How much of a role did the hostile crowd at Tuesday's meeting play in the new Wake County school board majority's willingness to compromise?
As noted in today's article, new school bard chairman Ron Margiotta repeatedly warned the crowd that he'd shut down public comment or call in security if they didn't calm down.
School board member Keith Sutton thinks the vocal complaints from the crowd are why the board was willing to accept compromises, especially on the proposed changes to the student assignment policy.
Let's back up to the start of the public comment period. By then, most of the supporters of the new majority had left after the swearing-in ceremony and reception.
The crowd was already in a fighting mood after the new majority amended the agenda to put the eight new items on the table.
Charlotte Turpin's comments were typical of what the board heard.
"You asked us to respect you," said Turpin, former Wake NCAE president. "I feel so disrespected right now by what I saw. I hope you have not sold your souls and do what is right for every child in Wake County.
Tempers were still high when it got time to discuss the revisions to the student assignment policy.
The revisions scrapped the section saying that "creating and maintaining a diverse student body" is a priority. Instead, two new priorities were inserted, including "promoting neighborhood schools with proximity to home consideration" and "providing choice in calendars and programs."
“We want to educate our students, but not through assignment," said new board vice chairwoman Debra Goldman. "This is the beginning of a process.”
The initial plan was to adopt the policy on first reading on Tuesday. This would have meant it could have been approved on final reading at the now scheduled Dec. 15 meeting.
Sutton proposed sending the policy first to the policy committee, which drew applause from the crowd.
Margiotta, who had been chairman of the policy committee, responded that you're "lucky" to get members to attend those meetings. This led to loud hissing coming from the crowd.
"Please be quiet or we’re going to ask you to leave," Margiotta told the audience. "Don’t make an arena out of us."
When Margiotta's remarks drew laughs, he threatened to ask security to make the crowd leave.
After things subsided, Sutton again said it should be sent to policy committee to be properly vetted. The other members of the board minority quickly backed Sutton.
Anne McLaurin also threw a jibe back at Margiotta, noting that she attends the policy committee meetings.
Kevin Hill noted how the new board members had accused the old board of being arrogant. He accused the new majority of doing just that now.
"It’s a very new process when essentially half the school board isn’t privy to information before the start of the meeting," Hill said.
Hill accused the new majority of trying to get changes approved "in the dark of night”
A vote was called with Sutton, Hill, McLaurin and Carolyn Morrison voting to support sending the policy to committee.
When it came time to vote against Sutton's motion, no hands were raised. John Tedesco said he thought that they didn't have to vote because the other side hadn't gotten a majority.
Tedesco and the new board members were told that not voting was the same as voting for the motion. This drew an audible cry from the crowd that he should know the rules before he's elected.
The other board members then voted with Margiotta casting the deciding 5-4 vote against sending it committee.
Tedesco then proposed a motion for a five-minute recess, drawing a cry of "shame on you" from the crowd.
In disgust, a large group walked out of the meeting. But Sutton said it was during the recess when a compromise was worked out.
Goldman said they should revote because Sutton's motion had merit.
The board unanimously voted to reconsider the motion and send the policy to committee. Those still present at the meeting applauded.
“We did something together," Tedesco said after the revote.
UPDATE
Click here to see the proposed revision to the student assignment policy.

Comments
<a href="http://www.uggbootszone.info/ugg-classic-crochet-c-1423
Fri, 01/08/2010 - 22:31 — yuying520vcxniuhsefbv
"assignment will be based on proximity to residence"
Wed, 12/02/2009 - 20:25 — Athey01I was wondering if the node system will be changed or revamped as a result of this proposed change.
The node system groups
Wed, 12/02/2009 - 23:30 — realisticThe node system groups neighborhoods. Why would that need to change? I'm not so sure it is understood that the nodes geographically around each school are already assigned to that school. If we go to a neighborhood school plan, who exactly determines what neighborhood goes to what school? Do you displace neighborhood A, that has been at that school since it opened but may be outside the "neighborhood" ? Wood Valley comes to mind here. They opened Leesville upteen years ago. They built Leesville's parent and community support system. They have pride in that school. Do they get booted out of the Leesville High to make space for Brier Creek - a newer subdivision? If proximity is the only thing driving school assignment, how many students will get moved because they are not close enough? Again, the ramifications of decisions made by this board have yet to be seen. Expect the largest reassignment ever - could be as many as 30,000 children in one year.
As I understand it, Wood
Thu, 12/03/2009 - 15:18 — woodstockAs I understand it, Wood Valley has already been "booted out" of Leesville. They go to Millbrook. And, Brier Creek students are destined to Broughton. That is what the status quo provided. Does any of that make sense?
Many will welcome a reassignment.
Brier Creek was originally
Thu, 12/03/2009 - 15:50 — shank56Brier Creek was originally assigned to Broughton.
Then reassigned to Leesville High.
Then reassigned to Panther Creek (overcrowded.)
Now back to Broughton.
Who has been protecting the Leesville base all these years ?? A shift could have been done to get Br. Creek close to home .
Brier Creek
Thu, 12/03/2009 - 16:31 — loriacBrier Creek is interesting because it is designated as a high growth area in Raleigh's master plan, yet no schools are planned here. So - they start getting sent all over the place, or forcing massive displacements of people who want their neighborhood school (like Leesville).
No one was happy when Brier Creek showed up in the first round of assignments at Leesville - it's a huge number of students, so displaced a lot of kids east to fill up all the schools they are building there.
Agree with everybody that BC
Thu, 12/03/2009 - 17:46 — jenmanAgree with everybody that BC is problematic. I think the BOE/WCPSS/city of Raleigh better get busy finding some land for a HS out that way. The problem will only get worse as BC is a growth center and the scarce land in that area will only be harder to find the longer they wait.
And
Thu, 12/03/2009 - 17:08 — Bob_SconceAlso interesting because it's sandwiched between the Durham County line and the Airport. There's just not a bunch of available Wake County land around there to build a new school. I think we can all agree that Broughton is really too far away.
"I think we can all agree
Fri, 12/04/2009 - 21:24 — woodstock"I think we can all agree that Broughton is really too far away."
Well, I guess you should say that we can all agree except the status quo BoE who decided it was was not too far.
You are right
Fri, 12/04/2009 - 23:15 — shank56Hopefully the new board will do what's right for BC and shift those students to their closest school- Leesville.
Shame on Ms. Head for insisting that her constituents attend their neighborhood school.
"Shame on Ms. Head for
Sat, 12/05/2009 - 08:19 — woodstock"Shame on Ms. Head for insisting that her constituents attend their neighborhood school."
What are you talking about? Head converted Leesville schools to MYR, shipped BC students to Broughton and Wood Valley students to Millbrook, and bows to the wishes of the Big Picture; she didn't give a damn about her constituents. Fortunately Head is gone and there is someone with intellect and common sense to take her place.
You play BOE member
Sat, 12/05/2009 - 09:45 — shank56So you want to move BC to Leesville. Look at the attendance map.
Which nodes do YOU move out of Leesville ? Care to take a stab?
Do you move BC back to Panther Creek? How many mobiles does PC have now?
First, it has been beyond
Sat, 12/05/2009 - 11:10 — woodstockFirst, it has been beyond obvious for years that the Brier Creek area needs a middle and high school. So, better planning needs to occur. As to where the high school students should go until new ones are built, the obvious choices are Leesville, Panther Creek, or Green Hope. What does not make sense is Broughton.
The Brier Creek development -- and I am not just talking about the country club homes, as there are many townhouses and appartments in that area too -- started over a decade ago. It is not "new" as some claim, and it is booming. Shipping students from that area to Broughton is just plain ridiculous, and just shows the status quo board members did not know what to do and did not give a damn about their constituents.
"Which nodes do YOU move out of Leesville ? Care to take a stab?"
Sure, Ill take a stab. We can start with the students bused in from S. Saunders Street and Raleigh Blvd. But, personally, I don't care specifically where BC students -- or any other students in Wake County -- go to school as long as it is within a reasonable distance and the schedules meets their families' needs. Broughton is NOT reasonable for Brier Creek.
I think they identify more
Thu, 12/03/2009 - 19:26 — loriacI think they identify more w/ Panther Creek.
Wakefield is way too far away for Leesville folks. Even Millbrook is 45 min away during peak traffic, and people would be driving by Leesville to get there. Sending Brier Creek to Leesville doesn't make sense - they have to travel anyway since there's no school there (no surprise to anyone who buys a house there). Why push everyone who's close to Leesville to far away schools?
It's not a happy story, and they wisely pulled Brier Creek out of the assignment to Leesville.
Agree Broughton is a long
Thu, 12/03/2009 - 17:21 — user12345Agree Broughton is a long haul ... it is going to be a mess .. no land and they will end up bumping people who thought Leesville was their neighborhood school who might actually live closer but BC has it's back against the wall and has to go to the first nearest school which is Leesville. I thought the idea about Wake building a schools in Durham and letting BC go there was out of the box thinking. Otherwise with BC's growth Leesville will become BC's HS.
Yes, that is an interesting
Thu, 12/03/2009 - 17:26 — carson79Yes, that is an interesting idea indeed, seems like it would save $$. A lot of the original Leesville neighborhoods have already been redistricted to Millbrook or Wakefield to make room for the growth closer to Leesville.
And...
Thu, 12/03/2009 - 18:12 — Bob_SconceThere's definitely a shift east -- Wakefield and Millbrook will give students to Heritage and Forest Ridge/whatever the new school is, and probably draw more Leesville students.
That shows another problem -- ideally, there would be a school between Leesville and Wakefield. But, that's all in the Falls Watershed. And, we saw how pissy the city council got when the district tried to build an *elementary* school there.
The problem with building in Durham County is that Wake would have to pay property taxes. And, that's not likely to be politically popular. Maybe somebody can build a charter school across the line in Durham county and draw students from both counties.
Brier Creek middle school
Thu, 12/03/2009 - 19:22 — shank56Brier Creek middle school students have long been assigned to Daniels too.
I don't know what the current enrollment ramifications are of Daniels being de-magged, and I haven't looked at Carroll's enrollment, but it could be that a shift could be done with Leesville Middle and these other schools and keep all on a tradtional calendar.
It could be more than 30K.
Wed, 12/02/2009 - 23:36 — red_balloonIt could be more than 30K. Remember that years of mismanagement have to be undone.
I thought about this the
Wed, 12/02/2009 - 23:23 — jenmanI thought about this the other day too, athey. Especially all the ridiculous spot nodes.
Do you mean
Wed, 12/02/2009 - 23:57 — TrailerParkGirlDo you mean like the apartments I used to live in that are two blocks from Briarcliff in the middle of Cary and basically surrounded by nodes going to Briarcliff but they are assigned to Olive Chapel on the far side of Apex? When you look at the Olive Chapel assignment map it is a neighborhood school except that one node by its lonesome way across the map. I'm sure WCPSS had to do that to accomodate growth.
Are you suggesting they stop reassigning apartment dwellers and giving them crazy assignments because they supposedly won't know the difference or care? :-)
Spot nodes
Wed, 12/02/2009 - 23:36 — realisticSpot node - a node assigned to a school not necessarily closest to it before children move into the node (ie - new construction areas).
Parents complained in Community Engagement Meetings saying - why should a new neighborhood get access to the nearest school, displacing an existing neighborhood that has been at the school for years? Voila - spot nodes. This also reinforces stability for the school population.
I have real estate ties - we learned about spot nodes quickly when dealing with new construction. While it makes it more difficult to sell new construction, it is a fairer way to assign students in high growth areas. I wouldn't want to get kicked out of my school just because someone else moved in closer to it in a new subdivision.
I agree with you that some
Thu, 12/03/2009 - 11:34 — jenmanI agree with you that some spot nodes are there for a valid reason. But many of the nodes were developed with busing for diversity in mind. TPG said it well.
Schools were also built with bussing for diversity in mind, and
Fri, 12/04/2009 - 14:01 — BWNelsonthe facilities themselves are not real conducive to "community schools".
When I think of "community schools", I think of schools where kids within half a mile can certainly walk, where there are entrances close to the street, and where the outside facilities, playgrounds, tracks, tennis courts, can be used by the neighborhood.
Our base is at Reedy Creek and I haven't tracked it out formally, but I wouldn't be surprised if the distance from the road to the elementary school is 1/4 mile long, then the kids' playground is sequestered in the back. Secondly, kids have to be bussed and driven there no matter where they live because Reedy Creek is a very unsafe street for adults to cross and walk along, let alone children.
Also, the construction of the Reedy Creek site itself is more geared toward bussing and transportation than for student use, hence the long driveways the big parking lots, and the very small playground. I've heard that was the only way they could adequately use the site, but it sure falls in line with a mass bussing plan, especially when I see maps from the BOE with big arrows pointing from downtown to Reedy Creek. It would take me awhile to find that map, but I am not kidding when I say I have seen it.
But that's just Reedy Creek. Here's are two other schools that freaked me out when I saw them. Two other schools that I have seen that are disturbing when looked at through the "community schools" lens are Washington and Carnage. Both are well made, excellent schools, magnet schools, but the "community" surrounding them is unable to support truly community-minded people. When my husband and I checked out Washington, what we saw was a nice building in the middle of a very depressed post industrial area with no grocery stores, pharmacies, gas stations, or restaurants that make up a viable "community". Same thing when I checked out Carnage. So these are great buldings in areas where vibrant communities have very little chance of growing.
What's kind of sad to me is that the magnet concept was partially designed to eliminate this sort of community inequity. We're from Michigan, so I don't know how things were when this started, but I would bet that Wiley, probably Olds, and some of the key downtown schools were falling apart because people were leaving the neighborhood for the "suburbs". So the magnet system came in, revamped a whole lot of the schools, and the NC State connection along with appropriate family housing near the school were able to rebuild the community along with the property values. Maybe the community structure around Washington and Carnage has improved too, but I shudder to think what it was like before in that area, because even I, a person that loves cities, would not want to live there. And I don't consider those areas around Washington and Carnage "communities", because they don't have any of the things we all take for granted in "communities", like convenient grocery stores and drugstores, restaurants, gas stations, etc.
I'm not saying that Neighborhood Schools won't work, but to make them work will take a whole lot of time, a lot of effort, and also money. Thank goodness things were slowed down a bit at that board meeting, especially for those newly elected board members. I hope this new board will be willing to do the required work and find the money to do it because the amount of uproar that the old school board saw is going to seem like peanuts if parents have to take their kids from schools they like and have gotten used to and put them either in over crowded, poorly designed schools, or else in under crowded, poorly supported schools.
Diversity will seem like peanuts. Don't think that every parent is unhappy with the way things are, and don't underestimate what a large group of really mad parents can do. Keep that in mind when you talk about reassigning 30 thousand students. Most of them are probably happy with their school, I have met very few parents unhappy with their school. Not that I've met huge amounts, but quite a few from different schools, both magnet and non. I'd say that I've talked to maybe 50 parents from different schools over the course of the last year.
I'm just sayin. Don't shoot the messenger here. I realize this is a fightin' take-no-prisoners-ya-hafta-break-a-few-eggs crowd on this blog, and I am hesitant even to post comments here after all the vitriol I have been reading. But there you go.
Don't be freaked out
Fri, 12/04/2009 - 16:35 — TrailerParkGirlFrom my understanding of the sort of community schools like what Arne Duncan supports is that they are started in struggling (for lack of a better word) communities. They then become the centerpiece for starting to "rebuild" the community. Yes, it is going to take a lot of work. IMO the community (both the immediate and larger) either have to find the will to do the hard work or remain stagnet. There is no "easy button" for success (like just put kids on bus across town). Life doesn't work that way. As far as money that comes through public-public and public-private partnerships.
I'm not familiar with Carnage, but Washington does have the sorts of things you mentioned within walking distance, except for a grocery store (as far as I know). There was supposed to be one going in to a new building to be built near Wilmington and Davie, but I believe that is on hold due to the economy. There's a gas station across from the Cargill plant and a number of restaurants as you get on the other side of Shaw, not that many of the nearby residents could afford a lot of them. There used to be a pharmacy nearby, but it closed a few years ago. However, there is a CVS downtown.
Having lived in higher poverty areas, I can tell you that the lack of things you mentioned are not uncommon. I think many people don't understand just what a pain it can be to get basic things done like grocery shopping or laundry with no car and/or washer/dryer and no nearby stores. Unfortuneately, those areas often simply cannot economically sustain businesses. They still consider themselves a community though and they definately know their neighbors (as socializing with neighbors is affordable entertainment). I would say more so than I've seen in some surburban settings.
"I'm not saying that
Fri, 12/04/2009 - 15:58 — user12345"I'm not saying that Neighborhood Schools won't work, but to make them work will take a whole lot of time, a lot of effort, and also money"
You are right and we all know it ... but it may not come down like you think ... they only need to get their inner circle into the good schools to repay the contributions ... everyone knows that every child can not go to the closest school so there are some unhappy parents who think things will change and there are parents who love their present school who will be booted out for the newbie supporters who live closer who will be unhappy. The newbie’s won't be able to do much beyond satisfying a few folks who made contributions in the end which is all they need to do to keep the cash flowing for the next election. Ultimately, I think we will find that Ron put one over on the rest of the county for the benefit of his district.
I don't believe that
Fri, 12/04/2009 - 15:57 — NWRaleighMomI don't believe that neighborhoods around Wiley were ever failing apart.
I don't think it was that
Mon, 12/07/2009 - 01:01 — carson79I don't think it was that they were "failing apart" (did you mean "falling"?) but that there was white flight or just aging of the demographics so there were less people and the schools were under-enrolled while far-flung schools were crowded.
Ever visited Carnage as the poster mentioned?
Not all spot nodes are new construction
Thu, 12/03/2009 - 00:16 — TrailerParkGirlHave you thought about a username change to not always realistic?
See my post above. I lived in those apartments in 1994 and they were by no means new then either.
Spot node - concentration of ED students in low-rent apartments or trailer parks that make easy targets for reassignment and bussing to create "diversity" at distant school.
Or 'high income areas as well'
Thu, 12/03/2009 - 10:09 — J8307200I live in an area that is a spot node that the houses range from 400,000-700,000 and have been a spot node for over 5 years. We have been reassigned several times over the last 5 years. We will not be aligned with the rest of the neighborhood which surrounds us on all sides for at least two more years. My children are on different calendars and my oldest bussed 17 miles away from my home. FYI - we are moving at the end of the school year back to where we are from simply to gain some sanity in our lives again and maybe reconnect as a family. Unfortunately as much as I would like it to change and have worked hard for it, change will not happen soon enough for us!
Good point
Thu, 12/03/2009 - 10:16 — TrailerParkGirlHow about this:
Spot node - concentration of ED students in low-rent apartments or trailer parks or concentration of NED students often targeted for reassignment and bussing to create "diversity" at distant school.
BTW - sorry to hear you are leaving but can't blame you. Best wishes.
Do you have any examples of
Fri, 12/04/2009 - 12:38 — carson79Do you have any examples of busing non-ED kids to increase balance at a distant school - NOT related to growth or keeping kids who already lived in the area at the schools they'd been attending?? Honestly wondering.
I thought all the spot Non-ED nodes were for growth? like Brier Creek
Yes. There were several
Fri, 12/04/2009 - 22:46 — ApexterYes. There were several nodes (4?) located off the Cary Parkway between Lake Pine Drive, Old Apex Road, Laura Duncan Road, and Hwy 64. Eight years ago, these were among the first largely NED nodes reassigned to a distant school for diversity. They were reassigned from Baucom (and Briarcliff) to Dillard Drive Elementary, which was very underenrolled because (a) WCPSS chose to build both Dillard Drive and Yates Mill Elementary within 1 mile of existing Swift Creek Elementary, even though this resulted in an excess of capacity there, and (b) more than 50% of the locals who would have been attending the local school (to balance out the ED kids being bussed there from the WakeMed Hospital area) magneted out, leaving their base school underenrolled. (For the record, there were 17 elementary schools closer to these neighborhoods than Dillard Drive.)his area.) WCPSS had planned to move nearby nodes in MacGregor West and another neighborhood on the other side of Hwy 64 to Swift Creek at the same time (for largely the same reasoning), but that group had more political clout and got out of it.
When Laurel Park was opened last year (inside one of these assignment nodes), the nodes were reassigned to MYR at Laurel Park. Their traditional calendar alternative was Joyner Elementary ---- something like 16 miles away. (This year, the traditional alternative was changed to Baucom when Baucom was converted back from MYR to traditional. Note that Baucom had protested its conversion to MYR in the first place because they knew that Laurel Park would be opening just a couple of miles away the following year.)
The reassignments to a DISTANT school were not done for growth. Had WCPSS chosen to build the schools where growth was occuring at the time, the kids could've been reassigned to a local school. Instead, WCPSS chose to build schools where there was already adequate capacity on the busable rim so that they could bus kids from either the inner city or the outer edge of the county.
The new board has a tough
Fri, 12/04/2009 - 23:09 — red_balloonThe new board has a tough job on hand: re-aligning infrastructure geared for busing and diversity to support a new system focusing on quality education for all with community involvement. This will cost a bit and will take time but will pay dividends in the long run.
Wood Valley
Fri, 12/04/2009 - 17:29 — loriacWood Valley nodes are sent to the 5th closest elementary school to balance diversity at that school. The agreement was that WV would then go to Leesville middle, high schools. Then - WV was transferred to West Millbrook middle, and Leesville middle was made YR.
Since WV is sent so far to Jeffrey's Grove, the feeder node system is now all messed up. Feeder nodes only work if you start at the right elementary school.
West Millbrook also needed Wood Valley's 'numbers' - so even though there's PLENTY of room at Leesville Middle, WV was reassigned to West Millbrook.
Not a happy story because of the broken promises.... many people opted out of Jeffrey's Grove this year. (to private or homeschooling) And, of course, NO ONE wanted Leesville middle to go year-round. (talk about screwing up a perfectly good school, but that's another story)
There are some nodes in Wake
Fri, 12/04/2009 - 16:57 — jenmanThere are some nodes in Wake Forest that are sent 17 miles to Knightdale HS. If I recall correctly, they live within walking distance of WF-R HS. They're finally being moved to a closer HS in a year or two.
Look at the maps yourself and you'll find them.
NED bussed
Fri, 12/04/2009 - 15:56 — TrailerParkGirlI don't know what the examples are but I had read on the blog (some time ago) about that being the case. From what I can remember of one they were told they were "needed" at a more distant ES for balancing and if they would agree to that then they would get a closer MS assignment, but they never got the closer MS assignment. I got the impression that might have been in Raleigh/N Raleigh somewhere.
I'm more personally familiar with some ED spot nodes. I'm on the Rim where the NED are "needed" in the nearby schools so am less familiar with NED bussing.
Maybe you could repost your question as a new comment for more response from those more familiar with that situation?
The audience
Wed, 12/02/2009 - 16:54 — SDR256I agree, the audience arrived armed for bear. They made quite a scene.
If in fact the board changed tact based on the audience reaction you have to recognize what a huge difference that is from the exiting board which might've watched people commit hari kari in the audience and would not have given an inch.
Like it or not, these board members are fresh from plenty of conversations with real voters and this is what they understand they've been asked to do. Its not a position you will find articulated in the media anywhere, so unless you're tapped into it, it may seem shocking. The media really should do a better job of reporting both sides of the story and then it would be clear there is a huge majority out there who just see it very differently than the rigid party line normally reported. This board will work toward academic achievement for all children and said so last night, with their words and the wording of their resolutions. They simply believe the means to that end is a separate path than the one that has gotten us the miserable 54.2% ED graduation rate 'achievement'.
Wow Part xxx
Wed, 12/02/2009 - 18:55 — supportwcpssHow quickly we forget. I remember the behavior of Wake Cares supporters at Board meetings. One meeting I attended some man who spoke in support of the diversity policy was accosted by woman with Wake Cares stickers.
But we conveniently forget about it.
....
Wed, 12/02/2009 - 19:16 — SideburnsI don't remember WakeCares having stickers.
And accosted? Really? Was Hitler there?
Ask
Thu, 12/03/2009 - 09:23 — supportwcpssAsk Wake Cares about some of those meetings. That type of behavior is independent of which side you are on.
Least we forget
Wed, 12/02/2009 - 19:49 — Voice_of_Reason_Hitler was far left wing! A Socialist in fact.
LOL... good one
Wed, 12/02/2009 - 19:22 — aquaman4life68LOL... good one sideburns!!!!!
Perfectly put! Most of the
Wed, 12/02/2009 - 16:57 — aquaman4life68Perfectly put!
Most of the audience was NCAE members, some of them are not teachers...they are custodians, bus drivers, etc. that do not "teach" the children and deal with all the things that the teachers and parents have had to tolerate.
Rules were broken
Wed, 12/02/2009 - 16:09 — realisticThe picture in the N&O today of the 4 board members was three seconds too late - had the photographer been two steps quicker you would have seen the 5 board members violating the Open Meetings Law. They called a 5 minute recess to confer with each other. N&O ran up, NBC 17 ran up, and had to explain to them they could not conduct such a group meeting and exclude the press and public. Also, during the 2nd public speaker sign up, Mr Margiotta allowed a gentleman to speak last without signing up - just by raising his hand. When the public cried foul, he instructed his friend to sit back down. What I saw were four newly elected people who decided to circumvent committees and ramrod their idologies all the way down to our children, without due process. It was obvious the resolutions were orchestrated by one or two of them, because when quesitoned, some of the others could not answer the questions posed by Dr Burns without looking at another board member for back up. Not one of them asked what the ramifications of these policy changes would be - very short sighted, and not leadership. Folks - you may think these new board members know what they are doing, but you are going to get more than you bargained for. And it won't be pretty to your tax bill or your property values. Don't say you weren't warned!
They were elected to get the
Wed, 12/02/2009 - 19:58 — red_balloonThey were elected to get the job done and I daresay they are off to a good start. I am sure you will agree given some time.
Picture says it all-funny
Wed, 12/02/2009 - 17:51 — shank56Ron has already served as a school board chairman/president back in Jersey - as we've been reminded many times.
Forget Robert's rules of order... now its Ron's rules from Jersey.
"Forget Robert's rules of
Thu, 12/03/2009 - 15:21 — woodstock"Forget Robert's rules of order... now its Ron's rules from Jersey."
Yes, Ron Rules!
That's right, let's pick
Wed, 12/02/2009 - 16:41 — aquaman4life68That's right, let's pick apart every move they made. Let's see if they violate the number of times they blinked per minute. This was THE FIRST meeting folks, BUT I'm glad to see everyone scared, its time for the shoe to be on the other foot!
I say let them open fire questions to Del...I have an even better idea, I would like to see Del stand up to a group of tired teachers that he has run over for the past 3 or 4 years.
I didn't know we had so many PERFECT people in the world, until I joined this blog?!?!? LOL
Must be a newbie
Wed, 12/02/2009 - 18:51 — supportwcpssThis blog has been picking apart the old board members on every move they made - some of value and some irrelevant.