The WakeEd blog is devoted to discussing and answering questions about the major issues facing the Wake County school system. How will the new student assignment plan balance diversity, stability, proximity and stability? How will Jim Merrill replace Tony Tata as the new superintendent of the state's largest district? How will voters react to a $810 million school construction bond referendum on Oct. 8 ballot? How will this fall's school board elections impact the future of the district?

WakeEd is maintained by The News & Observer's Wake schools reporter, T. Keung Hui. While Keung posts information and analysis on the issues, keep us posted on your suggestions, questions, tips and what you're doing to cope with the changes in Wake's schools.

Choose a blog

GSIW calls Wake school board election bill "interference in local representation"

Bookmark and Share

The Great Schools in Wake Coalition is telling its members they need to continue to fight against the Wake County school board redistricting bill because "we must stop this interference in local representation."

In action alert dated Monday, GSIW asks people to contact Wake County House members to let them know they oppose Senate Bill 325. The bill, which passed the state Senate, is awaiting discussion in the state House elections committee.

GSIW offers talking points to use, including how "redrawing lines that racially polarize the community does harm to our county." They suggest mirroring locally a bill proposed in the General Assembly that would create a nonpartisan redistricting process for state legislative seats.

In a case of hairsplitting, GSIW challenges the notion made by Sen. Neal Hunt that it would increase voter representation, particularly in cases where a parent might currently not be able to vote for the board member who represents their child's school.

"The bill does not increase representation for voters, with its two proposed at-large districts," according to GSIW. "In fact, the chance that children won’t attend a school in the district where their family lives increases."

On their first point, the bill would let you vote for two school board seats. That's up from the one seat you can now vote on.

On the second point, the new lines are so non-compact that it's possible your child wouldn't go to school in either of the two seats you'd vote on.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

GSIW has been screwing this community

for years with their brand of "interference", so they should know it well when they see it.

Nonetheless, GSIW doesn't get a say in this story. The GA cares not about them or their concerns.


Some nerve. Polarizing the community? I go back to what I said earlier. GSIW made a mockery of the '09 election, the '09 School Board and our school system in general. They illegally took over School Board meetings, creating fear to the point that parents didn't want to attend (and still don't). They illegally protested and got arrested. They shut down anyone else's opinion in any and every fashion - including Tata's when he attended their event about the Choice Plan. They overtake meetings wearing scarves and think it's cute. If they weren't so scary, they'd be comical.


If anyone should be accused of interference in local representation it is GSIW. They mastered the subject of interference during the last board's tenure!


Well, there's a load of disingenuous cr***. GSIW opposes the bill because it will likely turn control back over to Republican hands. Had the positions been reversed, they would be all in favor of it.

They're the ones that have been doing the radical polarization.

Cars View All
Find a Car
Jobs View All
Find a Job
Homes View All
Find a Home

Want to post a comment?

In order to join the conversation, you must be a member of newsobserver.com. Click here to register or to log in.

About the blogger

T. Keung Hui covers Wake schools.