Wake County Superintendent Tony Tata aggressively defended his efforts to recruit more minority teachers, saying that doing so would help provide more quality educators to the district.
In an interview today on WPTF, Bill LuMaye expressed skepticism to Tata about why he was pushing so hard to recruit more minority teachers. In turn, Tata challenged LuMaye, putting him on the spot at times.
LuMaye opened things up by asking Tata why he was sending recruiters to other states to look for more minority teaching applicants.
"It's important because we want the best qualified teachers," Tata replied. "We have high standards and, if you think about it Bill, if for example the Hispanic population has been exploding throughout the country and if we're stagnant or declining and the applicant pool for these increasing numbers of Hispanic or African Americans, then by definition we're leaving talent out there on the table.
If we're stagnant or declining in applicants, yet the national and North Carolina and Wake County numbers of these groups are going up, then we're leaving talent out there."
LuMaye responded that no one would debate Tata about getting the best teachers but he said it seemed to be about getting the best minority teachers. He asked what did Tata mean about getting the right mix (reference Monday's article) and is it important for a black student to be taught by a black teacher as opposed to a Caucasian teacher.
"First of all, for me it is about the talent," Tata said. "And if we have shunted the applicant pool of minority pipelines then by definition we're not getting the best applicants across the spectrum.
To answer your second question. To me it's important to have proper role models throughout the district. I think a white teacher can teach an African-American child or an African-American teacher can teach a white child equally as well. When you look at a 50.5 percent minority student population and a 14 percent minority or 15 percent minority teacher population, I don't know if we're really thinking about it and having an honest conversation. Does that sound right to you Bill?"
LuMaye said it's "appropriate" if you're looking at colors. But he asked does that have value.
"The argument I think you're making is 86 or 85-15 is right," Tata responded. "You've got to backward map and ask the question is that right? How did we get there? We've been there for a long time and so when you've really pulled the thread on this thing and I've operated this way all my life.
A very diverse multicultural workforce to me is very important as it always has been throughout my military career and it's important to me now. I was very upfront about that in my first press conference when I got here because I think there's value in the difference of opinion, the difference of background. And for me, in getting to know individual solders or individual students throughout my career, their background is important to me whether or not they're white, Asian, Hispanic, African American, American Indian, it doesn't matter.
The other night I was meeting with the American Indian parents forum and their culture is important and so who better to represent the culture of American Indians, or Hispanics, or African Americans, or Caucasians than those that have come up through them.
LuMaye responded that he's "not going to dispute that and you may have misread what I was saying."
"I guess what I'm questioning is whether or not we are getting the very best teacher for the kids and we take a look and you know this, my goodness, you know what the graduation rate of African Americans are and some of the minority groups is horrific," LuMaye said. "If you believe, and you're certainly more qualified than I am, that a black teacher would do a better job for whatever reason to get that black child to stay in school and graduate, I'm there with you. But on the other hand if we're sacrificing overall quality just to get the right mix, that's where I guess I would question you."
"I reject the notion Bill that you make that you have to sacrifice quality to hire minority teachers," Tata responded. "I outright reject your assertion there.
I think that my first discussion point was that because we have shunted recruitment, the applicant pool of Hispanics, of African Americans, of American Indians, you can go down the line. In the past, we have not had access to the talent that is resident in those applicant pools."
LuMaye responded that "I can understand that then."
"So what you're saying is, and I just want to be clear, the race is not a priority in the sense that you are looking at qualifications above everything else and that race is important in the classroom as far as the teacher is concerned but that's not the factor, that's not why you're hiring them," LuMaye asked. "You're hiring them because they are the best qualified."
"I want access to the best qualified," Tata responded. "If our applicant pool is X but it could be Y and Y is much larger than X, by definition you're going to have more qualified applicants so that's what I'm trying to do here.
And it is important to me that our students get to see every kind of role model. We are way deficient in male teachers so we have some 90 percent, I think, female teachers and I walked into an elementary school and one of the fourth-graders said, 'Hey, it's a dude.' He had no male role model in there. He was excited to see a guy come walking into the building.
If we think about it and we care about it, then it's important to have role models from whether or not it's culture, ethnicity, race, language, gender. All those things are important in a workforce so that these children can see people from those cultures, from those races, from those languages being successful and that matters. It matters to the white child to see the success of every different walk of life and it matters to the black child and the Hispanic child."
LuMaye closed the interview by saying "I agree with that." He told Tata he's "doing an awesome job."

Comments
...
Wed, 06/29/2011 - 19:42 — red_balloonI do not know why Tata thinks Indians would care for the race of the teacher. They care more for the quality of the educator than the skin color. Indians certainly don't go to school to learn about Indian culture. They get enough of it from different (and more relevant) sources. And I seriously doubt Indian parents have their kids look for role models only within the Indian community. Nor the Chinese for that matter.
So if Tata wants to pander to AAs and/ or Hispanics, he is welcome to do so but I do hope those teachers recruited to satisfy Tata's goals aren't dispatched to schools where a teacher's skill is valued more than a teacher's race.
Hasn't Wake always hired the
Tue, 06/28/2011 - 19:51 — woodstockHasn't Wake always hired the best possible candidates regardless of race??! Has Tata uncovered discriminatory practices? This initiative seems very odd and dated. Have we entered some kind of a time warp? Something is up here and I don't like it.
Can you not read? Tata wants
Tue, 06/28/2011 - 20:04 — danofncCan you not read?
Tata wants to make sure we are fishing in the right body of water when it comes to recruiting teachers. He is saying that there are qualified minority teachers out there, but apparently WCPSS' current recruiting practices aren't finding them.
I can indeed read. So, are
Tue, 06/28/2011 - 20:17 — woodstockI can indeed read. So, are you saying that in the past WCPSS has NOT been doing everything possible to find the best teachers? Did the Burns administration IGNORE valuable pools of teachers resources? If true, that is shocking!!! Why wasn't Barbar all over Rose Gill demanding action for this kind of outrageous discrimination??!!
That's easy...
Tue, 06/28/2011 - 21:05 — Bob_SconceBecause Barber is a self-aggrandizing opportunist.
If you're hiring the most
Tue, 06/28/2011 - 20:51 — danofncIf you're hiring the most qualified teachers, regardless of sex, race, age, etc., then you're doing the right things.
If, after doing that, you realize that your mix of teachers isn't close to the mix of students, then I think it's OK to make sure your efforts are being concentrated in the right areas.
That's what Tata wants to do. Why anyone sees it as a bad thing escapes me.
It doesn't mean that anything has been done wrong in the past.
When I was in the corporate
Wed, 06/29/2011 - 03:42 — jeffrey1When I was in the corporate world back in the late 1980s, I regularly interviewed candidates for positions in one of most technologically advanced companies in the nation at that time. That was also the time that the words "affirmative action" were on the radar of just about every corporation. We regularly had affirmative action seminars, as well as seminars on the interviewing and hiring process in our company.
At that time, it was explained to me that if the division that we were hiring for felt that there was a need to hire a minority candidate, then we were to use our affirmative action policy in selecting a candidate. The policy stated that as long as two (or more) candidates met the minimum qualifications for the postion, we were to offer the job to the minority candidate. The policy did not mention anything about the best candidate - only that the candidate had to meet the minimum qualifications for the position.
At that time, most of our candidates were recent college graduates. The job qualifications for a position were often generic (for example, BS in Computer Science, some xperience with blah, blah, blah, etc) to the point where just about any candidate that we interviewed met the minimum qualifications. We turned down some really good candidates, i.e. better qualified candidates, because they were white males.
It's OK to concentrate your efforts on hiring minority teachers, but if you do so at the expense of looking for the best teachers, then that's wrong. If you make a recruiting trip to a minority college, or a minority school district, make that trip IN ADDITION TO the places that you normally recruit, and offer the job to the best candidate.
Precisely...
Wed, 06/29/2011 - 08:28 — Bob_SconceAffirmative Action, as you describe it, was really a bad idea -- if somebody was hire because of "Affirmative Action," the implication was that they WEREN'T hired because they were the best person for the job. And that only serves to reinforce stereotypes.
Tata's doing something different -- he's looking for the best qualified candidates, but wants to expand the pool to increase the odds of getting minority applicants among the best qualified candidates. That says "we value people with your background, but won't lower our standards to get them."
You are sugar-coating
Wed, 06/29/2011 - 08:53 — woodstockYou are sugar-coating it. Tata is not doing anything that has not been tried a thousand times before and that was deemed illegal and bad practice decades ago.
You cannot tell me WCPSS has not been looking in all the available pools of candidates. Tata has opened a door and he has no clue what is behind it... but I guarantee Baber will be standing there with a sh!#-eating grin on his face saying "sucker."
BTW, where does Tata say: "we value people with your background, but won't lower our standards to get them." I must have missed that.
So you can't read. He
Wed, 06/29/2011 - 09:32 — danofncSo you can't read.
He doesn't say those specific words, but the quotes from his conversation on WPTF (hint: it's in the blog post) say essentially the same thing. I think Bob just paraphrased to avoid copying an entire paragraph.
It comes, oddly enough, right after LuMaye says that WCPSS would have to lower standards to hire minority teachers.
If Tata did not say those
Wed, 06/29/2011 - 09:48 — woodstockIf Tata did not say those specific words, then he did not say them. It is as simple as that.
The fact is, this ill-conceived initiative to hire teachers by their gender and/or race is an absolutely TERRIBLE IDEA and it is probably even illegal. We've been through this in this country thousands of times.. and it has been rejected thousands of times. It leads to poor quality, discrimination, and it is unfair. Race -- or gender -- is NOT a qualification!
It is beginning to look like amatuer hour in the Superintendent's office. First there is the Blue Plan which is blind to years worth of discussion on the matter surrounding student assignement and has appeasement written all over it... and now this fiasco. Tata better get around that learning curve a bit faster or he will be lost in the dust and looking for new opportunities.
?
Wed, 06/29/2011 - 09:31 — Bob_SconceFirst of all, it's not illegal. Talk to the HR director of your employer if you doubt me. As to what's 'best' and 'worst' practices, that's a subjective opinion.
How do you know what candidates WCPSS has been looking at? My impression is that they do very little out-of-state recruiting. (However, I have very little to back that up with.)
As to your last, that was my paraphrase of what's going on -- he didn't say it specifically.
Historically they have
Wed, 06/29/2011 - 11:23 — virginiadareHistorically they have always done a huge amount of out-of-state recruiting. They had to when the system was growing so rapidly just to find enough teachers. It was one of the first things to go when they had to cut the budget.
Can't read
Tue, 06/28/2011 - 20:46 — Solon77No you can't read. Tata is talking about role models to reflect the diversity of the student body - AA, Hispanics, Indian, Male, and other groups that make up our diverse culture. So to do so the recruiting efforts need to extend to a bigger box. You really need to get over your obsession with the NAACP.
With regards to the best teachers - what is it that wcpss has to offer ?
So, hasn't WCPSS been
Wed, 06/29/2011 - 06:32 — woodstockSo, hasn't WCPSS been looking into the "bigger box." We have Shaw, St. Augs, NCCU, NC A&T right in our backyard, has there been no effort in the past to take a peak in those boxes? Under Burns, did they intentionally ignore those boxes? Was that okay with Rev. Barber? Why is it an issue now?
This is where this will head and why I will not "get over" the NAACP:
Wilkes-Barre, Pa : ...The local head of the NAACP, Ron Felton, expressed dissatisfaction because “minority teachers are vastly underrepresented compared to the percentage of minority students in the district.”
To which Superintendent Jeff Namey replied: If we have an African American applicant, they are automatically interviewed, And if they are properly certified, and if we believe they can get the job done, it’s an automatic hire, Ron.
No holier than thou “holistic” evaluation, no disingenuous rhetorical camouflage of “race as one of many factors” here. For all certified black candidates who “can get the job done,” i.e., meet the district’s minimum standard, “it’s an automatic hire.”
--------------------------------------
Here are a couple questions:
1. What is the percentage of Asian or Indian American teachers in WCPSS?
2. How are Asian and Indian American students doing in our schools. (I believe they represent a high percentage of the best and most accomplished students.)
What about...
Wed, 06/29/2011 - 21:44 — mtbgaitHispanic teachers? And not just talking about ESL or Spanish class teachers. But those with Hispanic influenece in their upbringing. As a mixed race Hispanic/Male/Elementary teacher I don't see to many of us around. Sure do see a huge Hispanic/Mexican student population though.
I agree, Hispanics are a
Thu, 06/30/2011 - 08:23 — woodstockI agree, Hispanics are a significant and valued part of the diversity mix in Wake County. My point however, is that Asian and Indian American students are often at the top achievement-wise, yet there are very limited numbers of Asian and Indian American teachers in the classroom. So, the argument that students need teachers to look like them in order to achieve is questionable.
My concern in this debate is that we seem headed toward a situation where race/ethnicity will begin to be viewed as a qualification. It's not.
So....
Thu, 06/30/2011 - 08:52 — Bob_SconceThe fact that some students don't need teachers to look like them does not imply that no students need teachers to look like them. I suggest that this is probably more important for families which have a long history of poverty.
So one's
Thu, 06/30/2011 - 09:05 — woodstockSo one's race/ethnicity/appearance IS a qualification for a teaching position. Is that your position?
Uh....
Thu, 06/30/2011 - 16:19 — Bob_SconceAppearance definitely. Needs to be able to exercise good judgment in clothing choices. Hopefully, that's not generally a problem.
Apart from that, no that's not my position.
"My concern in this debate
Thu, 06/30/2011 - 08:33 — danofnc"My concern in this debate is that we seem headed toward a situation where race/ethnicity will begin to be viewed as a qualification. It's not."
But, we could ease the hiring process if we just had applicants list themselves as Democrat or Republican, be Republican is a qualification. woodstock said so.
Nope... never said that. I
Thu, 06/30/2011 - 08:40 — woodstockNope... never said that. I say plenty, you have don't have to put words in my mouth.
Maybe it is not the reading
Wed, 06/29/2011 - 13:53 — Solon77Maybe it is not the reading but the comprehension part that you have difficulty with.
Where does it say Minority = exclusively AA ? Tata cites examples across other demographics and one has to consider Hispanic is the largest growing segment of the student population.
As far as recruiting efforts - reference your post from above
You are sugar-coating
Wed, 06/29/2011 - 08:53 — woodstock
You are sugar-coating it. Tata is not doing anything that has not been tried a thousand times before and that was deemed illegal and bad practice decades ago.
You cannot tell me WCPSS has not been looking in all the available pools of candidates.
With regards to
This is a typical rant that noone pays attention to anymore. After every baseball World Series they complain that there is not enough AA representation, yet they don't seem to complain when the whole field in a majority of the track events is AA or their dominance in other sports or cultural events.
...
Tue, 06/28/2011 - 20:45 — SideburnsDid the Burns administration IGNORE valuable pools of teachers resources?