As has become the case recently, there was more gloomy news at today's school board budget work session.
Elementary schools may not be able to offer as many specials due to a change in the teacher allotment formula. The impact could be more noticeable at smaller schools.
Schools will likely see a reduction in their allotments for academically gifted teachers. In particular, new schools will see a cut.
Funding will also be cut to help students cover the cost for attending national academic competitions.
And there was skepticism that Gov. Bev Perdue's call to increase per pupil state funding will actually take place and blunt the impact of funding cuts.
Next step is Tuesday's budget public hearing. Usually few people speak but things could change this year due to all the potential cuts.

Comments
Funding Available
Sat, 03/28/2009 - 20:40 — cythompsonThe answer to improving schools (IAQ directly impacts test scores), freeing up budget dollars for kid programs instead of energy costs, and rebuilding our crumbling eduactional infrastructure, is Energy Performance Contracting. (http://earthsupply.blogspot.com/2009/03/green-buildings-and-efficient-systems.html)
In a nutshell: An Energy Services Company (ESCO), develops projects that don't require any upfront capital money. They facilitate securing financing that gets repaid for through the captured energy savings over time. The savings in energy are guaranteed by the ESCO. If the savings are less, the ESCO pays the shortfall. In other words, instead of continuing to pay the Electric Company the same amount that you pay them today, through energy efficiency, you pay the Electric Company less money but use those savings to pay the bank for the financing.
It is a budget neutral or slightly positive impact for the School while you modernize and make buildings more efficient, reduce carbon footprint, and don't increase taxes to pay for it.
My Choice for Wake Co.
Mon, 03/16/2009 - 10:20 — AngelaWMy Choice for Wake Co. School Board
Today, March 16, 2009, 1 hour ago | (Venita Peyton)
As some are slowly beginning to realize, all persons running for the four open seats on the Wake County School Board will not be elected by all voters. As an East Raleigh resident, no school board candidates will be listed on my ballot.
But since the search is on for the perfect candidate, I’d like to throw in my thoughts on the best qualifications.
-Someone with backbone. A person who can stand his or her ground, when necessary. Sometimes it takes one lone voice of reason to run the lava back up a volcano.
-Someone who is not a party insider. Of either party. With the volume of distrust against both parties, the media will surely use that person’s contacts either for or against others.
-Someone who is human enough to say “I was wrong” when the occasion speaks for it.
-Someone with a degree of cultural awareness. Enough, at least, to hunger for more, as the population of children and their needs, increases daily.
-Someone who isn’t afraid of the rain. I’d rather work with a school board member having a bad hair day, than someone who is high on self adulation.
-Someone who cares about children. Even a childless couple can be known for doing tremendous community involvement activity with other people’s kids.
-Someone who can read behind a smile or a frown. Some parents are under tremendous stress and may be missing parent-teacher conferences because they are intimidated or are overworked. Occasionally, a third party, with empathy, can suggest a small community gathering with other parents involved, just to diffuse some of the negative energy.
One has to be motivated to make the world a better place, when running for political office. No matter how polished or well prepared, there will always be one or more people who won’t vote for a particular candidate, for no particular reason. At the conclusion of a Wake County candidates forum at a senior assisted living center last year, I was approached by a woman, appearing to be well over 70. She said she liked what I had to say, but that she would not be voting for me.
It’s during times like this that a candidate must be armed with enough self respect to respond kindly and, perhaps, change the conversation. Because an abrupt walk-off might be considered rude, no matter how much one person can accidentally, or on purpose, hurt your feelings.
But you must remember that it’s not about you. It’s about serving an entire community of people whose needs must still be met.
Can you believe that WCPSS
Mon, 03/16/2009 - 01:13 — SDR256Can you believe that WCPSS wouldn't even entertain the idea of these schools? Why? They are *LESS* per student than what WCPSS currently spends per student - did you get that, LEEEESSSS money per student.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32bl70JBGzQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VAKBnR-QSls&NR=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJ1lMVr-IDU&feature=related
What about some of that money coming from Washington for LI districts? Assuming the way nodes are sliced and diced and reassigned doesn't screw up getting the funds to where it really should be used, why couldn't this be something to shoot for?
sigh. again. alas. probably too logical. Oh, and it might make them look like they didn't know what they were doing.
Maybe that should be the
Mon, 03/16/2009 - 09:12 — user1234Maybe that should be the question to any one running What is stopping us from turning all the schools over to KIPP and when will a vocational HS come online.
not just WCPSS....ready to pay for blogging??
Thu, 03/12/2009 - 21:08 — AngelaWhttp://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=6707044
McClatchy, the parent company, will have trimmed its workforce by a third when all the cuts are made, saving $300 million. Drescher says he doesn't think the N&O will fold like some daily newspapers have, but he says it will be different with more and more emphasis on its online edition. And, that may cost you in the future.
"Right now the revenue you get online is strictly from advertising. There's been an increasing amount of discussion in recent months about charging for online content and that's something we are interested in studying," he said.
That means buying a subscription to their website, something that is now free. He's also looking at increasing the price of the printed version, something that hasn't happened in many years.
Drescher's optimistic. While the future of newspapers will be less about ink and more about pixels, he claims the N&O will still be around for a long, long time, just with fewer employees.
In case you wondered, the company can't avoid job and pay cuts by just raising the price of the paper. Drescher says the money it makes from subscriptions is just 17 percent of its overall revenue
OT Debate on Bi-lingual
Thu, 03/12/2009 - 08:06 — vsheehanOT Debate on Bi-lingual education.
http://roomfordebate.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/11/educating-immigrants-voices-of-experience/?hp
I know some of you might die before reading the NYT but this is a debate that is well balanced with no academics talking only people that have lived through the educational system of Bi Lingual education. You will like it.
If they're going to start
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 22:38 — ApexterIf they're going to start cutting specials, they need to start doing it at the magnets first. These students already receive far more in the way of extras than the other students in the county. It is wrong to start making the cuts with the kids that already receive less than the kids in magnets.
[tongue in cheek]On the plus side, though, I hear that in spite of the hiring freeze and the impending layoffs of a number of existing staff, I hear we DO have money in the budget to hire 14 more bus drivers![/tongue in cheek]
Start by cutting funding at the elitist magnet schools
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 23:09 — FalcNow there's a good idea that will never happen, unless the BOE (eR) changes.
You see, while Mr. Delaney has stated that treating unequals equally is unequal, apparently treating equals unequally is OK.
It's OK with WCPSS that some ED students get to go to magnets while others go to non-magnets that have a higher ED% than most magnets (aka "not the right" schools). It's OK that some NED students who are assigned to low ED base schools have a much better chance of magnet acceptence than a NED student assigned to a "not the right" base school.
Apexter I am with you. That
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 22:46 — rr77rr99Apexter I am with you. That was my thinking exactly! Here we are doing the same darn song and dance.... cutting this... cutting that...but not at the magnets. No sir. Apply and maybe you can get in to experience the "well rounded" education the minority number of studnets in WCPSS get to enjoy.
Other posts mention AG is a farce. It is. It does not even exist in middle school.
This whole thing is just getting soooooooooo old already. Threat after threat after threat. Enough. Just cut everything, have basic classroom instruction...teach to the middle and then parents who can afford it can take their kids to art, music, gym classes outside of school. In fact, WCPSS should consider cutting all elementary and middle school classes to half day..with only concentration on the materials they need to teach the kids to test (cause that's all they do anyway) and then the parents can just take their kids to the extra "specials" that don't exist at the school at their local church or community center. There you go there's a plan. Stack the classes, 1/2 day splits, and there will be plenty of room and revenue for the towns and church programs. There, problem solved.
user1234--Charlotte isn't
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 21:17 — raleighreaderuser1234--Charlotte isn't really just a 'neighborhood schools' system. They have magnets and the have the 'choice' system. I'm still trying to figure out exactly how all that works with the busing, but Char-Meck is not just busing to 'neighborhood' schools.
Superintendent’s Proposed
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 19:46 — AngelaWSuperintendent’s Proposed Budget for 2009-10
Board Member Questions
March 11, 2009
http://www.wcpss.net/budget/2009-10-spb/09-10-boe-qa.pdf
Warning to all new MYR Parents
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 18:55 — Voice_of_Reason_When Wakefield Elementary converted to year round one of the first things I noticed was a lack of sufficient Teacher Assistants. I had Dr Burns on camera answer that he knew it was a problem but money was not budgeted. That was when the money was there. This to me was the number one reason for the downhill slide in the academic area; not to mention the increase in ESL students. I bet this will never happen a Leesville...Right.
of course it DID happen at
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 19:25 — AngelaWof course it DID happen at Leesville as well, don't kid yourselves....
MYR has screwed up every
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 23:07 — Big_PictureMYR has screwed up every school it has hit. The *grand master plan* is proving to be a dismal failure. Not only did they screw up one Leesville school, they plan to ruin another.
AG parents, I would raise
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 17:44 — H2OGuyAG parents, I would raise some hell about this!!!! You already get the short end of the stick when it gets to funding. This goes along with the good ole average kid in the school as well. These are 2 groups that will get less and less. The ONLY focus is on funding for the poor kids, that are below grade level. WE STILL after all these years, don't see any improvement in the lower income students achieving better since so much funding has been in place the past 30+ years.
The new age
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 20:41 — Voice_of_Reason_If you are poor and a poor performer, money will be spent on you. It is the way of the politically correct. (Th needs of the few outweigh the needs of the many). If your kids are smart, you must be rich, therefore you don't deserve special treatment. That too is the way some people think today.
Seriously, AG is a paper tiger in WCPSS Elementary Schools anyway. It looks good on paper, that's about it. In Middle and High Schools these kids at least have some opportunity to get more advanced classes. A lot of problems would be solved in Elementary School if they just allowed ability grouping. Of course, that's not politically correct.
BTW- All the AG parents could raise hell and not get anywhere with this current school board (eR).
Is this true?
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 23:10 — SDR256Apparently the handouts are not just money.
Today I heard that at Enloe, in HS English when a test is taken, base students automatically have 14 points added, Honors students 7 pts and AP 0 pts. Can this be true?
I think this could mean that for a failed test you might receive a C-. This is not exactly promoting academic excellence.
"The ONLY focus is on
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 19:53 — user1234"The ONLY focus is on funding for the poor kids, that are below grade level. "
Also, the 18% Special Ed kids cost 3X ($8,000/yr vs $24,000/yr) other students.
oops..I forgot about the
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 20:32 — H2OGuyoops..I forgot about the special ed children as well. The lower end, granted is important too, but the average and above is getting shafted BADLY!!!!! NO WONDER the teachers are overwhelmed with their jobs. All I can say is, every needs to stand by their child's teacher next year and know that that ONE person is only ONE person and can't do everything thing that is expected. There isn't a human on Earth that can do all they expect the teachers to do!!! The way the state and county "leaders" send the teachers through the "ringer" is absolutely pathetic!!!! It's amazing that we don't have a severe shortage of teachers, I sure don't blame anyone of them that choose to leave and find something else to do. My hat is off to each of you guys out there. Just know, there's at least one person on your side!!
I totally agree that AG
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 18:14 — SouthEastWakeMomI totally agree that AG services should not be cut. But we are dealing with the BOE and WCPSS both of whom find it perfectly acceptable to be merely average in a well below average (44th/50) state.
Until those in power care to
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 23:05 — Big_PictureUntil those in power care to be excellent WCPSS will continue to slide down the slippery slope.
Break down
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 16:21 — user1234I took the cost per student published at
http://www.schooldatadirect.org/
It is 2006 data. I includedCharlotte because many people hold them up as where Wake should be. (not me).
NoticeCharlotte spends more per student for transportation than Wake so neighborhood schools do not equate to lower transportation cost for them.
Wake spends less than the State average for Staff Support, General Admin, and Food Services which would indicate overhead is not out of line.
Interesting that the urban areas spend more on transportation
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 22:47 — FalcIt seems counterintuitive to me. I would have thought that areas like Wake and CM that are more urban would have higher population densities, which seems should result in lower transport cost per student. It seems rural, lower density districts would have to spend more because they have to pick up each farm/country kid at their house and drive them into town versus having subdivision group stops and express bussing.
Does it really matter if transportation is funded through local property tax dollars or state income tax dollars, either way it is still being funded by taxpayers.
I'd really like to know exactly how this allocation works. Are the tax dollars of state taxpayers in places like Wilmington and Wilson funding the transportation costs associated with WCPSS's policies when they do not get to vote for those who create those policies?
My theory .. urban areas
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 23:23 — user1234My theory .. urban areas have more choices and need more options - magnet schools, etc. My wife lived in a rural area where there were only a few buses that traveled around a large area picking up kids to take to the one school. I think all grades rode at the same time which saves money. Another thought is that bus drivers might be cheaper in rural area compared to urban areas. Finally, all the Special Ed education (one kid / one driver) we have may not be available in rural areas.
Overall, I don't think there is much savings in transportation as it stands today since it seem in line with CM. If we stopped providing transportation and made parents drive their kids, that would have an impact.
Needs
Thu, 03/12/2009 - 09:59 — Falc"urban areas have more choices and need more options" - I'm curious why do urban areas "need" more options?
"If we stopped providing transportation and made parents drive their kids, that would have an impact."
That's why my home district did just that last year for MS and HS kids who lived within the town limits, but that is not feasible here for a number of reasons.
You are right, urban areas
Thu, 03/12/2009 - 11:14 — user1234You are right, urban areas don't "need" them but "want" them ... I think urban parents who tend to have a higher level of education want more options for their kids while rural parents are probably satisfied with the standard offering ... if nothing else, urban areas need more transportation for fill magnet schools used to fill under utilized schools. My experience has been, rural areas only have a few schools and don't experience the high growth and movement areas like Wake have.
Given that transportation is such a small part of the budget (5%) and only say 1/3 of it is used on diversity there is not much (1%?) there to make up for the massive deficit WCPSS faces. Messing with transportation, school lunches, sports, etc. won't close their budget.
If we didn't bus students
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 16:41 — loriacIf we didn't bus students unnecessarily, we would spend less money. The comparison is interesting, but it's not the point.
AG savings
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 14:47 — SDR256Having attended one of the PAGE meetings, I learned that for every - can't remember the exact amount - it was around $32 - spent on No Child Left Behind, the amount for AG was $0.03.
Not sure what they'd save even if they cut the whole program. Seems like G88 is right - busing is where the fat is. And I've been long suspicious that somebody's bubba is in charge of that contract.
Busing
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 15:07 — loriacI've had the same thought - why is there such a lack of curiousity on the subject of busing - by the school board, by the county commissioners, by the N&O!
If you stop busing kids all over the county, there has to be savings. They can't hide this forever given the budget deficit.
I think we have gone over
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 15:36 — user1234I think we have gone over this issue multiple times that transportaion funding comes from the state by an allocation and it would not matter if every student walked to school it would not "save" anything since the state would just allocate our funds to another county.
What is the allocation based on?
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 16:11 — FalcI'M curious what the state allocation is based upon. Is it number of students, number of miles of bus route, number of schools, percentage or number of students outside walking distance, etc.? Thanks.
Why don't we go over it again
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 15:50 — g88ky07for those of us whose calculators don't work.
Why did Wake County have to dip into it's Mason Jar to cover a 2 million dollar plus short-fall last year when fuel peaked at $4.50+/- a gallon and Don Haydon didn't do his math correctly? Was that a "hidden" state allocation fund? So you basically want us to believe that Wake County doesn't have to foot the bill for a single dime of transportation??
No, bussing is a very hot
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 15:13 — lilybugNo, bussing is a very hot issue at the moment. Not only is it costly, but wrecks havoc on the environment. People assumed for awhile that it was a neccessary evil for the greater good, but more and more people are realizing the evidence on that is weak.
geeky--what school are you
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 14:45 — raleighreadergeeky--what school are you referring to?
Just one of probably several,
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 15:43 — g88ky07but we are at Ballentine and this is what is going to happen to us.
If you are at Vance, Middle Creek, Willow Springs, or any others, and are being impacted similarly by reassignments to Banks Road ES, or anywhere else, especially if they are not refilling your seats, I would LOVE to know.
Vance is being backfilled
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 16:04 — SouthEastWakeMomVance is being backfilled from Rand and Timber.
Thanks for the Vance info
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 20:51 — g88ky07I hear Willow Springs isn't being backfilled, but need to confirm that with anyone who might know.
As well as any other MYR schools not being "backfilled" after having kids moved out.
No Backfill at Willow Springs
Thu, 03/12/2009 - 00:03 — fvparentAccording to the reassignment plan, Willow Springs will lose base nodes to Vance and Banks, and will lose application nodes to Herbert Akins. No backfill.
Thanks FVparent
Thu, 03/12/2009 - 08:44 — g88ky07It's good to know people in "the know" :c )
Projected capacity numbers
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 23:24 — SouthEastWakeMomProjected capacity numbers from the quick and dirty analysis I did during the reassignment hearings. I used the 2011-2012 school year numbers (except for Banks as they weren't given). I didn't note what tab/growth model I got them off of from the WCPSS website. 2008/2009 numbers given first then the 2011/2012. All schools are mandatory year round:
Vance - 88.36%/107.55%
Willow Springs - 91.64%/82.63%
Banks - N/A/59.07%
Rand - 82.09%/61.80%
Thanks also SEWM!
Thu, 03/12/2009 - 08:46 — g88ky07Thanks also SEWM!
Gloom & Doom
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 15:38 — g88ky07So let's see, the budget gloom & doom gets worse, no surprise there, I expect it will get much worse, and remember, diesel is at a discount for the moment,
YET, we are going to reassign 145 kids out of an ES school, not send any new kids to that school, drive the total number of children to well below capacity, force the children left to different tracks when many of the tracks collapse, totally restructuring their lives AGAIN, not have the need or money to keep some of the Teachers or TA's around, cut programs, drive the F&R #'s up...
ALL while paying to cool, heat, operate, maintain, and transport to, empty classes, JUST so Chuck and his gang can keep another school on a forced year round schedule THAT IS CERTAINLY NOT NEEDED NOW!
Perfect way to help manage the budget crisis!
Perfectly STUPID!!!!
formula
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 13:37 — MudcrutchCould you please explain how the teacher allotment formula is calculated? What is the change?
Currently, specials are
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 13:56 — KeungHui (author)Currently, specials are funded at 1 month of teacher employment per 13.75 students. It would now rise to 1 month per 14 students. It's page 251 of the budget box.
Was The MYR Mistake Brought Up??
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 13:30 — Lisa_BWas there any talk about how much money they could SAVE by discontinuing MYR????
It is just insane that they would even consider WASTING more money operating these schools on the YR calendar when the capacity is not needed and there is available UNUSED capacity at nearby schools.
Let's see if the "Ethics Policy" is followed by all 9 board members (I know that a few have 'seen the light' recently and realize how WASTEFUL MYR has been and will continue to be).....the facts have been presented. Will they continue to be ignored?
Our elem school only offers
Wed, 03/11/2009 - 13:26 — raleighreaderOur elem school only offers the big 3 specials that they are required to offer so I'm not sure where they are going to cut back in that category. We already have fewer AG services than we had last year. Can't wait to see how/if they cut that one even further.