neighborhood schools were a bunch of misguided morons. Oh by the way, she asked that teacher where she taught and the poor womens eyes got big and she said she would rather not say...afraid of reprecussions. When she came out...she told me she had voted for Chris. Hey Jenny....how bout them apples???????
You tell 'er, sister!
Sat, 11/14/2009 - 00:04 — petehsSo many amazing stories from the field. We should write a book.
A type
Fri, 11/13/2009 - 15:29 — SDR256I guess every system has its personality and the type of personalities that it attracts. This system has seemed to breed some very undesirable characteristics - -
Rigidity, arrogance, spite, disrespect, small mindedness. There sure was more of that than we would like to see in a system that teaches our children.
Hopefully the housekeeping can begin in December which makes spiders and creepy crawlies unwelcome.
You just can't make this stuff up
Fri, 11/13/2009 - 00:13 — TrailerParkGirlMs. Lanane's "draft" (cough, cough) email has just about left me speechless and is a sad commentary on the state of the educational system here. Is "we must start the fight NOW" her idea of having "regular on-going conversations"? She slanders the new BOE members and wants a fight and now she wants conversation. Did her change of heart come the night of the D2 run-off results?
Ms. Lanane states, "we believe professional judgment the individuals working most closely with students on a day to day basis should matter greatly [sic]."
Well, I believe THE professional judgement OF the individuals working most closely with students on a day to day basis DOES matter greatly and Ms. Lanane has proven she has NO professional judgement. If her professional judgement stands as an example of the professional judgement of the individuals working most closely with students on a day to day basis within WCPSS, WCPSS is in even deeper trouble than I thought.
Time for Lalane to go
Thu, 11/12/2009 - 23:07 — annschleissThe question of “wacky Wednesday” early dismissal is a serious one that should have been further discussed with parents. It has caused serious inconvenience to many working parents who have to arrange to pick up children or be home earlier on Wednesdays than other days. It particularly affects low income single mothers who often have the kind of jobs with the least flexible schedules.
Most school systems keep the same hours each day, and are able to educate their students. If, for some reason, they had to dismiss the students one day earlier than other days, they could have given consideration to Friday. Many businesses have earlier end times on Friday. However, it should have been discussed with parents.
One of the factors in this recent election was the attitude of the Wake BoE toward the parents. I know many “grumpy mothers” (and fathers too) who voted for the change candidates not just because of the final decisions reached by the board, but the attitude expressed by board members when talking to parents and voters. The Wednesday closing time decision, and the attitude shown by many board members, was a factor.
Lalane’s comments about “their throwing teachers and students under the bus” go beyond the pale. There is no excuse for the leader of the teachers’ organization having such an attitude. I don’t care about her spelling errors; I do care about her attitude. Her attitude not only shows a lack of understanding for many of the real issues of the recent election, but a lack of respect for parents.
She is not a good representative of the teachers, many of whom do respect parents and want to work with them. If there is a way the members can remove her from office before her term is up, they should. Otherwise she should resign immediately.
Ann Schleiss
She should go and she will go if NCAE
Fri, 11/13/2009 - 10:35 — g88ky07wants to be taken seriously going forward! The new board will do what they think is best, but if Mrs. BlaBla thinks she's relevant to education in this county any further maybe she should remind herself how her relevance turned out for her in the recent elections!
She was as relevant as Stan Norwalk was!
Eloquent and precise
Fri, 11/13/2009 - 01:48 — SDR256Eloquent and precise Ms. Schleiss. Thank you!
I was thinking she would
Thu, 11/12/2009 - 20:03 — red_balloonI was thinking she would have resigned by now but I guess there isn't an iota of decency left in this rabble rouser.
My "take away" from Ms.
Thu, 11/12/2009 - 17:05 — rr77rr99My "take away" from Ms. Lanane has come from teachers themselves. I have asked several about the Wednesday schedule and if they were "for" or "against it" and every single one of them told me that they had NO IDEA about these Wednesday's. They heard about it on the news like the parents did. They had no time to react or present an opinion to the NCAE.
I was stunned because I watched Ms. Lanane present it to the BOE and she said that the teachers were all behind this. So, was she making that up? Are the teachers automatically behind whatever she says they are behind?
As a parent, that has never sat well with me. It seems like this NCAE is more of a "strong arm" organization that an organization representing teachers.
Now, it is posted here Ms. Lanane makes double what most of the teachers in the system make? For what? To go sit at BOE meetings and carry out Del's agendas without the knowledge of the teachers?
Now she's sending emails "rallying" the troops?
I'd say this is "shocking", but really, it isn't. It's just another wrinkle in the WCPSS nonsense that goes on behind our backs. Again, parents and especially the kids are nothing more than pawns in this system. It's one big shell game. There is no real focus on education. It's all about the accolades and who can climb the pay scale before someone finds out where the money is really being wasted!
You are correct about the
Thu, 11/12/2009 - 18:23 — dryeraseuserYou are correct about the teachers, knowing nothing about the early Wednesday proposal last year. I didn't know a thing about it, until I was reading over the blogs here and on WRAL. I use to be a member of NCAE, but no longer. NOT after she supported this and made it out to be something we supported as well! I asked a few other teachers who are members of NCAE, if any emails or newsletters discuss the possible early release day for PLC's. They looked at me like I had 2 heads, they OF COURSE, did not know a thing about it. WCPSS and NCAE, both DID not inform us in writing or any other means, about the plan to have early release every Wed. this year for those DREADED PLC's..wlel now..PLT's. This is why I would NO LONGER support an organization that would blindly support something like this and stand up and say we the teachers support this and wanted it...when in fact we knew NOTHING about it.
She can say that the new board members are throwing the teachers and students under the bus if they discontinue the PLT/Wed. deal all she wants. The teachers and students were thrown under the bus by The OLD Board, admin. of WCPSS and NCAE. Take some responsibility people...YOU did this to us...stop placing blame on the new members. It just makes me sick!!!!!
It's so interesting now how
Fri, 11/13/2009 - 13:37 — rr77rr99It's so interesting now how some schools are "inviting" the public in to comes see there PLC, PLT, "PYT" (oh, wait that's Michael Jackson..lol), days ... yet, another dog and pony PR show for the public.
Do you not LOVE how WCPSS thinks the "public" is made up of the stupidest people on the face of the earth? I don't know what ticks me off more, the constant schedule changes, or constantly being looked down upon and treated like a two year old?
Seriously... why do you think the face of the BOE changed? WCPSS administration has to really stop thinking Wake County is made up of morons.
Irony
Thu, 11/12/2009 - 13:57 — SDR256**"It's about making Wake County schools the very best in the nation," Lanane said. "If we're not talking, then it won't happen."**
Ironic, given her actions.
Way back when...
Thu, 11/12/2009 - 13:17 — louiselee44...when I taught in Wake County, teachers were "expected" (in a strong way) to join the NCAE. As a rookie, I didn't know any better, but later I was told that most teachers (certainly all the ones I knew) joined for the liability coverage, not because the group represented them. Then I found out about another group that teachers could join (for less $) that solely offered the same protection. Many of us chose to switch over. I don't know if that option still exists.
(No subject)
Thu, 11/12/2009 - 12:22 — ncmpgjrSHE MAKES CLOSE TO $80,000 FOR THIS?
Thu, 11/12/2009 - 11:17 — ncmpgjrSee page 5:
http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2008/561/890/2008-561890038-04563520-9O.pdf
One consolation - at least she's not teaching grammar.
How is NCAE given tax-exempt
Thu, 11/12/2009 - 23:44 — ApexterHow is NCAE given tax-exempt status when it makes political endorsements and campaign donations?
Actually,
Thu, 11/12/2009 - 12:39 — cthayes75It's closer to $100,000 per year. Look on page 10.
And anyone else find it interesting that the President of the Wake NCAE doesn't even live in Wake County? She lives in Sanford.
Teachers in Wake County have a very easy way to give themselves a pay raise. Quit the NCAE and save $370 a year.
Consider Resigning....
Thu, 11/12/2009 - 10:09 — tcd24035This is a tragic display of lack of leadership that if unaddressed has the potential to have a huge negative impact... Jennifer Lanane should resign as she has clearly displayed through her own actions that she is incapable of operating in a leadership position.
Very sad....
Nothing like some egg on your feet!
Thu, 11/12/2009 - 14:48 — g88ky07What an irresponsible and pathetic excuse for her actions. Her term expires in about 6 months and like Patti and Lori, she can just go ahead and quit if she likes. Anyone who would elect, appoint or want Jenn Lala to represent them after how she acted during the campaign needs to take a 2nd look in their mirror!
As stated earlier, she spit in the NEW school board's faces, isn't competent enough to not hit send or spell check and certainly doesn't speak for me or anyone I know!
I say don't wipe the egg off Jennifer, let it run down to the floor!
It worries me that...
Thu, 11/12/2009 - 09:02 — midtownmomthis woman is at the helm of a group that is making decisions for the teachers who teach my child every day. She needs to step down immediately for the group to remain in any way credible.
Here here!
Thu, 11/12/2009 - 10:10 — tcd24035Spot on...
Most of Jennifer Inane's
Thu, 11/12/2009 - 08:43 — CaryCurmudgeonMost of Jennifer Inane's emails and letters feature spelling and grammatical errors, so I do not believe that this was a first draft (it may reflect the best work she is capable of).
In her response, Ms. Inane makes a valid point that it is crucial for board members to build a relationship with the teachers who are the backbone of our system. In my opinion, the board can develop a more productive relationship with those school teachers if they do so in a direct way, without any involvement from Jennifer Inane.
Her term expires in June 2010. If her true desire is to help teachers, she would do the right thing and step aside now.
That is a shocking letter,
Thu, 11/12/2009 - 08:26 — woodstockThat is a shocking letter, especially considering it comes from someone whose job it is to work together with WCPSS stakeholders and to build collaborative relationships with the BoE. If Jennifer Lanane, President of the Wake NCAE, has no more anger control, tact, and grammar skills than her letter indicates, one must wonder how she ever attained that position to begin with.
I wonder what Sheri Strickland, the state-level NCAE President, thinks about Lanane's insulting and anger-filled approach. Until all the WCPSS stakeholders, like the NCAE, get onboard with the idea that there is a new dynamic on the BoE, it will be tough row to hoe for all.
Take home message:
Thu, 11/12/2009 - 08:15 — Apexter"WakeReps is a list serv for Wake NCAE Association Representatives and other members -- Do not forward to non-members."
So, the take home message is: Libel is OK, as long as you do it behind their backs!
How much longer is Lanane's term as NCAE rep? I think she has totally damaged her credibility and I question how effectively she can now represent the views of NCAE with the current school board.
On the other hand, if she loses the NCAE gig, that means she will be back in the classroom. Based on the level of literacy in that e-mail, I hope she's not a language arts teacher.
And I'm totally not buying the "I didn't know that hitting the SEND button would SEND the e-mail!" excuse.
...
Thu, 11/12/2009 - 08:10 — SideburnsFirst draft? As if that makes her email any better. Correct all your spelling mistakes, Jennie. It still reads as a horrible diatribe. Shameful from someone who is supposed to represent teachers.
Ms. Lanane practically spit on the new Board members at the "Friends of Diversity" stunt. Now this? Please.
Hmm where are these 2nd and 3rd e-mails?
Thu, 11/12/2009 - 07:44 — stacy123Hmm seems like these would be easy to re-produce. Of course the members never received those.