Should the Wake County school board move quickly to extend Superintendent Tony Tata's contract?
As noted in today's article, Tata is generally getting good reviews as he hits the one-year anniversary mark of his tenure on Tuesday. But he also faces some challenges, including potentially from members of the new Democratic school board majority.
Republican school board members are talking about wanting the board to take action next month to extend Tata's contract past the June 30, 2014 end date.
The Republican school board members who hired him are still among Tata's most vocal supporters.
“I think that in a system the size of Wake there will always be challenges," said GOP board member John Tedesco. "I think he’s done a wonderful job managing the challenges, protecting our teachers and moving us forward."
Tata is also getting praise from a number of people who aren't on the board.
"From the perspective of the business community, he has won a great deal of respect," said Harvey Schmitt, president of the Greater Raleigh Chamber of Commerce. "He has done a good job of meeting the challenges he’s faced and positioning the school system moving forward. I quite frankly don’t hear any concerns from the circles I travel in.”
Mark Elgart, president of AdvancED, said Tata's leadership is part of the reason that the district's high schools are on pace to get full accreditation by next January. He said at this point they don't see a need for a return trip and will instead read the school district's progress report, which is due Nov. 1.
"Without question, the superintendent’s leadership had a significant impact on the results of the review," Elgsrt said. "He has clearly gained the confidence of the board and the community to provide the leadership role he was asked to fulfill.”
Even Monserrat Alvarez, who protested Tata's appearance at the Wake County Taxpayers Association, last January said Tata is doing a better job than she thought he would do. But she's still suspicious of him because he was hired by the Republican board majority.
"He has done a good job, but I still have some doubts about him and how he came here," Alvarez said. "He really hasn’t tried to push his agenda.”
Some Democratic members are saying Tata's done a good job too.
"There are some areas he could have done better in, but you can’t expect him to be perfect in his first year, both in Wake and in his first job as a superintendent," said Democratic board vice chairman Keith Sutton. "I think he’s done well and is certainly on the way to being a successful superintendent."
New Democratic board member Christine Kushner is also saying positive things about Tata.
But new Democratic board members Jim Martin and Susan Evans aren't talking publicly about what they think of Tata's work this past year. They're also the two board members who've butted heads the most with Tata since taking office.
Republican board member Chris Malone said some board members aren’t showing Tata the respect he’s showing them. He thinks a contract extension would be a good way of showing Tata respect for his accomplishments.
“I’m a little concerned that some people won’t extend it because they want to prove that they’re in charge," Malone said.
Tedesco says that Tata has done such as “dynamic job” that he’s attracting national attention that makes him attractive to other school districts looking for superintendents. He says the board “needs to work hard to show our full support” or else Tata might decide he’d rather work elsewhere.
“This is my opinion, not anything I’ve heard from him, but if some board members put the squeeze on him for their own political purposes, then he may be more inclined to accept offers from other places to exercise his leadership," Tedesco said. "I hope he stays for a long time.”
Sutton says the talk about extending his contract is premature.
"Any talk about extending a contract would be premature," Sutton said. "There are steps that you’d want to take before you start talking about that."
Sutton acknowledges that tensions on the board, which had eased during the period before the elections, have gone up in the past few months.
“Certainly the tensions are visible," Sutton said. "But I’m not going to get into who’s respecting who or who’s not respecting who. I don’t think he’s the kind of person who’d leave because he was disrespected or feeling tension. That’s nonsense. What you’re seeing is people settling into their roles and having a lot of pressure.”
Sutton contrasted the current situation with what happened in 2009 when he said he and Carolyn Morrison were able to ease their transition on to the board. But he says the new members, under the intense media spotlight, are immediately facing issues such as the new student assignment plan.
“What you seeing is normal," Sutton said. "In any transition, you have a feeling-out period where you’re trying to figure out your way while trying to cope with a lot of issues. Sometimes the road will be bumpy. I’m optimistic that we can come together.”
For his part, Tata says his interactions with the new board have been "fair and healthy discussion." He also says he's not looking at leaving.
"I love the job and I’d like to stay as long as Wake County would have me,” Tata said.
On the other hand, Superintendent Del Burns was, publicly at least, not talking about resigning before he made his surprise announcement in 2010.

Comments
Republicans, sheesh
Mon, 01/30/2012 - 23:40 — valsparThere's not any data showing Tata has accomplished anything - yet.... except calming the waters so he could implement a new student assignment plan, and rearranging staff. Why would we even begin to consider extending a contract of someone still unproven in his initiatives? This isn't about Tata. This looks more like the R's forcing issues on the D's and backing them into a corner - in other words - politics using children's educations.
Do you even bother to read
Tue, 01/31/2012 - 00:55 — jeffrey1Do you even bother to read the blog responses before jumping in???
According to Keung:
In North Carolina, you're allowed to have the supt.'s contract extended out four years. If the board and supt. are on good terms, they extend it annually to the four-year mark. Generally it's a red flag if a board doesn't extend the contract.
1 year ago stability; now uncertainty
Mon, 01/30/2012 - 12:55 — sam123456One year ago we had an assignment plan that offered stability, now we have uncertainty. As an example, one year ago Brassfield feeder was to Wakefield Middle and High, today we have uncertainty with the new assignment plan. How are we as a community really better off today?
Sorry Sam....
Tue, 01/31/2012 - 13:56 — JanisTangowe have never had an assignment plan in WCPSS that offered stability. Stop saying things that are just not true. I know this plan may not be perfect. Maybe you were never force to move so in your mind you had stability. You are also assuming you won't get to Wakefield, but until you get the word that you won't you need to stop assuming it won't happen. I can give you the names and numbers of many people that did get moved and some of them dealt with constant shuffling. I will say it once again...my son's friend was reassigned 3 times by the time he was in 4th grade. His family has lived in the same house for that last 20 years. What kind of stability is that!
Yeah, yeah, we know
Mon, 01/30/2012 - 13:13 — FSandYOUBut what are YOU doing about YOUR situation? For sale sign in the yard yet?
This board isn't coming to your rescue you know.
The Martin & Evans Fibb Show isn't talking publicly
Mon, 01/30/2012 - 10:59 — FSandYOUNow there's a first. Maybe they're taking moves from the Goldman playbook?
Why is this a story TWO AND ONE HALF YEARS ahead of time? And I love the blatant bias in the 2nd paragraph.
Duck General and gather the troops. Sounds like you'll need them with The Martin & Evans Fibb Show and their supporting media fans.
I should have explained it
Mon, 01/30/2012 - 11:12 — KeungHui (author)I should have explained it more in the post and probably the article too, but school boards don't generally wait until the very end of the supt. contract to extend it. In North Carolina, you're allowed to have the supt.'s contract extended out four years. If the board and supt. are on good terms, they extend it annually to the four-year mark. Generally it's a red flag if a board doesn't extend the contract.
I'm not sure what you mean about blatant bias in the second graph.
Have the "quiet ones" told you something in private?
Mon, 01/30/2012 - 13:25 — FSandYOU"But he also faces some challenges, including potentially from members of the new Democratic school board majority."
How would you know "some" potentially have a problem with Tata, since the Fibbers aren't talking publicly? If they haven't told you anything on the issue you're either assuming or leaning to one side.
This entire story sniffs a foul to me. Sorry if I'm off base, but for this to even be a story at this time seems smelly.
Tomorrow is Tata's one-year
Mon, 01/30/2012 - 13:39 — KeungHui (author)Tomorrow is Tata's one-year anniversary so it makes sense to do a story now. I believe WRAL is promoting an interview they did with Tata for tonight's newscast.
It's news that the Republican board members are calling for the board to deal with extending Tata's contract next month. It's clear that Tata's relationship with the board isn't as smooth as it was before. So it's not exactly rocket science here to note that he may face challenges dealing with the new board. Board members from both parties acknowledged that tensions have been up lately.
However you want to sell it
Mon, 01/30/2012 - 19:00 — FSandYOUis fine with me.
As for tensions being up, of course they are. How could they not be when there are fibbers among the crew.
Of course it should be extended....
Mon, 01/30/2012 - 10:54 — Bob_SconceVoting against it is effectively a vote of no confidence. Heck, just based on the AdvanceEd report, he clearly doesn't deserve that.
question is
Mon, 01/30/2012 - 11:08 — EBDarcyThe question is why would they even take a vote?
So...
Mon, 01/30/2012 - 11:50 — Bob_SconceSee Keung's response above. Answer: because it's customary to do so. Not even having the vote would also be a sign of no-confidence.
Because it is Martin's mission
Mon, 01/30/2012 - 11:10 — FSandYOUto send those he doesn't agree with packing. With support from his pals in the media he probably thinks he has a platform.
That's all Jim 'The Arrogant One' Martin needs is a riser to elevate his entire being to the stratosphere his head has always lived in.
Mr Martin butted heads with Tata
Mon, 01/30/2012 - 21:01 — VillageMentalityBecause he got caught lying to the media about Tata and Tata called hin on it. I still can't believe the folks in his area were stupid enough to vote a liar in. What kind of Character Ed is that teaching kids...?
I can believe the voters were stupid
Mon, 01/30/2012 - 21:30 — FSandYOUenough to elect him and Evans. It's typical Wake County, right Mr. Stamp Licker!
...
Mon, 01/30/2012 - 09:49 — SideburnsBurns got a raise and contract extension twice, if I remember correctly. If that's the baseline for extending Tata's contract, there's not much to talk about. Unless, of course, the Dems are still plotting to get rid of him.
not the same
Mon, 01/30/2012 - 11:05 — EBDarcyThis is an entirely different situation than Burns. Burns had been with the school system for 20+ years and was a known entity. Tata came in with little relevant experience and while it appears he is doing a good job extending his contract now makes no sense. I agree with the poster who said the assignment plan is his signature project and we don't at this point know how success either the plan or the implementation of the plan will be.
Just Because...
Mon, 01/30/2012 - 11:32 — KevPerduePlease....just because he was a known entity doesn't mean he should have received an extension.
Let's look at his track record....how many kids were assigned annually, how many kids didn't graduate, how big is the achievement gap. I don't have an issue with waiting to see what the data says about Tata's performance, but it will be a first time it's been taken into consideration in WCPSS.
His signature effort is the
Mon, 01/30/2012 - 09:43 — finalfrontierHis signature effort is the rollout of the new plan. Until the implementation can be determined to be successful, in conjunction with improvements in teacher and student performance, it is too early to say if WCPSS has the right person as supdt.
Please define success. Andy
Tue, 01/31/2012 - 00:58 — jeffrey1Please define success.
Andy why make the success of the assignment plan contingent upon improvements in student and teacher performance, given that no previous assignment plans were judged according to that standard?
What is the rush
Mon, 01/30/2012 - 08:33 — mnordbergHow about we actually wait for results based on his decisions with regard to student performance,teacher performance, assignment plan, and school performance before we renew his contract. It seems a bit premature to jump up and down and say it is time to renew based on good political and PR work and not actual results.