The repeated theme at last week's ED task force meeting is that all children can succeed, but it's going to take a lot of hard work from the school system to help the students out.
The tenor of the Wake County school board's economically disadvantaged student performance task force meeting was set when this YouTube video of Sir Ken Robinson was shown to a packed room of teachers and principals.
Robinson contends that the current educational system is based on the intellectual culture of the Enlightenment and the environment of the Industrial Revolution. He argues that most people don't benefit from that model, creating the plague of ADHD.
Robinson advocates the idea of divergent thinking, in which people have the ability to come up with multiple answers to a problem.
He pointed to a study of 1,500 kindergartens in which 98 percent were tested at genius level for divergent thinking. But the same students scored sharply lower when the test was repeated over time.
Robinson said the study shows most people have the capacity to think creatively but it gets weeded out over time in the education system.
"It makes you think," said school board vice chairman John Tedesco, the head of the ED task force, after the video was shown. "Some things we can agree on. Some things we may not.”
Tedesco said the video was poignant because of his personal belief that children start out inherently brilliant. He said he wants to talk about how to expand that brilliance.
The next presenter was Angel Harris, a Princeton University professor and author of the book "Kids Don't Want to Fail: Oppositional Culture and Black White Achievement Gap."
Harris contends that the achievement gap is not the result of cultural pressure in the black community for students to "not act white."
Harris contends that black students perform badly in high school not because they don’t want to succeed but because they enter without the necessary skills. Harris finds that the achievement gap starts to open up in preadolescence, typically at elementary school, due to factors such as socioeconomics.
Harris pointed to national data showing that the average white high school senior is four years ahead academically of black seniors. With the white population expected to become the minority in the decades ahead, the country can't afford to ignore the racial achievement gap.
“You can’t have half of your population walking around with an eighth-grade skills set," Harris said. "It will have an effect.
Harris, who is African American, then gave his personal story about being in the bottom 10 percent of high school class in Brooklyn. He joked that the GRE exam had him as only being mildly literate.
But Harris said he was encouraged to go on to college, getting his bachelor's, master's, PhD and now a tenured position at Princeton.
"You can look at a high school student at the bottom 10 percent and not know what’s possible," Harris said. "It may not be probable. But it may be possible."
During the Q&A, Harris said that schools are oriented toward white, middle-class students. He said they need to find a way to help black students to adjust to that.
On the issue of institutional bias, Harris said it can exist even when it's not intentional. He said that the U.S. education system is racist and classicist because of the results. But he said he doesn't believe there's anyone behind the screen engineering the results
"It’s not KKK racist but racist by different results by class," Harris said.
Harris said some people may be uncomfortable about addressing it because more black and brown kids will be competing for spots at UNC and Duke. Tedesco was nodding his head during those remarks.
Tedesco said that institutional bias been built into the system over time. He quipped that Harris spoke as if he was on task force all year because he was addressing the issues the group has looked at.
Next up was Fuquay-Varina High School Principal Ed McFarland talking about how they implemented elements of Project Bright Idea at his school. While geared toward elementary students, McFarland said it's also applicable at the high school level.
McFarland stressed how successful implementation would require extensive staff development and training. He said a key is training teachers on differentiation.
While he said he couldn't attribute it all to Bright Idea, McFarland pointed to how they're seeing more students pass the EOCs and the achievement gap is narrowing.
Margaret Gayle, the head of Project Bright Idea, was the closing presenter. She said the program has been shown to transcend poverty, racial and ethnic inequality and background knowledge.
She talked about the importance of starting of kindergarten teachers starting their students talking in complete sentence on the first day. She touted the benefits of having students practice thinking and reflecting on what they learned each day.
She talked about immersing these young students in advanced vocabulary and analysis skills.
"Bright Idea teaches every child as if we think they’re gifted and then you start seeing magic things happening," Gayle said.
Gayle cited the example of how first and second grade students at a school in Thomasville had done research for a debate on whether Leonardo Da Vinci or Michelangelo was the greatest creator of all time.
She said it will take rigorous staff development, noting how some teachers actually broke into tears about all the work it would take to develop lessons that would challenge students.
But she said the result has been a closing of the achievement gap and more Title I students getting identified as academically gifted. She said teachers changed their perception of Title I students and they no longer felt like they didn't want to push the kids based on everything they were going through.
Also during her talk, Gayle praised Wake, which has had schools in the pilot programs, as dong a great job of identifying Title I students for AG services.
Click here for a March article by Jane Stancill about Bright Idea. While it's had success, it's not a cheap program to implement.
The presentations will eventually be posted on the task force website.
After the meeting, Tedesco said he'd like to expand the use of Bright Idea at all of the schools in in Wake. He said he's talked with Superintendent Tony Tata about whether they can at least begin training the staff at the Renaissance Schools on the program.

Comments
Robinson advocates the idea
Fri, 07/08/2011 - 11:08 — saragalazinRobinson advocates the idea of divergent thinking, in which people have the ability to come up with multiple answers to a problem.
We're placing such great importance on standardized tests that don't demonstrate anything at all about a child's thinking ability. They're used as a punitive instrument. These scores are used to make many decisions, including the perception whether it's a good school or a bad.
Robinson said the study shows most people have the capacity to think creatively but it gets weeded out over time in the education system.
Thanks to the emphasis on standardized tests.
Effects of standardized testing...
Fri, 07/08/2011 - 18:17 — paulastamSaragalazin is so correct - EOG testing here in NC measures math, reading and science (5th and 8th grades) proficiency...students are at risk of being labeled, stigmatized and developing low self-esteems because they come to perceive themselves as "failures" when they do not achieve math/reading/science proficiency. What about all the research on "multiple intelligences" or rather those that express their gifted abilities and intelligence through sport, music, art, etc? We are kicking these kids to the curb and at risk of dumbing down the curriculum - even more so under General Tata's leadership - he has a limited understanding of education and thinks he earns his $300,000 salary and numerous benefits by solely and constantly talking about "student achievement" - that would be fine if he were talking about student achievement across a balanced curriculum and the whole child BUT sadly he is speaking to standardized testing....
"Whenever you hear a politician (or General and WCPSS GOP board member apparently) carry on about what a mess the schools are, be aware you are looking at the culprit". Molly Irvins
Paula, "Independent, Fair & Speaking Up for MY Kids."
Even though EOG scores are
Tue, 07/12/2011 - 01:35 — klanders65Even though EOG scores are limited by subject and grade, using data always shows many more kids have mastered the material than have been identified as having mastered it by teacher recommendation. The teachers shouldn't feel bad. Outside of education, nearly all research is finding "experts" are really bad at deciding things compared to data. The top music schools have applicants perform behind a screen because the research showed the music experts selected males over females, believing females couldn't play musical instruments. When they can't see the applicant, they select males and females at the same rate. Doctors can't diagnose like data can. Teachers are not above all other humans.
Using data does not stigmatize and lower self esteem. It raises self esteem of those students who are stereotyped as not able to learn no matter how much they learn. These kids are labeled failures no matter how high they achieve. Only the data will set them free.
If you want your kids to learn art instead of math, science, and reading, I support you fully. But don't say it is okay for the high achieving low income kids or high achieving minority students, who are always tracked low no matter how high scoring to go learn art. Make that decision for your own kids.
I would bet you want your own kids to learn math, science, and reading. Am I wrong? Correct me if I am wrong and you have your kids in an art school that does not teach these subjects.
btw, that whole child thing went out in the 80s. I taught in a magnet that was doing the multiple intelligences Gardner thing. Instead of labeling kids as gifted, each quarter they asked for recommendations for kids gifted on one domain, like art, music, sports, math, etc. The same kids got recommended every time. They were the kids whose parents brought us lunch for teacher appreciation week, etc. That is how that played out all over, so it kind of faded away.
So...
Sat, 07/09/2011 - 23:25 — Bob_SconceThat's really more a criticism of the state board of education than anything at the local level.
Unfortunately, there's no good way to measure anything beyond mastery of the material in the SCOS. I fully agree that the EOGs are limited, but the state and federal governments have set up the system to focus on EOG performance.
As to 'multiple intelligences,' that's still really the realm of theory, and a disputed one at that -- check out the wikipedia page.
If so, Tata is still
Sun, 07/10/2011 - 09:39 — paulastamIf so, Tata is still exercabating the focus on standardized testing since the only two words that come out of his mouth are "student achievement".
Paula, "Independent, Fair & Speaking Up for MY Kids."
All of the current measures
Sun, 07/10/2011 - 11:26 — ApexterAll of the current measures and testing methods for student achievment have come through the efforts of the education intelligentsia. While those within the education field should be the bedrock of education policy, I feel that we have handed over the reins to them too freely. This has left us with our current school systems that have multiple fundamental problems. One example (that pretty much exists statewide) is the current model of telling our children that they must ALL go on to get a bachelor's degree in college or they're losers, and have, in doing so, devalued (and have darned near obliterated programs for) vocational education. Locally, it took our county school system from one that was dedicated to providing equal opportunities to all to one which provided incentives (in terms of nearby magnet programs) for inner county/Raleigh students to voluntarily participate in achieving diversity goals while it penalized those on the outer county edges (distance unavailability of magnet schools, frequent reassignments that were labelled as "due to growth" while ignoring the fact that the frequency was exacerbated by shifting non-local students out to the high growth areas, forced conversions of schools to the year round calendar, etc.)
Educators need to be heavily involved in the direction that our education system takes, but by and large, most do not have the breadth of education to understand all aspects of administering a system that encompassess 17,000 employees, 140,000+ students, and a budget in excess of a billion dollars.