WakeEd

The WakeEd blog is devoted to discussing and answering questions about the major issues facing the Wake County school system. How much will the new Democratic majority on the school board do to undo the changes made by Republicans since 2009? Will the new student assignment plan be a hybrid of the last two models or primarily be a return to the use of busing for diversity? Who will replace Tony Tata as the new superintendent of the state's largest district? How will voters react to a likely request in 2013 to borrow potentially more than $1 billion to build and renovate schools?

WakeEd is maintained by The News & Observer's Wake schools reporter, T. Keung Hui. While Keung posts information and analysis on the issues, keep us posted on your suggestions, questions, tips and what you're doing to cope with the changes in Wake's schools.

Choose a blog

Wake County Schools Superintendent Tony Tata on the "State of the Schools"

Bookmark and Share

Wake County Schools Superintendent Tony Tata came out with a three-point message at his State of the Schools address on Thursday.

As noted in today's article by Thomas Goldsmith, Tata talked enthusiastically about the gains that Wake made on state exams. But he warned that the results could drop as Wake and the rest of the state switches to the new common core curriculum and tests this school year.

The third prong of Tata's speech was the need "to make a compelling case" for the passage of a school bond issue in 2013.

Academically, Tata said "we had a pretty good year." He cited increases in test scores, both among schools overall and among subgroups such as economically disadvantaged students.

Tata singled out changes such as Central Office providing money to Title I schools that was previously being held in reserve for emergencies and getting Title I schools to shift from targeted to schoolwide assistance programs.

Tata also pointed too the gains at the Renaissance Schools being greater than the non-Renaissance schools, noting the use of the "pay for performance model."

"Some people say 'Well Tata, that's not sustainable,'" Tata said of the Renaissance School gains. "Well, I would rather try to figure out how to sustain it going forward than to sustain what was happening before."

Tata also pointed to the gains at Walnut Creek Elementary School, saying they will sustain the level of support provided to the school.

Tata acknowledged that the graduation rate is lower than it was six years ago and how now it's "painfully obvious that the state has caught up with us." But he also pointed to how the graduation rate went up two years ago after years of decline and only dropped slightly this year.

Moving forward to common core, Tata stressed how much more rigorous the new curriculum is compared to what was in place previously. As a hint of what could happen with the new tests, he pointed back to how Wake's test scores dropped after the state renormed the exams in the mid-2000s.

"We could be in for a little sticker shock on our reading scores at fourth-grade and, if you extrapolate it outward, across the system unless we double down and really make sure we do the things like we're doing such as gap analysis," Tata said.

Tata said they're preparing for the rigor of common core with things such as increased spending on staff development and getting more students to take Algebra I in middle school through the use of EVAAS.

After talking about various accomplishments such as increasing the use of inclusion for special-education students, reductions in student suspensions, expansion of new programs such as the single-sex leadership academies,  Tata turned to the issue of challenges.

"There's a lot of great stuff but we have some challenges," Tata said.

Those challenges include improving academic growth at middle schools, raising the graduation rate, implementing the common core, dealing with the budget, restoring full accreditation from AdvancED and the "huge" challenge of capacity.

"We're going to have to go to the community, to all of you, and say, 'Look we need space,'" Tata said.

Tata said they're looking everywhere for school space, such as the locations being leased for the single-gender schools.

On the new student assignment plan, Tata said on Sept. 18 staff will "deliver an updated version on the assignment plan that will be an improvement of what we have today."

Tata talked about the growth that could bring 20,000 more students by 2016.

"As we look at that growth, we've got to make a compelling case for construction to the entire county," Tata said. "And how do you make that case? You talk about where you are doing well, that you're a high-performing organization, you're producing results.

And we need this growth and this growth begets more business and it's a synchronization that happens between business and a great community to live in and great schools. And you can't have one without the other. And so as we move forward, we need everyone to be involved and to speak on behalf of the school system."


Video streaming by Ustream

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The actual growth rate..

seems to be consistently below projections. In 2006, they projected a 9000 student/year increase (and the bond was based on those projections). Actual growth was about 6000. In 2009, they projected about 7000 students/year increase. Actual was about 5000. So how come that bond money was not enough even though actual student growth has been substantially lower?

Well...

Look more recently -- I think this year's projections are a lot closer.  We'll know in about 3 weeks.

And, I think if you look, you'll see that the last bond has stretched out longer than was originally intended.

Wow, another hacked ID?

Cause I have screamed about this for years upon years bp, THIS is one of the biggest reasons voters don't trust this school system when it comes to bond issues, inept people making their projections for them.

So when they'll tell us 4,000 next year guess what that really means, 2000-2500.

Maybe.

With the growing number of

With the growing number of charter schools and other educational alternatives to WCPSS, expect this number to be increasingly difficult to predict.

Well said

"Some people say 'Well Tata, that's not sustainable,'" Tata said of the Renaissance School gains. "Well, I would rather try to figure out how to sustain it going forward than to sustain what was happening before."

I absolutely agree with Tata on this point. If these efforts bring improvement, then that helps bolster Wake's argument for the money to keep them going. I was so tired of the excuse that we can't do this or that because we don't have the money. Yes, it's a valid concern but if we waited until we had the money to do everything we want, we'd never get there. There's never enough money to do what you want so I'd rather get creative with the resources we have at the time and at least do something.

Read more here: http://blogs.newsobserver.com/wakeed/wake-county-schools-superintendent-tony-tata-on-the-state-of-the-schools#storylink=cpy

True leaders don't make

True leaders don't make excuses for why they can't do the right thing.  Some will disagree with Tata on many things, but they cannot say that he is not a leader and WCPSS desperately needed a leader.  Thank goodness we finally have one.

Agreed.

Agreed.

Dan, I think someone may

Dan,

I think someone may have hacked your user ID.

Whomever you are...we agree.

Whatever. I don't think it's

Whatever.

I don't think it's a secret that I'd rather the BOE put a great plan in place and challenge the CC to pay for it than to say "Yes, sir" to the CC suggested allocations and plan according to that.

Well that's great.  We

Well that's great.  We agree to that as well.  Now if the BOE puts a "great plan" in place that includes any type of "diversity" social engineering, the CC's should tell them where to stick it.  While the CC's shouldn't be in the business of telling the BOE how to direct the school system, they also shouldn't be dumb enough to give more money to a BOE attempting to implement policies that have failed in the past.  I don't expect the CC's to direct the school system's policies but I do expect them to be good stewards of our tax dollars.  Providing extra funding for some renamed, recycled diversity scheme for fall into the category of wasting tax payer money.

Cars View All
Find a Car
Go
Jobs View All
Find a Job
Go
Homes View All
Find a Home
Go

Want to post a comment?

In order to join the conversation, you must be a member of newsobserver.com. Click here to register or to log in.

About the blogger

T. Keung Hui covers Wake schools.
Advertisements