WakeEd

The WakeEd blog is devoted to discussing and answering questions about the major issues facing the Wake County school system. How much will the new Democratic majority on the school board do to undo the changes made by Republicans since 2009? Will the new student assignment plan be a hybrid of the last two models or primarily be a return to the use of busing for diversity? Who will replace Tony Tata as the new superintendent of the state's largest district? How will voters react to a likely request in 2013 to borrow potentially more than $1 billion to build and renovate schools?

WakeEd is maintained by The News & Observer's Wake schools reporter, T. Keung Hui. While Keung posts information and analysis on the issues, keep us posted on your suggestions, questions, tips and what you're doing to cope with the changes in Wake's schools.

Choose a blog

Recapping the COW meeting

Bookmark and Share

Here's a recap of today's Wake County school board committee of the whole session.

Much of the COW was focused on the calendar surveys and the criteria that will be used by staff to make recommendations for which schools to convert.

The date for staff to bring recommendations has been pushed back from Feb. 16 to March 2. This will allow all four community engagement meetings to take place before staff comes forward.

The March 2 date now means that the board will hear the recommendations the day after Asst. Supt. Chuck Dulaney retires.

Supt. Del Burns warned today that the longer it takes to make calendar changes for 2010-11 the harder it will be on schools preparing for next school year. The upshot is that April would be next to impossible so a call would have to be in March.

School board member Carolyn Morrison made a pitch to delay implementation of calendar changes and ending mandatory year-round until the 2011-12 school year.

School board vice chairwoman Debra Goldman stressed to her colleagues that they keep in mind that it won't be easy on schools making changes so late in the process. But she didn't outright say delay implementation.

At Goldman's suggestion, the board also agreed today to include staff among those who will take the calendar survey.

The board agreed to have staff use this criteria for conversion: school capacity, parental choice, impact of the calendar change on a school's instructional program, interest in year-round education, staff interest, ability to offer alternatives to students and teachers and matching middle school calendars.

The criteria is a variation of what was used to determine which schools to convert to year-round in 2007.

Other tidbits, which I'll cover in more detail in other posts, include Dulaney saying they expect that that the resolution ending mandatory year-round will lead to an increase in the number of people accepted into year-round schools. He said they're also recommending giving traditional-calendar choices to people who are assigned to modified-calendar schools.

Earlier in the COW, Asst. Supt. David Holdkzom talked about the calendar survey. He said that as of this morning there had been 21,000 English responses and 300 Spanish responses.

Holdkzom downplayed the fraud concerns that have been raised about the survey, saying it would be hard for a person to randomly come up with a correct NCWISE number for the survey. He said less than 1 percent of the surveys responses were fraudulent or duplicates.

Holdzkom said they've been able to help a few people who called his office to say they had inadvertantly filled out an application more than once. He said he doesn't have the staff to be able to handle those requests on a wide scale basis.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

What I watched was polite

What I watched was polite discussion with valid questions and concerns from all, especailly Ms. Goldman.

The old regime made

The old regime made districtwide changes over a very short period of time to create this mess. It sounds like the survey scheme, now the delay of gathering, analyzing and reporting those results (pushing it out now until March), is being done purposefully as a delaying tactic.

Their surveys are useless, the data is not analyzed or used in a purposeful manner. It's just the very act of the survey itself that seems to add some value and credence. Seems that just an enrollment process for kids for next year and declaring what/where you want would have served a better purpose than just an opinion poll. Sort of like when the conversions were made in 2007.

Or what if they made regions (don't use the nodes) within the WCPSS district, and change a "region" at a time to the new format whatever that is). Just start somewhere. Delay is not helping the families who have to choose camps, summer programs, schedules by early March also. Everything old is new again.

Pointless

post.

Cars View All
Find a Car
Go
Jobs View All
Find a Job
Go
Homes View All
Find a Home
Go

Want to post a comment?

In order to join the conversation, you must be a member of newsobserver.com. Click here to register or to log in.

About the blogger

T. Keung Hui covers Wake schools.
Advertisements