Next year's Wake County student reassignment plan is a work in progress with everything approved by the old school board under review with new suggestions coming in all the time.
During Tuesday's work session, Laura Evans, senior director of growth and planning, laid out to the board an explanation of the assignments being considered and the direction they're leaning toward. It will help to have your copy of the handout present.
The ensuing discussion showed how the thinking has changed to reflect the new student assignment policy. Multiple times, Evans talked about bringing students home, having them attend their neighborhood schools and moving the least number possible for stability.
The first thing you'll see on the handout is that actual enrollments are much lower for this year than projected back when the three-year plan was developed in 2009 for Barwell Road, Hodge Road and Timber Drive elementary schools. Evans said the differences mean they may need to change how they populate the new Walnut Creek Elementary School in Southeast Raleigh.
Moving to the pages listing the changes suggested, the first 17 are all from the multi-year plan.
But you'll see that item 18 calls for looking at reducing applicants at Brooks Elementary School, a magnet School in North Raleigh.
Evans said that Brooks was added to the list at the request of Felecia Locklear, the school's principal, because an apartment complex in the school's base that had been abandoned a few years ago is now being rebuilt. Evans said Locklear is concerned that the new housing could crowd the school.
Evans said that items. 32-36 were suggestions they had heard from parents. She reiterated that all suggestions from parents, both in and out of the workshops, will be listed and reviewed.
Items 37-38 were suggested by Washington Elementary Principal Peggy Beasley-Rodgers because the school has lost of a lot of base students from the closure of the Walnut Terrace housing complex. Evans said that Beasley-Rodgers had requested that the base be expanded to get more kids who live by the school, located near downtown Raleigh, rather than to just accept more magnet applicants.
Item 39 is based on school board member Deborah Prickett raising concerns about Hilburn Elementary being underenrolled.
Item 40 is from parents whose kids would go to the new Walnut Creek Elementary.
Evans said one of their priorities is to make the least number of moves possible for stability.
Focusing on the Walnut Creek moves, Evans said they're definitely going to recommend some changes to what's now slated to go there. She started her review by looking at the schools slated to feed Walnut Creek.
Looking at Aversboro Elementary's base, she noted that two nodes are "a pretty good distance" from the school's Garner campus. Based on the new Policy 6200, she said "they want to do something" about sending those two nodes to a closer school, although it might not be Walnut Creek.
Looking at Barwell Road Elementary's base, she said they don't feel they need to reassign any students out of the school because enrollment is far below projections. Part of the reason is that 153 students in Barwell's base have transferred out because the school isn't meeting No Child Left Behind standards. Evans said those students would likely return if Barwell makes AYP because they'd lose transportation for their choice school.
If they're not going to reassign Barwell students, Evans said they'll have to look elsewhere to help populate Walnut Creek. For instance, she said they might reassign four Southeast Raleigh nodes out of the base for Farmington Woods Elementary in Cary, which is overcrowded.
Hodge Road Elementary, which is also feeding to Walnut Creek, is still crowded and needs relief. Evans said they may now recommend reassigning some students to Knightdale Elementary.
Looking at Timber Drive Elementary's base, Evans said they might reassign some nodes that are bordering Walnut Creek's proposed base.
School board member John Tedesco asked Evans about making it possible for the nodes that live around Timber Drive to go to there. Tedesco can be heard whispering that Timber is crowded because of all the nodes who come from Southeast Raleigh. Evans said it would take several moves as part of the next multi-year plan to let those nodes go to Timber.
Evans said they're also hearing suggestions from some parents about having Walnut Creek open on a traditional calendar instead of a year-round calendar. If it opened on a traditional calendar, she said they could designate East Garner as the year-round application school for those people who don't want to leave. She didn't indicate whether she's recommend a calender change.
Looking at items 10-11, Evans said that they're still going ahead with sending those nodes to Wilburn Elementary to "bring them home." She said that Wilburn Principal Jennifer Carnes said they can still handle the nodes even though they'll spend the first part of the 2011-12 school year at the modular campus on Spring Forest Road.
For item 12, Evans said the game plan has been to reassign four nodes from Davis Drive Middle to Salem Middle to provide a calendar match because they're also assigned to Laurel Park Elementary. She said they're hearing good feedback from parents about dropping the reassignment and instead making Salem the year-round calendar option.
For item 13, Evans said the plans calls for reassigning students to Knightdale High to open up more magnet seats at Millbrook High. She said they're revisiting it because one of the nodes actually goes to Durant Road elementary or middle school. Evans said they had thought all the nodes came from River Bend Elementary.
For items 14-17, Evans said it had all been part of an effort to change traditional-calendar application nodes for several schools to free up more seats for magnet applicants at Smith Elementary. She said they're reexamining them and may not recommend the changes because Smith's base hasn't grown.
But with some of Smith's northern nodes touching Walnut Creek, Tedesco suggested that Evans consider moving them. School board chairman Ron Margiotta said that would be "logical."
Evans then moved to the discussion of potential changes to relieve schools that are expected to be at or above 112 percent of capacity next year.
For item 19, Evans noted that Cedar Fork Elementary is now capped. She also pointed out that 215 of the 865 students are traditional-calendar applicants, pushing out some of the base. She also said it would be "hard" to reassign students from the base because "it's their neighborhood school."
Evans said they'll discuss with the board which of the options to use: continue the cap, reassign students, change the number of application students or change the calendar. She said it's too late to add more modular units for next year.
For item 20, Evans said that "reassignment is the least desirable because it's not very stable." But she said it's something they might have to consider to relieve crowding at Dillard Drive Elementary. She said they may look at nodes along the boundaries of the school's base to see if there is space at neighboring schools.
For item 21, Evans said they can talk about reducing the number of magnet applicants at Douglas Elementary School in North Raleigh. She said the school had accepted a significant number of new applicants this year.
In the long term, Evans said they might want to reassign some of Douglas' nodes to a neighborhood school. She said that may be part of the next multi-year plan.
With time running out before Evans had to go to that evening's community workshop, she switched to taking requests from board members to discuss individual schools. Prickett asked about Leesville Road Middle School, which is item 30.
Evans said they've "already started to give some thought to this one" as she pointed to the Leesville satellite nodes in Southeast Raleigh that are near the proposed base for Walnut Creek. That's when the gasp came from the crowd and an "oh my God" came from either the audience or the board table.
Evans said that "we want the middle school and the high school feeder pattern to be a neighborhood school" for Walnut Creek so "we can look right here as part of the solution to Leesville Middle crowding."
"I don't know that we can bring all of these children home or in the area, but we're certainly looking at it," Evans said.
Anne Sherron, a citizen member of the board's student assignment committee, shouted out from the audience "the middle and the elementary, " a reference to where they'd go if they were reassigned to Southeast Raleigh. She's raised concerns that this kind of move will take away magnet seats in Southeast Raleigh.
Evans said they're looking at which schools in the neighborhood have room.
Board member Carolyn Morrison asked if they could look at doing something for Carroll Middle School, which is projected to be at only 76.5 percent of capacity.
Margiotta asked Evans if there are any suggestions for reducing the population at Mills Park Elementary and if they're considering converting Highcroft Drive Elementary back to a traditional calendar.
Looking at the base area for Mills Park Elementary, Tedesco noted there are nodes inside the Raleigh Beltline near the RBC Center. Evans said they could look at them to give them a closer school, which Margiotta said would comply with the new assignment policy.
Board vice chairwoman Debra Goldman asked about item 34, Kitts Creek. Evans said parents want to go to a middle school closer to home. Evans said they have seats available at West Cary Middle.
Tedesco and Goldman also suggested having the Mills Park Middle nodes near the RBC Center go to East Cary Middle. Goldman said those kids would be "five minutes from East Cary." Evans said they'd look at it.
Tedesco then brought up Garner High to look at reducing crowding. He said he wants staff to make suggestions rather than him offer them. Evans said it was an "eye opener" all the things that Garner High Principal Drew Cook is doing to handle crowding.
Prickett closed things out by suggesting they look at helping York Elementary because it's underenrolled. She said people are talking about adding a classical magnet theme to York.
Evans said she got it and asked board members to e-mail her any additional suggestions. She'll be back before the full board next on Dec. 7 to present the revised 2011-12 student assignment plan.

Comments
Sour grapes ... the parents
Mon, 11/22/2010 - 10:19 — user12345Sour grapes ... the parents and kids wanting academic rigor sought it out and sacrificed with their time and convenience to make it happen. You and your husband chose two careers and a huge house out in the burbs and made a different choice. I think many of the kids and parents left behind who chose local day care instead of academic rigor are hoping to get more for no investment or change in lifestyle. Even if the one magnet elective was offered at the local school, I am betting many kids would not take it and their parents would moan about the amount of homework and how it affects sleeping late of Saturdays. Other schools are not weaken but choose to be weak because of apathy and laziness of the parents and kids. Again and again, demand that your local teachers treat your kids like magnet student and teach them and test them to the level they are capable of not the minimal day care level your school has gravitated to.
sour grapes?
Mon, 11/22/2010 - 12:45 — loriacYou make it sound so easy, just like the WCPSS marketing makes it sounds like these wonderful schools are available to anyone.
First - not everyone who applies is selected for the magnet. Then what? Oh, it's up to them to demand rigor at their base school.
Fine - we demand rigor, and my son takes honors and AP classes. Guess what - the classes are great, and I believe they are just as rigorous as any at Enloe. But, WCPSS doesn't tout the base schools at all because this would conflict w/ their marketing strategy. So the kids who work hard at the base schools get less recognition than their magnet counterparts (important for college applications).
So - why not tout ALL WCPSS schools? Because then the powerful magnet parents would be up in arms.. their house prices might go down... it won't be as exclusive and Kyle or Kaylee might not get into UNC (I'm making these comments just as incendiary as yours above, User).
This whole program is wrong - it may have worked at one point, but it's way past time for a review.
I never understood why you
Mon, 11/22/2010 - 13:18 — user12345I never understood why you put so much importance on the superficial "touting" by WCPSS. You remind me of those drama mom who worry about name placement in the program or count number of lines to determine an actor's importance. I would much rather have my base teachers and principal agree to require more from my kids and bypass the "touting". Let the score speak for themselves.
Sour grapes?
Mon, 11/22/2010 - 12:00 — NWRaleighMomI was willing to choose academic rigor over convenience but we were denied, denied,denied,denied, denied... So were my friends. Teachers and principals were approached (different schools/different principals) about rigor and ability grouping. Their reply was that we needed to apply to a magnet school.
I feel for you and loriac
Mon, 11/22/2010 - 13:00 — user12345I feel for you and loriac above .... it seems like the predicament we have gotten into is that the school needs people to move from an overcrowded suburban school to a under utilized inner city school and had to provide enticements to "pay" for the long ride. Over time, the best and most dedicated families and kids have gravitated to the magnet program and the base schools have become lazy and complacent ... there is the argument that base can not compete with magnets, and magnets offer more languages,etc .... I think they are all excuses that allow the "system" (parents, kids, teachers, principals) to avoid making improvements and increasing academic rigor at the base school... maybe with more lazy and apathetic parents left behind at the base school there is not enough leadership and momentum to push for those changes against the "system".... personally, I hate the thought that your only option to getting a better education is to get selected for a magnet program .... I guess one way to address the issue is to open more slots but that just further increases the brain drain of students and movitiated parents from the base making the base more apathetic .... my preference would be to use the magnets to fill places that need filled to defer capital expenses and improve the expectation of the base school so they get to at least above average at least. It seems like if you try to trap motivated parents and kids in a dumbed down base school they will just leave the system for private school.
Neighborhood schools
Mon, 11/22/2010 - 14:08 — Solon77So it would seem that many would like to dismantle the magnet program. Let's say that happens and students return to their neighborhood school. Then what ?
You Are Forgetting
Mon, 11/22/2010 - 20:11 — local23That Panther Creek HS, Salem MS, Mills Park MS are in RM district and guess what those schools are doing a great job in AP & AG Placement along with high scores in EOG/EOC and also many schools of excellence - all without extra's that you as a magnet parent receive and what we as tax payers pay for!
Considering
Mon, 11/22/2010 - 23:31 — Solon77Considering Salem and Panther Creek are 8% and 12% ED respectively, I would expect these schools to be near 90% pass rates on EOG / EOC. That said only 35% of the Salem students are taking Algebra I. Compared to for example: West Millbrook 44% (37% ED), Carroll 36% (48% ED), Ligon 78% (31% ED) . Considering Algebra I is the gateway to opportunity, I am surprised that with a predominately affluent school only 35% of Salem students are taking Algebra I - I would expect the number to be double that. With regards to Panther Creek - AP courses taken are middle of the pack. Again being a predominately affluent school I would have expected higher.
The only way this is going
Mon, 11/22/2010 - 18:32 — jenmanBetter for all
Tue, 11/23/2010 - 00:41 — Solon77Do we go after the charter school parents and disparage them because they got what they want and now they are abandoning the neighborhood school ? Do you think they care ? Do we start disparaging parents whose kids got into Carolina and ours only go into one of the lesser known state schools - all are funded by taxpayers.
Stability - why is this a surprise ? Why do you think year round schools first garnered popularity - stability. Why do you think when people are looking for houses they pick certain areas of the county - because of the high probability of stability. This is the main priority that needs to be determined in the assignment model - proximity or stability, in the areas of high growth cannot have both.
Revisiting the purpose of the magnet program
Assignment models are like the tax code - as conditions change the original purpose does not always support the intended result. There have been a number of schools demagnetized and a review process needs to be in place. Broughton was a tough one - if the end goal of the district is to have all schools at a high level, why tear down something that has been successful. Unfortunately the district is not in a position to start adding resources and taking the $12m saved by discontinuing the magnet program will not fund equity across the system.
Do we go after the charter
Tue, 11/23/2010 - 09:06 — jenmanThis will get ugly. When
Tue, 11/23/2010 - 05:58 — loriacThis will get ugly. When the cuts come, and base schools are pared back to minimal offerings with 40 kids per class - do you really think it's fair to continue offering all the extras at magnet schools? The inequity will be too great for this to continue. $12 million is $12 million.
Are We Meekly Standing By?
Tue, 11/23/2010 - 07:44 — fiveblindmice"long overdue strategically placed tax increases"
Tue, 11/23/2010 - 19:21 — FSandYOUSorry, but a lot of people are not interested in paying any more with the current events within the system and with the current state of their wallets. So then what?
Where are you going to cut from if education doesn't lose a dime? What other strategically placed tax increases should I be watching out for?
Glad to get in on the toothpick thread. One word per line. At best.
I agree more school funding
Tue, 11/23/2010 - 08:09 — loriacI agree more school funding is needed. I would even be ok with a tax increase if I knew it would STAY with the schools. I would also love it if they privatized the ABC boards, and stopped paying all those 'bubbas' large salaries to lose money.
"Maybe they need to rant,
Mon, 11/22/2010 - 17:45 — AngelaW"Maybe they need to rant, rave and picket outside of their neighborhood school to get the attention needed. "
they did that just this year at LMS to keep the Orchestra program for this year....your point?
....
Mon, 11/22/2010 - 14:48 — SideburnsFluff
Mon, 11/22/2010 - 23:57 — Solon77As I have stated many times, there is fluff that could be pared back, especially at the ES school level where the focus needs to be on Reading and Math. All of our middle schools need to offer a foreign language. Principals that sacrifice foreign language need to be called out.
Are you saying that the Arts is not a valid academic pursuit ?
good point
Mon, 11/22/2010 - 14:27 — loriac'it will cost at least this much or more for the extra that will be required to service a high poverty school.'
Right now the base ED kids have the worst deal of all - either they are bused out of the magnet school, or if they stay, they do not get to partake of the magnet offerings. In fact, the base ED kids do the worst at magnet schools.
I think it would make sense to spend that magnet money on the appropriate programs needed for ED kids. Right now they don't get any extra resources in the suburban schools or in the magnet schools.
Please
Mon, 11/22/2010 - 15:03 — Solon77I think it would make sense to spend that magnet money on the appropriate programs needed for ED kids. Right now they don't get any extra resources in the suburban schools or in the magnet schools.
I agree that the magnet offerings could be scaled back to provide funding for students in need of academic support.
the enemy? hardly...the
Sun, 11/21/2010 - 23:12 — AngelaWthe enemy? hardly...the elite? certainly.....the point being made is that magnet parents and students featured at BoE board meetings have showed the public their true colors....and it certainly isn't about "all" kids.
So
Mon, 11/22/2010 - 15:10 — Solon77So I know neighborhood parents whose true colors are wanting the undesireables out of their school. Do I therefore assume that all that favor neighborhood schools share this view ?
Please keep saying it. Your
Fri, 11/19/2010 - 20:48 — loriacPlease keep saying it. Your post explains a lot of why I am very uncomfortable with the magnet program (user calls it magnet envy). The bottom line is that only a very few students get the very best of WCPSS, and the above reasons are not good ones in my book.
Not rambling
Fri, 11/19/2010 - 20:28 — SDR256You were not rambling. I really enjoyed reading this post. I wish we could clone you and get all of the Jenman clones to facilitate the committee meetings. You ask valid and provoking questions in a non-confrontational way.
If that were possible I'd
Fri, 11/19/2010 - 20:33 — DrActualFactualIf that were possible I'd position all the Jenman clones on the BOE (talk about consensus).
But then who would I debate
Mon, 11/22/2010 - 21:45 — jenmanBut then who would I debate with? lol
"First thing you'll notice"
Fri, 11/19/2010 - 10:55 — FSandYOUSays it all.
"Actual enrollments are lower than projected" well no ...
Those who are in this department giving us their wrong guesses still, and were when these projections were made, SHOULD BE FIRED!
How many of those 22 schools did we really not need to convert? How many of those are currently costing us more to operate than they did before they were converted? How much has this cost the families and the children who have been impacted?
The revised assignment plan should include converting every year round school that is not at 95% capacity back to a traditional calendar and yes, for next year.
We need to pull money from every corner of the county that we can NOW to chip away at the 80-100-120 million $ shortfall. This waste can be put to use now to help save our teachers jobs and help keep our kid's classes from becoming too large to be productive. If we have to cut 2000 teachers jobs, all those kids have to go to other classrooms. Do the math and that's how much larger class sizes will be. How many of the teachers who are left will then say forget it and leave?
How come Anne Serron isn't screaming about this? How come she hasn't been tossed out, for good!
Or it could also be that no
Fri, 11/19/2010 - 17:31 — kbrooks500Or it could also be that no one can predict with accuracy the impact of parental choice on enrollment. No one can say for sure how many students will opt out for calendar or magnet options, how many transfers will be requested and accepted, or if a school has to offer choice under NCLB, three years ahead of time.
Ever forecasted ?
Fri, 11/19/2010 - 13:27 — Solon77Have you ever forecasted ? In 2006 had you already predicted the meltdown at the end of 2008 and the prolonged recession extending into 2010 and possibly 2011 ? If so, please share your crystal ball - my 401k could use a little help.
Signs of the meltdown began
Sat, 11/20/2010 - 21:04 — jeffrey1Signs of the meltdown began appearing long before 2008.
Housing prices peaked in California in 2005 and were sharply lower in 2006. Foreclosures in California also began to sharply increase in 2006. Some other key areas of the country were not far behind.
Considering that people do not move into Wake County if they can't sell their home in whatever city they are moving from, it makes sense for anyone in charge of forecasting growth to look to other areas of the country to aid in that forecast.
And when WCPSS was forecasting 7000 additional students as the reason behind the need to convert 22 schools to MYR, I was one of the ones predicting a lot less.
BTW, my 401(k) weathered the downturn just fine.