WakeEd

The WakeEd blog is devoted to discussing and answering questions about the major issues facing the Wake County school system. How much will the new Democratic majority on the school board do to undo the changes made by Republicans since 2009? Will the new student assignment plan be a hybrid of the last two models or primarily be a return to the use of busing for diversity? Who will replace Tony Tata as the new superintendent of the state's largest district? How will voters react to a likely request in 2013 to borrow potentially more than $1 billion to build and renovate schools?

WakeEd is maintained by The News & Observer's Wake schools reporter, T. Keung Hui. While Keung posts information and analysis on the issues, keep us posted on your suggestions, questions, tips and what you're doing to cope with the changes in Wake's schools.

Choose a blog

School board to vote on changing how action items are added to agenda

Bookmark and Share

The Wake County school board is scheduled to vote today on a pair of policies that could impact how the new Democratic majority adds action items to the agenda.

The board vote on Policy 1322 would revise how the regular agenda could be amended. It says that action items such as resolutions may only be added to the board agenda if they're consistent with the requirements of Policy 1321.

The board is also supposed to vote on revising Policy 1321 so that when board members request action on an item they'd have to "provide the Board with adequate data and back-up information." The current policy only puts that onus on providing data on the superintendent.

Both policies are scheduled for first reading. But if two-thirds of the board agrees, they could be approved today on one vote with no requirement for a second reading.

These policies come after charges made the last two years by critics of the Republican board majority that they acted without data or backup information. It's an issue that was also raised by AdvancED.

UPDATE

The items were added to the agenda in response to the AdvancED report.

During the work session, the board agreed to modify the wording on Policy 1322 to say that it would take a two-thirds vote of those present to have an action item added at the start of the meeting.

The revision on Policy 1321 has been removed from the agenda because it's felt that the two-thirds requirement added to Policy 1322 will address the issue.

The revision to Policy 1322 was unanimously approved on first reading. The new majority will handle the second and final reading.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

You bring up those people...

but you aren't arguing the fact             about       what the Board is doing---mucking it up during the 11th hour by changing policy because they think they can.  Tear down the house while I give you the keys--have a nice day !.

Burns resigned.  Dulaney retired (after about three years of you people calling for him to go ahead and quit).  Head and Millberg didn't run again. 

Everyone knows what the Republicans did when they were elected, how they did it (meeting behind closed doors and surprising the other board members with resolutions nobody had seen) and the impact it had.  Putting lipstick on those five Repuplican pigs won't make them prettier.

Tedesco said the other day on television that he hopes there is no December 7th surprise....how sad he equates his country being attacked with accusing another political party of "maybe doing" what he and his sick cronies did in 2009.  I said it before, and I'll say it again, he is psychotic.

If Tata quits, you better believe his spin machine will be "ahead of" that story and we will all be better off for that last chapter in this farce.

...

...mucking it up during the 11th hour by changing policy because they think they can.

It appears that Rev. Barber's complaint has driven this policy change.

 

Can you share with me the report?

I didn't see it on the WCPSS website or on the BOE agenda, or here. 

I only wish that paperwork filed by Rev. Barber more than an year and half ago, perhaps--maybe--sorta--kinda encouraged the Gang of Five to do anything.  In case you haven't been paying attention, they don't care about him, or his organization, or his opinion of what they do.

So...

Nor should they care what he thinks. He is a wart -- not good for anything, pops up in inconvenient places and is hard to get rid of.

But, it is worthwhile to keep the AdvancEd accreditation, if only because the public believes it has value.  And that's what they re doing.

Wart? You might be described as a

hemorrhoid, however painful you might be.  I ask again, where is the report for which this action is being taken? 

?

Yeah yeah.  That's funny.

http://www.wcpss.net/news/2011_mar16_accreditation/110316_advanced_report.pdf

See pages 13 and 14.

Funny as a wart

isn't it?

Click here for the AdvancED

Click here for the AdvancED report.

Thanks Keung

That is all I was looking for.

truthBtold - PWNED! 'Nuf

truthBtold - PWNED! 'Nuf said.
 

this could have been done last March, when the report was issued

better late than never I guess.  It's a good legacy for Ron...

How political and hypocritical.

What a good example of pure politicking these republicans are. I am so glad they have been kicked out. I sincerely hope Tedesco quits too - that is not too uncommon amongst tea-partiers and republicans. When the going gets tough they quit.

They quit?

Like Burns? Like Dulaney? Like Head? Like Millberg?

I see your new plumbers haven't fixed your sewer leak yet.

You forgot Gill...

You forgot Gill...

Gill had a higher calling

Nancy Petty and the Rev B told her she was needed elsewhere to do great things.

Cars View All
Find a Car
Go
Jobs View All
Find a Job
Go
Homes View All
Find a Home
Go

Want to post a comment?

In order to join the conversation, you must be a member of newsobserver.com. Click here to register or to log in.

About the blogger

T. Keung Hui covers Wake schools.
Advertisements