WakeEd

The WakeEd blog is devoted to discussing and answering questions about the major issues facing the Wake County school system. How much will the new Democratic majority on the school board do to undo the changes made by Republicans since 2009? Will the new student assignment plan be a hybrid of the last two models or primarily be a return to the use of busing for diversity? Who will replace Tony Tata as the new superintendent of the state's largest district? How will voters react to a likely request in 2013 to borrow potentially more than $1 billion to build and renovate schools?

WakeEd is maintained by The News & Observer's Wake schools reporter, T. Keung Hui. While Keung posts information and analysis on the issues, keep us posted on your suggestions, questions, tips and what you're doing to cope with the changes in Wake's schools.

Choose a blog

Going from African American male achievement to the diversity policy

Bookmark and Share

A discussion Thursday about how to help improve the performance of African American male students turned into yet another fight over school diversity in Wake County.

School board member Keith Sutton gave a presentation during Thursday's ED task force meeting highlighting the racial achievement and graduation rate gaps between black and white students. Click here and here to see what was handed out.

The ensuing Q&A turned into a discussion of the elimination of the diversity policy, with some shouting and heated words.

The first questioner, a Ligon parent, noted how the Schott Report talked about how African American males do better in good schools, which he said means integrated schools. To applause from the crowd, he said it's "crazy" to isolate more black students into schools that aren't integrated.

The Rev. Anthony Davis, a representative of Bishop Richard K. Thompson, head of the Eastern North Carolina Episcopal District of The A.M.E. Zion Church, talked about how toxic the discussion has become. He said he's read blog comments from people about throwing the "garbage kids" out of their schools.

School board member John Tedesco, chair of the ED task force, said he struggles at times with the way the community conversation has degenerated. Responding to Davis' remarks, he said he would "slap someone in the face" who talked about getting rid of the garbage kids.

Tedesco said that the community is a lot closer on the issues than it is apart, saying they agree on 73 of 74 things.

"While there’s a difference in perception on student assignment, I seriously think we need to harness our energy on the 73 things we agree with," Tedesco said.

But what seemed to set things off is when Tedesco talked about how the other large N.C. school districts are "dealing with significantly more challenged populations and been able to start taking steps to reinvent themselves around public education."

When Tedesco mentioned that Guilford County's graduation rate is higher than Wake's, Patty Williams of the Great Schools in Wake Coalition shouted out that he's ignoring the white flight from the schools there.

"You‘re asking us why we can’t move forward when what you did Tuesday was a step backward," said Jim Martin, a member of the task force, about Tuesday's reassignment plan vote.

Davis said that the reason they're so concerned is that they're looking down the road and seeing the situation in Wake will get worse without the diversity policy.

“I don’t just want you to think it’s troublemakers or people who just want to march," Davis said.

Tedesco responded that while they'll have a lot of arguments about the elements of student assignments it's not about the intent. This prompted Diana Bader to shout out from the audience "you proved it (intent) on Tuesday," as she pointed to the reassignment of low-income students into higher poverty schools.

"You can scream all you want," Tedesco replied to Bader. "I know you like to scream."

"We care about children just as passionately as you do," Bader replied. "You want everybody to fall over and march in line with you."

Bader accused Tedesco of trying to manipulate the public into thinking that the school board will find the resources to help students at high-poverty schools.

"We have a good school system the way it is," Bader shouted. "We’re not going to go along with the ride.”

Jennifer Mansfield of the Wake Schools Community Alliance countered by asking if things are so good why they're looking at graduation rates at the meeting.

Bader said you should compare Wake to the rest of the state and the nation.

Mansfield said she came to the meeting to talk about helping African American male students, not to talk about student assignment policy. She said people need to stop yelling and speechifying.

Tedesco told Mansfield he respectfully disagrees with her. He said that if he can use the meeting as a bridge for having a healthy conversation that he's fine with it. He said would prefer to not have ranting and raving.

The Ligon parent who had fired the first question during the Q&A blamed the school board for making the conversation so toxic. He said the school board is pitting schools against each other while magnet parents have been tirelessly giving to help their schools.

But Tedesco replied that the community was being divided before the current board took office.

The daughter of the Ligon parent spoke up about how diverse her classes are at the school.

"School isn’t just about academics although it’s a large point," she said. "It’s about meeting new people and preparing people for the outside world.”

Lynette Aytch questioned how Tedesco can talk at the ED meetings about his commitment to vulnerable students when he and other board members make decisions that "seem to be preferential to moving kids around to address a political agenda and not an education agenda."

"People are not blind to that," Aytch said. "It seems to be two different kinds of conversation. If you’re committed to vulnerable students, you won’t make decisions that show no regard to vulnerable students."

The next speaker defended Tedesco for being willing to speak with critics, saying "let’s not always kill the messenger.”

Sutton called for a moment of civility before he criticized Tedesco and the leaders of Wake CARES.

Sutton said that while he appreciates Tedesco's sensitivity and care for economically disadvantaged children, he's creating polices that seem to hurt them and are a step backward. Then he pointed to Tedesco's appearances on national television and how he went to a Tea Party event last year to "ride them on. " He said there's a disconnect creating a level of distrust.

Sutton then mentioned the remarks that Patrice Lee, a co-founder of Wake CARES, made at the Garner High reassignment forum about the achievement gap at Enloe High. (He didn't mention Lee by name.)

Sutton then mentioned, by name, how Wake CARES co-founder Kathleen Brennan, has brought up the poor graduation rate for low-income kids in Wake. He accused her of not doing anything to talk about how to help the situation.

"If you talk about graduation rates and the only time is to help your agenda, then that doesn’t quite sound sincere," Sutton said. "That’s the disconnect. That’s the distrust."

Bader started choking up as she talked about how passionate she is about the students and that she knows what Tedesco is doing to them.

Tedesco said caring about kids doesn't mean you only have to have a a particular view on the issue.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Just how small is the vocal

Just how small is the vocal opposition to the school board. The same few names keep being mentioned time and again. Do they really represent a significant point of view? It seems like an inordinate amount of time is spent responding to their antagonism... not sure what they offer to the process.  Quite frankly, some of them -- like Bader and Martin -- seem unstable.

To round out his first week

To round out his first week on the job, Wake superintendent Tony Tata offered insight to the problem, and potential solutions to boosting student achievement.

"I want to really understand the context of what is happening here in Wake County, so I can make the best decisions as I lead this school district going forward," Tata said.

Tata has said that increasing student achievement and preparing students to compete in a global economy are his top priorities as superintendent 

http://www.wral.com/news/education/wake_county_schools/story/9064989/ 

Again and again ... my

Again and again ... my wife's HS kids CAN NOT READ ... maybe at a 5th grade level ... which means they can not write.  Again and again, they get passed along in ES and MS since EOGs does not hold them back and finally they get stuck in HS until they age out or quit .. if you can not read, you can not do math, science, history, etc.  .... why make this so hard?  And grouping them all in the same school won't solve the problem like JT thinks.

Well, this is the harsh

Well, this is the harsh reality of Wake's "award winning" school system and "nationally recognized diversity policy?" So, it seems you are beginning to finally recognize that busing kids around the county served no purpose and that it is time for change and a more focused attention on student achievement -- there are no magic bus rides. It is good that you are starting to look at the facts. I keep telling folks you just could not be as stupid as you usually seem.

"grouping" in magnets apparently doesn't help either...

High schools in Wake County administer End-of-Course Tests to measure proficiency in certain subject areas. At Enloe High School in Raleigh, for example, at least 90 percent or more of white students earned proficient scores on course-end English, algebra and biology tests.

About 75 percent of black students were proficient in English, but just 57 percent were proficient in biology and 36 percent in algebra. 

http://www.wral.com/news/education/wake_county_schools/story/9064989/ 

About 75 percent of black

About 75 percent of black students were proficient in English, but just 57 percent were proficient in biology and 36 percent in algebra.

And you solution is to concentrate them in a high poverty school?  Any thought to addressing their need in the school they are in now?

I think it makes a lot of

I think it makes a lot of sense to put kids with silimar academic needs in a common setting.  This way the instruction can be tailored to an appropaite level -- a remedial level if necessary. It does not make a lot of sense to put students struggling to even read in a class full of students that are on grade level. Neither the struggling student or the other students would be well served... it is the very reason AP classes are reserved for accomplished students.

School within a school

Doesn't this lead to a school within a school ?  

I don't look at it that way;

I don't look at it that way; I look at it as doing what is necessary to teach in a manner that reaches students sufficiently so they can succeed. I leave it to others to come up with the catch phrases.

I think it makes a lot of

I think it makes a lot of sense to put kids with silimar academic needs in a common setting.

You are probably right ... they do that ability grouping in every school now (even outside the neighborhood) ... no need to move them to a high poverty school to make that happen ... also grouping kids by income in high poverty schools is NOT grouping them by ability unless you are in the low expectation folks ...

OK User1234 Help me out

First off, unlees something just changed ability grouping is not done at Elementary school for the most part. Middle and High have limited slots for higher potential students. So the ED kids would probably have a harder time to compete for those limited slots in a higher income school. Some on this board have said that WCPSS tends to have lower expectations for these children so that even makes the problem worse at high income schools. So explain to me how the SED busing is suppossed to help again.I am not sure I am following your logic.

yeah, ask the teachers at

yeah, ask the teachers at this school what is not working.

That would have been a good

That would have been a good first step ....No need to work with the teacher or student now... you just want them purged ... 

not @ Enloe, why would I

not @ Enloe, why would I want them purged?

useless, useless, useless.

Hey I made a valid statement

Hey I made a valid statement that my wife's kids could not read ... your posts are always about bring things back to your magnet envy and disappointment in not getting you kids in while you friend did ... that is really sad ... it is not always about you and your disappointments in your kids.

your wife's kids could not

your wife's kids could not read and AA children at Enloe are not learning the same as their white peers. (and you cannot phrase things well)

what is the solution?

magnet envy, friend?  wth are you raving about now?  nevermind I truly don't care.  I just continue to do what I do for ALL children in our schools, you just continue to rant and rave, and show your ignorance and bias.

what is the solution? Well,

what is the solution?

Well, you teach kids to read at grade level in ES and MS so they can read at grade level in HS ... wow, that was rocket science ... do I need to speak more slowly?   

User - Rocket Scientist Here

Why not fail them in Elementary school until they can read. There used to be a program way back when called Summer School for kids that couldn't pass. They lost summer break. That was a big motivator in my day. If that doesn't work group them in special needs schools that have the right type of specialized teachers after they get behind over a year until they catch up. But don't send them up for failure in Middle and High.

But I guess that would be discrimatory and racist if we had a disproportionant amount of minorities in such a program. You know that the race baiters wount be screaming.

Now that's rocket science.

no, what is "rocket science"

no, what is "rocket science" in your words is to actually TEACH them, not bus them...which is what this BoE is attempting to do.....

Just joining

But won't they still be bused to somewhere?   What proportion of those being reassigned to a "closer school" will no longer require any busing at all?   Do we have any metrics on how much shorter the bus ride will be for all those who will continue to ride a bus to their newly assigned "closer school"?

And what about teaching those who are not reassigned at all but remain in their current school but not meeting their achievement goals?   What programs have been implemented in the last 15 months beyond the proposed 4 school project, as yet unfunded, and the Renaissance program JT has mentioned?   The EVAAS change is important but is not related to assignment as it applies county-wide regardless of to which school a student is assigned.   What programs have been put in place to teach these children to read regardless of where they are assigned?

...

"But won't they still be bused to somewhere?"

Of course they will. The difference is that the old assignment policy would use reassignment (busing) as a (the?) solution for low-performing schools. Rather than reassigning students for appearances, this Board wants to capture the school population in a proximity-driven model and actually address the academic problems with academic solutions. In the past, low-income kids were targeted for reassignment if the school did not perform well. I think that's what AngelaW was trying to say.

Just as the old Board reassigned children in an attempt to meet a magical 40% threshold, this Board is reassigning children in alignment with their proximity-driven model -- ultimately to create long-term stability for neighborhoods and communities.

Now and future.

Said before and will say again.  The past is just that -- the past.   It is way past time to stop complaining about the past and ante up specifics on what this BoE is doing.    What exactly is this BoE doing to help a child struggling with learning to read?   In 6th grade?   Regardless of where they go to school?   Regardless of their income?   Regardless of their ethnicity?

You repeat campaign slogans but don't ever give any specifics.    After 15 months in office, there has been a lot less focus on addressing academic problems with academic solutions by far with the vast majority of the BoE's time focused on reassignments.   That, by itself, is upside down and does nothing to assist the students who are not achieving and who are already in their proximity based school.  

Also, there is supposed to be more of a focus on data driven decisions.  It is not out of line to ask then, for these students newly reassigned back to where they'll be "stable", how many fewer minutes they will spend on the bus.   How many students can avoid a bus ride altogether?   How will the BoE monitor whether parental involvement increases when these specific newly reassigned students change schools?   Have any formal studies been done about the degree of parental involvement among those being reassigned at their current school (2010-2011 calendar) to create the necessary baseline metrics?   How will the impacts of the incremental decrease in stability for these students be assessed?   

...

I don't think I was complaining. I was just pointing out that the old assignment policy was used as a solution to low-performing schools.

I agree that this Board could be spending much more time on achievement. But, Goldman, McLaurin, Hill, Morrison and Sutton voted to go back to the node system and micro-manage the last year of the assignment plan. In fact, not only did they spend 1 1/2 days discussing node after node -- Kevin Hill made the Board do it all over again at the last Board meeting. It was a complete waste of time.

Have you asked Mr. Hill why he chooses to waste so much time on assignment issues? Let me know if you do.

Not camplain

You are making campaign statements not complaining.   The question is not why didn't one side cave to another.  It is why are they arguing about assignment ahead of achievement in the first place.   If you're going to micromanage, then why did any of them decide to reverse their earlier decision to not just follow the previous 3 yr plan.   Why were any new nodes added to that?   The whole thing would have been done even earlier still if only those originally planned changes had been moved forward.    Again -- all of them could have better focused on achievement and have not done so, continuing to return to assignment time and time again.

...

"If you're going to micromanage, then why did any of them decide to reverse their earlier decision to not just follow the previous 3 yr plan.   Why were any new nodes added to that?"

The assignment policy changed. This Board values proximity and choice and the new student assignment policy reflects this. When the 3-year plan was devised by Dulaney, the policy was driven by an F&R quota so the last year of the plan followed that policy.

Like you said in an earlier post, why move kids based on an old policy if you are just going to move them again under the new policy? It is a shame that whole assignment process wasn't tackled in one piece and now we seem to be back to year after year diddling with nodes. I blame Goldman and her minority friends for bringing us back to this nonsense.

Known controversy

There was never a doubt that changing the assignment model would be controversial.   A year ago, I remember suggesting that the BoE needed to go out and conduct  a hearts and mind campaign to persuade the public.   From a community engagement standpoint, there was and is a lot that needs to happen with achievement that would have shown their focus on the most important priority and, most likely, allowed the BoE (all of them) to build bridges to the community as a whole.   You cannot pretend that no one expected the move to be contentious.   To blame Goldman for the PR debacle in which all 9 members of the BoE have participated is ridiculous, and again, relates to continued campaigning for your side instead of for the kids in the system.

And just to follow-up -- you still disregard my question about what data are currently being collected in WCPSS to prove the hypothesis about proximity based schools?   Answers to any of my original questions about numbers of bus riders, distance on a bus, and programs to assist with reading on grade level would also be welcomed.

...

I don't know what WCPSS staff is collecting. I'm fairly certainly they spent an inordinate amount of time collecting diversity busing information for the OCR complaint. And probably just as much time on all the ridiculous AdvancEd requests. You should probably ask your Board member those questions. I'm not sure why you're asking me about such details.

Frankly, the student

Frankly, the student assignment plan Tedesco was working on with community members was taking achievment and drop put rates into consideration by making themed academies and other resources part of the offerings students could choose. It acknowledged that students had differing interests, career goals and academic needs and that by addressing those the things student performance and motivation could be enhanced.

Unfortunately Goldman along with Hill, Morrison, McLaurin-Meeker and Sutton shot that promising approach down.

Campaign statements

Perhaps campaign statements is a good place to start. Following is from the Chris Malone candidate questionnaire.

Wake County students deserve an excellent education. In some cases, that may mean a college-preparatory curriculum. In others, it may mean vo-tech training.

I favor implementation of innovative learning models as a means to improve classroom education for at-risk students 

Some of these students wish to pursue trades or other careers which do not begin with college. By forcing these students into a college-preparatory curriculum instead of offering them coursework which prepares them for what they want to do, we are only encouraging them to drop out. We should expect the same graduation rate from ED students as their non-ED peers, and we must provide whatever support is required to get them there. We know that other school systems (ie. Guilford County with its Mission Possible program) achieve better results through innovation, and we cannot be afraid to learn from others.

The focus needs to be on keeping these kids in school, it is nearly impossible to get them back once they drop out. We need to inspire students to stay in school by offering them a firm educational foundation and expand their frontiers by exciting their minds. We are not doing that. 18% of students leave every year and that excludes those that drop out. Having said that, I would be interested in anything that would bring them back to school.

So after 15 months - how many items can be checked off  ?

 

 

 

Thank you Dove

Thank you Dove

Didn't he say that assignment would not solve achievement?

Didn't he say that assignment would not solve achievement? In other words no assignment mechanism in isolation addresses achievement. Obviously, not grouping all in the same school hasn't solved the problem either. Therefore, rather than all the battle and focus on assignment can we put that energy into achievement and the multitude of factors that impact achievement?

Personally, I wish people were as passionate about achievement as they are about assignment. If they were, all our schools would end up truly good schools.

That is why looking at this

That is why looking at this neighborhood movement is so confusing ... they sell it as the cure all to achievement but that does not make sense ... and there is no additional resources coming or possible ... which is why it appears to be a racial segregation plan at it's root ... as you said, if achievement was the goal, where kids go to school would be unimportant and trying to concentrate the poor kids all in a few schools would appear to be a bad idea ... which take me back to the real plan is racial segregation ...

Enough Already!

user12345 said:

they sell it as the cure all to achievement but that does not make sense

You are a PUTZ!

No one in favor of neighborhood schools is trying to say that assignment is a cure all to achievement. If you would take the time to LISTEN, you would realize that we have been trying to remove the connection between assignment and achievement. But people like you continue to perpetuate this myth, and now it seems to be a common belief among diversity supporters that we believe that neighborhood schools will solve achievement. STOP SPREADING LIES!

user12345 said:

...and there is no additional resources coming or possible ... which is why it appears to be a racial segregation plan at it's root...

...which take me back to the real plan is racial segregation...

Screw You! You are pathetic! I can't tell you how sick and tired I am of you calling good, honest, decent, inclusive, and considerate people racist. Your answer for everything appears to be racism. If I had a nickle for every post that mentions race, I'd be a very rich man by now. Why don't you take a long hard look into a mirror and ask yourself why no one can have a different view from your unless they are racist? Or why your view of the world is black and white?

"I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."

I wonder what Dr. King would have to say about you? Here's what I have to say: I have no idea what color your skin is, but there is no content to your character. Until you find some character, I would hope that you just SHUT THE HELL UP!

PS Yes I am mad, and perhaps that language says a little about my character. But I can tell you that I try and respect most people. In this case, however, I have lost all respect for you.

Keung - This is a one-time outburst that needed to be said. I would hope that you do not delete it. I apologize for some of the words I used, but user12345 is hurting our community far more than he is helping. And he needs to know in no uncertain terms just how toxic his rhetoric is.

user is a broken record of

user is a broken record of bigotry..... warehousing the poor, getting undesirables out of your school, bribing board members with campaign contributions to get special favors, etc.....  If you HAD respect you're a saint.

1) If you think achievement

1) If you think achievement is priority #! than why all the emphasis on assignment.  If as Chris says that assignment has nothing to do with achievement than why are they spending 90% of their energy on it?

2) You are one of those folks who has never come to terms with racism and think is all went away in the 1960's with a new law.   Yet you are confronted with the fact that thousands of WCPSS teachers are routing poor and minority kids into classes below their ability up until a few months ago.   You are confronted with the fact that minority kids are suspended longer than non-minority kids and still you think we live in fantasy land.

Racism is not overt like in the past ... it is a quiet subtle killer that is crippling tomorrow's majority today.  Man up to it and work to eliminate it instead of pretending it does not exist.

"...thousands of WCPSS

"...thousands of WCPSS teachers are routing poor and minority kids into classes below their ability up until a few months ago." You're complaining that the BoE isn't doing anything about achievement, but that an example of a problem that the old BoE didn't do anything about, but the new BoE did. They would be doing more, but the "usual suspects" turn every discussion about achievement into a discussion about assignment. Example: this blog. The meeting was supposed to be about AA male achievement, but as the blog says, "The ensuing Q&A turned into a discussion of the elimination of the diversity policy, with some shouting and heated words."

Give it a rest. Race and

Give it a rest. Race and racism are not the issues here. Just because you have made it your mantra does not make it so.

And the issue is?

And the issue is? Achievement? Come on say it.  Than we can compare it to where the energy and focus is going.  Note, Chris has already stated that assignment has no linkage to achievement ...

The issue is communities and

The issue is communities and family life. The truth is achievement occurs most of the time for most students. The problem is that low income and black male students who sit in the same classrooms and have the same teachers and are presented the same instruction as all the other students are failing at unacceptable rates. So, why is that? Seems to me, the schools and which one you go to are less of an issue than what is happening outside of school. Address that issue and I think some solutions will be found. I know you like to harp on race and student assisgnment... but it is really just  distraction to the real issue at hand here.

I don't see the outside the

I don't see the outside the classroom difficulties of poor and minority kids ever being addressed or solved ... it is too big ... plus many conservatives don't think that area is part of their responsibility.  For example, prenatal and the first six months may be the most important time for development but there is little help for most kids during that time.   Racism is not the plague ... it is a natural human reaction ... just like the self interest in our own children ... but for society to flourish we need everyone onboard.   We simply need to recongnize ineffeciencies like math placement and not assign evil intent just correct the problem ....I would much rather concentrate on the things that could be done in school than hope something will eventually happen at home.  The fact that some schools do better with the same kids others do poorly with shows that there are ways to do better but there is a lack of desire to follow through ....so, all the energy on assignments and getting in the right node won't improve achievement and should not be a priority if we really wanted to improve education ...

"...so, all the energy on

"...so, all the energy on assignments and getting in the right node won't improve achievement and should not be a priority if we really wanted to improve education ..."

I agree completely. Let's stop the nonsense of trying to balance schools by some weird definition of diversity, send kids to schools in their communites and treat students as individuals with individual needs. All the attention paid to the color of a kid's skin and how much their famlies earn or claim to earn is just wasted effort. Let just drop all of it right now and find out to reach kids so they will succeed.

.... Or just leave them were

.... Or just leave them were they are today and not worry about trying to concentrate them all in a few high poverty schools ....

You just said assignment is

You just said assignment is not the answer to achievement. I agree. Why should families and students continue to be burdened with the ridiculous and pointless node system?

Why should families and

Why should families and students continue to be burdened with the ridiculous and pointless node system?

Because they want to attend a "good" school.   The "good" fully resourced schools with all the advanced classes are in the suburbs.  Surely, you understand why a parent would want the best for their child and why they would fight so hard against having their child placed back in the failing neighborhood school.

The "good" fully resourced

The "good" fully resourced schools with all the advanced classes are in the suburbs.

LOLOL!!! Ah, right. So many things wrong with that statement it is difficult to know where to begin. Have you ever heard of Magnet Schools... you know, those resource-rich schools that only an elite few have access to? How many are in the suburbs? They are recognized as the best schools in the county and the low income kids that live around them are not allowed to attend. Also, how many struggling/at-risk ED kids are taking AP classes?  

hmm ... Barwell vs. Davis

hmm ... Barwell vs. Davis Drive ... why don't they want to go back?

Thank You Jeffrey1!!

Thank You Jeffrey1 for saying what many of us have wanted to say....Thank you!!

Neighborhood movement and achievement

Hey User,

I have to tell you no one I know has ever said assignment was a cure all. As for myself I have repeatedly said that it has no symbiotic relationship with achievement other than it creates a foundation that the student and the community can build on. Through neighborhood schools parents can be involved more easily and build a support system. The student becomes secure in their surroundings and builds their own relationships and from there find the right atmospere for themselves to prosper and learn.  Only my thoughts.. but I hope it helps with the confusion...

Help with the confusion

 

5. What's your position on the issue of "neighborhood" schools and abandoning, or changing, current assignment policies that seek to balance student populations in every school ("diversity")?

The current policy is based on a flawed premise that poor students have less learning potential that those who come from middle-class families, and on an equally-flawed assumption that a positive learning environment is not possible in schools with higher concentrations of F&R students. The numbers don't lie, our assignment policy is failing. While middle-class students are performing reasonably well, less than 54% of ED students are graduating.

Education is the primary mission of our school system. We know that reassignment is not the solution to improving academic performance of at-risk students, and we know that sending students many miles from home makes it more difficult for parents to provide support to their children and their schools. As such, I favor implementation of innovative learning models as a means to improve classroom education for at-risk students and increase parental support for all students and their schools.

So while you say that assignment has no symbiotic relationship with achievement - justification of the move to neighborhood schools starts off by attacking the current assignment policy as a failure to improve achievement.  If you claim assignment is not linked to achievement then you can't claim that assignment is behind the achievement failure.   Is the current diversity policy responsible for qualified students not being placed in the correct math class ?  Is the diversity policy responsible for setting the bar low ? Is the diversity policy responsible for the zero tolerance and suspension rates ?  Is the diversity policy a barrier to implementation of innovative learning models for the at risk ? 

and we know that sending students many miles from home makes it more difficult for parents to provide support to their children and their schools.

Maybe or maybe not and is it relevant to achievement ?  Magnet students are two hours on the bus each day and yet their achievement does not appear to suffer.  Charter and Private schools are not proximate to their student body and achievement is high.  KIPP schools are not neighborhood schools - but application schools and have high achievement levels.  

The student becomes secure in their surroundings and builds their own relationships and from there find the right atmospere for themselves to prosper and learn.

And how does this work for a kid from the projects ?

If you claim assignment is

If you claim assignment is not linked to achievement then you can't claim that assignment is behind the achievement failure.

He never claimed that assignment is behind the achievement failure. Go back and read it again. What he said was:

The numbers don't lie, our assignment policy is failing.

In other words, the policy failed to do what the former BOEs promised it would do, not that it resulted in achievement failure. There is a huge difference.

Our former BOEs said that the assignment policy was necessary to maintain healthy schools, and that healthy schools would result in achievement success for ED students. The policy failed. Chris and those of us who support him have long argued that assignment and achievement are for the most part, mutually exclusive. Assignment and achievement may be correlated, but one does not cause the other.

If we are EVER going to make headways into achievement, I firmly believe that we have to convince the general public that assignment does not cause achievement (either low or high). Despite the overwhelming evidence documenting that ED students have not benefited from the diversity assignment policy, many are unwilling to let it go. Not until both the Board AND the public let it go, can we begin to properly address achievement.

And how does this work for a kid from the projects ?

You actually think that kids from the projects don't have familiar relationships and familiar surroundings?

It is well documented that all children, starting from birth, need stability and repetition in their relationships and their surroundings in order to thrive. It's the reason a newborn will cry in the arms of a stranger, but calm down in the arms of his mother. It's the reason that a 6 month old will continue to laugh at the same silly face you make over and over. It's the reason that a two year old can watch the same Sesame Street  Video over and over, long after you've gotten sick of it. It's the reason that kids in ES can act out or develop sleep difficulties when placed in an unfamiliar setting.

You're thinking like an adult and trying to project that thinking into the minds of 6, 7, and 8 year olds. For most adults, the idea of going to a different school a few more miles down the road, in different surroundings, and with a few less friends is no big deal. To a 6 year old, it can be a huge difference, wrought with uncertainty.

Don't discount the positive effects of stability, repetition, and familiar surroundings on our children.

Cars View All
Find a Car
Go
Jobs View All
Find a Job
Go
Homes View All
Find a Home
Go

Want to post a comment?

In order to join the conversation, you must be a member of newsobserver.com. Click here to register or to log in.

About the blogger

T. Keung Hui covers Wake schools.
Advertisements