The bad news is now official on teacher bonuses under the state ABCs program.
There's an across-the-board 30 percent cut in bonus payments this year.
At schools that meet expected growth, teachers will get $527 instead of $750. Teacher assistants will get $263 instead of $375.
At schools that exceed expectations to make high growth, teachers will get $1,053 instead of $1,500. Teacher assistants will get $351 instead of $500.
The problem this year is that the General Assembly capped the State Board of Education to spending $94.3 million in bonuses. DPI says they would have needed $134.2 million to fully fund the program to provide the usual maximum bonuses.



Comments
Bonuses
Tue, 08/12/2008 - 10:55 — Anonymous (not verified)Someone mentioned Proud Democrats should stand up. I am a proud democrat but cannot stand what Easley has allowed to happen to the mental health system in this state. And, as a teacher who has been promised a small bonus for a job well done only to have it be yanked I have to say this is beyond belief. Yes, Mrs. (B)easley was compensated for her part time employment to the tune of 4 teacher salaries. I arrived yesterday at 7:15 AM and left school at 8 PM due to the expectations of my job. If it weren't for the love of teaching and the commaraderie and coimmunity that is teaching I do believe many would bail. Everyone in the community as a whole can be thankful that teachers are dedicated beyond these insults. In the meantime I will be "shakin' the bush boss!"
Promises from Politicians
Fri, 08/08/2008 - 19:05 — Voice_of_Reason_A Democratic Governor, A Democratic Legislature, a promise to support Education, promises of bonuses, endorsement of Democrats by the teachers. Yes you got a bum deal teachers... but we get what we vote for. Talk is cheap, action speaks volumes.
My Take...
Fri, 08/08/2008 - 16:41 — Deidra (not verified)You don't offer a bonus for performance, then tell the people who succeed that the bonus is cut. What kind of psychology is that? I have heard many teachers talking with heartbreak about this situation (yes genuine demoralization). Most teachers succeed at teaching because they love it, but like most people they long to be recognized for it. One parent who is truly thankful is a great gift to a teacher, but being appreciated by "the boss" is even more helpful for long term job satisfaction. Instead of saying "Job well done!", the state is essentially saying to teachers "Suckers!" I'm not sure I can stay in teaching beyond another two years if things don't improve.
Thank you
Fri, 08/08/2008 - 23:27 — H2OGuyTHANK YOU Deidra!!!
You said exactly what teachers think and the point we have tried to make about the whole bonus system. Don't offer something, if you can't give it up in the end.
kinda like the old saying.....
"Don't bite off more than you can chew"
and that's what the state did!!!
Not having enough money, shows everyone, that the state doesn't expect us to make great gains in education. They would never say that, but I know that is what they think."
BUT...they stand behind NCLB.."Have 100% of students on grade level by 2014"
IF...they truely believe that is possible, then they should have in the bonus account enough money to pay every single teacher in the state of NC.
We see they don't...."Actions speak louder than words"
Insane
Fri, 08/08/2008 - 08:51 — Anonymous (not verified)I am a teacher. A professional that has worked hard and devoted many years in educating myself in order to be an effective member in my field. Yet many teachers are not treated as professionals. Yes, the pay is demeaning, but we all knew that getting into the field, and yes it is rediculos that our bonuses are being cut. Money is always an issues esp. when it comes to education. However, what many people do not realize is that many teachers are working well over 50 hours per week. We do not receive "lunch breaks". Our "planning period" is often filled with parent or administrative meetings. So in all reality we are working 8-12 hour days with not even enough time to use the bathroom. Now that is what kills me.
Where did those numbers come from?
Thu, 08/07/2008 - 21:45 — Kevin Smith (not verified)In the original press releases the SDPI said they needed $107 million to fully fund bonuses and the legislature gave them $94 million. (12% reduction - teacher bonus = $1322)Now they Claim their 30% short. How did that happen?
And why does everyone keep saying teachers got a 3% raise? If you compare last years pay scales to this years pay scales you'll find that the only teacher bracket that got 3% is first and second year teachers, all others got less. In reality the average state employee who is not a teacher got a bigger raise than teachers (because of that not less than clause the leg. always throws in there).
I agree. And they wonder why
Wed, 08/20/2008 - 20:50 — Anonymous (not verified)I agree. And they wonder why there is a shortage of teachers, why they can't attract new teachers, and why they can't retain good teachers.
Bonus amount
Thu, 08/07/2008 - 22:12 — KeungHui (author)$107 million was what DPI estimated would be needed months ago while the budget was being developed by the General Assembly. After the budget was adopted with the $94 million cap, DPI said it appeared that more teachers would be eligible for bonuses than they had anticipated. They're now saying that $130 million is the amount that would be needed to fully fund the bonuss.
cut in bonus
Thu, 08/07/2008 - 20:30 — KRISTINE (not verified)AND don't forget these teachers will also pay taxes on this bonus cut. UMMM and it may also be that this LAME excuse for a bonus might actually cause their income to increase to just the next tax-level notch. Thank you to the Confiscatory TAX and SPEND government. YES pad the pockets of a few, redistribute the wealth from the underpaid teachers and expect them to work magic with some of the under achieving kids whose parents do not take any responsibility.
Do you mean that teachers,
Thu, 08/07/2008 - 20:56 — shank56Do you mean that teachers, like all employees of any business , will pay taxes on any bonus earnings?
No teacher or income earner should pay taxes on "bonus cuts"; ie they should not pay taxes on funds/monies they do not receive.
Am I missing something here?
What do you expect......
Thu, 08/07/2008 - 14:31 — WuptdoDid you expect the democrat controlled NCGL would do any different? Do you think for one moment that Gov. Weasley would stand up for teachers or schools? The one of the largest budget increases in NC history and still not enough money for teacher bonus's? And to make it worse, they have to borrow money to pay for the budget. Where did all that money go?
Now folks, regardless of your party affiliation, you can lay this directly on Gov. Weasley and the State's democrats. Can some "Proud Democrat" stand up and defend their actions?
Remember this, next time you are in the voting booth.
Teachers, WHY?
Thu, 08/07/2008 - 13:38 — g88ky07Teachers, WHY do you keep teaching and taking this abuse? WHY do you continue to allow your bosses to give you the finger while YOU continue to give, give and give?
I think it's time for a teacher strike and then we'll see if Patti and Rosa can replace you fine folks as easy as they say they can!
Public Employees and Strikes
Thu, 08/07/2008 - 14:34 — Bob_SconceIn North Carolina, public employees who go on strike are committing a Class 1 Misdemeanor. If I recall correctly, this can mean 6 months in jail. They also cannot bargain collectively.
Personally, I think it's a good rule. Pubic employees unions wreak havoc in other states. Even though organized labor would love to change the rules, I suggest that NC's anti-union, pro-business climate is one of the reasons we're doing so much better than states in the Rust Belt.
what if they are sick is
Thu, 08/07/2008 - 16:19 — bigwinniewhat if they are sick is that a misdemeanor?
Well...
Thu, 08/07/2008 - 17:25 — Bob_SconceConspiracy or solicitation to commit a misdemeanor are also misdemeanors. By my read, the statute is broad enough to cover a "sick out."
Teachers have the same right to go out and find better paying jobs that you or I do. In the end, the thing that's going to force the State to pay them more is competition from other employers.
What would happen
Thu, 08/07/2008 - 17:38 — Voice_of_Reason_Hypothetically, say they did strike.
How many of you would believe the state or county would throw all the teachers in jail if they did strike? What if they didn't picket and just didn't show up. How many would be fired? Just imagine the repercussions.
Oh yeah...
Thu, 08/07/2008 - 18:01 — Bob_SconceThey may all be fined and the ringleaders would probably be jailed. But,, the ringleaders would probably be locked up before it got very far, since conspiracy, attempt and solicitation are all punishable. And, since there's probably a morals clause in the teaching contract, the ringleaders would end up losing their jobs as well.
I think it would be a bad idea as well -- strikes generate a lot of animosity when they're legal. An illegal one would probably lose most of the public support that the teachers have.
And what, pray tell, is your
Thu, 08/07/2008 - 20:59 — JustWonderingAnd what, pray tell, is your position on the minimum wage, OSHA, social security, the Fair Labor Standards Act, child labor prohibitions, the forty hour work week, overtime pay for hourly employees, the National Labor Relations Act, human rights, environmental safeguards, and the Fourteenth Amendment to our Constitution?
And you?
Fri, 08/08/2008 - 00:12 — pmAnd what, pray tell, is your position
And yours?
?
Thu, 08/07/2008 - 23:24 — Bob_SconceThat is a topic for another blog post. Or series of them. But, see http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/MinimumWages.html for a discussion of the minimum wage.
vote for Barr
Fri, 08/08/2008 - 00:46 — JustWonderingOh, a Libertarian, I see. Well I hope that many Republicans will vote for Bob Barr. It is the patriotic thing to do.
Hmm..
Fri, 08/08/2008 - 08:54 — Bob_SconceI think I've been posting here long enough for you to recognize that fallacy. Would a libertarian really endorse a huge bonus for public school teachers or suggest that vouchers may not be appropriate for Wake County?
In any case, the article I pointed to mentioned that 90% of economists believe the minimum wage increases unemployment among low skilled workers. It's hardly out of the mainstream.
Patriotic ?
Fri, 08/08/2008 - 08:02 — Voice_of_Reason_Bob Barr has no traction or really any chance of winning, whether you agree with his policies or not. You could make a protest vote BUT, what would happen? It probably would allow Obama to win. So if you are conservative, you have two choice really: 1. Don't vote or vote for Barr(really same thing) or 2. Pick the candidate that is closer to you point of view. Obama will not attract conservatives because of his policies. McCain, a moderate, does not have much real support by conservatives, but when push come to shove they will go and vote. Of course Obama is sooooo far to the left that a lot of Democrats would vote for him, they may hold their nose and vote for McCain. To be patriotic is not who you vote for, it's voting.
Interesting
Thu, 08/07/2008 - 12:35 — Anonymous (not verified)It is interesting that teachers get their bonuses cut and only a 3% raise while Mrs. Easley gets almost a $100K raise for "expanded duties", come on. All educators have expanded duties every single year, with overcrowding and out of control students. Something just isn't adding up here.
Shame them!
Thu, 08/07/2008 - 11:39 — H2OGuyThe state of NC should be ashamed of itself. How dare them not fully fund the bonuses that they PROMISED. It's amazing how they can promise one thing and then not be able to fund it later. Just like Gov. Easley, couldn't keep his promise to raise salaries of teachers to the national level, due to this years inability of the Gen. Assb. to provide the money to help the Govenor to keep his promise he made a few years ago.
But im sure everyone in the Senate and House got everything that was due to them for their time and "hard" work. They should make sure the same is done for everyone else that works for the state and the people they represent. Of course, I'm probably fooling myself on that one.