Things seem to be pointing in the direction of Beverley Clark becoming the new chairwoman of the school board today.
Amid the behind-the-scenes wrangling, it would seem that Clark has the votes to win this afternoon's election over Kevin Hill. Then again, Lori Millberg thought she had the votes until the last minute last year.
One thing to see today is whether the vote is unanimous. That would mean that one of the hopefuls realizes he/she can't win and wants to put on a show of solid support for the new chair.
Clark has never been chairwoman during her 10 years on the board. Hill has been on the board for two years.
Usually the new chair in an election year would be someone running for re-election. But three of the four incumbents aren't running for re-election.

Comments
I think the incumbent...
Sun, 07/12/2009 - 12:06 — infiniqueI think the fact that the incumbents are not running for re-election is a good signal that the new team would be able to rope in their team and do a good job.
With the current economic crisis and uncertainty, we can only hope for the best. I am hopeful we will turn this around and negate the deficits right now.
Jason Seoul
Please fix
Thu, 06/18/2009 - 18:22 — Dadof3Keung, there is "b" tag that needs to be properly closed in this post: http://blogs.newsobserver.com/wakeed/selecting-the-new-wake-school-board-chair-today#comment-58277
otherwise, it's a run-on bold problem for all successive posts. Thanks!
was it EVER about the kids?
Tue, 06/16/2009 - 14:21 — AngelaWGill Marks Last Day On School Board
Veteran Wake County school board member Rosa Gill marked her last day on the board Tuesday. Gill's depature comes after her selection by the Wake Democratic Committee as N.C. House District 33 Representative.
Gill succeeds former Rep. Dan Blue, who was selected to take the Senate seat vacated on the death of State Sen. Vernon Malone.
Gill said in an interview Friday that she has always aspired to be part of the General Assembly and was not worried about what would happen with her district's representation on the board.
"I think the individual who will replace me will be one who has the same views that I have voiced in the past," she said.
...
Thu, 06/18/2009 - 18:26 — Dadof3...
Ron M.......
Tue, 06/16/2009 - 12:51 — WuptdoRon M would be the obvious choice for Chairman. He has a great relationship with his community and most the WCC's respect him. In these tough times, you need someone at the helm to make the tough decisions, and those with education background do NOT know what a tough decision is.
FYI -- don't forget folks, sometime in the near future, WCPSS is going to be asking for another $500-900 million dollars in bond money.
sometime in the near
Tue, 06/16/2009 - 13:26 — gwaihirsometime in the near future, WCPSS is going to be asking for another $500-900 million dollars in bond money
=====
Depending on your definition of "near future", my opinion is that they won't get it.
In the "near future", people will be much more worried about making ends meet than they will be about WCPSS buildings.
That's funny!
Tue, 06/16/2009 - 14:14 — g88ky07I never totally forget about the "next time" I get to hear FOWC and Ann tell us how we need to pony up, but you are correct, bond passage in this county won't happen again for years!
Sorry Stan, I know that will break your heart to hear that, but you and Rakestraw can cry about it on your own time!
Until they can fill up the schools they have, talk of bonds is just hilarious!
chaboard
Tue, 06/16/2009 - 12:48 — RiversideRealistThank you (and all the other drones that keep blabbing) for always being a an example of the point I, and people like me, are trying to make.
It's so nice to have a visual aid :) Saves me a lot of time.
"
Tue, 06/16/2009 - 12:38 — RiversideRealist...government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem. From time to time we've been tempted to believe that society has become too complex to be managed by self-rule, that government by an elite group is superior to government for, by, and of the people. Well, if no one among us is capable of governing himself, then who among us has the capacity to govern someone else?"
[bold is my emphasis]
Amen, AMEN, A M E N.
Those were the words of a
Tue, 06/16/2009 - 12:43 — chaboardThose were the words of a very, very stupid man. Well, they were probaby Peggy Noonans words but they were READ by a very stupid man.
Ron Margiotta for Chairman
Tue, 06/16/2009 - 09:15 — kmisegadesThe obvious choice of course is Ron Margiotta:
1. By far the most intelligent member of the BOE
2. By far the most responsive member of the BOE
3. By far the least PC member of the BOE
4. Has a disproportionate number of families and students in his district, that alone should justify his election
Remember that Ron is the
Thu, 06/18/2009 - 14:25 — user1234Remember that Ron is the only board member without any Title I schools and most of his schools are either Distinction or Honors so he does not have the same concerns/issues as the other eight members or most of Wake county.
Yet, according to Keung
Tue, 06/16/2009 - 09:35 — shank56Yet, according to Keung last week, Ron will not be attending the meeting today.
Hmmm...
Tue, 06/16/2009 - 09:20 — supportwcpssIf it means taking ron's vote away I might be all for it.
Interesting how a supporter of "diversity"
Tue, 06/16/2009 - 11:03 — Falconly wants their own views represented.
Do you get the irony - even a little?
Charters and Government Meddling
Tue, 06/16/2009 - 09:13 — kmisegadesThese statements ought to go over like a lead balloon in Raleigh, dead-set against unlimited charters in NC.
While the news sounds encouraging, this line is chilling:
"To be clear, this administration is not looking to open unregulated and unaccountable schools."
So, who would regulate them? The same administrations that have given us our current failed government schools!
The best solution of course would be vouchers and tuition tax credits, with absolutely no strings attached from any government entities. Free markets will respond to the needs of families and regulate themselves far better than an agenda-driven government ever could.
Speaking Of Charters
Tue, 06/16/2009 - 12:36 — chaboard...major national study of charters released yesterday.
North Carolina A
Tue, 06/16/2009 - 12:44 — AngelaWNorth Carolina
A supplemental report, with an in-depth examination of the results for charter schools in North
Carolina found that reading gains were significantly higher and math gains significantly lower in
charter school students compared to their traditional public school peers. For students that are
low income, charter schools had a larger and more positive effect on reading and no difference in
math compared to their traditional public school peers. African-American students performed significantly below their traditional public school counterparts in math, with no discernable difference in reading.
The results also suggest that new charter school students in North Carolina do about the same in
reading and have an initial loss of learning in math compared to their counterparts in traditional
public schools. In subsequent years, charter school students show no significantly different or
better gains in reading and math from charter school attendance compared to their counterparts in
traditional public schools.
Overall State Results
The report found that achievement results varied by states that reported individual data. States
with reading and math gains that were significantly higher for charter school students than would
have occurred in traditional schools included: Arkansas, Colorado (Denver), Illinois (Chicago),
Louisiana and Missouri.
States with reading and math gains that were either mixed or were not different than their peers in the traditional public school system included: California, the District of Columbia, Georgia and North Carolina.
Hmm.
Tue, 06/16/2009 - 09:23 — Bob_SconceKent -- is that a reference to Angela's post (in which case the "administration" would be the Obama administration)?
Nobody's talking about unaccountable schools. But, accountability comes from the same place that it does when you buy a bicycle or a wheelbarrow -- if the product stinks, nobody buys it and the company goes out of business. Being "accountable" to the government basically just means being subject to the whims of politicians.
[BTW... Is Thales-WF going to expand to 7th & 8th grades?]
Interesting...
Tue, 06/16/2009 - 09:19 — supportwcpssJust like free markets created interest only loans and lead to record number of foreclosures. But I guess you would consider that 'free markets' correcting themselves.
Hardly....
Tue, 06/16/2009 - 09:32 — Bob_SconceA huge culprit in the whole crisis was the federal government, through things like the community reinvestment act and a politically-driven shift at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac toward lending money to people who didn't meet the traditional criteria.
It used to be that a mortgage required 20% down, payments no more than 28% of income and total debt payments no more than 35% of income. But, the government (largely past presidents and congresspeople, many of whom are still on the Hill) decided to expand the "dream of homeownership" by, among other things, making 0% down mortgages and, yes, interest-only loans available to people who didn't have 20% to put down.
In any case, you cannot use one extremely degenerate situation, even a large one, to prove that capitalism doesn't work, when there is so much overwhelming evidence in the other direction.
Never said
Tue, 06/16/2009 - 09:37 — supportwcpssCapitalism didn't work. Never even gave any subtle hint that I said that. But to sit here and say government is all bad and free markets solve all the problems of the world is just ridiculous. There are good and bad examples on both sides of this chasm.
There is a balance, one Kent has no clue about.
He wants a survival of the fittest scenario with every situation in our community.
?
Tue, 06/16/2009 - 15:32 — Bob_SconceSorry. A knee-jerk reaction -- I'm used to people using the financial meltdown as some sort of argument that capitalism doesn't work, and I attributed that to you.
When it comes to schools, doesn't everybody want survival of the fittest? The schools that do the best job of educating students should survive, and the ones that do the worst job should disappear. Unfortunately, public school are often allowed to fail year after year.
"When it comes to schools,
Thu, 06/18/2009 - 14:15 — user1234"When it comes to schools, doesn't everybody want survival of the fittest? "
Only if everyone starts off with the same distribution of kids. Putting all the poor, non-English speaking, Special Ed kids in one school and all the wealthy smart kids in another school and watching the first group fail compared to the second school is not much of a contest.
Love versus cash
Thu, 06/18/2009 - 15:01 — Dadof3For the record, I'm not a Nietzschean and I reject such a model for any developmental process.
For a strict materialist, I suppose you might think that the poor are doomed to fail on their own. While I'm not arguing against better provision to public education, I don't buy your "more money equals better education" premise, nor the soft bigotry that the poorer financial classes are doomed to failure. Stated more bluntly, I don't buy your "your rich kids can beat up my poor kids" premise.
To wit: what is a greater predictor of student success; parental involvement or state dictates? What better enables effective and remedial parental involvement? A financially poor kid with loving and involved parents have an unmistakable edge that the rich student with "too busy" parents at SAS Academy longs for.
You keep talking about
Thu, 06/18/2009 - 15:37 — user1234You keep talking about theory ... if you are going to have schools compete head on head and delete the bad ones you can not put all A player on one team and the B players on other team be surprised at the outcome. Everyone knows that B player can win the superbowl with the right coach and everyone knows that if their parents discover religion and become 100% involved over night things change. So it is possible but not probable. It seems the people who want to go head to head and compete school to school are people with all the A players who know the outcome.
Theory?!?
Thu, 06/18/2009 - 16:27 — Dadof3So "love versus cash" is a theoretical proposition for you? There's no rational argument around that. It's like having to argue that a cloudless daytime sky is blue.
That's a profoundly bigoted statement. No class of people are "better" than another.
Bad schools, bad schools,
Thu, 06/18/2009 - 16:14 — CaryCurmudgeonBad schools, bad schools, whatcha gonna do.....
"if you are going to have schools compete head on head and delete the bad ones"
Exactly what is a "bad" school? Is is dominated by bad students? Bad teachers? Bad buildings?
Seems like people grade
Thu, 06/18/2009 - 17:12 — user1234Seems like people grade schools using scores ... so I guess we would delete schools based on scoring. They might be bad because of students, teachers or administrators.
Through the mirror darkly
Thu, 06/18/2009 - 18:18 — Dadof3I can barely tell what your point is, but it speaks volumes that you exclude "parents" from the list of influencers.
Hint: parents are a crucial factor to student success. That's not theory, either.
OT-alert
Tue, 06/16/2009 - 08:43 — AngelaWPRESS RELEASES
States Open to Charters Start Fast in 'Race to Top'
Education Secretary Seeking Autonomy with Real Accountability for School Innovators
FOR RELEASE:
June 8, 2009 Contact: John White, Press Secretary
john.white@ed.gov
(202) 401-1576
Emphasizing the need for additional effective education entrepreneurs to join the work of reforming America's lowest performing public schools, U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan told reporters during a conference call this afternoon that states must be open to charter schools. Too much is at stake for states financially and for students academically to restrict choice and innovation.
"States that do not have public charter laws or put artificial caps on the growth of charter schools will jeopardize their applications under the Race to the Top Fund," Secretary Duncan said. "To be clear, this administration is not looking to open unregulated and unaccountable schools. We want real autonomy for charters combined with a rigorous authorization process and high performance standards."
This summer, the Department of Education begins accepting state applications for the federal government's largest one-time investment in K-12 public school reform. By the end of the year, the department will be distributing grants from the $4.35 billion Race to the Top Fund. Also, $1.5 billion in Title I School Improvement Program funds is available to improve teaching and learning for all children.
"I am advocating for using whatever models work for students, and particularly where improvements have stagnated for years," Secretary Duncan said. "We cannot continue to do that same thing and expect different results. We cannot let another generation of children be deprived of their civil right to a quality education."
President Obama has called upon states to encourage the expansion of charter schools. A network of innovative and high-achieving charter schools can be an important part of a state's school reform effort. However, charter schools are facing significant obstacles to expansion in too many states.
For example:
Ten states do not have laws allowing public charter schools;
In the 40 states with charters, 26 put artificial caps on the number of public charter schools and President Obama has called on states to lift these caps and other barriers to having a healthy network of charter schools throughout the country;
In Maine, the state legislature is debating a bill that would establish a pilot program for its first 10 charter schools;
Tennessee has not moved on a bill to lift enrollment restrictions on charter schools; and
In Indiana, the legislature is considering a moratorium on new charter schools.
These actions are restricting reforms, limiting choices for parents and students, and denying children access to new high-quality instruction.
Very timely article
Tue, 06/16/2009 - 09:30 — designmanWow, that is a timely and eye-opening article. The ideas expressed, such as...
"I am advocating for using whatever models work for students, and
particularly where improvements have stagnated for years," Secretary
Duncan said. "We cannot continue to do that same thing and expect
different results."
and
"These actions are restricting reforms, limiting choices for parents and
students, and denying children access to new high-quality instruction."
...may cause some on the Wake County school board to go into convultions. The very concepts of innovation and parental choice is contrary to their view of education policy.