WakeEd

The WakeEd blog is devoted to discussing and answering questions about the major issues facing the Wake County school system. How much will the new Democratic majority on the school board do to undo the changes made by Republicans since 2009? Will the new student assignment plan be a hybrid of the last two models or primarily be a return to the use of busing for diversity? Who will replace Tony Tata as the new superintendent of the state's largest district? How will voters react to a likely request in 2013 to borrow potentially more than $1 billion to build and renovate schools?

WakeEd is maintained by The News & Observer's Wake schools reporter, T. Keung Hui. While Keung posts information and analysis on the issues, keep us posted on your suggestions, questions, tips and what you're doing to cope with the changes in Wake's schools.

Choose a blog

N.C. Futures Action Fund to run television ads against "Tea Party takeover" of Wake schools

Bookmark and Share

We now know for sure who's running the N.C. Futures Action Fund group that's been funding campaign pieces targeted at the Republican candidates for Wake County school board.

In a press release today, Dean Debnam, the director of the N.C. Futures Action Fund, announced that the group has purchased television ads "asking voters to 'Stop the Tea Party takeover' on the Wake County School Board."

"Wake County citizens don't like the forced agenda from the Tea Party takeover of our schools," Debnam said in the press release. "We want to make sure they know that next Tuesday they can stop the right wing takeover of our schools dead in its tracks."

Previously, no one publicly stepped forward to be identified with N.C. Futures Action Fund aside from Richard Nordan, the former Wake County Democratic Party attorney listed on the group's incorporation papers as its agent.

Debnam has ties to Common Sense Matters, the group who N.C. Futures Action Fund has provided funding to send out various mailers. Debnam's polling firm, Public Policy Poling, has been polling people about the themes in the mailers.

Here's the group's press release:

For immediate release
October, 7 2011
NC Futures Action Fund
Dean Debnam, Director
 
TV ad calls for an end to the Tea Party takeover of Wake County schools.

The North Carolina Futures Action Fund will begin airing paid television ads asking voters to "Stop the Tea Party takeover" on the Wake County School Board.  The ads send an urgent message to voters as a number of candidates, and one sitting board member, have affirmed their support for the divisive, extremist views of the Tea Party.

To preview click here:  http://www.youtube.com/user/NCFAF

"Wake County citizens don't like the forced agenda from the Tea Party takeover of our schools.  We want to make sure they know that next Tuesday they can stop the right wing takeover of our schools dead in its tracks," said Dean Debnam, the Director of the NC Futures Action Fund.

The ad features Board Member John Tedesco affirming his support for the Tea Party, calling himself "Tea Party Tedesco."  Heather Losurdo, another board candidate, has also voiced her support for the Tea Party in an interview just last week with local ABC television station WTVD.  "Yes, I support the Tea Party," Losurdo stated on video tape.

Tea Party leaders across the nation have tried to advance an agenda to discredit, dismantle, destroy, and ultimately privatize our public schools.

TV Script -

The Tea Party backed right-wing agenda has taken over our schools…
Our school board leaders have turned us into a national laughing stock.
and as the nation laughs…
the people stop coming...
the jobs dry up...
and the best city to live in, in America....
is threatened.
It's not too late to stop the tea party takeover of our schools.

1318013232 N.C. Futures Action Fund to run television ads against "Tea Party takeover" of Wake schools The News and Observer Copyright 2011 The News and Observer . All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Look for a personal finance

Look for a personal finance software that provides its users with the tools needed to manage stocks, bonds, mutual funds, 401K, etc. Personal investment options within the software will also allow you to plan for retirement, home purchases, how to manage collage expenses, debt relief and other financial goals. we have good <a href="http://redvisiontech.com/">Mutual Funds software</a> for your investment.

Smarter than the Left

Fortunately the graduates from our school system are smart enough to recognize blatant radical left-wing propaganda for the true lies that underlie this type of political advertisement.  They know that the cause of the financial meltdown in this country was not a school board but several Democratic administrations (Carter, Clinton and now Obama) that were responsible for the Community Reinvestment Act, the Interagency Task Force and Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act

Today the “Fair Lending” laws are being enforced more vigorously than ever.

During the first two years of the Obama Administration there have been 60 Fair Lending referrals to the Department of Justice. Fair Lending penalties can be very expensive. One California Bank defended 5 potential violations at a cost of $6 million!

During President Clinton’s eight years only 16 cases were referred to the DOJ and during President Bush’s two terms only 9 Fair Lending referrals were sent to the DOJ.

While Carter signed into law the Community Reinvestment Act in 1977 it did not list specific criteria for evaluating the performance of financial institutions, not until Clinton created the Interagency Task Force was the criteria defined and enforcement began.

In October 1997, First Union Capital Markets and Bear, Stearns & Co launched the first publicly available securitization of Community Reinvestment Act loans, issuing $384.6 million of such securities. The securities were guaranteed by Freddie Mac and had an implied “AAA” rating. The public offering was several times oversubscribed, predominantly by money managers and insurance companies who were not buying them for CRA credit.

In 1999 the Congress enacted and President Clinton signed into law the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, also known as the Financial Services Modernization Act. This law repealed the part of the Glass–Steagall Act that had prohibited a bank from offering a full range of investment, commercial banking, and insurance services since its enactment in 1933.

In the first Act Senator Gramm had demanded full disclosure of any financial “deals” which community groups had with banks, accusing such groups of “extortion” but in the fall of 1999, Senators Christopher Dodd and Charles E. Schumer prevented an impasse by securing a compromise between Sen. Gramm and the Clinton Administration by agreeing to amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to allow banks to merge or expand into other types of financial institutions. In the new Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act’s FDIC related provisions required that any insured bank holding institution wishing to be re-designated as a financial holding institution by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System would also have to follow Community Reinvestment Act compliance guidelines before any merger or expansion could take effect. This led to the practice of making the loans, securitizing them and selling them on a massive global scale.

In October 2000, to expand the secondary market for affordable community-based mortgages and to increase liquidity for CRA-eligible loans, Fannie Mae committed to purchase and securitize $2 billion of “MyCommunityMortgage” loans. In November 2000 Fannie Mae announced that the Department of Housing and Urban Development would soon require it to dedicate 50% of its business to low- and moderate-income families. In 2001 Fannie Mae announced that it had acquired $10 billion in specially-targeted Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) loans more than one and a half years ahead of schedule, and announced its goal to finance over $500 billion in CRA business by 2010, about one third of loans anticipated to be financed by Fannie Mae during that period.

It was during the Clinton years that the teeth of enforcement was put into the CRA through his Interagency Task Force and the passing of the “new” Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act that included CRA compliance along with Fannie Mae’s commitment to purchase and securitize hundreds of billions of high risk loans that ultimately led to the financial collapse of 2008/2009. 

You can try to create a school system that keeps people dumbed-down, but you can’t keep the knowledge away from them forever.

Largely Unsubstantiated

First of all, most subprime loans were made by firms that aren’t subject to the CRA.

Economists, including those from the Federal Reserve and the FDIC, dispute the contention that the CRA lead to the financial crisis. The Federal Reserve has said that research has not validated any relationship between the CRA and the 2008 financial crisis

Paul Krugman has noted that 55% of commercial real estate loans were currently underwater, despite being completely unaffected by the CRA. According to Federal Reserve Governor Randall Kroszner, the claim that "the law pushed banking institutions to undertake high-risk mortgage lending" was contrary to their experience, and that no evidence had been presented to support the claim. In a Bank for International Settlements (BIS) working paper, economist Luci Ellis concluded that "there is no evidence that the Community Reinvestment Act was responsible for encouraging the subprime lending boom and subsequent housing bust." FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair, Comptroller of the Currency John C. Dugan, Tim Westrich of the Center for American Progress, Robert Gordon of the American Prospect, Ellen Seidman of the New America Foundation, Daniel Gross of Slate, and Aaron Pressman from BusinessWeek have all concluded that the CRA did not contribute to the financial crisis.

Well...

Can't blame the whole thing on the CRA, but it was certainly part of it.  Another part was the loosening of lending standards by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.  I think it's pretty clear that if banks had required 20% down, no more than 28% of monthly income to mortgage and no more than 35% to (total) debt.

Another part was the

Another part was the loosening of lending standards by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.  I think it's pretty clear that if banks had required 20% down, no more than 28% of monthly income to mortgage and no more than 35% to (total) debt.

Agreed. Not to mention "low doc" and "no doc" loans.

Cars View All
Find a Car
Go
Jobs View All
Find a Job
Go
Homes View All
Find a Home
Go

Want to post a comment?

In order to join the conversation, you must be a member of newsobserver.com. Click here to register or to log in.

About the blogger

T. Keung Hui covers Wake schools.
Advertisements