It's no accident that Wake County school board member Kevin Hill is only on one board committee.
As noted in today's article, school board chairman Ron Margiotta said he only had Hill on the human resources committee because of his lack of cooperation with the new board majority.
Margiotta said he obtained copies of e-mails Hill had sent to members of the public trying to "stir up the pot" against the majority.
"Kevin Hill has been the most critical of what we're trying to do," Margiotta said in the article. "The committees can be adjusted once I feel Kevin Hill is willing to be more cooperative."
Hill said placing him and Anne McLaurin on only a few committees contradicted the notion that the majority wants to work with the minority. Combined, Hill and McLaurin are on three committees. They're not chairs or vice chairs.
All four new board members are on between three and five committees. All are committee chairs with Debra Goldman and John Tedesco chairing two apiece.
But Tedesco pointed to how they can work with members of the minority, particularly Keith Sutton and Carolyn Morrison. Combined, Sutton and Morrison chair one committee and are vice chairs on four committees. (I'm not including the so-called legislative committee as an actual committee.)
Margiotta says he honored most of the committee requests that board members had made.
In McLaurin's case, she said she had asked to stay on the policy and student achievement committees. She's still on policy but is now on the facilities committee.
"I guess the board will do whatever it wants to do," McLaurin said. "I'll serve wherever I am on."
Click here for the new committee list. Click here for the list that had been developed by Hill before Margiotta was elected chairman.
Hill would have had the other eight board members each serve on two standing committees. All the committees would have had four members.
Margiotta's new committees have three members. Hill said he's concerned that having fewer members will cut down on the diversity of thoughts on the committees.
All board members can attend any commitee meetings. But only the committee members can vote in those meetings.
Hill would have kept Margiotta as chair of the policy committee.
Margiotta said he had been asked before to lead the policy committee because the old board considered it to be a "meaningless committee."
During Margiotta's tenure on policy, he was charged largely with conducting the review of board policies that had been called for in the curriculum management audit. The committee also dealt with policy revisions required by changes in state and federal laws.
The policy committee is far more high profile now that it will deal with the proposed changes to the student assignment policy. Goldman will chair that important committee.

Comments
No!
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 10:44 — stacy123Supportwcpss has never had a pleasant day!!! (or more accurately a pleasant, rational post!!!)
Take the "napoleon" comment Mr. Margiotta was elected and now has a board majority that shares his views and of course is making changes that he and the majority campaigned on. If one had a reasonable perspective, you would expect the new board members/majority to head the committes and have a majority on the respective committees. In a democracies, the majority rules - astounds all logical thought to call this "Napoloen-esque" - Who grabbed the crown from the Pope and crowned himself emperor
Okay, now you're really scaring me
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 09:49 — NCParentThis is what I'm talking about. Is Mr. Margiotta seriously questioning Mr. Hill's right to try to get support for policies that go against the majority? Mr. Hill needs to show cooperation with the majority in order to be given more responsibility? May I remind Mr. Margiotta that Mr. Hill also has constituents who elected him based on his beliefs about how the school system should be run.
As I have stated in the past, I am all for what the board is trying to accomplish with regard to a return to neighborhood schools and the traditional calendar, but they are going about this in a horrible manner. I am very afraid that there is going to be severe retribution for the actions of this new board.
May I Remind You!
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 10:10 — JanisTangoMay I remind Mr. Margiotta that Mr. Hill also has constituents who elected him based on his beliefs about how the school system should be run.
May I remind you that Mr. Margiotta had constituents that elected him based on his beliefs about how the school system should be run. Are you saying that when Mr. Margiotta was the lone minority on the board that the rest of the board was ignoring the wishes of his constituents? I don't get your point here!
Acting immaturely and
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 10:38 — ncellagatorActing immaturely and unprofessionally will do little to help Mr. Margiotta's or your cause. It has nothing to do with politics at this point but the manner in which Mr. Margiotta and the rest of the board is conducting business. The public needs to hold both sides accountable to their behavior. Mr. Margiotta's statement that he is doing what is best for the board is a very concerning statement. He is supposed to be doing what is best for the students in this school system and throwing a power tantrum is not what is needed at this time. He is supposed to be leading and so far I'm not impressed by his ability to lead in a democratic manner.
So...
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 11:16 — Bob_SconceSo.... How many Republicans chair committees in the US House of Representatives? How about the US Senate? How about in the NC General Assembly? One of the reasons that you want to be the majority is that you get to determine committee membership.
This is a means to an end -- Margiotta wants to do what he thinks is best for the district and this is a way for him to ensure that he has the ability to do so.
I'll agree that this is more hard-ball politics than the school board is used to, but that's to be expected -- the minority will use whatever leverage it has to impede the majority and you should expect that majority to use whatever leverage it has to fight against those impediments.
This is totally professional and expected and democratic
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 10:51 — stacy123Let's see , the board members who were elected by a large majority of the voters (those who voted), now make up a majority on the Board, and fill a majority of the committees and holding a majority of the Chairmanships. Seems entirely dmocratic, professional and is similar to what is done at all the other branches of the state and federal government.
Speaking of analogies Mr Hill and the other board members have been diametrically opposed to Mr. margiotta's views and I mean hard right vs. had left kind of opposition. So really this is not a surprise and Mr. Hill would not have provided anything constructive in committees based on his public comments(and apparently e-mails!!0, so it is actually good leadership/effective mamagement.
I couldn't disagree more!
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 12:11 — carson79I couldn't disagree more! From your point of view, this may seem that way, but it really looks from the outside and opposing view that Margiotta is shutting down dissenting opinion and cutting off alternate voices. And whoever said it before is dead on - his comment about "what's good for the Board" is just really strange! I don't even know what he was thinking saying that I wonder if he slipped up...and he should release the "emails" he is using as justification for shutting Hill off - esp if they were sent to the public as claimed.
I am not sure what you are
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 13:27 — woodstockI am not sure what you are saying. Are you actually suggesting that Margiotta and the new board majority embrace dissenting opinions and move forward with policies that reflect these opinions? I don't get it. Any resolutions that may come out of the committe meetings must be voted on by the entire board. Hill will always be able to voice his views at that point during debate and/or when casting his vote.
Margiotta wants the committees to be productive. With Hill's current attitude, he would be a detriment to that productivity.
Exactly. The committees is
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 13:49 — shearertwExactly. The committees is where you get things done. Hill and company don't want to do anything. They want to keep things as that are. Why would you make someone like that head of a committee when you trying to change things?
Maybe you should clarify
Fri, 01/15/2010 - 12:43 — ncellagatorMaybe you should clarify your statement more accurately that you feel Mr. Hill and the 3 veteran members don't want to do anything with which you agree. I hardly doubt they ran for office to do nothing.
IMO, the 4 new board members and Mr. Margiotta know they can basically do what they want. A good majority of taxpayers are having their heads turned in the wrong direction due to their behavior and truly their ineptness to present even a basic outline of how they plan to accomplish their agenda. And please don't lay that the work has to be done by staff and staff alone. Any board member that is to vote on this needs to be fully educated on the implication of their for every child before their vote. Parents can jump up and down all they want about what they want the school system to be but without the support of the taxpayer it just won't happen. There is no reason for Mr. Marigotta to lead the board in such a manner that they drag themselves into the muck of politics after each meeting. They are setting themselves and their supporters up for continuous scrutiny that may or may not be merited so why do it. The only reason I have heard is because we have the votes to do it. It is a disgraceful way for adults to conduct a business that is about educating children.