The New York Times is coming to Raleigh to follow the fight over the diversity policy and the saga over Wake County Schools Superintendent Del Burns' resignation.
A Times reporter is supposed to be at today's special closed-session school board meeting on Burns and tomorrow's policy committee discussion on changes to the student assignment policy. The next few days could provide plenty of fodder.
Wake's national recognition for the diversity policy and the melodrama surrounding Burns' resignation has made the national media attention inevitable.
Back in January, Matthew Brown had warned at a school board meeting that the New York Times would be coming. He had said that it would soon lead to other national coverage of Wake.
Brown, who has represented the Coalition of Concerned Citizens for African American Children at some media events, had urged the school board majority to slow down or risk becoming "known nationally as the new face of segregation in America."

Comments
Bob Herbert's Op Ed piece in the NYT...
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 23:19 — Its_the_parents...Amazing why no one has brought this up...this is about a school in Harlem, here is the article link, and here is a direct quote from the article:
"It never crossed Ms. Kenny’s mind that a rich and abiding intellectual life was out of the reach of kids growing up in a tough urban environment."
Here is the link: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/23/opinion/23herbert.html
AND NO MENTION OF BUSING AS A SOLUTION!!! Now are you going to accuse Bob Herbert of being racist???? Haha...
It is time to drive home the point that the statistical "Enron-style" fraud of "healthy schools" where at-risk children are "swept under the rug, across the county" to make a bureaucrat's "school system statistics" look good are no longer acceptable. I could go on, but...
NY Times Coming To NC
Wed, 02/24/2010 - 12:23 — RMC10I'm pretty sure The New York City School Districts have enough problems going on up there to keep the media busy. NC could probably use their system to compare and contrast
Did he show?
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 23:04 — Bob_SconceSo, the real question is: did any reporter from New York show up? Does he recognize that what's going on right now is partially attributable to his newspaper?
yes
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 23:34 — loriache took my name/number and I got his, will look him up tomorrow. He looked sooooooo young, made me feel old :-).
I couldn't help but notice tonight-
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 22:22 — raleighlauraWhile many of the speakers regarding whether Leesville should be year round or traditional calendar addresssed the board, the reporters and cameramen were sitting on either side of the stage, listening, but just taking notes and hanging out. When an african-american man addressed the board about how the board didn't give sufficient notice of the community engagement meeting in Southeast Raleigh, the reporters jumped up, and especially the camerman on the left, began to actively fiddle with the camera to be sure he was getting it. I don't disagree with the speaker's concern about the notice, but his comment was not the general theme or message reflected by the speakers at the meeting. My dollar is on his statements being "the soundbite" on the news tonight, rather than a soundbite reflective of the majority of comments, pro or con year round, about the Leesvile situation.
How many people did speak at
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 23:41 — changewcpssHow many people did speak at Leesville Road? How was the crowd?
It would be a shame if they do focus on one person not involved in the Leesville Road effort.
hmmmm very interesting
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 23:39 — aquaman4life68hmmmm very interesting observation there raleighlaura. I don't doubt it one bit!
I'm going to watch the news at 11 for sure just see what sort of "reporting" they provide from this meeting.
Economy
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 14:07 — VadamsonIf Wake County becomes “The New Face of Segregation in America” what will this do to our economy?
Danger, Danger, Will Robinson !
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 14:51 — Voice_of_Reason_Rev Al & Jesse will come and stir up a bit of urban renewal if we touch our busing program. Damn the US Supreme Court and the voters of Wake County.
Actually, both of them are
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 16:48 — CaryCurmudgeonActually, both of them are supporters of community schools, and their voices would be welcome.
You'll Note That All That Mattered To VoR
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 18:59 — chaboard.....was their skin color.
Don't play the racist card on me
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 19:58 — Voice_of_Reason_I think the people I mentioned are troublemakers and live off of making that trouble. They do more harm to race relations than anyone. They are also pawns used by left wing groups to achieve their goals. In this case, the CCCAAC is doing that work locally, but the New York Times might bring in the big guns. It's not about color to me at all, only ideology. If you knew me, you would know I am not a racist and never have been. But I do not agree with a lot of so called black leaders either. I would disagree equally with whites, brown, green, or purple people in this matter. I didn't agree with the last BOE's policies either because they don't help the people whose so called leaders claim to be defending.
Pfft...
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 14:38 — Bob_SconceThe local hat industry will heat up, because I'll be eating mine. Not going to happen. That's just fear-mongering.
:-)
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 14:44 — jenman:-)
WHO?
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 13:22 — RandyRockettWho is the reporter assigned from the NY Times? Do we have a name aor maybe an e-mail address?! Please let me know.
So...
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 13:28 — Bob_SconceJust go hang out in front of that door. He'll be the pretentious one.
For the N&O and the NY Times
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 10:55 — MissVBoth the N&O and the NY Times should ask Dr. Paul Biting of NC State if the College of Education videotaped yesterday's forum on Neighborhood Schools & Busing. It was the ONLY forum/discussion where the audience heard a dispassioned opinion that was not clouded by personal agendas. Panelists included Principals Marcia Alford (Lacy Elem) and John Wall (North Garner MS) and Mrs. Kathleen Brennan of Wake Cares, the longtime parent advocacy organization. While some of the statements made me inwardly shudder (like using average bus ride number of 10 miles rather than the REAL 18+ miles that many inner city minority students travel), it was a start.
Who was the audience-
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 13:15 — shank56Who was the audience- students in the college or others?
What did the principals say about diversity?
This is what should be
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 11:32 — changewcpssThis is what should be receiving a front page story and not overshadowed by the whining attention seekers clamoring for more meaningless air time. The media circus will be joined by the likes of Rev Barber and C Wright. Oh great. Good luck Leesville Road.
I find it very interesting
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 11:08 — woodstockI find it very interesting what the N&O decides to cover and what they decide not to.
Considering the lack of
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 11:35 — KeungHui (author)Considering the lack of coverage by any media outlet, I'd say this is more a case of the NC State not communicating to the right folks that the event was taking place. I didn't know about the event.
ARe you not getting the
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 13:50 — carson79ARe you not getting the Great Schools in Wake emails??
You need to be added to some lists from the pro-diversity group then - I got 2 mass emails about this event...
Interesting that you did not receive word.
They've been sending me
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 13:57 — KeungHui (author)They've been sending me e-mails on their forums, but not about the one on Monday.
Gotcha, I checked back and I
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 14:05 — carson79Gotcha, I checked back and I only got one email on this and it was not from Great Schools in Wake. I think it was last minute, I also heard from someone who is in the college of education at state that she hadn't even heard about it...
So...
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 10:32 — Bob_SconceDisappointing as it would be for the press, I think the board members need to be much more deliberate and measured in what they say publicly. Recent comments have been great political theater, but they've also generated far more heat than light, and that's going to get in the way of reforming the district.
It's perfectly OK for a board member to be angry at Del Burns -- Burns' acts last week were a stunt intended to make the board look bad. But, the right response would have been "Dr. Burns is the Superintendent of the district and will continue to have our support until he leaves that position. Beyond that, we don't discuss personnel matters in public and would ask that you refrain from speculation."
Bob I am with you on this one
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 16:33 — festusToo much heat, too little light. No one in Wake County is served by posturing. Burns will be an effective agent of the board for three more months, and hopefully the board can focus on hiring someone equally qualified for 2010-2011. Further ruckus is not helpful. At this point, Burns appears to be done talking. Is the board?
So...
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 16:47 — Bob_SconceI don't think they've been posturing. I just think that they're not accustomed to people hanging on their words -- it's a transition from being a private person to being a public one. Notice that Chris Malone and Ron M have been fairly silent through the whole thing -- they have more experience in government.
Words of government leaders get blown out of proportion constantly -- remember the brou-ha-ha when Reagan joked about bombing Russia on an open mike even though everybody knew he was joking?
Burns Theater
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 11:10 — jackjones209I agree that the board members need to be more deliberate and political in their communications.
Having said that, it is clear that Del Burns is unhappy in his position. If you are unhappy enough to resign, you do so immediately. At this point, there is nothing that is going to make the position acceptable to Burns and both parties should just go there seperate ways. Even if he does not actively work against the Board, having him around will inevitibly slow down the changes that need to be made.
Lastly, do we really want his input on the budget and other items for next year anyway? Much of what we have been fighting over isn't just POLICY decisions but IMPLEMENTATION decisions as well. We need to dramatically change the way we IMPLEMENT changes and it is clear that Del Burns is not the person we need to do that.
Why does he want to stay?
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 11:27 — changewcpssWhy does he want to stay? Give him a waiver so he is not penalized financially and let him leave. He does not support the new direction so he needs to step aside now. He hid the EVAAS report, ignored the falling graduation rate, and stood idly by when the MYR conversions were thoughtlessly ramrodded through. He does not need to be an obstacle to progress any longer.
I agree 100%.
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 11:31 — woodstockI agree 100%.
Well...
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 11:19 — Bob_SconceI'm neutral on whether he should go immediately or not. I disagree with his policy views and agree that he might be an impediment to the board's goals. But, I don't know what the alternative is -- who will do the work that he would otherwise do if he stayed? The board might be able to keep him in check while he finishes up his responsibilities. If he does stay, then (at minimum) he needs to be instructed not to talk to the press anymore about his reasons for leaving. That just contributes to the media circus.
Send Him to Leesville Road Tonight!
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 10:12 — ForCryingOutLoudI hope the NYT reporter knows about the "community input session" at Leesville Road tonight -- he could attend that as well. Too bad he's not here for one in Western Wake.
Good for the Leesville Road
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 11:22 — changewcpssGood for the Leesville Road familys. They have endured a lot at the hands of the old board. National press will give them the extra support they need to get rid of MYR. Let's work on bringing national press to all of our meetings.
A Times reporter is "supposed" to be at
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 10:13 — g88ky07but will he/she be allowed in, my bet is not.
Let's stop wordsmithing this
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 11:34 — KeungHui (author)Let's stop wordsmithing this here. If you'll notice all the media coverage today in print and on tv, reporters say they'll be at today's meeting. It doesn't meet that they'll be inside the room during the closed session. It just means that we'll all be hanging around outside waiting for them to go back into open session or to make a public announcement.
The NYT reporter, or any
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 10:04 — red_balloonThe NYT reporter, or any other reporter, gets to attend the closed door session?
It means the media will be
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 10:08 — KeungHui (author)It means the media will be camped outside the door of the meeting room waiting to see whether the board will make a public announcement, either after the meeting ends or in open session.