WakeEd

The WakeEd blog is devoted to discussing and answering questions about the major issues facing the Wake County school system. How much will the new Democratic majority on the school board do to undo the changes made by Republicans since 2009? Will the new student assignment plan be a hybrid of the last two models or primarily be a return to the use of busing for diversity? Who will replace Tony Tata as the new superintendent of the state's largest district? How will voters react to a likely request in 2013 to borrow potentially more than $1 billion to build and renovate schools?

WakeEd is maintained by The News & Observer's Wake schools reporter, T. Keung Hui. While Keung posts information and analysis on the issues, keep us posted on your suggestions, questions, tips and what you're doing to cope with the changes in Wake's schools.

Choose a blog

Wake County school system explains to AdvancED reasons for dropping choice plan

Bookmark and Share

More to come later, but the Wake County school system is defending the decision by the school board's Democratic majority to drop the choice-based student assignment plan in its response to AdvancED.

In this 28-page report sent today, Wake says the board majority's vote was based on “reasonable beliefs that there were demonstrable and substantial problems with the Choice Plan.”

“While four Board members believed that the Choice Plan remained viable and that any problems could be successfully addressed, five members came to the conclusion that a fundamental change in approach was needed,” according to the report.

In an eight-page appendix, the report lists various issues with the choice plan: students not being assigned after the first choice round, students being capped out of proximate schools, newcomers being placed at a disadvantage, underenrollment, preassigning students to feeders without guaranteed transportation, the long registration lines at Central Office, that parents had insufficient information to make informed decisions, widespread bus problems at the start of the school year and increased transportation costs, anxiety about lack of base assignments and negative effect on socioeconomic balance at schools.

The report also denies the allegation from the Wake County Taxpayers Association that the board majority is being unduly influenced by the Great Schools in Wake Coalition. For instance, it cites how the board allowed the choice plan to go forward even though GSIW urged that it not be implemented.

"Any specific votes that happen to have broken along party lines reflect good faith differences on important matters of educational policy, not the desire to promote the agenda of any political party," according to the response. "All Board members deny that they have made decisions based on partisanship or that they are beholden to special interests."

The report is silent on the issue of the firing of Superintendent Tony Tata even though it was added by the WCTA in its amended complaint. AdvancED didn't amend its list of questions to include any about Tata's firing.

UPDATE

The WRAL breaking news alert that "the national accreditation group AdvancED has found a complaint against the Wake County Board of Education by the Wake County Taxpayers Association to be without merit" is dead wrong.

AdvancED hasn't even reviewed the report yet. It's WRAL misinterpreting that Wake is telling AdvancED that it should find the complaint as being without merit.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

DEAD WRONG?

Apparently they don't think so, the same story is still up.  Maybe Jim hasn't seen it yet?

Looks like many are migrating over to that website, as the comments bashing the N&O's  "censor payola wall"  are endless on this homepage.

Jobs may thin out quickly at the N&O, so you might want to be nicer to that other media bunch.  Just sayin'.

WRAL is basically trying to

WRAL is basically trying to pretend that the breaking news alert didn't happen. They didn't send a correction on it. What's online now for them is correct that it's Wake that says the WCTA complaint is without merit. What was wrong was the breaking news alert saying AdvancED had called the complaint without merit.

Don't forget to pay for your e-edition!

and submit your personal info to keep reading all the riveting news about the GSIW tweaks to the student assignment plan, assaults by Evans, stupidity by Martin, which group of kids gets reassigned next, how many F-bombs Sutton tosses out to the public, all the bull shtt reasons why a bond must be supported or else.

N&O ALERT:

"We are improving our e-edition sign in process to make it easier for you to read, (or not) our e-edition. On Wednesday, December 19th all e-edition subscribers (no matter what device you read the e-edition on) will need to complete a one-time account activation to read the e-edition."

In other words, tomorrow your readership tanks.

WRAL has it all wrong and

WRAL has it all wrong and gets caught trying to spin erroneous news?! Now there is a shocker.

Eh...

Never attribute to malice what can be explained by incompetence.

This is a general complaint that I have about reporting -- too many reporters seem to only report their first impression, which is often just plain wrong.  Once reported though, it gets repeated as truth.  (Fortunately, not true of our intrepid host -- the only things that ever seem to be wrong with his articles ususally come when an editor sticks a misleading headline on there.....)

It may not be outright

It may not be outright malice, but it is very likely bias. First impressions are partially formed by they preconceptions and general mindset one brings to a situation.

Cars View All
Find a Car
Go
Jobs View All
Find a Job
Go
Homes View All
Find a Home
Go

Want to post a comment?

In order to join the conversation, you must be a member of newsobserver.com. Click here to register or to log in.

About the blogger

T. Keung Hui covers Wake schools.
Advertisements