WakeEd

The WakeEd blog is devoted to discussing and answering questions about the major issues facing the Wake County school system. How much will the new Democratic majority on the school board do to undo the changes made by Republicans since 2009? Will the new student assignment plan be a hybrid of the last two models or primarily be a return to the use of busing for diversity? Who will replace Tony Tata as the new superintendent of the state's largest district? How will voters react to a likely request in 2013 to borrow potentially more than $1 billion to build and renovate schools?

WakeEd is maintained by The News & Observer's Wake schools reporter, T. Keung Hui. While Keung posts information and analysis on the issues, keep us posted on your suggestions, questions, tips and what you're doing to cope with the changes in Wake's schools.

Choose a blog

Wake County school board protesters say they're proud of their actions

Bookmark and Share

If the idea of prosecution is to deter people from committing an offense again, it doesn't look like that's happening for at least some of the people who pleaded guilty on Friday to disrupting Wake County school board meetings in 2010.

As noted in today's article, protesters who spoke to the media after entering guilty pleas were defiant. They said they were proud of their actions and would be prepared to be arrested again if they don't like how the new school board or future boards are acting.

"We now are able to go back to the school board to speak again," said the Rev. Nancy Petty, pastor of Pullen Memorial Baptist Church. "And if we sense that they're  headed off as the old board did, we will follow our conscience again and we will do what is necessary to protect our children and to keep our community involved in this conversation."

The Rev. William Barber, president of the state NAACP, was also adamant in his defense of their actions that led to their arrests.

"We are guilty of standing for children and we're proud of it," Barber said. "We are guilty of standing for constitutional education. We are guilty of wanting equal educational opportunities for every child. We are guilty of standing against processes that would lead to resegregation and regression. We are guilty of trespassing against wrong and we are proud of it.

Our civil disobedience, we are proud of it. And if our civil disobedience was engaged in in order to draw attention to a greater violation. The principle of civil disobedience is when you're willing to break a lesser law because you believe that some persons or system is breaking a greater law, and we believe the former majority was walking all over the constitution and all over history.

But it should also be known today that the former majority is guilty. They are guilty of trying to take us backwards as a state and as a county. They are guilty of trespassing on the constitution. Remember, they were found guilty of violating the Open Meetings Law. Remember they said on camera, their former chair called people who were trying to speak out 'Animals coming out of their cages.' They're guilty of that.

They are guilty of trying to shut down public opinion, and it was because they were guilty of all those things that we chose to engage in civil disobedience. Our guilt is redemptive and we are honored to do community service. Our guilt is redemptive. Their guilt is shameful. Our effort brought people together. Their plans are already falling apart."

Barber continued to criticize the former board majority throughout the press conference.

"We are proud today to be found guilty of standing for righteousness," Barber said. "This kind of guilt is redemptive. What the former majority was guilty of is shameful.

Barber took credit for last fall's school board election results.

"Our moral outcry worked to sensitize the public's conscience," Barber said. "The public responded through their organizing and electoral power by removing the majority that was engaging in regressive public education policies."

Barber also said that they had accepted mediation prior to the last fall's board elections. He blamed the former board majority for rescinding the offer.

Assistant District Attorney Steven Saad said he was notified in late October by the attorneys for the protesters that they were interested in mediation. That would put it between the Oct. 11 general election and the Nov. 6 runoff election.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

...

Blow all the hot air you want -- but diversity is no longer part of the conversation, Rev.

Have you noticed that the people who are upset are so because they want a guaranteed neighborhood school too? Charter parents want their neighborhood school; magnet parents want their neighborhood school; those who don't like their feeder patterns aren't happy because it isn't to a neighborhood school. 

The conversation has changed. And you've become irrelevant and tiresome. Just like GSIW.

sore loser

You are entitled to your point of view, but you don't get to have your own facts.  The people whose views you decry beat you 5-0, five up, five down.  The winning percentages, 82-18, 70-30, 70-30, 52-48, and 52-48, average to 60-40 in their direction, on the whole.  Every single "neighborhood schools" candidate went down in flames.  You are the one blowing hot air.

...

I wasn't referring to the election results. I was referring to the LTE's, the public comments, the articles, the emails from parents who want to change this plan. No one is talking about "saving diversity" anymore. Heck, even magnet parents are clamoring for a neighborhood assignment.

The only way diversity in assignment will return is if this new Board manipulates and/or restricts choice and forces it upon us. And that would be their demise.

Our guilt is redemptive and

Our guilt is redemptive and we are honored to do community service.

But that didn't stop Barber from instructing his lawyer to ask the judge to waive community service. Thankfully the judge refused.

Read more here: http://blogs.newsobserver.com/wakeed/wake-county-school-board-protesters-say-theyre-proud-of-their-actions#storylink=cpy

Duncan McMillan, the

Duncan McMillan, the attorney at the proceeding, didn't ask to waive community service. He asked Judge James Fullwood to waive the fees to be in the community service program. I don't have the exact breakdown but they're paying $430, which covers both the court courts and the fee to participate in the community service program. Fullwood said he couldn't waive that fee.

Well, then I apologize for

Well, then I apologize for the mistake.

However, considering the cost of extra security at subsequent board meetings necessitated by the actions of these folks. I think they should consider themselves fortunate that they are only responsible for $430 in community service fees, and not the costs of extra security.

And I still maintain that it's a cop-out when you claim you're willing to "pay the price" for your acts of civil disobedience, only to try and get out of paying the price.

As do I....

.

Ah, thanks for the

Ah, thanks for the clarification.

not true

That is a lie.  Rev. Dr. Barber did not do anything of the kind.  I happen to know his lawyer, and that is simply not the case.

Bill can count on Keung

Bill knows he will always have full use of Keung's blog to screech any bloviations he wishes.

Uh... No...

The NAACP LOST the open-meeting suit.  Barber's making it sound like they won.

Cars View All
Find a Car
Go
Jobs View All
Find a Job
Go
Homes View All
Find a Home
Go

Want to post a comment?

In order to join the conversation, you must be a member of newsobserver.com. Click here to register or to log in.

About the blogger

T. Keung Hui covers Wake schools.
Advertisements