Blogs

newsobserver.com blogs


WakeEd

The WakeEd blog is devoted to discussing and answering questions about the major issues facing the Wake County school system. How much will the new Democratic majority on the school board do to undo the changes made by Republicans since 2009? How will the new choice-based assignment system work now that the socioeconomic diversity policy has been eliminated? How will Superintendent Tony Tata lead the state's largest district through more budget cuts and possible layoffs? How will the board respond to growth and the school construction program?

WakeEd is maintained by The News & Observer's Wake schools reporter, T. Keung Hui. While Keung posts information and analysis on the issues, keep us posted on your suggestions, questions, tips and what you're doing to cope with the changes in Wake's schools.

NAACP demands that District 2 runoff go on

Bookmark and Share

Folks who thought that the diversity policy supporters might try to slip an election win in District 2 may be right after all.

The state NAACP announced today that it's demanding that elections officials go ahead with the runoff even though Cathy Truitt withdrew the request. The same press release also accuses Republicans of using neighborhood schools as a guise for resegregation.

If the runoff goes forward and Truitt gets the most votes, she could be declared the winner or the seat could be declared vacant so that the current school board would fill the spot.

Here's the NAACP press release:

APPLYING OLD STRATEGY TO WAKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD ELECTION:

Changing Mid-stream

 
Press Statement by

Rev. Dr. William J. Barber II

NC NAACP STATE PRESIDENT

 
This election for school board in Wake County has turned on the issue of whether we want an American school system here in Wake County that follows the Constitution, upholds the mandates of Brown vs. Board of Education and provides a high quality diverse integrated educational environment or whether we want to abandon the Constitution and some progress for a return to resegregated high poverty schools, which discriminate and undermine commitment to fundamental high quality education. Some seemingly want to run back to and old America while those wanting to maintain diversity desire to keep pushing towards a better America and North Carolina.   

 
While this is supposed to be a non-partisan election, we can clearly see this push against diversity is being done and orchestrated to some degree by persons affiliated with the Republican Party.  And, it is being carried out by reviving the old Nixon Southern Strategy of the late 60s and early 70s in new ways. We have seen in this election cycle the re-vitalization of Nixon's Southern Strategy Proven Slogans against "Forced Busing" and for "Neighborhood Schools," which then and now meant resegregation and serve as code words to engender racial fear and division.

 
Now, this week, a new manipulation is being employed: the engineers of this plan, plan to hijack the school board, do away with diversity, and have gone beyond coded political debate to an attempt to disenfranchise voters and railroad the voting process itself.   We cannot stand for this as a community. People of all races and backgrounds who believe in fundamental fairness must challenge these efforts. It is one thing to be wrong in your debate and misleading in your political positions.  It’s entirely another thing to try and manipulate the law and voting process in the middle of an election where voters have already gone to the polls.  This is anti our democratic process.

 
We call on the county and state boards of elections to adhere to a logical interpretation of the Law.

 
According to statute (NCGS 163-111(c)(2-3):

 
“(2) A candidate who is apparently entitled to demand a second primary, according to the unofficial results, for one of the offices listed below and desiring to do so, shall file a request for a second primary in writing with the chairman or director of the county board of elections no later than 12:00 noon on the ninth day (including Saturdays and Sundays) following the date on which the primary was conducted, and such request shall be subject to the certification of the official results by the county board of elections:

 
(3) Immediately upon receipt of a request for a second primary the appropriate board of elections, State or county, shall notify all candidates entitled to participate in the second primary, by telephone followed by written notice, that a second primary has been requested and of the date of the second primary.”

 
These provisions clearly mean that a candidate had, in this instance, through October 15 to seek a second primary (which I assume the second place finisher did in this case).  The reasoning behind this is pretty clear: making sure that preparations can be made in a timely fashion for the run-off if it is necessary.  Approaching this reasoning from the other perspective, one could reason that, in this scenario, if the second place finisher said she would seek a run-off by October 15, then the election's board will operate on this information going forward from this date, and, therefore, subsequent efforts to get off the ballot after this date, when preparations have already been made for the election, should be disallowed.

 
We must not allow the political chicanery of any group for its own political reason to upset or overturn the rights of the voters and the integrity of the system.

 
Beyond today we are organizing a NAACP MASS meeting on Oct. 30 at 7pm at Martin St. Baptist Church to expose this New Southern Strategy under the guise of “neighborhood schools” and to articulate our clear legal and activism strategy going forward.  We are committed to SAVE OUR DIVERSITY AND SAVE OUR CHILDREN.

 
Founded in 1909, the NAACP is the nation's oldest and largest civil rights organization. Its members throughout the United States and the world are the premier advocates for civil rights in their communities, conducting voter mobilization and monitoring equal opportunity in the public and private sectors.  For more information, call the State Office at 866-626-2227 or e-mail us at execdirnaacpnc@gmail.com.  ###

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Something new and different

I wonder what the NAACP makes of these folks?

http://www.baeo.org/

Bill Gates makes big push on education reform

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has been the biggest player by far in the school reform movement, spending around $200 million a year on grants to elementary and secondary education.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33469415/ns/us_news-education/

NAACP

Do all black people think alike? Make sure to read the banner on this online magazine.

http://www.issues-views.com/index.php/sect/1003/article/1040

WCPSS is not in here (obviously not "urban"...but....let's learn

To ascertain whether any urban school districts were
raising achievement among ELLs, we examined both state
assessment data and results from the Trial Urban District
Assessment of the National Assessment of Educational
Progress (NAEP). However, we found major limitations in
both data sets. State data were not comparable from one site
to another, and definitions of English language learners varied
considerably across state lines. The report touches further
on these limitations. NAEP data resolved some of these
problems, but only a limited number of urban districts—11
in 2007—participated in this testing

http://www.cgcs.org/publications/ELL_Report09.pdf

Baltimore School District on Upward Swing

Fair student funding is just one piece of a multipronged strategy that Mr. Alonso, a Harvard University-trained lawyer who taught special education in Newark, N.J., has introduced since becoming Baltimore’s schools chief in 2007. Given broad latitude by the appointed school board members who hired him, Mr. Alonso has replaced roughly 40 percent of the city’s principals, eliminated more than 450 positions in the central office, shut down or overhauled failing schools, and opened a variety of schools designed to serve children at risk of dropping out.

Three years after Maryland’s top education official threatened to take over or close several low-performing Baltimore schools, Mr. Alonso presides over an 83,000-student district that has moved out of the bottom academically and gained momentum around raising student achievement.

Elementary students’ performance on state exams improved enough this year to propel the district out of “corrective action,” the status assigned to Maryland school systems with a high percentage of schools that fall short of meeting benchmarks under the federal No Child Left Behind Act. The designation allows state officials to intervene by taking over schools or shutting them down. (Baltimore’s middle and high schools, however, did not make adequate-yearly-progress goals.)

The graduation rate—one of the lowest in the nation, by some measures—is rising, albeit modestly. Out-of-school suspensions, which hit a high of 25,000 in 2005, have plummeted. And for the first time in decades, enrollment in Baltimore’s public schools is going up.

“I think Dr. Alonso is building a high level of confidence in the school system,” said Nancy S. Grasmick, Maryland’s longtime state superintendent of schools. “I never saw such a comprehensive approach to school reform and improvement from anyone else who was in that position. He has not, and will not, tolerate chronically underperforming schools.”

http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2009/10/28/09baltimore_ep.h29.html?tkn=PZOF3nySnzkJ8va7OIc5xe3z8nz2nQx7nc2C

Something that hasn't been

Something that hasn't been mentioned yet--I've heard candidates and WSCA members say that KIPP is not the answer for everybody. But there are aspects of the KIPP program that could be implemented in all schools. Nobody thinks that KIPP is a magic bullet.

One very simple concept from KIPP that wouldn't cost anything--referring to kids as the 'class of 2015' or whatever year from the time they enter Kindergarten. Start referring to that expectation of graduation as if it is going to be a fact. Very subtle, but reinforces the importance of school and sets an achievable goal.

I know that Vance Elementary

I know that Vance Elementary already does this. 

What gets me is...

Polls have shown over and over that "minority" parents want a say-so in where their children attend school - and they don't want to be told (ordered), "this is what you have to do". Yet some of these groups continue to claim that they speak for the majority. I have seen this happen all too often, and it infuriates me.

What do you think they will

What do you think they will say when KIPP is imposed on them with uniforms, parental contracts, school until 5 pm, and school on Saturdays.  

man, you are so literal

Are you literal because this is your personality or are you just enjoying a dogmatic point of view for the sake of the argument?

SOME neighborhood school characteristics, like stability, has been blown into 'resegregation'.

And same thing, KIPP schools structure and discipline I fully expect you will blow into somethink akin to a reform school. Why not SOME aspects of KIPP schools? Remember, this board will work hard to discover what parents from a community want before PROposing (as opposed to imposing) anything. 

Kipp is not imposed on

Kipp is not imposed on anyone (and I suspect you actually know this).  Parents have to apply to have their students attend, the student and parents must agree to abide by Kipp's policies before the student is admitted.  Kipp is an option for those who are seeking a good education for their children. 

I suspect that most of the

I suspect that most of the kids that need it most won't apply or sign up (10%. 20%?? will??) and we will be done with this concept.  We have to impose mandatory school on parents by law to make sure they all get their kids registered , shots, etc.   It seems unlikely that any program demanding a lot of parental involvement will be widespread successful ... my thought is that if parents were that involved (uniforms, contracts, late and Sat. school) they would not need KIPP and would already be on their way to success ... so, as an "option", which I fully support, KIPP will have limited impact on the problem because it is optional ... guess: 10% of the kids who need it with a good marketing campaign ...my opinion ...

Hmm..

You seem to be suggesting that kids in KIPP schools across the nation would have succeeded anyway. 

I think you've previously made the point here that parental involvement is critical, that there's really not a lot that can be done for kids whose parents just don't care, and grouping poor kids together in schools means that the kids whose parents do care are grouped in with a lot of kids whose parents just don't care.   And, as a result, those potentially successful kids fail.

(I apologize if I'm putting words in your mouth.  Please correct me if I have that wrong.)

KIPP gives those potentially successful kids a way to succeed.

 

You are right ... I think

You are right ... I think the secret to KIPP will be to give "GIVE A DAMN" GAD parents (did you introduce that?) a program / structure to link into ... those parents care and want to do something but live in a bad place with bad schools and bad influences ... KIPP will give them a way out ...

What do you think about KIPP for the low F&R population?  Normally we just give them AG/AP offerings ....Even the top folks may need more structure for their kids ... sort to like private / military school structure some kids need ...

Well..

I don't think admission to any WCPSS program should be based on how much a kid's parents make.  That said, I suspect that part of KIPP's success comes from being in the community.  If the KIPP school is in SE Raleigh, it would be difficult for a kid from, say, Brier Creek to be part of that.  And, KIPP isn't really targetted to those kids.

I think the best bet for improving education is listing the charter cap.  There is a lot of innovation happening in education, mostly from outside the public school structure.   Public schools are a bit like General Motors or Microsoft -- big, institutionalized, with a lot of players interested in perpetuating themselves.  As a result, they tend to ossify.  Charters schools can do things that those Public Schools are simply institutionally incapable of.

KIPP

As I understand it, the KIPP program has some kind of contract with parents. They are required to be involved to some extent. They understand this when they CHOOSE this school. 

An alternative maybe something like what the Latin School in Philadelphia (http://www.boyslatin.org) does - the EFN (Extended Family Network)

The Extended Family Network (EFN) Philosophy

The African Proverb, “it takes a village to raise a child,” is often quoted as a remedy for addressing the social ills affecting today’s children and youth.  A more pressing question is, “what does it take to raise a healthy village?” 

The EFN brings together five “core” family clusters in a structure of mutual support, values training and nurturing one another’s children.  These “core” family clusters consciously serve as surrogate “aunts”, “uncles” and “cousins” to  one another, providing positive role models; mentors, accountability, and a strong affirming support network to the parents and children. 

(and there is more on the website http://www.boyslatin.org/) 

Contract with Parents

I'm not sure what KIPP's contract is like, but people may be interested in the below (emphasis added) taken from a current student handbook from an ES in WCPSS. I don't think all schools are doing this though. (sorry formatting does not come over well) 

staff believes that family involvement in a child’s education is anecessity. We believed educating students is a group effort that includes students,families, and teachers. We are asking all parents/guardians to contract to commit at least75 hours of service to the enrichment of your child’s education. Furthermore, attendanceat school is vital to success. The contract will also ask parents to ensure that theirchild(ren) have appropriate attendance daily and that they arrive to school on time. Someways through which this contract can be fulfilled are: Volunteering in the classroom Eating lunch with your child/ren at school Reading to your child or having her/him read to you Helping with homework Serving on PTA committeesPlease be sure to read the information sent home with your child on the first day of

school and sign and return your contract as soon as possible.

 

Is this Partnership

When Partnership Primary opened, a requirement for parents was a mandatory volunteer policy- including the list above (reading to your kids, attending PTA meeting, helping with homework).  The school had 5-10% F&R - not sure what it is now.

 Meanwhile,  in many of  the  nearby ITB  elementaries with 20-40% F&R , involved parents like me were  having to pick up the slack for those uninvolved parents who never even read the weekly folder or sent in stuff- including a snack for their own kid. 

Partnership is a MAGNET,

Partnership is a MAGNET, how do you like them apples?

Partnership Elementary is a school of choice within the Wake County Public School System. We enroll just over 300 students in grades kindergarten through fifth grade. We deliver the NC Standard Course of Study through a small, individualized learning environment. At our school, individualized instruction is delivered using a team approach to know each child as a learner, to teach to his/her strengths and challenges, and to document progress through Personal Education Plans (PEP) for EVERY student.

Our school is unique because...

* There is no risk of reassignment by the Wake County School Board for applicant families.
* Each student has an individualized learning plan and progress is documented through Personal Education Plans, student data notebooks, and parent-teacher-student conferences held four times a year.
* We have a high level of parent involvement. Each family is asked to volunteer a minimum of four hours a month for the school.
* Each quarter our students focus on a community-based service learning project.

Partnership was opened  as

Partnership was opened  as an application school under Superintendent Jim Surratt, who wanted to show that it could compete with Magellan Charter school.   I  think its original mission may have changed- but it is and always has been an application magnet.

Partnership's history and

Partnership's history and status is messy. It was Jim Surratt's attempt to replciate a charter school in the school system. For many years Partnership had a separate application and a separate application window from any other school. There were complaints that because it didn't follow the same cycle as the magnet schools that the process made it hard for families not in the know to get a seat. Throw in the fact that until the past couple of years they didn't have any base and you had complaints about that school having very low percentages of F&R students.

 Beverley Clark was particularly pushing the board to make changes. As a result, a small base population was assigned to Partnership a few years ago to raise the F&R figures.

Either this year or last year, Growth and Planning decided to change Partnership's application process so that they used the same application form and application window as the magnets. Earlier this year, staff asked the board if they formally wanted to designate Partnership a magnet school. The board said no because of challenges detrmining what priority to give the Partnership applicants for middle and high schools. Unless things change, Partnership is an application school using the magnet application form but it is not officially a magnet school.

Nope

It's from a >40% F&R non-magnet OTB.

Another way to do this was

Another way to do this was being used in the town we used to live in back in the Midwest.  A church would adopt one of the struggling public schools as their community service project.  The empty nesters/retirees would volunteer at the school helping in classrooms, with reading groups, in the lunchroom on the playground, etc. There was no proselytizing - just an ongoing service project for the church members. I haven't heard of anything like that happening here in Wake - but, as I'm not familiar with all of the schools - it might be happening somewhere.

Here, too

Crossroads Fellowship, a fairly large church in North Raleigh, has basically adopted Brentwood Elementary, with the same view. 

Good to know

So the seeds are definately here, now they just need to be spread and watered more.

hmmm ... I worry that there

hmmm ... I worry that there will be some anti-religious folks who won't want a church involved in their kid's school ... like having the Democrats adopt a school for some ... especially if the sect is non-Christian / traditional ... I wonder if a mosque would be allowed to adopt a school like Crossroads ... also there has to be some backlash to forcing volunteers .... some how we need to make this where people come in of their own accord are not forced or complelled to ... that is a better foundation for a community ...

What's different?

How does anyone know what the religious views of anyone volunteering with their children now are? Why should it matter, for instance, that a Muslim mom is teaching a kid any more than a Jehovah's Witness is teaching another? Its school. I thought you liked the idea of diversity. This is one great way to get people exposed to each other, isn't it?

There may be mosques and synagogues which would like to join in. All hands on deck! 

You are right, normally you

You are right, normally you can not tell one Christian sect from another but Muslims dress differently many times and it would be apparent that who they are if they came in hijab / burka like they do in our schools.  Everyone has a perspective and having a church / mosque as the main support for a school seems like a slippery slope.

 

I don’t mind parents volunteering in schools because their presents is reflective of the student body but I am a little more cautious of a religious organization providing most of the help to a public school especially a low wealth one which is dependant on charity and good will of others. 

"There may be mosques and synagogues which would like to join in. All hands on deck! "

The reason I was asking you is that we have been discussing the plight of the low wealth schools and the idea that churches would adopt one and make a difference.  I assume your kids do not attend a low wealth school that needs that kind of church help and I was wondering if you would be accepting having it integrated into your kid’s school as you might suggest doing for a low wealth school even if the adopting church has views opposite your beliefs.  In addition, I am a little disappointed that government would turn to religious organizations to fix the problems that are their responsibility.  I doubt we would see a church being called in to help a high wealth school when the government failed so I was wondering about the double standard for low and high wealth schools that are so vulnerable without options.

Calibre of character

I FULLY welcome any calibre of character of person who is so concerned with the education of our children that they would take the time to volunteer. What are you implying? By the way, user, I have Muslim relatives and you would not know them by their dress. And, quite frankly, their children are better behaved than mine are. So I'm not sure what DIFFERENCES you're trying to paint. 

You don't get out much - -  do you. 

Responsibility

Fix problems that are the government's responsiblity? The only places where fixing problems is solely the government's responsibility is in communism. If you want to live somewhere where everything is just the government's responsibility, Cuba might take you.

That is part of the issue with anti-community schools. The community takes less ownership in schools and an important resource is diminshed. When people don't own something, they are less likely to take care of it (think rental housing or what happened in Europe under communism).

No one is "turning to" a religious organization. They are offering. Churches generally promote community service involvement among their members. One way to serve the community is by volunteering in schools. The particular organization that is the source of volunteers shouldn't matter. Who cares if it's a church, mosque, or the Ladies Garden Club. All level of wealth schools can use volunteers, are you kidding? Why look a gift horse in the mouth? Our not low or high wealth school doesn't.

I think WCPSS is

I think WCPSS is responsible for providing every school / student a quality education.  If that is not happening, they need to address that.  So, if a low wealth school is failing, they should step up and fix it.  Churches, volunteers, parent supplement the process not replace it.  WCPSS is still in charge and ultimately responsible.  Education is a State function supported by non-State players, not the other way around.

Contary to both of you, I would expect a lot of push back if the Church of Satan adopted Dillard Drive or West Lake (which you two mentioned) especially if they were not parents and just a random organization that wanted to get in the school and help (your gift horse).

We the People

Yes, WCPSS is responsible for providing a quality education and where failing should fix. That's a given and no one said replace, we said supplement. We the People are responsible for WCPSS. 

Maybe we should have an annual Constitution Day like back home where the kids put on skits and presentations and the parents come watch (like a school play). Might be a nice reminder for people.

Not sure how you got from mosques to Satanists and I'm not really aware of any large Satanist churches that might be looking for community service projects. You do like to go to extremes.

"WCPSS is still in charge

"WCPSS is still in charge and ultimately responsible."

No. We -- the citizens -- are the ones "ultimately responsible." We cannot blame the state of affairs on the officials we elect into office. That is why the vote is such an important resonsibility. If WCPSS does not do its job, we must take action to see that they do. We are in that process right now.

Bravo

I know me-toos are bad nettiquette, but I must say; "Bravo" to this point:

No. We -- the citizens -- are the ones "ultimately responsible." We cannot blame the state of affairs on the officials we elect into office.

We forgot this once; I pray we don't forget ever again.

I think you misunderstand....

To my knowledge, the school district took no affirmative steps here -- it didn't "call in" or "turn to" anybody.  Instead, it just said, "Oh, you'd like to volunteer your time?  Great!" 

Why is it good when communities get involved in schools, but bad when the church, which has historically played a central role in the community, gets involved?   Or, is it only ok for parents to be involved?

 

You are right, they did not

You are right, they did not call in anyone … they just neglected the situation for so long that someone with compassion and conviction had to do something … I think the US has always been sensitive about mixing church and state …especially as it related to the poor who can be manipulated in exchange for some benefit ….  and now that we are becoming more and more diverse (multiple religions and beliefs including no belief) we need to be cautious in public areas inserting religion … Christians and Muslim work side by side in our school but I don’t think any church has adopted us?  I don’t know how people would react if a Christian, Muslim, or Santeria group or the Church of Satan wanted to adopt our school?

Exactly

All aboard the SS Achievement for All. All hands welcome and needed.

Uhh...

"Forcing Volunteers" -- if that were currently happening, it would be an issue.  But, at Crossroads, I think it was just some member saying "I want to do this, who's with me?" and then a bunch of people joining them.  It's a big church.

There will always be naysayers -- you can't make everybody happy.  But, as long as the volunteers don't push their faith on students, the naysayers have no legal grounds to complain.

 

The forced volunteers

The forced volunteers observation was more in relationship to joining a KIPP school ... wealthy people don't have to sign a contract or commit hours to a school of excellence or distinction and I was wondering if there is a double standard for poor people who want a similar excellent education with KIPP being what is offered to them?

Separate subject: So, you would not have a problem with a mosque adopting your children's school and providing volunteers, etc.?  Like you said as long as they are not pushing their faith I would welcome the help.

wealthy people don't have

wealthy people don't have to sign a contract or commit hours to a
school of excellence or distinction and I was wondering if there is a
double standard for poor people who want a similar excellent
education with KIPP being what is offered to them?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Well, there are plenty of 'wealthy' families who sign up for charter schools like Magellan or Endeavor that have requirements for volunteering at the school.  The waiting lists are HUGE at those places.  I don't think there is a double standard.

Remember KIPP is not being

Remember KIPP is not being sold as a small charter school for a few families that want to sign up but as the answer to the quality education for the poor who either because of family problems, stablity, structure, poor facilities / teachers need KIPP's extra attention and structure to progress/excel.   A program like KIPP should be as likely to have poor as well as rich, White or Black students.   Much of the talk is about putting KIPP schools in poor area not middle or wealth areas ... so, my assumption is that poor families will need to submit to KIPP's ways if they want a quality education that they should have been able to get at their neighborhood school with no uniforms, contract or commitment required.

No.

I have a number of Muslim friends, two of whom volunteer in my kids' school, so no.  

However,  lots of people still equate Islam with terrorism.   Based on how we see Muslims act in the news, parents may fear that a Mosque might be trying to place a bomb or something in the school.  

Unfortunately, Muslims in the US have not done a fantastic job of disassociating themselves from the nut-jobs out there.  So, if I were a Muslim, I would suggest that a mosque should start a public service campaign someplace else and work up some credibility in the community before adopting a school.

 

I think about a month or so ago a new mosque

opened and they had an open house to build community understanding.

Same experience

What you describe is very common and extensive in my hometown in the Midwest. They are very involved doing the sorts of things that your describe and in working with the alternative HS. They also just built a nature center at one of the ES that is available for use by the entire community outside school hours. Maybe it's a Midwest thing - afterall it is the Heartland.

I knew of one school here that was approached by a church but it's not been taken advantage of to the same extent as back home and it's the only one I've heard about. It's a little surprising to me considering that there is more overall church presence here.

an aside

I was just in DC for the weekend doing the tourist thing.  You could see the Kipp school groups a mile away.   They were dressed to the nines - suit jackets for the boys, smart dresses/cardigans for the girls, and EXTREMELY well behaved.  I saw person after person stopping to compliment the adults with them on what a great group of kids, etc.  

I've only read about the KIPP schools, but seeing them in action was something else.  You could see the pride. 

KIPP school

I seem to remember that someone applied to start a KIPP school in Raleigh but was turned down, maybe because of the 100-school cap on charter schools.  Does anyone know who wanted to start this school?  Will they be trying again?

Hopefully..

The Obama Administration is correctly pushing charter schools and suggesting to states that if they don't uncap the number of  charters, that they will lose federal money.  Hopefully that policy will survive in the face of blistering attacks from teachers unions, afraid of losing power.

If it does, we could be open to a whole new round of education innovation in Wake County.

The Obama administration and

The Obama administration and Al Sharpton are also pushing for neighborhood schools.  Evidently Mr. Barber did not get that memo.

You are exactly right. 

You are exactly right.  Look at the Public Policy Polling data that Keung posted here right after the election.  No demographic group in any of the districts favored busing.

And last week we confirmed through the SAS report that the current school policies have systematically discriminated against AA children.

A shame.

I think there is an

I think there is an assumption of equal distribution of resources and maybe an increase for those with the most need if they are sent packing.

Cars View All
Find a Car
Go
Jobs View All
Find a Job
Go
Homes View All
Find a Home
Go

About the blogger

T. Keung Hui covers Wake schools.

Want to post a comment?

In order to join the conversation, you must be a member of newsobserver.com. Click here to register or to log in.
Advertisements