If Wake County Schools Superintendent Del Burns is ousted early tonight, it won't be because his supporters stayed silent.
As noted in today's article, there's been an active lobbying effort over the past few days by people who want the school board to allow Burns to stay on through his June 30 resignation date. Del's Army, a Facebook group organized by the son of former school board candidate Carlene Lucas, has become a central point for Burns' backers.
"Other parents like myself need to stand up and speak out," Lucas said. "We hope they listen to us and not the elite few."
A similar view was echoed by Yevonne Brannon, a founder of the Great Schools in Wake Coalition, whose coalition includes several liberal groups. A number of critics of the new board majority feel they're beholden to special-interest groups.
Brannon noted how members of the new board majority can be seen talking at board meetings with Wake County Republican Party Chairman Claude Pope Jr. and Wake County Taxpayers Association President Russell Capps.
"I hope they they won't listen to the voices of outsiders but listen to the clear voices of the community," Brannon said.
Brannon said the large response in favor of Burns shows the board majority that people don't want an interim superintendent so soon.
“This is the opportunity to do what’s best for the community,” Brannon said. “This is the community saying they want the school board to keep him on and have a smooth transition.”
Brannon argued that the community "is very distraught and confused right now about what's going on." She said the best way to calm things down is to allow Burns to remain as superintendent through June 30.
"Let's not make the next four months as stressful for teachers and students as the last four months have been," Brannon said.
School board member John Tedesco denied the concerns made on the Great Schools in Wake Coalition's web site that the new board majority is "responding" to "politically conservative groups" who are calling for Burns' dismissal.
“At the end of the day, we’re going to look at what’s in the best interests of education in Wake County,” Tedesco said. “There’s no political interest group that’s going to sway the decision,”
Tedesco took more shots at Burns, noting the district's declining graduation rate, rising achievement gap and rising number of high-poverty schools. He said that a CEO would be held at least partially responsible if the company's metrics were getting worse.

Comments
Location of Del Burns petition
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 13:24 — mdsdwelchWhere is it so I may sign it?
Here is the link
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 14:38 — supportwcpsshttp://www.petitiononline.com/mod_perl/signed.cgi?StopWCSB&1
#17. Clay Aiken Looks like
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 14:49 — red_balloon#17. Clay Aiken
Looks like the celebrities are weighing in.
...
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 15:12 — SideburnsI like #78 who lives at 54.2 Failure Lane.
And, g88ky, your friend is back -- #102.
Johnny Come Lately
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 21:58 — g88ky07... he comes back around.
haven't heard from him in a
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 15:54 — jenmanhaven't heard from him in a while.
Take your pick
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 13:42 — red_balloonTake your pick ...http://digg.com/odd_stuff/Top_5_Most_Silly_Petitions_Rejected_by_No_10
#5
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 22:22 — Voice_of_Reason_Walking tanks w/ Plasma dischargers for everyone..gotta love the British
Is this the typical supporter of Del?
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 08:39 — g88ky07"A few hours after I posted my petition objecting the way this board is doing things, there was a prowler at my house. Given that Tedesco said he's HAPPY to be called a bully, I really can't put anything past them."
So is Carol Love accusing John of "prowling her house"?
Talk about people being Out on "the fringe". Good Grief!
g88, I was happy, too,
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 23:41 — petehswhen Keung called me yesterday and asked me,
"How does it feel to be the boogeyman?"
I gladly take on that nickname if the result is raised awareness, accountability and level of dialogue surrounding the issues that need to addressed in our community.
If nothing else, the discussion is now alive, and that will lead to improvements.
Debate is healthy.
It's gone
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 21:06 — fiestamomSomeone deleted her spurious accusation off the Del's Army facebook page. I saved the screenshot.
Is she related to the dude
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 11:42 — changewcpssIs she related to the dude who had lynch mob pictures on a hate site? Sounds like they are both very unstable and need to be carefully monitored by the law.
She's obviously less than
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 09:09 — woodstockShe's obviously less than stable. I see a restraining order in her future.
"If Wake County Schools
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 08:15 — woodstock"If Wake County Schools Superintendent Del Burns is ousted early tonight, it won't be because his supporters stayed silent."
...or that the N&O providied fair and proportional coverage. The coverage is over the top..especially the overly dramatic and misleading headlines. A petition with about 70 signatures, as of this morning, and a facebook page -- hastily asssembled by the son of a failed candidate who got 1% of the vote in the election -- hardly amount to a significant mobilization.
Actually, she got more like
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 17:11 — Tony_LucasActually, she got more like 3.5% but that's in the past. Also, I wouldn't really say she failed, she stood up for what she believed in and ran as an independent. She didn't bring party politics into the race and didn't even seek the endorsement of the party she belonged to. I actually enjoy how some people on this blog try to belittle those who disagree with them. I believe it is time for many to grow up and act like responsible adults. The fact is that there is a growing number of dissatisfied citizens with the way the board is handling things.
The fact is that there is a
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 19:19 — red_balloonThe fact is that there is a growing number of dissatisfied citizens with
the way the board is handling things.
May their numbers grow. I am glad they are going from being satisfied with a farcical system of excellence to waking up to the challenges that WCPSS has evaded addressing.
Agreed, it is an absolute
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 08:23 — CaryCurmudgeonAgreed, it is an absolute joke. When it was discovered that Burns had been sitting on the SAS report for five months, the N&O printed one small article. If the board decides tonight to have Del leave now, tomorrow's front page headline will probably read "Armaggedon Imminent."
Joe, I'm sure I've had this
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 10:00 — KeungHui (author)Joe, I'm sure I've had this debate with you before. Mention about the SAS report and that it was delayed on the front page the Sunday before the election is hardly buried.
Keung, Not taking a shot
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 10:53 — CaryCurmudgeonKeung,
Not taking a shot at you, you don't decide what gets printed in the editorial section, or what news gets printed where. I've told you before that I think your reporting is fair. But the overall presentation of this topic by the N&O is outrageously slanted.
Mr. Hui I agree with Joe
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 11:55 — Voice_of_Reason_I have defended you in the past and find you to be fair, but your editors need to know that coverage this slanted in the N&O needs to be called out. It makes a joke of your paper to a large percentage of the public.
Called out?
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 14:59 — g88ky07Isn't that "supports" job?
I'm Very Disappointed In N&O
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 08:56 — JanisTangoWouldn't it be nice if they offered a regular section for the other point of view. No offense Keung, but there has been a lot of one sided reporting for sometime now. It is getting quite ridiculous to read the articles. I would cancel my subscription, but my husband has to read the sports section every morning!
There are very little
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 09:21 — woodstockThere are very little ethics left in journalism these days. Keung does a decent job, but even in his articles the slant is evident in the headlines, the proportion of coverage provided on certain issues, and what is not covered.
In the "not covered" department, there is no questioning of Burns about his comments that are considered by many to be insubordinate. Also, regarding YR schools, there is never a mention that parents dislike Track 3 and hate Track 2; these details dramatically change the picture that have been painted about calendar preferences.
"considered by many to be
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 13:39 — carson79"considered by many to be insubordinate"
You've been asked several times - please supply a quote that meets the definition of "insubordinate."
You mean you asked and I
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 15:23 — woodstockYou mean you asked and I didn't jump to respond? Weird.
Are you too lazy to watch the interview yourself? He tends to drone on, so I guess I can understand that.
Here are some tid bits for you. Please bear in mind Burns' main responsibility is to carry out board policies:
"I did not see myself implementing those policies."
Regarding the new direction..."that is not something I can do."
There is plenty more of you ever decide to watch the video.
already watched it on wtvd. Guess
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 15:43 — carson79already watched it on wtvd. Guess your next task is to look up "insubordination" (or just quit using that term). What order has he not followed? Can you fire someone for insubordination for not following an order that has not been issued yet? I don't think so.
LOL Maybe if you keep saying
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 18:04 — woodstockLOL Maybe if you keep saying it, you'll convince yourself.
btw, no one is being "fired." Burns resigned. The question is will he have an office at WCPSS after tonight.
Not to pick nits, but he
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 21:35 — CaryCurmudgeonNot to pick nits, but he RETIRED. As a 34-year employee, he filed his retirement paperwork and will begin collecting his $140K pension.
His us of the word "resign" and his subsequent media tour were meant to maximize the drama factor. Well, he got his wish... for the last week, everybody is talking about Del, it's all about Del.
....
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 09:25 — SideburnsAs always, Hui gets stuck in the middle. If there was more news from the other point of view, I'm sure he would report it. Unless I've missed something, I haven't heard about any organized efforts from the side in support of removing Burns.
There was nothing new on the
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 09:58 — KeungHui (author)There was nothing new on the WSCA, WCTA and AFP front yesterday (at least that they were willing to tell me) about a last-minute organized effort to mobilize people to lobby the board. We reported last week that those groups had issued statements saying Burns should go immediately. The new thing was that the other side had gotten organized over the weekend, hence the stress on "last ditch."
I am not sure a petition
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 09:26 — woodstockI am not sure a petition with 70 signatures written by a woman who thinks John Tedesco is the prowler in her back yard represents a legitimate organized effort.