The Great Schools in Wake Coalition is accusing the Wake County school board's student assignment committee of engaging in "bullying" by floating the proposed reassignment of thousands of Southeast Raleigh students.
In a press release today, GSIW charges the proposed reassignment of more than 6,000 students, many from low-income families in Southeast Raleigh, is a case of targeting families who have little sway or influence over the board "under the guise" of proximity.
GSIW contends that, at least in the case of David Williams' proposed reassignment of students out of East Garner Middle that it will actually result in the Southeast Raleigh kids going to a more distant school.
“Bullying involves an imbalance of power or strength, and that’s just what continues to happen in Wake County’s student assignment,” said Yevonne Brannon, GSIW chairwoman in the press release. “Low-income children, those whose families have little sway or influence over this Board, are losing out, and in this case, being reassigned without any parent input.”
Brannon also contends that one of the messages from the four November community workshops is that parents want stability for next school year.
“The Board majority continues to operate under a mantra of ‘divide, demonize, and demoralize,'” said Brannon. “The three-year assignment plan was implemented to provide greater stability in assignment and allow the Board of Education to focus on improving student achievement.
Instead, they are politicizing student assignment at the expense of the children they were elected to serve. We need a Board that will unite our citizens, focus on student needs and parental input—and not simply bully the community with misbegotten ideas that serve a political agenda.”

Comments
We can also make a case for
Wed, 12/01/2010 - 23:35 — HJ2ss2We can also make a case for this population being bullied when their children were bused all over Wake County to "even out the numbers".
Very true.
Thu, 12/02/2010 - 17:40 — jenmanVery true.
assignment or
Wed, 12/01/2010 - 21:11 — AngelaWassignment or teachers?
Parents have always worried about where to send their children to school; but the school, statistically speaking, does not matter as much as which adult stands in front of their children. Teacher quality tends to vary more within schools—even supposedly good schools—than among schools.
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/01/what-makes-a-great-teacher/7841/1/
...
Wed, 12/01/2010 - 19:59 — Sideburns“The three-year assignment plan was implemented to provide greater stability in assignment..."
The three year plan reassigned 26,000 children and Brannon calls it "greater stability". The student assignment committee recommends reassigning children based on the new Policy 6200 and Brannon calls it "targeting families". Reassignment was a good thing under previous Boards -- but is "misbegotten" with this Board? Got it.
Everyone suffered when the
Wed, 12/01/2010 - 20:13 — user12345Everyone suffered when the 26,000 had to be placed due to growth. What people are wondering is why 6000 SE students are being targeted now?
In a press release today,
Wed, 12/01/2010 - 19:31 — user12345JT sure is not offering much stability to SE parents. Wonder why he has singled them out?
Why?
Wed, 12/01/2010 - 22:27 — FSandYOUHow about because you gotta start somewhere.
Try dry ice on your bag of hate. I hear it helps freeze things in place so that you can cope with the world around you better.
OK, so you want to make a
Wed, 12/01/2010 - 18:13 — willynillyOK, so you want to make a difference? Take these issues on for a change:
Make every parent provide a number so that teachers can call them. Don't allow a parent to come to school on June 1 and yell and scream about there child failing and blame us when we did not have a number.
Get involved knowing what IEPs are and help us (teachers) avoid having parents get admin to sign off on their child getting a minimum grade of a C. This might be possible if some of these students could get a C on a multiple choice test with the choices being A and B.
Create an oversight committe for principals. Find a way to discover what principals are doing to teachers and then hold those principals accountable if found to have done something unethical.
Get involved where it counts, with teachers....in the classrooms. All this other stuff will go away if the foundation is strong.
Good grief...
Wed, 12/01/2010 - 17:29 — Bob_SconceA few people on a board advisory committee propose something (which has been proposed by many other people before in a variety of different settings), and GSIW has its collective underwear in a knot that Tedesco "allowed" them to do it? Talk about an over-reaction.
These "we're outraged" press
Wed, 12/01/2010 - 18:21 — CaryCurmudgeonThese "we're outraged" press releases from GWIS have become pretty routine. I read them and think of the inspector in Casablanca walking into Rick's casino and saying "I'm shocked, absolutely shocked, to see gambling going on here."
Play it again, Yvonne.....
totally agree
Thu, 12/02/2010 - 12:22 — wakepta123it is a political press release meant to rally the base. Oh eys GSIW is so non-political run by yvonee brannon.
Rally the base?
Thu, 12/02/2010 - 17:45 — FSandYOUWhat, all 150 of them?