Wake County Superintendent Tony Tata's weekly press briefing covered a variety of topics today, including the new student assignment plan, bus safety and school board chairman Ron Margiotta's request for board meeting videos that may have been used to attack Susan Evans.
Tata gave an update on implementation of the student assignment plan, saying letters were sent Wednesday to families explaining the plan had been adopted. He said a summit of his various advisory committees discussed Thursday how to do community outreach.
For those concerned about the plan, Tata stressed the oversight function that will be performed by staff and a community advisory board to monitor implementation.
Tata pointed to all the deadlines and important dates that will be taking place, including the Nov. 5 magnet school fair and the start of the magnet application period Dec. 5.
Tata also gave an update on his efforts to improve bus safety following a spate of accidents last school year.
Tata said the recent decision to outsource transportation parts will allow the transportation staff to focus more on service and maintenance issues.
Tata pointed to a summer review by the state of 92 Wake buses that resulted in 28 being taken out of service due to what he called minor and easily corrected fixes. He said they need to continue to do a better job of maintenance.
Tata also pointed to how the state gave Wake a bus safety score of 51.3 while the average for this region in the state is 36.7. The lower the number the better.
During the Q&A section, Tata was asked about the number of new buses that will be needed for the assignment plan. He said they'll get a better handle of how many of the projected 5 to 25 new buses will be needed as they see where families make their picks for next year.
Tata was asked if he felt Wake's new choice plan would be a model for other districts. Tata said yes, indicating he felt that people in fast-growing districts around the country will watch how Wake implements a plan that addresses growth without reassigning thousands of students a year.
Tata was asked if the continuing rise in the percentage of minority students meant he was concerned that more white students were choosing private schools. His answer was no as he said it represents growth in the community, particularly in the Hispanic population.
"I feel very good about the representation in our schools," Tata said.
Tata was also asked about the public records request that Margiotta had made for staff to provide him the video of the public comment sections from six board meetings. Evans spoke at all six meetings and video from several of those meetings appeared in YouTube videos attacking her.
Public records requests from multiple groups for information on what Margiotta was provided were answered this week.
The e-mails don't show direct proof that Margiotta gave the video to the anonymous person who made the YouTube videos, which are not officially connected to his campaign. (The lack of a smoking gun is we haven't previously reported on it, especially with none of the campaigns or groups willing to publicly make the charge against Margiotta.)
Tata said he's not investigating and has not been requested to investigate whether Margiotta's request may have constituted a misuse of school district resources. He said questions about why Margiotta made the request should be directed to him.

Comments
The videos just shows how Evans conducts herself...
Sat, 10/22/2011 - 06:39 — woodstockRegarding the Evans videos, shouldn't the concern be that she has repeatedly made a spectacle of herself in a way that could be used against her? She is a newly elected board member, the concern is that she made bad judgment after bad judgment in how she conducted herself in public -- arrogant, mean-spirited, supported failed policies -- not who simply disseminated the videos available to the broader public. Anyone could have made a public records request.
Deflecting again, I see?
Sun, 10/23/2011 - 18:05 — valsparEvans made her public statements in public, and knew she was doing so. I'm more concerned about how Margiotta conducts himself in private. And more voters in Western Wake feel the same way I do vs the way you do. So I win.
How did Margiotta conduct
Mon, 10/24/2011 - 04:29 — woodstockHow did Margiotta conduct himself in private? More importantly, why do you even care? As a voter and a citizen, what concerns do you have about school board members beyond the policies you are left to live with? What specific policies decisions did Margiotta or anyone make that so offends you?
And, if you think you won by electing Evans as your school board representative, then you deserve everything you are about to get from that woman. BTW, if you are not a magnet parent from Western Wake, Evans thinks you are an unsophististicated bumpkin... and there is video to prove it.
Don't try to change the
Sat, 10/22/2011 - 15:24 — xmarkspot62Don't try to change the subject (as you so often attempt to do); the issue is that Margiotta asked WCPSS staff to obtain the video for use in his re-election campaign (Margiotta's personal business) during the staff's regular work day (read: on WCPSS time); that's not the way I wanted MY tax money spent.
So...
Fri, 10/21/2011 - 15:12 — Bob_SconceI don't see how responding to a public records request, even one to produce materials that would later be used in political advertising, could be considered "misuse of school district resources." Margiotta had the same right to request those tapes as anybody else.
There is a separate question about how those got from Margiotta to a youtube video put out by group that wasn't supposed to be coordinating with the campaign. But, that nothing to do with the initial request.
How he made the request counts.
Fri, 10/21/2011 - 19:31 — localyankFrom what I understand, he didn't make a public records request, he made a request as the board chairman, and that's part of the problem because it gives him privileges and responsbilities others don't have. The other problem, as you point out, is that as the board chairman he apparently handed the tapes over to a group to make an attack ad. He should explain what happened and leave it at that instead of stonewalling.
I think the issue is that if
Fri, 10/21/2011 - 16:54 — danofncI think the issue is that if the videos came through the campaign, they should have been listed as having come through the campaign. If Margiotta gave the videos to whoever made them, he should acknowledge that he did it.
I don't see why that would be an issue either way.
Margiotta's character
Fri, 10/21/2011 - 19:22 — localyankRequesting videos from staff, turning those vidoes over to groups to create attack adds, denying having knowledge of those groups and then refusing to answer questions speaks volumes about Margiotta's character. If he's done nothing wrong likes he claims, then answer who he turned those videos over to. I don't think this guy should be let off the hook.
Tata may not want to
Fri, 10/21/2011 - 12:41 — xmarkspot62Tata may not want to investigate Margiotta, but another Board member might, according to this story:
http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/video?id=8400174
The fact that this other
Fri, 10/21/2011 - 13:09 — KeungHui (author)The fact that this other board member isn't named weakens that.
Why is he quiet on the subject
Fri, 10/21/2011 - 12:30 — sam123456Thank you for response. Do you know why he is quiet on the subject? This impacts many families yet they are doing nothing to fix it. It seems like he/they want to forget about us.
Brassfield Representation
Fri, 10/21/2011 - 12:25 — sam123456Did Mr. Tata say anything about Brassfield? We are being significantly negatively impacted by this and yet it seems to be kept extremely quiet.
??
Sat, 10/22/2011 - 01:34 — Dove314Perhaps you should be asking BoE members if the feeder pattern for your area is set to this longer distance to help WCPSS balance ED status within the new choice plan. Elsewhere, we were noting that it seems that proximity is taking a lower priority than balancing ED as children from Brassfield are bused south and children from Fox Road are bused north. Not sure the stability in assignment outweighs proximity and history for you given your posts here.
BRASSFIELD
Sat, 10/22/2011 - 13:02 — erikhugheshttp://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Brassfield-Assignment-Wakefield-and-Millbrook/230281933695400
Just trying to have the conversation. Brassfield was pretty much all Wakefield until 2006 and 2009 reassignments under the diversity reassignments to Millbrook. This impacted half the school Now, we are all Millbrook under the approved plan. So yeah, many will struggle with the change and it has been dramatic over a short period (You couldn't even get a kid through elementary school in that time).... It needs to be talked about and District 3 candidates/Tata/the board need to engage the issue.
You Really Need Your District 3 Rep
Sat, 10/22/2011 - 21:58 — JanisTangoon board with asking for a review(whoever that might be). I seriously doubt Mr. Tata would take on a review without the board member for the district agreeing!
Odd
Sat, 10/22/2011 - 13:08 — prettyintensestuffWhy does Vicki Adamson have all of Kevin Hills emails?
So it Carpenter Village
Fri, 10/21/2011 - 19:49 — local23But, sometimes you just have to accept and move on!
Why should I just accept it???
Sat, 10/22/2011 - 12:23 — sam123456Local23, why should I just accept it??? I will be forced to have one child at Wakefield High and another at way down at West Miilbrook Middle. This is not right for my family and many others. Does this seem like stability -- of course not, proximity -- of course not!! When something is wrong one should not simply accept it but rather should continue to press on to make the situation right.
It is called choice...
Sat, 10/22/2011 - 14:18 — KRCYour address should have 5 elementary options. I would think at least one of your elementary options is aligned to the Wakefield Middle/High feeder pattern. Move your child to that school next year and you are all set. I know, I know, you don't want to have to move your child, but you have to decide which is more important. For them to stay where they are and potentially go to Millbrook, or go to a Wakefield aligned school, and make new friends with kids that will also go to Wakefield. You are not the only parent in Wake County going thru this. We have the same problem up IN Wakefield. Those assigned to Forest Pines (IN Wakefield btw) are aligned to Wake Forest. So, we will be moving our child to Wakefield Elementary, where he will have to make new friends, AND change calendars to boot, so that he can go to Wakefield Middle/High. We want Forest Pines to be realigned, but have also been told no due to capacity. So, as Local23 says, accept it, deal with it, make a choice, move on. We are.
Only one has wakefield
Sat, 10/22/2011 - 23:20 — sam123456KRC...Only one of the elementary school choices will provide my child with Wakefield as a choice. What will be the chances of getting in??? You say deal with, make a choice, and move on....choice does not really seem to be a true option. Under the previous plan I would have had a guarentee to go to Wakefield. Now that is gone.
Without knowing what that choice is...
Sun, 10/23/2011 - 17:48 — KRCI have no idea how to respond. Again, I am in the same boat, and actually live in Wakefield - go figure. But Wakefield Elementary is significantly under enrolled, so you should have a good chance if that is your choice. Especially given a lot of folks will not be choosing moving kids in the upper grades. I am at least giving it a shot. If denied, I'll apply for a transfer, knowing I at least applied to the school I am trying to transfer into.
I am only trying to point out that you do have options, maybe not 100% guarantees, but it is not the doom and gloom you portray. BTW, I hear MHS is an awesome school, and offers even more electives than WHS. And if it is where the rest of your daughters classmates will be going, she may actually want to go there. I have 2 friends that have put their kids thru multiple HS's. One had 3 go thru 3 different HS's. Guess what, it all turned out A-OK, and the kids all loved their respective HS's.
Kids are way more resilient than we want to believe, it is usually the parents that have difficulties adapting.
not 100% guarantee
Mon, 10/24/2011 - 19:38 — sam123456KRC -- you are right we will not have 100% guarantee. Wakefield ES may be under enrolled now but I heard that North Forest Pines parents received a special letter that they can apply to Wakefield ES and MS. That will drive up enrollment. The rest of schools just received some standard letter. The student assignment task force said that Wakefield HS will be over enrolled so yes it is "doom and gloom" for my current Brassfield child and my family and many others in similar situation. I will have one child at WHS and one at West Millbrook Middle separated by 8 miles or so -- not an ideal situation by any means. The board needs to fix the Brassfield situation ASAP.
So...
Tue, 10/25/2011 - 08:16 — KRCNorth Forest Pines is getting special treatment? That is news to me, I was not aware. But practically all of the N.Forest Pines students live north of 98, and actually want to go to Wake Forest High, because that is where they are zoned already, Check out the base attendance map, no one from the Wakefield subdivision attends N.Forest Pines. My brother's family attends N.Forest Pines, lives above 98, and will stay on the feeder pattern to WF by choice. He agreed there would not be a lot of apps from N.Forest Pines to Wakefield. I doubt that special treatment will 'max' out Wakefield Elementary by any means. I say you still apply to Wakefield Elem and then your two kids will be right next door to each other. Just trying to give you hope that it might work out.
Well..
Tue, 10/25/2011 - 09:44 — Bob_SconceN. Forest Pines is the year-round option for most of Forest Pines' base area (and vice-versa, if I recall) so you have to consider that map as well.
THe other thing to consider is that while WES does have a bunch of spare capacity, it's mostly all on Track 2. That won't be very attractive.
Which brings up something I've yet to hear anyone
Tue, 10/25/2011 - 10:56 — FSandYOUelse bring up. All these people do understand that choosing a YR school means the school will assign them as they see fit don't they? Which means the dreaded tracks 2 and 3 will get filled now whether parents choose them or not.
I wonder if that will seem like the same thing as getting your 5th choice?
Hidden questions
Tue, 10/25/2011 - 13:53 — sam123456Yes, there are many hidden open questions that have not been fully explained. On one hand they tell us that we will have choice when we really won't. In this case I would have to take a risk of not only disrupting my child and rip her out of Brassfield but then I may get a non-desirable track since our older children are on traditional calendar. The only way to fix this is to send students who, under the previous plan, would have gone to Wakefield to continue to send them to Wakefield instead of West Millbrook MS/Millbrook HS. This needs to be changed ASAP or I guess the other option is to put the plan on hold until such time that the open issues are fixed.
http://voiceforequity.blogspo
Tue, 10/25/2011 - 12:39 — jenmanhttp://voiceforequity.blogspot.com/2011/10/little-known-details-of-controlled.html
Also of interest is that you can't apply for a transfer to any of the schools on your choice list or to the magnets. It shall be interesting.
Well...
Sun, 10/23/2011 - 21:54 — Bob_SconceKids are way more resilient than we want to believe,
People say that a lot, but
"Kids are resilient." How many times have I heard that in a Hollywood movie as a self-centered adult 'does his/her thing' at the expense of the children? How resilient are children? If you look at the whole picture of health and well-being, not that much. Believing in children's "resilience" actually may be undermining and social policy.
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/moral-landscapes/201106/believing-children-are-resilient-may-be-fantasy
I've read a number of parenting books that talk about the need that kids have for stability -- knowing that the world is basically the same today, tomorrow and the next day helps kids develop confidence.
I've read a number of
Mon, 10/24/2011 - 02:27 — jeffrey1I've read a number of parenting books that talk about the need that kids have for stability -- knowing that the world is basically the same today, tomorrow and the next day helps kids develop confidence.
Exactly. Kids thrive on repetition.
Newborns may fuss in the arms of strangers, yet are comforted when held by their mother. It's because they quickly learn the sights, smells, and sounds of mom, and are comforted by the stability of those senses.
As toddlers, kids can listen to Barney (the purple dinosaur) sing those same songs over and over. Or watch and re-watch that Sesame Street video until every line is burned into their memory. But kids never grow tired of them.
Ever wonder how some kids in ES can eat the same thing for lunch day in and day out? Again, it has to do with stability in their every day lives.
This kind of dependence on stability starts from the moment they are born and exists well into their teen years. And it is yet another reason to demand stability in school assignment.
We are doing the same thing
Sat, 10/22/2011 - 17:45 — snordone- moving our kids to get them into the feeder pattern that will lead to our current HS. I don't like it but HS is more important, and after that move we will have stability, which is what matters.
No.
Fri, 10/21/2011 - 12:27 — KeungHui (author)No.