WakeEd

The WakeEd blog is devoted to discussing and answering questions about the major issues facing the Wake County school system. How much will the new Democratic majority on the school board do to undo the changes made by Republicans since 2009? Will the new student assignment plan be a hybrid of the last two models or primarily be a return to the use of busing for diversity? Who will replace Tony Tata as the new superintendent of the state's largest district? How will voters react to a likely request in 2013 to borrow potentially more than $1 billion to build and renovate schools?

WakeEd is maintained by The News & Observer's Wake schools reporter, T. Keung Hui. While Keung posts information and analysis on the issues, keep us posted on your suggestions, questions, tips and what you're doing to cope with the changes in Wake's schools.

Choose a blog

Wake County school board committee discussing projects in next school construction bond issue

Bookmark and Share

The initial list of Wake County school construction needs is out for consideration in the next school capital improvement program and bond issue.

As noted in today's article, staff will lay out at today's school board facilities committee meeting that 24 new schools are needed over the next four years. That includes 14 new elementary schools, three middle schools, five regular high schools, the CTE high school and an alternative school.

They've also listed 12 whole campus renovations that will essentially mean rebuilding those schools, 16 partial campus school renovations, various life-cycle projects and assorted support and athletic facilities.

"This isn’t the final list,” said Don Haydon, the school system’s chief facilities and operations officer. “This is to get the conversation started. It’s one way to look at the data.”

One conversation starter could be that the 24 new schools assumes they'll all open on a traditional calendar.

One way to reduce the number of new schools is to put more schools on a year-round calendar, including opening new schools on that calendar and converting existing schools. Considering the tumult in 2006, it's uncertain how much the school board wants to revisit that issue.

Of the whole-school renovations, only Wiley Elementary is inside the Raleigh Beltline. The other ITB schools were addressed in prior construction programs.

Five of the big renovations are in North Raleigh. Two are in Garner. Two are in Fuquay-Varina. One is in Apex and the other in Eastern Wake.

Most of the big renovations are for schools built in the 1950s through the 1970s.

The support and athletic facilities projects could be a harder sell.

For instance, staff wants more than $30 million to build four regional bus transportation centers. Haydon said having the centers, instead of one location for major maintenance, would increase maintenance capacity and increase efficiency.

Staff also lists upgrades to Athens Drive High School's stadium, which could cost $1 million to $7 million. The Athens Drive boosters have hired a lawyer and threatened to sue if repairs aren't made to the system.

The lists also includes $10 million to $30 million to build a regional athletic stadium or complex. The complex could hold all or some combo of basketball, volleyball, baseball, softball, football, soccer, lacrosse, tennis, track and field and band performances/competitions.

Haydon said the regional complex is being added to the list to see if there's any interest.

Some people have suggested that Wake build regional athletic facilities that high schools could share instead of having their own

If the decision is made for a spring bond referendum, Haydon said the school board would need to sign off on the final list of projects in December with the commissioners doing so in January.

In addition to the timing of the referendum, the amount has to be set.

School board member Chris Malone, chair of the facilities committee, said that it has to be “more modest” that the $970 million bond issue approved in 2006.

“I don’t believe we can sell a $970 million bond,” Malone said. “I wouldn’t support that amount.”

But Malone said he doesn't expect they'll be able to avoid raising property taxes to pay for school construction needs.

Commissioner Joe Bryan said the commission will likely ask that the potential $1 billion-plus price tag be divided into more than one bond.

“It’d be nicer to look at what we have to do over a three- or-four-year period,” Bryan said. “It needs to be reasoned and measured.”

With a penny increase in the property tax rate worth about $120 million, an increase of three or four cents could supply a portion of the projects that would be requested.

1344343501 Wake County school board committee discussing projects in next school construction bond issue The News and Observer Copyright 2011 The News and Observer . All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I can't believe that the

I can't believe that the Athens athletic field renovations have taken this long. It's absolutely in violation of the ADA and I'm surprised that nobody has brought a lawsuit yet.

So...

Not an expert here, but my recollection of the ADA is that there is no affirmative duty to improve existing facilities.  But, if you are improving them, then all your improvements have to be ADA compliant.

I think it may be different

I think it may be different for government owned facilities. I used to work in Facilities Planning at a state University back in IL and ADA complaince was not even a question--it was automatic campus wide.  I'm thinking of the fact that Athens Drive is a high school--kids have to go there. It's not like shopping at some old building built in the early 1900s.

I'll have to look back through my ADA docs--it feels like a lifetime ago since I worked in the field. And there's always the possibility that IL had stricter accessibility codes than the feds & NC do. Or maybe the University held itself to that standard.

OT-sort of

Six Memphis suburbs vote to start their own school systems

Aug 3, 2012 1:55 PM

 

 

From The Memphis Commercial Appeal: Declaring they want no part of a unified Shelby County, Tenn., school system, voters in six suburban municipalities have given landslide approval to referendums establishing their own districts. despite the resounding approval of the municipal school district, the issue is far from settled. In a trial slated for Sept. 4, a U.S. district judge will decide whether the state law allowing the referendums violates the Tennessee Constitution.
 

Read more: http://asumag.com/dailynews/memphis-shelby-county-tennessee-lawsuit-block-creation-municipal-suburban-school-systems-20120627/?NL=ASU-03&Issue=ASU-03_20120807_ASU-03_504&YM_RID=southernbelle27613@yahoo.com&YM_MID=1330501#ixzz22tQe6N1g 

We can only dream...

We can only dream...

...

been my dream for years and years.  It would make so much sense and probably pretty easy to at least separate into "sections" since WC is so big.  as for the old refrain as to expensive, really you'd just be exchanging transportation costs over time.

You don't have to

You don't have to dream....as soon as Holly Springs wants to write a check for ~$140 million, let everyone know.  As a Wake County citizen, I'd support giving HSE back for free in exchange for Holly Springs buying back the schools (the high school, plus the Holly Groves and Holly Ridges) that the county built during the town's population explosion.

Go for it.

Let's make a deal....the

Let's make a deal....the county must also give us back our property tax revenue that paid for those schools and any portion of state/fed revenues they used as well.

As best as I can tell, the

As best as I can tell, the last bond referendum added 4.7 cents to the county tax rate.  Based on Holly Springs current valuations, that means that Holly Springs contributes about 1.1 million dollars a year towards that bond service.

If we took that amount back 10 years,(which obviously wouldn't really be that high, since the tax increase was in 2006 and Holly Springs total property value wouldn't have been as high) it would cover the bonds that built the Holly Ridge and Holly Grove schools and the high school.  And Holly Springs would have contributed around 10 million dollars to the construction costs.

So make it $130 million instead of $140 million.

If Holly Springs had been required to pay for its own schools, you'd have some of those glorious NY-style taxes you like to complain about so much.

Currently, all those schools

Currently, all those schools have students from Apex, Cary and FV as well as HS and have for years.  We'd need to get those peoples funds as well because they have already used the facilities. 

I actually would not advocate for HS to go it alone.  I think HS, Apex and FV would be wise to combine themselves into a single system.  Cary could be included to but I think they're probably large enough to go it alone.

Nope...you're not getting

Nope...you're not getting Fuquay.

Sorry.

I don't think anyone would

I don't think anyone would mind...or notice.

Not so fast

your Mayor seems to have decided he can go things alone, now that he's taken over the sports scene, and they are getting ready to unveil their "future" plans.

Maybe breaking loose is in the plan.

Cold Water...

It would take an act of the General Assembly to do that, and the general trend in NC has been in the opposite direction -- merge smaller districts into larger ones, not the other way around.

I know, that's why I said we

I know, that's why I said we can only dream...

Small........

You do see that with VERY small school districts.    My nephew's children are attending school in a VERY small school district in Colorado.  His daughter has 4 kids in her entire grade and his son has 11.  Wake  would never be close to a situation like that even if it split up to 5 smaller districts.   It is perfectly logical that we could have more districts and still share central support functions.   Wake seems to be real proud of being one of the largest school districts in the nation.  Big is not always better. 

Preaching to the Choir...

I don't think it's a coincidence that the best districts in the country tend to be small -- they treat students more as individuals and less as groups.  I have a relative who was on the school board of a 6-school district (3 elementary, 2 middle, one high), and she knew all the curriculum leaders in each school, and many of the teachers personally -- she knew them ALL by name.  As a result, the school board had a very good idea of the issues in each school and of the needs of families in the district.  

In Wake County, it's impossible for the school board to get anywhere close to that level of detail -- I'd bet that there isn't a school board member who knows the names of every principal in the system (Hill is the possible exception because they are all people who he used to work with), let alone teachers.  If you were to pick a random school and a random board member, would that board member have any idea of the issues that school is dealing with?  Would that board member have any idea of how to best serve the students in that school?

Unfortunately, it's not going to happen, and I gave up tilting at windmills a long time ago.

small districts

Though there may be some advantages to a small system, I'm not sure you can correlate small with better. Look at some of the much smaller systems here in North Carolina. Some are are just awful usually because they are located in a very poor, sparsly populared area that can't support a really good program. A small system in an upper class area with a lot of funding and a high percentage of parents who care about education and make it a realy priority will probably be a great system. But an equally small system in a very poor area with few human or material resources will face huge challenges. As in everything, the quality of leadership and the availabilty of resources makes a much bigger difference than just the size of the system.

Well...

I'd say that being small is a necessary condition to being a great school system.  But, I don't think it's sufficient.  You're right that it's possible to be a small crappy school district.

Like I said, though, trying to break the district up is just tilting at windmills -- not going to happen, and it's better to focus energy where it will do some good.

Crazy...

Why do taxpayers need to spend millions of dollars on athletic facilities at schools? What a waste of money! IMO, they can spend money on athletics after they have made sure that all the graduates can actually read. Stupid priorities.

$1000

Though paying for the facilities does fall on taxpapers, the school system itself hardly spends any money on athletics. Each school gets $1000/year for the entire athletics program in a high school. The boosters are responsible for buying uniforms, maintaining the fields and any other cost you can imagine.

Because building the athletic facilities are funded through a bond, even if we didn't have those facilities it really wouldn't help the schools with their funding since those dollars that would have been spent on a building wouldn't be redirected to the system. It's not like the choice is 7 million dollars for a stadium or 7 million extra dollars for the operating budget.

$$ for New Football Stadium?

bpuli, I have to agree.  I just read an article about the long term effects of  repeated brain injuries in football players.   Not sure spending 7 million on a new football stadium for Athens Drive HS is a good use of public funds or in the long term interests of the athletes.   Maybe spend money on more teachers, tutors for low performing children, etc.

The football field is also

The football field is also the track, the soccer field, the lacrosse field (if they play lacrosse) and where the band practices....they aren't just football fields.

Not to mention that it is

Not to mention that it is not ADA compliant. It's not as if Athens is asking for a brand new stadium just because they want something shiny and new. It's not handicap accessible, which is a big deal. When I worked in Interior Design, one of my areas of interest was ADA compliance. When people think about the subject, they often think: "all of this money to remodel for one or two kids in a wheelchair!?!". People rarely think about the fact that anybody can become temporarily disabled at any time. You could break your leg in an accident, have surgery or any number of things that could require you to be in a wheelchair or on crutches for a time. Every student, parent, staff member, etc should be able to safely access the stadium and fields.

Here is some of the info I found on the stadium:

The stadium doesn’t have wheelchair access in the home bleachers, handicapped restrooms or a place for athletes to seek shelter during a weather emergency. The road leading to the stadium needs widening to allow access for emergency vehicles on game days. Athens Drive booster club adviser and former president Karin Evanoff said she is concerned about the safety of the unlit gravel parking lot.

The stadium facilities at Athens Drive High School have not been upgraded or improved since the school opened over 30 years ago.  The parking lot remains unpaved–the restroom and concession areas are small and outdated.  Handicap access to the stadium is in dire need of improvement.  Pedestrian access, seating, press box and lighting likewise need improvement.  The most serious need at the stadium is team dressing, restroom, and medical facilities.  Due to the distance of approximately one-half mile from the main school building to the stadium, Athens’ teams have take buses to the stadium and use buses for shelter during inclement weather.  There are no dressing rooms or restrooms for the athletes at the stadium.

There is no field house at Athens Drive High School. The parking lot is gravel, the football field is dimly lit.

The press box is so cramped that only three people can sit inside. Without a field house, it can be hard for football players to find a bathroom so they sometimes use the woods instead.

 

fight with Raleigh

I can't remember the exact details but apparently the reason that Athens Drive facilities are so substandard has to do with some wrangle with the City of Raleigh that has been going on for decades. The N&O did some stories on it within the last year.

Yes. I should have mentioned

Yes. I should have mentioned that. I believe that Raleigh owns the land that the stadium is on and it is part of or connected to Lake Johnson park. WCPSS had to get permission from the city before any work could be done and they now have that permission. I think there's an issue with runoff into the lake and that is why the parking lot isn't paved. I saw some mention that a new parking surface needs to be water permeable.

It's definitely not a simple thing to get these upgrades done. I think that everybody sort of dragged their feet over the years and the two entities just never got it together in order to get it done.

Yup...

I've been to a number of events at Athens Drive HS and it is old and deteriorating.

I wonder, however, if maybe this isn't an opportunity for that new centralized sports facility.  Based on the documents presented to the board, it seems clear that the central part of the school district is growing as well -- maybe the right answer is to build a new high school without a stadium and build the new centralized facility to serve both the new high school and Athens Drive. Part of the cash could come from selling off the existing stadium.

After all, no matter what renovations are made to the stadium,, it's not going to be any closer to the high school.

Getting a

Getting a well-rounded education includes more than what can be taught from books or in a classroom. Sport provides a lot of the intangibles that make our lives richer. Things like competition, sportsmanship, teamwork, fitness, pushing beyond our preconceived physical boundaries, winning -- and losing -- graciously, overcoming challenges, etc. are all provided by participation in athletics and they are in every way as important as knowing how to bisect an angle or conjugate a verb.

Well said.... One only needs

Well said....

One only needs to work around people who have never played a sport in their lives to realize just how important athletic programs are...

On the face of it, that

On the face of it, that sounds reasonable but it's incredibly short-sighted.

First, athletic programs keep a lot of kids in school that otherwise wouldn't hang around much past 10th grade.  Eliminate athletic programs and you can expect to see an increase in drop outs....and by the way, those drop outs will come from the very demographics we are trying to keep in school.

Second, athletics teachs a lot more than how to score a touchdown.  I don't think we should take that learnig opportunity away from 80% of the students in an attempt to reach the remaining 20%.  That doesn't make sense.

The kids...

who drop out due to a lack of athletics program probably would never graduate anyway. Maybe they should be pursuing plumber training programs, as you suggested in your other posts.

That's simply false (not

That's simply false (not that you ever operate in the truth).

Athletic participation reduces the probability of school dropouts by approximately 40 percent.

From a study cited here:

http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/dec99/vol57/num04/-Extracurricular-Activities@-The-Path-to-Academic-Success%C2%A2.aspx

Centralized Athletic Facility?

This idea originally arose with the idea that the facility would be used by multiple schools, instead of building facilities at each school.  However, my read here is that the proposed facility would supplant, and not add to, the school-based facilities.

It's an idea that's not going to get by the Commissioners.  But, the board needs some things to cut, just to show that they're serious -- this is probably at the top of the list.

If there are high schools in

If there are high schools in the proposed construction list, the centralized athletic facility could be suggested as something for them to share.

Yeah...

It might be a good idea (although, there are downsides for students).  Big problem is that the new high schools look like they'll be distributed around the county.  How far away should this facility be from a central high school?

Personally, I think this is something the staff is expecting to get cut.

The student downside is that a schools' football field is something of an icon in the school -- it's the centerpoint for a lot of school pride among the students.  So, they lose something by not having it. 

I was just throwing it out

I was just throwing it out there as the only possible way to make it reality.

I agree with you that it is likely something they asked for so they can ultimately sacrifice it in the name of compromise.

If they did build something like this, it would need to have a FieldTurf surface, which would make it much easier to maintain and also much more able to handle the increased traffic on the playing surface.

On the same page with you

On the same page with you here Dan.  My HS (1400+ students) shared a football stadium with 2 other HS.  We did have our own practive fields, track and wieght room (funding by boosters).  The field got used every Friday night as apposed to less than have that many.

If we don't get a BILLION dollars from you

we'll have to convert 22 more schools!

We'll just have no choice!!

convert all to YR or unconvert all to traditional

The problem is now all the capacity numbers are skewed by the YR numbers.  All the YR schools should have an asterisk.

West-South looks to have plenty of middle school capacity because 2 of 3 middle schools are year round.  Year rounds are under-enrolled but you can't get a seat on traditional calendar, which is a big problem if you already have high-schoolers!

Regions never impacted by YR get new traditional calendar schools? And Apex/Cary is still stuck with year round calendars that nobody wants?  That's as unfair as sticking us with the new toll road while N. Raleigh gets their road for free!

  That's as unfair as

  That's as unfair as sticking us with the new toll road while N. Raleigh gets their road for free!

 

I am not sure I understand your point. Do you want 540 in North Raleigh to be a toll road, or do you want the rest of 540 to be toll-free? If they add tolls in North Raleigh will you be fine with the tolls in your area. Also, btw, I don't know of any roads anywhere that were built for "free."

Cars View All
Find a Car
Go
Jobs View All
Find a Job
Go
Homes View All
Find a Home
Go

Want to post a comment?

In order to join the conversation, you must be a member of newsobserver.com. Click here to register or to log in.

About the blogger

T. Keung Hui covers Wake schools.
Advertisements