Gov. Bev Perdue is standing by her decision to give the Order of the Long Leaf Pine award to the Rev. William Barber, president of the state NAACP.
Perdue, who was at Wiley Elementary School this afternoon, told WTVD she was "honored and privileged to give him the award." The award has been criticized by supporters of the Wake County school board majority.
“I think all of us understand the need to stand up for what we believe in, whether you agree or disagree with the person he's been a real agent for change in North Carolina in his role as the head of the NAACP and I admire that,” Perdue told WTVD.



Comments
Totally random but when I
Fri, 08/27/2010 - 17:40 — HJ2ss2Totally random but when I read about Bev being "honored and priviledged" I can't help but wonder if it's anything like Led Zepplin's "Dazed and Confused".
It's more like "Bev'd and Bewildered"
Fri, 08/27/2010 - 18:08 — g88ky07She has guaranteed her one and only term. Not that it was ever in doubt!
Of course the Guv is
Thu, 08/26/2010 - 11:54 — actnowOf course the Guv is privileged to honor any clown that would boost her political fortunes. We bus children to academic glory and politicians to power.
HEY BEV.......try this why
Thu, 08/26/2010 - 09:57 — willynillyHEY BEV.......try this why don't ya! Let's say you find someone you can control and then appoint them OVER an elected body. Yeah, THAT'S the ticket......find 4 people you like and simply appoint them OVER the people on the board (ELECTED PEOPLE) and that will solve EVERYTHING. HUH? What was that? Oh darn....LOL.....that's right, she already tried that!!!!!!!!!!
Perdue can pick them!
Wed, 08/25/2010 - 23:31 — PACK_MIKE77Barber is right up there with Perdue's "honored and priviledged" choice to run the State Highway Patrol. Let her keep picking them!
That is pretty pathetic,
Wed, 08/25/2010 - 19:57 — CaryCurmudgeonThat is pretty pathetic, that she would use a ceremony to mark the first day of school for political purposes. Who says there aren't any moon pies in our schools.
“I think all of us understand the need to
stand upbreak the law for what we believe in"Others
Wed, 08/25/2010 - 20:37 — HereWeGoOthers who broke the law for what they believed in:
Martin Luther King Jr
Nelson Mandela
Gandhiji
Rosa Parks
Susan B. Anthony
The citizens that hid Anne Frank
The citizens that formed the Underground Railroad
Oskar Schindler
Shirin Ebadi
James Chaney
Andrew Goodman
Michael Schwerner
Homer Plessey
AungSan Suu Kyi
You forgot these guys on
Thu, 08/26/2010 - 08:39 — shearertwYou forgot these guys on your list:
Jane Fonda
Timothy McVeigh
Bill Ayers
.......
Just because you believe in your cause doesn't make it RIGHT!
Sorry, late to the party.
Thu, 08/26/2010 - 08:43 — shearertwSorry, late to the party. I hadn't seen Bob's similar post below when I posted this.
I would not call what has
Wed, 08/25/2010 - 23:00 — willynillyI would not call what has been done here anything close to the coveted "civil disobedience" of the 1950s. Every weekend I drive by the monument in Greensboro where Woolworths used to be. I cannot even imagine the bravery and just plain "guts" it took for those young men and women to sit at that counter. It would not take a rocket scientist to see that what was happening needed to be stopped. Lynchings in which parents took their YOUNG children and looked into the camera and smiled as a young black man swung from the end of a rope. Disgusting and perverse. Civil rights thrown to the wolves.
Shindler knew of the camps and the gasing of human beings. He took steps to stop something that was already underway. The same was true of Anne Frank and her family and friends. People knew what was happening. Also, Mandela was keenly aware (as most were) that humans were being killed because of their race.
I do hope that this board is not being comapred to the Nazis, lynchers and others who have perpetrated hate and evil among their fellow man. To do that is alarmist, (as some have shown on these strands) such as saying the board is being drug into court. There has never been, to my knowledge, anything like that mentioned. I will say that there is a great danger in this case being dragged to court to have it end up at the Supreme Court. There is no way that ends well. If the board's postion wins people who want resegregation will see that and use it to fill their very own agenda. At that point Brown v BOE will be on a slippery slope and close to coming to an end. If the anti-neighborhood schools win students may be moved from school to school year after year to ensure a Federal Mandate is fulfilled to create "social balance." We know that social balance is not supported as an answer by any conclusive evidence. I'm not sure I like either of those scenarios.
The democratic process has worked here. NO ONE can predict the outcome of these inititives since NO research exists to support either one. This notwithstanding the fact that these initiatives have yet to be implemented. A large segment of Wake County became tired of the status quo. I do not believe that they wish their children avoid going to school with this child or that child. Do those people exist? Yes, of course they do, but I do not think that this vote was compiled by those people. Apparently many parents were tired of their children being transferred so often to balance a population.
Can anyone thinking clearly see the possibility that the WCPSS has routinely moved large numbers of students? I think so. Has this been done to improve grades in lower performing schools? Certainly it has. To deny this would be to simply ignore that as a fact. Can a person thinking clearly see that moving a large group of students away from one school and another group into that school does NOT solve the problem that the school (one of them) is not being improved upon? I hope so.
Recent research seems to show that there is a greater disparity WITHIN these two schools (between which children are being moved) as to effective teachers than there is between the two schools themselves. So should we not find out which school is effective BEFORE we move a large number of students? Hmmmmmm, what if the lower performing students are moved to a school where the disparity is greater thus improving the chances that each of these children may get that "bad teacher" for more than 2 years consecutively?
This LA Times thing has really thrown a glitch into this whole thing. I have posted in many of these strands that.....IT BOILS DOWN TO THE CLASSROOM AND THE TEACHER! I think this study the LA Times has done shows that, too.
So where are we now? Well, we have one group that says that there are REEMS of research that shows this mixing thing works. Well, I have been at the same school for now my third year. I have taken a group of students who are diverse, F&R, low SES etc etc and gone from 36% passing the science EOG to 65% in a single year. (I was not working at the school when the 36% hit). Last year my students passed at almost 80%. In 2 years, in a very one sided population, one in which many here are saying it can't be done, I helped my students increase scores from 36% to almost 80% in 2 years. I had 11 students get 4s 2 years ago and last year 33 got 4s on the science EOG. Now, of course, the posters will say that testing proves nothing. YES......it does.
In 8th grade science I can take from 90 to 100 students at the beginning of the school year....many who cannot read or write and move them VERY far. I work very hard to teach them to read and write. I teach them to think for themsleves. I teach them to do research and to trust themselves. I teach them how to learn vocabulary. I teach them how to do this by themselves......without me. I actually USE THE TEXTBOOK unlike some idiot teachers who praise themselves that they NEVER use a textbook. Hey, if you attended college and took Biology you know that this skill is much needed.....USE THE BOOK D----MIT. At the end of the year my students have been exposed to an entire year of material......and they remember it. So....what is wrong with testing. If you are a good teacher......you teach the curriculum........and the test is written based on the curriculum.....what are you affraid of? I have proven, many times, that my (ANY) students CAN do it AND THEY CAN DO IT ANY SCHOOL. Contrary to any and all predictions.
Education is so full of BS these days. I do not believe in most of the crap they tell teachers to do. I paid a heavy price for this from an assitant principal and a principal at Holly Ridge Middle School in 2004. I was accused OF "CRAP" and raked over the coals. I was offered by the WCPSS attorney to leave and keep my mouth shut. My response: "Screw that, I want to see what you have." OK, so I said that to MY attorney. I fought and won. I was reinstated. I was sent back TO THE SAME SCHOOL from where I was "accused." My principal was not finished. He made further accusations and was caught dead in a LIE. He lied to me and to MAurice Boswell, Asst Superintendent HR. I produced letters and emails to this fact. The WCPSS promoted this idiot. THAT is what happens to successful teachers who know their s--t. NO ONE wants to hear that the fads and feel good techniques are useless and most of what educators believe is NOT true.
Wow
Wed, 08/25/2010 - 23:05 — starsonoursYou are trying to compare the people who interupt a school board meeting with the people on this list?
You would actually compare
Wed, 08/25/2010 - 22:43 — CaryCurmudgeonYou would actually compare Barber with these people? Really? Tell you what, if Bev is so convinced that Barber is right and we should just reload the old busing program, then she should make it happen. Her party controls the state legislature, and Wake County is at their mercy. Go ahead, call a special session and force Wake County to go back to busing. If she admires Barber for "standing up for what he believes in" then she should do the same -- and live with the repercussions. And since this is so important to her, she should have her party mandate socio-economic busing in all state school districts, not just Wake County. That cause is no more just in our school system than any other.
Why don't Donte Strobino and his FIST buddies get Longleafs too? They stood up for their beliefs and worked just as well with the school board.
BTW, I won't list them all here, but there are many more Americans who brought about significant positive reforms while working within the law and the democratic process.
Sorry, but this just reeks of pandering for votes, and of an attempt at diverting attention away from her own problems with Highway Patrol corruption, campaign finance, SBI mismanagement, etc.
Pfft....
Wed, 08/25/2010 - 22:34 — Bob_SconceHere are some other names of people who broke the law for what they believed in:
Timothy McVeigh
Terry Nichols
Michael Fortier
Ted Kaczynski
Eric Rudolph
Sometimes breaking the law for what you believe in just means you're a nutjob.
No Bob... when you murder
Thu, 08/26/2010 - 20:45 — zandeNo Bob... when you murder innocent people in cold blood you are a "nut job." There is zero comparison here.
Hmm, I have a different
Sat, 08/28/2010 - 10:08 — woodstockHmm, I have a different take. Barber -- professed representative of the black community -- has done nothing to improve the dirth of academic achievement among blacks, especially black males; and, in fact, would rather rabble-rouse and play political games than perform any actual work to enact positive change. Therefore he plays a role in perpetuating academic genocide ... students who do not graduate are destined for a life of financial hardship. It may not be murder, but it is just as insidious.
Is there zero comparison
Thu, 08/26/2010 - 21:13 — starsonoursIs there zero comparison here? Yes the only thing they have in common is being arrested. But the same is true for the school board protestors and the first list. Do you really try to place someone who disrupts a meeting on the same level as Gandi and Mandela? Nope no comparison and equally absurd.
Nor do I try to compare the
Thu, 08/26/2010 - 21:19 — zandeNor do I try to compare the people arrested at the school board meeting to those who commit mass murder. That is just morally bankrupt and you certainly have to know that. At least I hope so.
Pfft...
Thu, 08/26/2010 - 22:12 — Bob_SconceI did not suggest that what Rev. Barber was arrested was at all equivalent to what Timothy McVeigh was arrested for. My point is that it's possible to break the law for something you believe in**, yet not have Ghandi's moral authority. If you can easily think of other examples I could have used, I'd be interested to hear them. Remember that the names have to be ones that most people would recognize.
(**Not suggesting this is true of Barber; I still think he's just self-aggrandizing. I'm not sure about his cohorts.)
Yes both comparisons are
Thu, 08/26/2010 - 21:27 — starsonoursYes both comparisons are absurd. I don't speak for Bob but it appears to me that he was trying to show how absurd the first list was by coming up with an list that also had no comparison other than an arrest record.
Fair enough Stars. I don't
Thu, 08/26/2010 - 22:05 — zandeFair enough Stars. I don't think I am going to far out on a limb here to say that most people would be able to tell the moral difference between someone who gets arrested for mass murder during the execution of a hate crime vs. someone who gets arrested during a peaceful protest against a policy he/she believes will lead to the racial and economic resegregation of the school system. That was my issue with Bobs post.
Pfft..
Thu, 08/26/2010 - 22:15 — Bob_SconceI don't think Barber cares one whit about racial and economic segregation. I think he cares about one thing, and that one thing has a divinity degree, a buddy named Tyson and now an order of the long leaf pine.
Sorry Bob I just copied your
Thu, 08/26/2010 - 08:41 — shearertwSorry Bob I just copied your post/idea above....hadn't scrolled down far enough yet.
Come on now, you are trying
Wed, 08/25/2010 - 23:45 — magnetParentCome on now, you are trying to put "protestors breaking the law" in the same category as "mass murderers breaking the law"? Are you sure you are a lawyer? ;-)
Not quite...
Thu, 08/26/2010 - 00:15 — Bob_SconceI am suggesting that breaking the law when you think you're doing something good doesn't make you a hero. In general, it's a bad thing.. How about Mike Nifong? Didn't kill anybody, and probably thought those Duke boys deserved it.
For every one rare person you can find who broke the law with the highest intentions, I can point to a thousand who broke it for the lowest. I think Barber is in this second group, not the first. If he really were high-minded, he would have taken Margiotta up on his offer to sit down with him and the Superintendent. But, Barber was more interested in the limelight.
Could not have said better
Wed, 08/25/2010 - 23:02 — willynillyCould not have said better myself.
In my opinion
Wed, 08/25/2010 - 20:58 — loriacIf Mr. Barber railed against the injustice of the use of EI, and how it resulted in keeping minority children out of 8Th grade algebra and ultimately the college track, I would respect that. However, he fights for the very system that is not helping ED children. I'd love to follow the money. In my opinion, Mr. Barber cannot be mentioned in the same breath with your list. He is all about self-promotion,unlike every person there.
Would you include Nancy
Wed, 08/25/2010 - 21:08 — zandeWould you include Nancy Petty and the 20 some others that were arrested protesting the elimination of the diversity policy over the last several months? What sort of "self promotion" were they interested in? Could it be that people really feel a passion about this that you do not understand?
Could It Be They Are Misguided!
Wed, 08/25/2010 - 21:24 — JanisTangoCould it be they are misguided? I talked to one of the 'Pastors' that signed the letter with Petty when she got involved. This paster does not agree at all with what is happening with the protests and arrests. This person felt misguided by what Petty ask them to sign. They agree with diversity...sure we all do. They don't agree with the protests, bringing up Jim Crow and the disrespect this crowd had dished out time and time again in regards to the new school board. They do think this group is now part of the problem and wishes they would try to be part of the solution. What a novel concept.
JanisTango.I hear what you
Wed, 08/25/2010 - 21:43 — zandeJanisTango.I hear what you are saying and I am sure that you do have a point in a few cases. I also met a few of those who were arrested. Some at the March meeting and some at the meeting when 19 people were arrested. Misguided is not a word I would use to describe these individuals. I would describe them as determined and passionate and feeling threatened and unheard.
I also have to ask... do you consider the board majority as part of the problem? I really do consider them a huge part of the problem. They came in with very little community buy-in (I know.... they were elected but democracy requires leading as well as campaigning) they quickly pushed through an agenda that would radically change the way WCPSS would distribute services and they were quite dismissive of those who disagreed with them. The level of protest, I believe, indicates failure on their part as much as it indicates misguidance, recalcitrance or disrespect on the part of the protestors. They are very poor leaders IMO.
I Haven't Always Agreed With Everything...
Thu, 08/26/2010 - 08:44 — JanisTangoI haven't always agreed with everything the new board has done and I have said this time and time again, but I also feel that no one has given them any opportunity to be 'heard' either. They have dealt with protests and nastiness since the day they took office. What would you do if people labeled you the way these people have been labeled by the 'other side'. People that sit here and say everything was hunky dory before they were elected haven't been paying attention. There was so much turmoil and conflict in this school district and the previous board didn't help the situation. Parents felt they have no choice but to make a change at the ballot box and that is what happened. The comments out of Chuck Delaney and Lori Millberg's were offensive and down right rude. They were both given a pass by all their supporters. I'm sure their mouths dropped to the floor when the election results came in. They sat up in the 'ivory' tower and continued to level abuse on parents time and time again. They had no intention of sitting down and listening to the parents that were offering different solutions when they were in control. It's always easier to paint the parents that were complaining as racists and people that don't want poor black kids in their school. To be honest since I have been involved I haven't met a single parent that fits that mold. I'm willing to give them a chance to do something different.
I actually think the board
Wed, 08/25/2010 - 22:33 — jeffrey1I actually think the board majority could be doing a lot more. I like the way JT has responded and I wish the other 4 were more like him. If I was counseling the board majority, I would tell them:
"Look guys, a lot of us think you are on the right side of the diversity issue, so why not go out of your way to accomodate whatever opposition is thrown at you. Let Kevin Hill and Keith Sutton sit on another committee or two as long as you retain your majority. Give Barber his 45 minutes in front of the board, and invite someone from WSCA (Note to Mudge) to give a 45 minute presentation on the majority's views. Let everyone have their 3 minutes at the microphone during Public Speaks, and don't bang the gavel until they are 30 seconds over. And for Pete's sake, don't pass notes, engage in conversation, or make ANY comments when someone is speaking. I believe some staff person takes notes on every speaker, so send out a thank you form letter to every speaker following each meeting (I've heard of other districts doing this). Keep meetings to two a month, even if the second meeting is just a public comment period. Invite the NAACP, NC Heat, and anyone else who requests it, to a one-time meeting with the board. Is this going to take a lot of time from already busy schedules? Yes, but you guys are taking a huge step here, and you've got a lot of nervous people out there that want to be heard.
And communication is the key. Ron, you or another member of your majority should be giving a "state of the school board" type of address at least quarterly. Get the N&O to give you a quarterly op-ed column. Get WRAL to do give you a half hour of TV time once per quarter. Use the media to your advantage. Lay the facts out for everyone to see. Use charts, tables, and whatever visual aids that are necessary to show people that diversity busing has not achieved the results that were intended. (I was a fan of Ross Perot before he began to flip flop on his candidacy). Go out into the poor communities and let the voices of ED parents be heard. You guys have nothing to worry about - the facts are on your side.
Debra - forget about after school dance lessons! If you've got an opportunity to save money, take it. Cut whatever you can, but do not cut back on teachers. You guys are not making that much money for your huge efforts, so if you can afford it, donate your board salaries back to the school system (Tom Oxholm did this). You did not take this job for the money anyway.
And finally, fight back. Do not let accusations from groups like the NAACP and GSIW go without response. Don't let them hijack words like diversity and resegregation. The facts are on your side. When people say that you were elected with by only 6% of the voters, let them know that it was significantly greater than any other board election in history. The decision on H-6 was the right decision. Show them why. MYR did not save money, and may have actually cost more money. Show them the capacity figures, the extra utility costs, the extra busing costs, the wear and tear on the facilities that cuts down on the life of infrastructure, and tell them about the dozens of districts around the country where MYR failed and was abandoned. Increased security costs are not your fault. Put the blame where it belongs. Burns was going to get his $145,000 whether he worked or not, yet there are thousands that believe that was an avoidable expense. Tell the people how using NCSBA to hire a superintendent is penny-wise and pound-foolish. When these groups spread misinformation - Fight Back."
Jeff, Great post, thanks for
Wed, 08/25/2010 - 22:55 — CaryCurmudgeonJeff,
Great post, thanks for the plug. We've seen Mr. Barbor's 45-minute presentation, he gave it at a press conference. There are no revelations there, just lots of rhetoric and accusations. From the NC Spin program it was clear that Barbor quickly becomes lost when the conversation moves from rhetoric to facts. Give him his 45 minutes and be done with it. In fact, give him an extra half hour. Let him make his pitch, then let the board members ask him questions for 30 minutes. See if he can provide direct answers to the hard questions about what the old busing plan did for ED/minority performance.
And, please, finish the zone/assignment plan quickly and move on to building a plan which will result in improvement of minority/ED academic performance and start closing the achievement gap. Barbor & company are not interested in compromises, so just get it done. Having a sensible plan in place to improve academic performance should help get the focus back on education, where it belongs.
Ask Questions
Wed, 08/25/2010 - 23:19 — jeffrey1See if he can provide direct answers to the hard questions about what the old busing plan did for ED/minority performance.
That's the key to Barber, and a lot of diversity supporters for that matter. Ask them the right questions and they will trip over their own words. When the question is evaded, ask it again. They can't win.
HereWeGo.... !! Yep... great
Wed, 08/25/2010 - 20:39 — zandeHereWeGo.... !! Yep... great list and great response.
Bless her heart!!!
Wed, 08/25/2010 - 19:31 — aquaman4life68Bless her heart!!! LOL....she's just trying to buy votes, kinda pathetic..
You lost me there aqua. What
Wed, 08/25/2010 - 20:37 — zandeYou lost me there aqua. What money are you talking about... buying votes?? Maybe pandering if you want to go that direction but what do you mean by "buying votes?"
I believe he is referring to
Thu, 08/26/2010 - 02:15 — HJ2ss2I believe he is referring to Bev.