Blogs

newsobserver.com blogs


WakeEd

The WakeEd blog is devoted to discussing and answering questions about the major issues facing the Wake County school system. How much will the new Democratic majority on the school board do to undo the changes made by Republicans since 2009? How will the new choice-based assignment system work now that the socioeconomic diversity policy has been eliminated? How will Superintendent Tony Tata lead the state's largest district through more budget cuts and possible layoffs? How will the board respond to growth and the school construction program?

WakeEd is maintained by The News & Observer's Wake schools reporter, T. Keung Hui. While Keung posts information and analysis on the issues, keep us posted on your suggestions, questions, tips and what you're doing to cope with the changes in Wake's schools.

Starting Wednesday early dismissals

Bookmark and Share

Ready or not, we're about the begin the era of weekly Wednesday early dismissals.

As noted in today's article, year-round schools this week will be the first to begin sending students home early each Wednesday. They're arguably the guinea pigs that will test things out before traditional-calendar schools start in late August.

The one thing that's not in doubt is that Wednesdays aren't going to be the same.

One noticeable change is that classes will be shortened on Wednesdays.

Another change is that after-school clubs will no longer be held on Wednesdays. Clubs will have to meet on other days.

Sports and band will still take place on Wednesdays. But you're looking at study halls for the students while their coaches are in their PLC meetings.

It looks like support staff such as secretaries will be drafted to oversee the study halls.

Support staff such as custodians and cafeteria workers will also be drafted on Wednesdays to watch kids at after-school child care programs run by some elementary schools. Teacher assistants normally are in charge but they'll be in PLC meetings for part of the day.

In response to childcare concerns, some elementary schools and the YMCA have set up Wednesday-only programs. But you have to pay for a full year.

The biggest test could be transportation. Wake has shrunk the window for its three-tier bus system to get students to and from school each day.

But transportation won't be tested until traditional-calendar school starts. It could make the first few weeks even rougher than usual.

One of the lingering complaints from parents is over how quickly the early dismissals were approved by the school board without much public discussion.

Even though the time committee spent two years on the issue, they didn't officially present it to the school board until March 10.  They then asked for adoption for the upcoming school year.

The board obliged, adopting the changes three weeks later on March 31.

Kevin Hill, chairman of the school board, said he didn't have a problem adopting the change on such short notice considering the "caliber" of the members of the time committee. The committee included principals, teachers, administrators and parents.

Click here for a district web site explaining the Wednesday situation.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

OT-alert

Federal Dollars Could Boost Durham History Instruction

http://durhamcounty.mync.com/site/durhamcounty/news/story/37934/federal-dollars-could-boost-durham-history-instruction

wasn't WEP talking about WCPSS improving their history lessons as well? where's the money?

Why can't I drop my child off 10 minutes earlier??????

If school is starting 10 minutes earlier, doesn't it seem logical that parents should be allowed to drop their kids off 10 minutes earlier?  Apparently, there was a lot of confusion about the drop off time on the first day of the new school year.  At OCE, the front of the building was jammed full of kids whose parents thought that a 10 minute earlier start time also meant a 10 minute earlier drop off time.  Personally, I was going to use the extra 10 minutes at work to almost make up for the hour I'll be losing each week picking up my child every Wed. for early dismissal?  Does the School Board just like to stick it to the parents, or what?  I just don't get it!!!!!?????

Is it possible someone is

Is it possible someone is still confused and was looking at old information?  Our school's website says at one place students can enter at 7:50 and another place that they can enter at 8:00.  They sent home an agenda and their 2009/2010 Student Handbook yesterday that stated the the instructional day begins at 8:30, but prevoiusly sent home something else that says 8:20.   Yesterday the carpool line began unloading at 7:50 but today it didn't start until 8:00.  Everything is so inconsistant it's no wonder nobody seems to really know what is going on.  

Students are allowed to

Students are allowed to enter 20 minutes before the official start of the school day. Some schools allowed students in earlier on Tuesday because  it was the first day and you had a lot of parents coming in to check classrom assignments.

Students used to be able to enter 30 minutes earlier. It's tighter now because they wound up starting the Tier 3 schools 10 minutes earlier. By having them come in 20 minutes ahead of first bell, it should be the same time as it was last year.

I am amazed....one of the

I am amazed....one of the schools are going to have the cafeteria and custodial staff looking after the children?? HAS WCPSS lost their minds??? That is a lawsuit waiting to happen!!! As a teacher, I am amazed by this...I couldn't believe what I was reading, I had to reread that paragraph severl times, just to make sure I wasn't misunderstanding this. This isn't good...and if something happens...then everyone responsible for this stupid idea of PLC and early Wednesdays SHOULD be sued!!!

I could not agree more!!! 

I could not agree more!!!  I question, like a previous post, where the $$ is going to come from to pay cafeteria staff for the extra time if they are used.  At our school, we have only ONE full-time custodian - a contract service cleans the school at night.  I doubt seriously that she considers "child care" as part of her daily job description!

"Drafted" to watch the children?

Are we to assume that the custodial and cafeteria staff "drafted" to watch children in the after school programs will be paid for their time? Where will the extra funds to pay for their "drafted" time come from?? Basically, the school will be paying double for after school care on Wednesday as the TA's who are normally providing care will be paid for their planning time as well. I predict that the schools will be begging for parent volunteers to watch kids once funds run dry due to all the budget cuts currently in the works.

...

nktrail,

Can you write me offline? Hui can give you my email address. Thanks.

 

just email me -

just email me - trailfamily@hotmail.com.   I don't mind posting my email - I have good "junk" filters! LOL!

Early Wednesday's Dismissal and Additional SOS Days

All it's going to take is one parent suing the School Board for early dismissals and extra days off when a child or children get hurt, killed, kidnapped or lost because that child was sent home early, and there is no child care for underage children, and parents cannot make other arrangements or get off earlier from their jobs (that help provide taxes to the school board), and that child should have been in school - unedr the traditional ending school bell. While children can be safe for maybe that hour between 4 and 5 (when parents get home), the School Board's decision to change the start/ending bells on xyz at a whim days gives too much "hang" time to kids.

This Planning time should be completely rescinded by the Boards and the County Commissioners should make sure it does, or the State of NC Children and Family Services for added endangeriment to children. And believe me with so many parents financially strapped, they just cannot buy into the YMCA's extra costs right now.

....

"Kevin Hill, chairman of the school board, said he didn't have a problem adopting the change on such short notice considering the "caliber" of the members of the time committee."

Typical BOE condescending attitude.  You parents aren't the right "caliber" to be listened to.  Jennifer Lanane from the Wake NCAE apparently is.  She's the one that pushed for this and the reason the decision was so quick.

 

Afternoon Care

I would assume that if I am just a parent volunteer that can request a level 4 background check that it more then likely mandatory that all workers hired in WCPSS have background checks.

I just can't imagaine that the custodians and cafateria workers are really going to want to watch students.They were hired to cook or clean not babysit.

Question Mr. Hui - members of time committee

I noticed that one of the parents listed is Diane Dulaney, who is now the president-elect of the Wake PTA Council. Is her last name being the same as Chuck Dulaney a coincidence or is there a family connection?

I believe that Chuck's

I believe that Chuck's wife's name is Donna. I recall that she did run a well funded program for WCPSS at one point. Not sure whether that's still the case. 

Donna Olsen

Donna Olsen

Hui, question below

I think the BoE members who voted for these early dismissals as well as Ms. Lanane who helped create this mess, should have to rotate schools and help watch the study halls with the custodians and cafeteria workers.....is this not the most insane situation to date?? Custodians and cafeteria workers? can that even be legal? Are background checks done on custodians and cafeteria workers in the school system? and if so, are they normally cleared for level 4 as would be required under these circumstances???

Same old...

Why is there no coverage that contrary to federal mandate, WCPSS has failed to provide choice to those who attend a year-round school that has not reached AYP, as defined by NCLB, for two years in a row?
Why doesn't this story mention that again contrary to federal mandate, WCPSS growth and planning department was in charge of NCLB options, not the Board of Education and the Title I/NCLB program director?
Why no reporting that WCPSS attempted to file for an extension for meeting the NCLB provisions but were denied by the Feds because they had made no good-faith attempt to comply with the law?
Why aren't people being told that WCPSS has tried to use the year-round calendar (once again) to circumvent legal school choice, but this time they are being watched by the Federal government so might have bitten off more than they can chew?
It is amazing how well the media is controlled by the school system here. It is all good news and their press releases, no real reporting.

AYP and NCLB Dates

Weren't those reporting dates all blurred last year because the reading scores were released so late into the year?

The NCLB statues don't

The NCLB statues don't care.  There are deadlines that must be met, and a district can file a request for an extension if there are exceptional circumstances.  This year, it was judged that there were none.

Please read the NCLB statutes for yourself.  It is black and white.  Yes or no.  Make up your own mind.

Was there a reason given to

Was there a reason given to you for denying a transfer request?

It isn't a request.  A

It isn't a request.  A Title 1 school that fails to make AYP two years in a row must provide an alternate school for students to attend.  The answer can only legally be which school the child will attend.

There has been no formal response that I am aware of, although Mr. Hui might have more recent information since my comments seem to have inspired him to do some follow-up.

I'm familiar with the case

I'm familiar with the case you're referring to. I have been looking into the issue.

I know you are.  I made

I know you are.  I made sure you were.  I gave the person you spoke to your contact information.  Yet even though this was weeks ago, nothing has been published on this.  Even though WCPSS filed for an extension and it was denied, nothing has been said about this.

Here we are at a time when money is tight and the school system is jeopardizing federal funding simply because it did not make clear guidelines and explicit timelines.  How is this not worthy of a blog post, not to mention a story?

Calling me right before I

Calling me right before I was about to go on vacation didn't help. If you also haven't noticed, there have been some other things I've been working on. I haven't blogged about it yet because I was still working on the story.

Hmm...

My understanding is that WCPSS only needs to provide alternatives for schools receiving Title I money which have failed to achieve AYP 2 years in a row.   Which year-round schools are you talking about?

 

http://barwellroades.wcpss.n

http://barwellroades.wcpss.net/transfer.html

Call and ask about the results of the transfer requests.  

Ok.

I'm afraid that you're going to have to spell it out for me.  Are you saying that even though Barwell Road claims to allow students to transfer to East Garner or Swift Creek, that the school district is not actually allowing the transfers to happen?

If so, the correct place to complain is the Office of the Inspector General at the US Dept. of Ed.   http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/oig/hotline.html  .  If you really want action, I suggest sending them a certified letter (make sure that it's clear, concise, has proper grammar and no misspellings) and CC the folks in WCPSS responsible for NCLB. 

 

Already done, Bob. 

Already done, Bob.  Started this process a long time ago.  The deadline came and went (this is all spelled out in NCLB statutes in terms of what is required and when), now the first day of school is here and neither the state nor the Feds can get answers from WCPSS.

NCLB mandated transfers were not approved.  No new assignments were given.  It is really that simple.  I don't see how you can be confused.

did you report it here

did you report it here too?

http://www.reportpubliccorruption.org/

this needs to blown wide open not looked into....

Reported to a lot of places

Have reported this to a lot of places, to the State, The US Dept of Ed, local officials, media, it just seems that Wake County gets away with it anyway. They knowingly missed federal mandate dates, failed to follow procedures and continue to do things their own way, not caring what is best for the children and the parents.

The NCLB program may have its faults and may not be liked by everyone or agreed with by people, but the concept is good and it is a Federal Law. Whether you agree with it or not, a law is a law.

Many parents have no clue that they have this option and those that do, that have lived in Wake county and dealt with the Political Machine, have given up on trying to get what is best for their children, because they assume that it won't matter and Wake County will do whatever it wants anyway and get away with it yet again. It is time to stop being steamrolled, the parents have already lossed to Wake for the Year Round issue and the transportation issues and so many others, what's next?

Wake county may be the fastest growing county, have a huge population and growing pains, but it is no reason to make our kids suffer for it. As these are public schools, they do not answer to politicians, or to the board or event to the teachers, they answer to us, the parents/taxpayers. It is our children's education and future at stake, money and politics should have no place here.

Not well thought out...

Custodians looking after large groups of after school children? Really?? Are they going to train them in child care, safety and emergency medical treatment since they'll be responsible for young children?

Study Hall? Really?

So, school lets out at, say, 1:45 and that football practice starts at 3:00. Does the district *really* think that high school students will voluntarily sit in a study hall for that time? It seems to me that it's far more likely that they'll just leave and come back or hang out in the parking lot or something.

WRT to Kevin Hill's comment, kudos for delegating and then trusting the people who you've delegated to. The board could make its job much easier if it did more of that. HOWEVER, the board needs to make sure that it chooses the *right* things to delegate. Things that are largely administrative and that do not impact large portions of the students should be delegated. (School construction, school naming, etc....) Policy making and decisions that do impact a lot of students should not. Unfortunately, this fits into the second category.

Unfortunately

I believe this is really tough at the high school level.   Feel badly for school admins that have to deal with the kids hanging out.  Someone will do something stupid and then kids will be sent home and someone will have to bring them back.  Also no clubs on Weds - that will be tough as it is normally one of the big days of the week that clubs met .  Now they will only have Mon, Tues and Thursday.   Finally Susie and Johnny that just go home will have yet another hour in the day to mess around.....kids are already planning that as the lets hang out on a school day - more stress for parents....Arghhhhh

...

Chris_H,

Could you write me offline? Hui can send you my email. Thanks.

 

Hui or Sideburns how do I go about getting this request

filled?  Thanks

...

Just send Hui an email to say it's OK and he will send you my email address.

keung.hui@newsobserver.com

Thanks.

Excellent, Smithers...

Love ya, Sideburns.

Cars View All
Find a Car
Go
Jobs View All
Find a Job
Go
Homes View All
Find a Home
Go

About the blogger

T. Keung Hui covers Wake schools.

Want to post a comment?

In order to join the conversation, you must be a member of newsobserver.com. Click here to register or to log in.
Advertisements