Does the Wake County school system do enough to keep students away from pornographic and violent websites on school computers?
As noted in today's article, Carolyn Homan doesn't think so and has been trying to urge the school system to do more since November 2011. Feeling she wasn't getting anywhere, she made her pitch directly to the school board on Tuesday.
Homan showed a YouTube video and held up explicit images that she said she had found while surfing computers at her children's school, Brassfield Elementary School.
"Kindergarten computers have access to porn,” Homan said at Tuesday’s board meeting, as she held up photos of graphic images she said came from Brassfield’s computers. “Filters filter out only a few sites such as Playboy, leaving billions of explicit videos and sites.
Here's a small sampling of items available at every school computer at Brassfield. This is just a sampling: hot stripper porn dancing, hot stripper pole dancing, full anime porn movie, and this portrays elementary school children raping a babysitter.
Plenty of gruesome sites were found which feature dismemberment. Plenty of violent sites were found, and as you can see there's the school background. This was all on school computers.
This is one of the milder explicit photos. The rest I didn't feel comfortable bringing.
Something must be done, especially for the youngest children."
Homsn has created this YouTube video and t this Facebook group to lobby the school system to change the district's Internet policies.
Homan’s unconventional approach caught the attention of school board members, who asked system administrators to look into the issues she raised.
“If you look hard enough, you can find (inappropriate material),” said school board chairman Keith Sutton. “That’s what she did.”
Board member John Tedesco said that during a break in the meeting, he, other board members and administrators looked up some of the sites Homan mentioned on Tedesco’s school district-issued iPad, using the district’s network.
“If it’s as she said, it shouldn’t be that easy for our children to run across that material on school computers,” Tedesco said.
But Vass Johnson, Wake’s senior director of networking, said Tedesco may have been using a cellular network to access the sites, which wouldn’t be covered by the school district’s Internet filters.
Homan proposes that individual schools set up dual access systems, in which students would be limited in what they could search, but teachers would have unlimited access. If students need more access, Homan said, the teacher could provide it on a supervised basis.
And if that can’t be done, Homan suggests setting up a districtwide system of limited access to pre-selected sites. She said she also would want search engines such as Google and navigation bars disabled.
Johnson said school officials are not sure Homan’s options would work in a district the size of Wake, whose 150,000 students make it the largest in the state.
Instead, school officials say they follow an approach of educating teachers, parents and students on Internet safety and using filters to monitor what students can see. For instance, Wake will hold these three classes on Internet safety for parents March 12-14.
“We need to find a balance between providing sufficient and appropriate access,” said Cathy Moore, deputy superintendent for school performance.
Wake has had Internet filters blocking access to inappropriate sites even before it was mandated by federal law several years ago, Johnson said. He added that Wake uses a countywide database, updated weekly, that lists thousands of prohibited sites and search terms.
Even with the technology, Johnson said the school system relies on teachers to provide Internet supervision.
“There are no filtering programs that are 100 percent effective,” Johnson said. “Ours does a good job. But nothing compares to a class being monitored by a classroom teacher.”

Comments
Disagree - ElevenYearsinCary
Thu, 02/21/2013 - 12:57 — sam123456I was shocked to see that my elementary school child could have such easy access to these types of sites in a school environment. There is no need for a child to have such easy access to these types of sites as there is NO educational value. Stronger filtering software should be put in place. If a child truly needs access to these types of sites then they can submit a request to their parent...so that the parent can be active in the decision; otherwise, we have no idea that they have the potential to look at these sites while at school.
Take some...
Thu, 02/21/2013 - 15:47 — bpuli9999responsibility and raise your kids properly. How sure are you they are not doing it at home or at a friend's place? You want the government to tell you what your kids can watch?
So...
Sun, 02/24/2013 - 10:28 — Bob_SconcePart of being a 'good parent' means minimizing the attack surface.
Your view, unfortunately, comes down to "Oh, well, your kid wouldn't have done that if you had done your job as a parent." That's garbage. Recognize that children are not fully-formed adults. They make mistakes. They do not have the same ability to control impulses that adults do. They need enforced limits and supervision.
Sure, at some point, you gotta trust that you've reared them right. But, elementary school is hardly the place where that approach makes sense.
Now, as a technical guy, I don't think any of the filtering software works particularly well -- there's just too much garbage out there, and it's easy to put up new garbage. Plus, there are always edge cases (do you allow renaissance art?) The best approach is to ensure that there's a teacher in the room actively monitoring what their kids are doing.
bpuli9999 -- WHAT???
Thu, 02/21/2013 - 15:56 — sam123456first, please do not critique my parenting...you have NO basis for your critique!! no, i don't want the government to tell me what my kids can watch -- I can decide that. However, my kids should not have access to see that at school. Please tell me what is wrong with having the filters at school -- if my kid needs to go to one of those sites, then they can ask me and I will decide (which by the way, the answer would be no.).
sounds more like a pure IT
Thu, 02/21/2013 - 10:47 — mnordbergsounds more like a pure IT content filtering problem. Many companies and schools use content filtering software packages and it sounds like the one wake is using isn't up to date. Of course any software package is only as up to date as the filter list from the vendor and how much time they invest in keeping it up to date. There are good ones out there and maybe they need to revisit their choice of vendor. But good parent and teaching about the internet is the most important thing with the content filter to stop the most obvious stuff.
Sounds more like a Gainey and School Board failure
Thu, 02/21/2013 - 13:07 — FSandYOUThe buck stops at the top with ALL things edu!
WHEN ARE THEY GOING TO ACTUALLY DO SOMETHING GOOD FOR THE KIDS??????????
It was happening...
Thu, 02/21/2013 - 15:46 — bpuli9999when Tata was the super and the BoE was a republican majority. What did they do?
Parents are responsible for promoting good internet behavior
Thu, 02/21/2013 - 10:07 — ElevenYearsInCaryThere is no need for additional internet policies or technologies in WCPSS. Policies are no substitute for active parenting, and trying to restrict access beyond what's already being done is counterproductive.
The idea of only providing access to 'approved' sites is similar to banning books from libraries. It's not only out-dated, but counterproductive.
One comment...
Thu, 02/21/2013 - 15:48 — bpuli9999that actually makes sense.
And these are the same people who talk about freedom and small government. And yet they want it to babysit their kids.