The vacancy sign is now officially out in District 4 and Venita Peyton is hoping to get the nod.
Now that Rosa Gill is officially a state legislator, the school board has begun taking applicants for her position through noon on July 20. Click here for info on the selection process.
Peyton announced on her blog that she's applying for the seat.
"I am not a blank sheet," Peyton writes in her blog. "Most board members know that I've been critical of the system because I don't see proof of all parents and children being treated with respect. I see an unacceptable, internal buddy-buddy system. This is not an appropriate business model."
It would be a surprise if the remaining eight board members were to pick Peyton when there will be less critical applicants vying for the opening.
It's doubtful that board members would publicly say they're not going to pick Peyton because she disagrees with them. But you can expect them to tout the qualifications of the person they pick, especially if it's a retired educator.
Now if the board were to pick someone with higher political aspirations such as Bernard Allen Jr., who has been rumored to be interested in the position, that would say things as well.
(Despite this post, I'm still on vacation this week. The two other posts I've written were done in advance. I won't be responding to comments or questions until next week.)
CORRECTION
Changed the application deadline to July 20.



Comments
Go, Venita!!!
Tue, 06/30/2009 - 21:36 — me_mcadamsGreat news about running! You are awesome - wish you much success. Wish I could vote for you myself...
Accountability
Mon, 06/29/2009 - 08:10 — AngelaWhttp://blogs.abcnews.com/johnstossel/2009/06/accountability.html
This is foolish top-down government-think. National Alliance bureaucrats weeding out bad schools will fail as government bureaucrats failed. Real accountability comes from customers. If we attached the money to the kids (government spend big: $10,000 per student is the American average--$200,000 per classroom), and let them take it to ANY school, we’d have a real market. That would bring us better schools just as its brought us better cars, computers, movies, phones, etc.
Sure, some charter schools are lousy. But failure is part of innovation. Parents will quickly figure out if their kids’ school is lousy, and if they are allowed other choices, they’ll pull their kids out. The weak schools will die from lack of customers. The best schools will grow, and help more kids.
By contrast, weak PUBLIC schools NEVER die. They wreck children’s’ lives decade after decade.
Links to by state information on charter schools and choice
Mon, 06/29/2009 - 11:37 — FalcRan across these trying to figure out why one of the systems in my out-of-state home county is open FREE to students outside the district:
You can place your cursor over states on the map for summary info or select a state for more details:
http://www.heritage.org/research/education/schoolchoice/?CFID=67316384&CFTOKEN=43998478
This one is more specific to public education open enrollment policies:
http://mb2.ecs.org/reports/Report.aspx?id=268
Cap on charters might cost N.C.
Mon, 06/29/2009 - 05:36 — AngelaWhttp://www.newsobserver.com/politics/story/1587467.html But in a conference call with reporters this month, U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan said, "States that do not have public charter laws or put artificial caps on the growth of charter schools will jeopardize their applications under the Race to the Top Fund." North Carolina is one of 40 states that allow charters, and one of 26 that cap the number. The current cap is 100, though at least two bills in the General Assembly would raise it. One measure that passed the House would put it at 106; the bill is still in a Senate committee
Last week, a Washington-based group questioned the effectiveness of North Carolina charters. The Center for Education Reform sought to identify "the winners in the Race to the Top for charter school growth." It ranked states on criteria that included the fiscal equity and operational independence of their charters. North Carolina earned a "D" as the 15th weakest in state charter laws.
Center president Jeanne Allen said North Carolina charters suffer from "death by a thousand regulations" and the lack of strong partners such as universities. She called "Race to the Top" a chance for states to take another look at their charter schools
Camden's MetEast High School;it has no dropouts
Sat, 06/27/2009 - 11:03 — AngelaWhttp://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/wire/sns-ap-us-big-picture-school,1,4091223.story?page=1
thanks
Sat, 06/27/2009 - 22:46 — klanders65thanks for the post. That is a great story. We need to look more at what works. Examples are out there.
June 26 Superintendent's
Fri, 06/26/2009 - 14:31 — AngelaWJune 26 Superintendent's Journal: Further Actions to Prepare for a Lean Year
In this week's video journal, Dr. Burns explains further steps taken this week -- prompted by recent developments in the North Carolina General Assembly -- to prepare for the possibility of significantly reduced state funding.
Dr. Burns says that the possibilities of significant cuts in funding for teachers, teacher assistants and schools "are rapidly becoming probabilities." As a result, Dr. Burns announces extending the existing hiring freeze to include teacher assistants and teachers in grades six through twelve, as well as banning out-of-state travel and restricting all expenditures of county funding to essential goods and services only.
This Superintendent's Journal is located at http://www.wcpss.net/announcements/archives/2009/06/june_26_superin_1.html.
Downloadable in QuickTime
Transcript
-wcpss
substitute "moving" for
Fri, 06/26/2009 - 08:34 — AngelaWsubstitute "moving" for "reassignment" and wonder if it is ANY different to kids??
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31551946/ns/health-kids_and_parenting/
Wow...
Fri, 06/26/2009 - 09:19 — supportwcpssImplying that WCPSS reassignments will lead to suicide.
Wow...amazing.
And CONTINUOUS FORCED MANDATES on the parents
Mon, 06/29/2009 - 08:16 — g88ky07may cause plenty of parents to jump off 'da bridge too!
Isn't it just so hard to understand why!
Uh.. No...
Sat, 06/27/2009 - 18:10 — Bob_SconceDid you even read the article? It was talking about an increasing *CHANCE* of suicide, not that suicide will definitely result. The point is that kids are not quite as resilient as they're made out to be by people who would subject them to constant change.
Interesting leap
Fri, 06/26/2009 - 10:14 — Dadof3OK -- I didn't make that leap; rather I read that moving a child has a negative impact. But, since you did go there, let me ask you a question from a diametric aspect; is it your contention that reassignments or non-elective year-round scheduling has no discernible psychological impact on the student or the family's well-being?
Of course not
Fri, 06/26/2009 - 14:44 — supportwcpssOf course you didn't make that leap. You blog buddies would never negatively criticize each other. It's a story of suicide and moving. Link posting woman told us to replace moving with reassignment.
Reassignment and YR has not had a negative impact on my family nor a number of others that I know. I do know that prior to reasignment and YR the large class size, overcrowded schools, and trailers were having a negative impact on my kids and others I know. Someone will always complain about a negative impact due to a change. It's a matter of minimizing that impact.
A matter of minimizing that impact on WHO
Mon, 06/29/2009 - 12:17 — FalcSounds to me like you are in support of the policies because someone else's kid and family got thrown under the bus and it helped minimize negative impacts on you, your kids, your family and the people you know. NICE.
I was thinking the same
Mon, 06/29/2009 - 15:55 — jenmanI was thinking the same thing. For some schools and for some families, MYR was a good thing. But some converted schools are collapsing tracks and sending out letters asking families to change tracks 2 months before school starts. It's great that MYR had no negative impacts on you and your kids. But to dismiss the negative effects on other families and other schools is just arrogant and selfish.
Huh.
Fri, 06/26/2009 - 14:58 — Dadof3Funny, I've tasked others and others have tasked me from time to time. But like Old Reliably herself, you're always at the ready with rotten vegetables. I suggest you only see what you want to see.
Re: minimizing impact; that's the old saw that is so glibly applied to children. You also seem to be saying "we minimized impact through a positive attitude;" which suggests there's a reason to alter one's discipline. But, it is fair to say there are many trade offs and balances; to which I agree. It's a matter of priorities; and to what extend you want others to make decisions for your family.
and so because reassignment
Fri, 06/26/2009 - 14:49 — AngelaWand so because reassignment and MYR didn't affect YOU or others' YOU know, you discount any psychological impacts throughout....typical.
due to budget cuts, enjoy those larger class sizes again..
Get a grip
Fri, 06/26/2009 - 14:55 — supportwcpssEverything in life has a 'psychological impact' and I don't discredit any of them. However, it is a matter of how you handle those impacts.
The real question is whether the impact is from the school schedule or new school or the parents inability to get a grip.
"the parents inability to get a grip. "
Mon, 06/29/2009 - 16:11 — g88ky07this sums up YOU and those you brown nose to no end to the depths of YOUR, and their, souls.
FYI, we're "getting a grip" on the voting lever and this fall will yank that lever and then we'll see how YOUR kids do when we change up THEIR lives, and yours, once again! Since you adapt so well I see schools be changed back to traditional calendars being no problem for you and being reassigned closer to home should be welcome news for you since your bunch handles change with ZERO impact!
Glad to know we won't have to worry about you jumping off 'da bridge!
get a heart and a soul
Fri, 06/26/2009 - 15:07 — AngelaWand should the real answer be the school schedule or the constant reassignments as happens in WCPSS, then what?
common sense, really
Fri, 06/26/2009 - 10:25 — AngelaWthank you for pointing out the REAL point and not the sensationalistic (almost) accusation by a previous user....
while you didn't ask *me*, I would contend that there ARE psychological impacts on both fronts.....reassignments and FYR.....
Thanks Angela. :-)
Thu, 06/25/2009 - 18:03 — jenmanThanks Angela. :-)
another OT alert
Thu, 06/25/2009 - 14:13 — AngelaWsince Keung's away....
House sex-ed bill wins approval
http://www.newsobserver.com/news/story/1583347.html
user1234--YOU could start a
Thu, 06/25/2009 - 08:26 — jenmanuser1234--YOU could start a chapter in your neighborhood! Seriously. The neighborhood chapters have been formed by parents like you who are concerned about the way things are and decide to join us. Some people have been skeptical but after attending a meeting and talking with us they've come on board. Besides our public meetings, we are always willing to meet for coffee or lunch with interested parents/citizens who want to discuss issues in further detail.
Our meetings are typically too large to engage in a roundtable discussion. We've been trying to get the info about who we are and what we believe in at these meetings. Trying to have discussion at the meetings is hard because of time constraints and the number of people in attendance.
Who do you think has been
Wed, 06/24/2009 - 17:28 — jenmanWho do you think has been hostile to you here on the blogs? I'm just curious. Maybe they are members of WSCS, maybe not. I don't know.
Like Falc just said, the meetings are not debates. They are presentations. But we all usually stick around for a while afterwards to meet people and talk. You are definitely free to approach us to give us any feedback or to question us. I do agree that some more info on the website about who we are would be helpful for people such as yourself who are skeptical.
A couple of
Wed, 06/24/2009 - 19:07 — user1234A couple of observations...
Does the steering committee ever get any input from the people or is it all one way from them out to the people ... if it is only one way, I can understand why people would be hostile to input since the plan is set...
"You are definitely free to approach us to give us any feedback or to question us.”
I would have thought you would have wanted to approach me since you are selling something ... I would think the leadership would want to know people's concerns ... again, if they already working off the steering committees concerns and don't want any more ... I understand ...
"For people such as yourself who are skeptical...”
.. Before skeptical comes ignorance ... without answers to people's concern many people will move on and "buy" another product....
I have mentioned before education is primary for me ... so reassignments, calendar, YR, etc. really don't matter to me ... I would travel any distance year round to get my kids the best education .... I understand why others have these concerns ... they just are not my concerns ... Second, I have mentioned that I am concerned about the disparity in the schools ... I don't think a person should have to live in certain neighborhoods to get your kids a great education ... if all schools are equally good, most people should not worry about going to school A 2 miles away or school B 4 miles away ... if people find it necessary to migrate node to node to stay in a school district (e.g. Dana Cope story) something is wrong with the system that would inflict such a perverse incentives. I get the sense that except for a few people, many here don’t live in mix income neighborhood, at older schools and think everyone’s life and concerns are the same as theirs. And if you mention how some board policy has help you, your schools or kids you are denounced as “status quo”. So, I am waiting as many other are to see want is in it for me.
Stunning!...you can contradict yourself in the same paragraph!!
Thu, 06/25/2009 - 22:28 — Its_the_parents...Cognitive dissonance??
"I would travel any distance year round to get my kids the best education"...SO are you saying that some schools may be better than others and are worth going to? Despite all WCPSS mediocritizing, dumbing-down, leveling efforts?
"I don't think a person should have to live in certain neighborhoods to get your kids a great education"...so which is it? Aren't your magical WCPSS "healthy schools" policies (in force for a while now) already delivering us to this utopia? Or is paradise just waiting for a few more years of implementation?
But wait a minute...you reserve the right to drive long distances to give your children access to "better" schools?....but wait a minute again..."if all schools are equally good, most people should not worry about going to school A 2 miles away or school B 4 miles away"
So which is it? You graciously reserve the right to secure your children the best education by situating them in a school of your choice, yet continue to support policies that should make this a moot point...but as you yourself admit, isn't happening
Sounds like major "entitlement" hypocrisy to me. Come on, you are a good person, join us in changing a broken system. Can we do it? Yes, we can!
CaryCurmudgeon:
Fri, 06/26/2009 - 16:17 — user1234CaryCurmudgeon:
“SO are you saying that some schools may be better than others and are worth going to? Despite all WCPSS mediocritizing, dumbing-down, leveling efforts?”
Yep, as you have said WCPPS has only been able to address 2/3 of the schools. One only needs to look at the vast difference between the schools to know there are “good” and “bad” schools. One only needs to look at the premium people pay for a home to go to a certain school to see the preceived difference. That is what we are fighting for to equalize the schools so kids across the county can get a great education no matter where they live. And of course, that has not been realized yet. So, if I was offered a chance to drive across the county to a magnet or specialized school (NC School of Math and Science) I would take it.
“Aren't your magical WCPSS "healthy schools" policies (in force for a while now) already delivering us to this utopia? Or is paradise just waiting for a few more years of implementation?”
Again, remember that they have only gotten through 2/3 of the schools. Growth, demographics, and politics make it a constantly changing landscape. So, yes, we are working toward having every school be healthy but no we have not arrived yet. It will take constant vigilance to complete the work.
“But wait a minute...you reserve the right to drive long distances to give your children access to "better" schools?....but wait a minute again..."if all schools are equally good, most people should not worry about going to school A 2 miles away or school B 4 miles away"”
Remember the difference between the way things are and the way we want them. Today there is disparity between the schools that drives the constant jockeying and moving but we are working to reduce that by improving the "bad" schools so there is no differences worth moving over. So, in the here and now, smart parents have to jockey from one school to another, drive long distances to get a great education while our kids are in school. After the election, we will close the gap in the disparity and school to school difference won’t be big enough to matter.
I'm curious
Wed, 06/24/2009 - 20:06 — FalcHow have board policy helped you or your schools or kids?
Was that when you were not on the rim? I'm not aware of a rim school that has been helped, unless you count certain attempts to try to fix what they broke in the first place (other attempts only made things worse). If their policies are helping you why do Athens, Cary HS and Garner HS have ED rates in the 38-42% range (and only Garner is a magnet) while Broughton and Enloe are under 30% plus were/are magnets?
Here's a link to Apexster's post about how things got they way they are here in case you missed it. It's a good summary of the history of the policies, decisions and impacts.
http://blogs.newsobserver.
"But school board member
Wed, 06/24/2009 - 21:36 — user1234"But school board member Ron Margiotta disagreed, saying teachers in low-poverty schools have challenges too. He said those teachers might be in a class where they're dealing with eight languages."
I loved that blog because it showed me Ron's understanding / empathy for the other eight districts. Ron has few F&Rs and no Title I school so compensating teachers in high poverty schools does not serve his interests.
Sorry didn't realize the link
Wed, 06/24/2009 - 22:32 — Falcjust went to the top of that blog thread. The post I was referring to is by Apexster down the thread and titled "Although I've long advocated."
I know you are not a Ron fan, but remember Rosa disagreed too on that issue. That was an example of where singling out groups creates sticky situations.
Anyway, Apexster post is a good read.
I went back and found it
Thu, 06/25/2009 - 07:49 — user1234I went back and found it and agree that it is a jewel ... don't you wish we could mark those good entries so they are easier to reference. Concerning Ron ... actually I am a fan ... unfortunately he does not cheer for my team ... he delivers for his district (e.g. teaching low poverty kids with multiple languages is equal to teaching low income kids). Like Apexter showed that a long list of individual disjoint initiatives has worked at odds with each other. I don't have any problem blowing it all up and working toward a new master plan though history will say that disenfranchised groups typically don't fare well in those re-organizations...
For me, our schools appear
Wed, 06/24/2009 - 21:25 — user1234For me, our schools appear to be under 40% F&R. With a little node movement, we could have been much higher. Once you go high on F&R, resources get dry up (diverted to IDPs, admins) and you lose all your AP course and many electives. We can have two school five miles apart here, one with high F&R, no advanced course and one with low F&R and all the advanced course which means a person has to sell and move to another neighborhood to get a decent education which seems unfair. I get the sense that people in <10% F&R schools don’t have any concept of that since they have never experienced it. I know what I have now which is not great but bearable and I am cautious of what is being promised since it is unknown and being presented by people who don’t have the same concerns or experiences as me. People should not confuse cautiousness with status quo or support for everything WCPSS does. I am just waiting for my concerns to be expressed and addressed.
I was using the data from the
Wed, 06/24/2009 - 23:46 — Falc2009-12 reassignment plan.
http://ap2008.wcpss.net/assignment-proposal//schools/318.html?view=profile1
Based on the data for each HS per the plan, Athens has one of the highest ED rates for HS in the county while other HS have <15%, so how are the policies working for you again? Compare Athens ED rate with Enloe's rate and what Enloe gets or Broughton. How far apart are they in distance? Look not just West my friend.
Don't forget that some Athens base AG students are at Enloe to get magnet resources. What if those resources were more equitably split and available at Athens and those students went to school in their community?
Try Athens and Apex.
Thu, 06/25/2009 - 07:56 — user1234Try Athens and Apex. Pay special attention that two adjoining schools where one is over capacity by 500 kids (trailers everywhere) while the other is at capacity but will probably be way under next year. Broughton and Enloe are special schools with IB and magnet programs.
I know and wasn't trying to suggest not to look West
Thu, 06/25/2009 - 11:59 — Falcrather, don't only look West. Historically, the rim's been handed the short end of the policies from both sides, which is why I get confused by your statements that they've helped.
The rim has the capacity, but the Western Wake families (not blaming them) do not want to come because there is no incentive - all they get is a long bus ride with no special programs at the end of the ride. They don't try to put the affluent ITB nodes in because they don't want to upset that apple cart. They still send the extra ED kids though to make use of the capacity who now get a bus ride to a higher ED school with no additional resources, but have no options but to come. The rim locals left to avoid reassignments, get magnet resources and then to bail out of the schools as they started plummeting downward. As a result of the mess, the rim locals then could not be "let out" and get denied access to magnets and still got a constant shuffling through of students from further away.
Well Put
Thu, 06/25/2009 - 14:17 — user1234Sad isn't it ... like I said unless you have your own website, PAC, media contacts, you get shafted ... it is wonderful you understand the issues ....
"Does the steering
Wed, 06/24/2009 - 19:55 — jenman"Does the steering committee ever get any input from the people or is it
all one way from them out to the people ... if it is only one way, I
can understand why people would be hostile to input since the plan is
set..."
Yes, absolutely we get input from people. One of our members was actually somewhat against us until s/he talked to us and found out what we are really trying to do. I'm not sure who has been hostile to input. There is no set plan. We have no agenda or policies that we are trying to get passed. We want to elect BOE members who will be willing to listen to all ideas, concerns and solutions. Right now very very little is being done to address rim school concerns, concerns of people in high poverty schools or the concerns about academic quality.
"would have thought you would have wanted to approach me since you are
selling something ... I would think the leadership would want to know
people's concerns ... again, if they already working off the steering
committees concerns and don't want any more ... I understand ..."
I DID approach you here on the blogs. I've asked you to email me personally or email the general wsca inbox. I've asked you to attend a meeting to find out first hand what we are about. We are reaching out to people all over the county and are constantly reevaluating our goals and our message.
I have listened to the concerns that you expressed in your message. I know others have as well and I find that we are often in agreement with you. WSCA and its supporters also want to see equality among the schools and don't want to see people feeling like they have to live in a certain place to receive the best. Honestly, we don't know what the answer will be. What we do know is that WCPSS is perfectly happy with things the way they are now. They do not see any of the flaws that you or might see. They do not see the inequities that you and I see. Or perhaps they do see them but they don't want to upset the status quo of pleasing certain areas of the county. I don't know, but I'm tired of a BOE and a school system that is too arrogant to admit its weaknesses or mistakes and too afraid to even investigate other solutions.
There are many here who are skeptical of you and your motivations. Even when we agree with you, you seem to attack us anyway with sterotypes or preconceived notions of who you think we are. I think that you do have legitimate concerns and that you actually fit right in line with what we are trying to achieve. I am a very understanding person who is always willing to give people the benefit of the doubt, but I am really frustrated at this point.
“I DID approach you
Wed, 06/24/2009 - 21:01 — user1234“I DID approach you here on the blogs. I've asked you to email me personally or email the general wsca inbox. I've asked you to attend a meeting to find out first hand what we are about. We are reaching out to people all over the county and are constantly reevaluating our goals and our message. “
I apologize … I did not mean for that to sound like it came out … what I was trying to convey is that WCSA needs to “sell” itself … I have mentioned that many people around don’t have kids, don’t follow school issue day to day, don’t understand why half the people love YR and half hate it … it is the no-child apathic public that needs to be convinced. I think that is the real “sell” job. Also, saying the sky is falling, WCPSS sucks, the board (except Ron) are morons, etc. to try to spur action does not work for me … personally, I don’t respond to those negative messages ... maybe it work with others …
“I have listened to the concerns that you expressed in your message. I know others have as well and I find that we are often in agreement with you. WSCA and its supporters also want to see equality among the schools and don't want to see people feeling like they have to live in a certain place to receive the best. Honestly, we don't know what the answer will be.”
Good … I can roll with that …
“Even when we agree with you, you seem to attack us anyway with sterotypes or preconceived notions of who you think we are.”
Sorry, I don’t mean to be mean… my perception is that I can getting shafted and I am waiting to others (e.g. RIM schools, mixed neighborhoods, high F&R areas) to sign on to see if there is anything for us here … for example, when I look at the Chapter Program (http://www.wakesca.org/WSCA-Chapter-Program) the neighborhood included are not part of the group …..
Finally, I don’t see any names on the website. Did I miss them? So, I can not tell who on this blog speaks for WCSA … I can not make the association between the screen names and the WCSA officers to know who is speaking with authority and who is not a part of the group … just some feedback …
user1234--Have you ever
Wed, 06/24/2009 - 11:15 — jenmanuser1234--Have you ever attended a WSCA meeting? We ARE addressing the rim concerns, as well as the concerns of ALL parts of the county. This is not a Western Wake organization. We've reached out to people in all parts of the county to discover what their issues are. One size cannot and does not fit all in this county, yet WCPSS only has one solution for everybody. Just because you don't read about all of our efforts in the newspaper doesn't mean that we aren't making them.
There is no need for a rim school group to form their own organization or PAC. We are an umbrella organization that encompasses all of the concerns you mentioned. We have some members who are rim parents, some are affected by MYR, some by frequent reassignment, and people like myself who are concerned with magnets. There are many other concerns we address as well.
Anybody can join our group and we encourage those with differing viewpoints to share those with us. We also want to hear about any issues that we have overlooked. There are no easy answers in all of this and we don't claim to have one. What we do know is that WCPSS has ONE solution and it isn't working for everybody. In fact, its downright destructive for many communities and children. We need to have academic opportunities for EVERY kid in Wake County, not just 'certain' kids. We need to find solutions that help all areas of the county, not just certain ones.
“Have you ever attended
Wed, 06/24/2009 - 12:50 — user1234“Have you ever attended a WSCA meeting?”
I have not. All of my impressions are formed from WSCA leaders and supporters on this blog and the website which states the organizations goals as:
Wake Schools Community Alliance (WSCA) supports:
Academic success as the first priority for ALL Wake County students
Stable neighborhood schools in a community model
Voluntary calendar options for all families
School Board candidates/representatives who will move forward with innovative solutions
I know it is early but concerns about diversity, tracking kids, lower expectations for AA, renovation / new construction priority, equitable distribution of advanced classes and electives, distribution of experienced teachers, etc. don’t seem to be spelled out yet. SRD replied with his personal diversity perspective but I was unsure if it was the organization view too.
“We have some members who are rim parents; some are affected by MYR, some by frequent reassignment, and people like myself who are concerned with magnets. There are many other concerns we address as well.”
These would all the good things to include in an FAQ section on WSCA website on how each of these concerns should be addressed. As I have mentioned that I never heard WSCA supporters on the blog from rim schools like Milbrook, Sanderson, Athens, or Garner so either they don’t blog, don’t care or don’t support WCSA.
WCPSS is the entity with
Wed, 06/24/2009 - 22:33 — SDR256WCPSS is the entity with lower expectations for at-risk children, to the extent that they build those assumptions for failure into their Effectiveness Index - where they try to predict which schools will do well. The schools with more children of low income they weight more to fail - assumed failure. WSCA has spoken out against this practice - LOUDLY. So, user1234 I suggest you get your facts straight and use your own opinions less as a filtering mechanism.
We are a parent led organization. We don't have PhD's in WCPSS. We have our hearts in the right place when it comes to CHILDREN. We are not politically slanted and do not approve of politicizing the education of children.
User1234 - You've missed our county-wide reachouts. Knightdale was the end of that. But you can still come to our neighborhood chapter meetings and fundraisers!
"WSCA has spoken out
Thu, 06/25/2009 - 07:25 — user1234"WSCA has spoken out against this practice - LOUDLY. So, user1234 I suggest you get your facts straight and use your own opinions less as a filtering mechanism. "
SDR ... I am guessing that people who attend your meetings heard that loud message ... all I am suggesting is that you include that loud message on you website so others can hear (read) it too. Please remember that the general public, like me, is going to your website to verify what is being said.
"User1234 - You've missed our county-wide reachouts. Knightdale was the end of that. "
My only comment was that the "reach out" was presented as one way communication with presentations to audience. I was curious how the concerns of low income, F&R, LE, mixed income, rim schools, etc. were being folded into the final stradegy. I was looking for those concerns on your webpage so I could make sure I understood clearly what was being said. I appreciate you giving your personal views on these subjects numberous times but as the general public, I can not tell if your personal view are WCSA views ... that is all ..
Complex
Thu, 06/25/2009 - 12:58 — SDR256Well, I understand why you would want us to tie it all up in a neat package. I wish we could do that too. Its just too complex for that. We can't define ourselves to the nth degree because in part, that's not what we're about. We agree on a set of broad statements and agree that we need candidates who will be willing to discuss the details about how to get us beyond the status quo failures.
Part of the issue is that, as Dadof3 points out, we are a group of parents who have a lot of plates in the air and we have to stay focused on the campaign. We can't continue to refine and sift through words on the website to perfect them. Another part of the issue is that we've learned from the past. WakeCARES posted some 'position statements' on their website, and some blogs I believe, and the opposition mined their website for ammunition. We don't want to play into that hand, so to speak. We believe more in making positive statements about what we are, rather than making negative statements about what we are not. Saying something like 'we are not against diversity' really just plays into the whole WCPSS model that diversity has one definition. We instead have chosen to state that we support academic excellence for ALL children. That clearly states all children. As in... all children.
It is a group effort, and we're not professional politicians. If its not enough for you but you're still curious, please come to a meeting. The website is not the be-all and end-all of what we are.
Hope that gives you a bit more information.
I understand ... I just
Thu, 06/25/2009 - 14:09 — user1234I understand ... I just need to make my judgements and choices from publicly available information (blog, paper, etc.)
Closed-mindedness
Thu, 06/25/2009 - 09:43 — Dadof3WSCA isn't a funded think-tank with a paid panel who has a full workday day to work out position papers and agendas. As if that's helped democracy looking at nationwide politics for both parties. WSCA's family members want to make profound change in a way the current WCPSS will not accommodate; we families don't want and surely don't need, more navel-gazing.
Sorry, but, once again you're dissembling. WSCA simply will never meet your arbitrarily moving bar and you're too close-minded to participate.
Your attributions of hostility are merely projection.
"WSCA isn't a funded
Thu, 06/25/2009 - 10:29 — user1234"WSCA isn't a funded think-tank with a paid panel who has a full workday day to work out position papers and agendas."
Copying and pasting SDRs blog comments to the webpage is not high maintenance.
Snort
Thu, 06/25/2009 - 11:38 — Dadof3Well, given your voluminous posting here, I can see why you'd be glib about such things. There is a charming naïveté in what you write.
I presume SDR was representing SDR's take on WSCA, not WSCA's position on the matter.
My point stands.
Well...
Wed, 06/24/2009 - 13:16 — JSBinNCFor the record, we are now part of the Millbrook ES family - and I am a member of WCSA - I don't feel like I have an opinion to share right at this moment because this coming school year will be our first.
I will say though - on paper, based on the numbers/stats from the WCPSS growth/planning page - it would appear that the base node out of MEMS is not really doing too much to help the school - and potentially is doing a lot worse by at least some of those children now being forced into YR at Green. Track out camp, etc - is expensive - and if the net effect isn't that great for either school - why move these kids that also see MEMS as their "home"?
We are very excited about our upcoming school year!
**Edit - we are magnet seats... accepted via the 2nd chance - as I am certain that someone was going to ask that...
;)
User1234--Strings programs
Tue, 06/23/2009 - 12:21 — jenmanUser1234--Strings programs are not being provided at ANY new high schools per the BOE. Its not the principal's decision. It was either Panther Creek or Green Hope that was the last one to get strings. I remember reading a news story about some kids who were involved in the strings program getting reassigned from Apex HS to the new HS that didn't have strings. They had their appeal hearings where they asked to please be able to stay at Apex so they could be in orchestra. They had played since at least middle school. I think that some of the kids even offered to go to any high school with strings. They were denied.