It would seem that the Coalition of Concerned Citizens for African American Children is questioning the diversity of Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Triangle, which employs Wake County school board member John Tedesco.
In a CCCAAC press release on Wednesday, a summary of e-mail messages was produced between Tedesco and CCCAAC member Hank Graden. Much of the discussion is about Tedesco's views on diversity and his role as vice president of Big Brothers Big Sisters.
Here's the press release, minus the e-mail addresses I stripped out:
TO: Media
FROM: Coalition of Concerned Citizens for African American Children
RE: Conversations Between Mr. Tedesco, WCPSS and Mr.Hank Graden, CCCAAC
Please review email communications between Mr. Hank Graden, CCCAAC member, and Mr. John Tedesco, WCPSS BOE.
If additional information is needed please contact (Graden's e-mail address).
Wednesday, January 13, 2010 9:05 AM
From: "Hank Graden" To: coalitionofconcernedcitizensforafricanamericanchildren@yahoogroups.com. See summary of my e-mails with John Tedesco.
Summary of e-mails between Hank Graden and John Tedesco (1/13/2010)
Prepared by Hank Graden
1/12/2010
So with all of this new information about you, why are you so aligned with the others on the Board who were on the Board (Margiotta) and the newly elected Board members who are not as informed and “open” as you say you are? There seems that you could align with the 4 existing School Board members who seem to be more similar to how you describe yourself and be independent of the other 4. HG
Again your assumption is flawed. You assume that the other 4 that I align closely with (as you put it) do not value diversity as well. These (all 8) are good decent people who are committed to the best means possible to educate every single child. I do currently see the existing process and policy flawed as flawed for the long term success of EVERY child (it currently helps some - and well), but too many of our children (especially in our underserved communities) are being hidden away at these so-called "healthy schools" that look good on paper because of the performance numbers of the whole. Go inside and look at the sub groups and then the student by student data and we fail many kids who need us the most.
We failed to close the achievement gap. We fail to establish equity in education, We fail to be able to deliver the appropriate curriculum stretch by classroom to challenge our brightest and raise our vulnerable. We fail to slow down the school to prison pipeline. We fail to offer all low income children children the rigor they deserve and need to succeed because we set low expectations and need to be sure the schools scores look good - so we can tell every one that there are no unhealthy schools in Wake County . Sure that will help make us look attractive to more outside groups. BUT What good is that if we continue to elevate our crime rates, drop-out rates, and actually worsen the all too real achievement gap. We can and must do things differently. Too many kids are being lost.
The 4 I aligned with (again your words) have shown that they are not so blindly sold on our "sacred cow" and "golden goose" that they can not consider a different path. They are actually willing to think outside the old paradigms - They are willing to do what needs to be done to re-tool our system so it works for EVERY STUDENT not just schools and the System. As I am getting to know my new colleagues some of them are showing me interest in addressing these issues as well.
John Tedesco
Board of Education
Wake County Public School System
District 2
"A life is not important except in the impact it has on other lives."
- Jackie Robinson
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 1:19 PM
Mr. Graden,
Let me help you out here sir in your false assumptions. I am pro-diversity in every aspect of life.
I have had many more lucrative job offers in less diverse settings and turned them down to work with the team I am with now. I chose to live in a very diverse community. I attend a diverse church at Victory Fellowship in Garner if you wish to vet that for is racial makeup as well. I have worked with diverse populations for a long time. I have had diverse relations in my personal life. I have grown up in communities that make SouthEast Raleigh look like Chapel Hill . I am a God Father to African American kids. And many of my views on the current educational policies of this community have been shaped by my colleagues, and the numerous other distinguished non-profits in Wake County who have informed me that they feel the current practices do not help children. Further that view was shaped by individuals in the African American community in SouthEast Raleigh who have spoken to me privately.
We are arguing over a Student Assignment Policy that is falsely noted as the "Diversity Policy". We can call it the "Sunshine and Bubble gum policy" for all I care (sarcasm intended), but if it fails to meet the goals of high quality education for every single child in Wake County, effective delivery of that education to all children, and opportunity to close the achievement gap and establish real equity in education, and effective use of our resources - then the policy is in need of major adjustments. Why are you not fighting for the real issues?
The real issues are in the spotlight everyday. Yesterday the N&O and the WRAL video below spotlight that Wake Schools sets performance biases against economically disadvantaged students and places them out of upper level course work to boost scores at the expense of the students ability to graduate and succeed in college. All to sell the idea of healthy schools at the expense of children left behind.
http://www.newsobserver.com/news/education/story/279764.html
http://www.wral.com/news/education/video/6787561/
This mornings article by African American Staff writer, Barry Saunders, notes that the Diversity policy is not the answer, but rather teacher standards and quality.
http://www.newsobserver.com/news/education/story/279771.html
Why are those concerned with diversity not caring about these concerns?
Maybe they should concern themselves with the fact that while we focused so much on seating policies we lost focus and ended up with sliding graduation rates for the whole county, a broader achievement gap than before and a 54% graduation rate for economically disadvantaged kids. Maybe they should speak loudly against this.
So with all do respect Mr. Graden maybe you need to know me better and what I am passionate about and who and what has shaped me before you make false assumptions.
John Tedesco
Board of Education
Wake County Public School System
District 2
Date: 01/12/2010 12:28PM
I have looked at the website for the Big Brothers Big Sisters Executives and staff. Quite an impressive group of diverse individuals who one would assume would be pro-diversity in most every part of life, including public schools. One would also assume that you might be a “lone voice” at the organization where you work and your approach to changing the current methods of strengthening Wake County Schools by using economic information to balance schools.
It looks like most of the current leaders and staff at BBBS are well prepared to serve a minority population that the agency serves, but do you fit in there? The website does not provide any information about the Board and their position on diversity. HG
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 1:47 PM
Calla,
In regards to your request for information on my organization I submit the following. I am copying our Vice President of Partnerships, Mr. Barron Damon, your member Hank Graden, and my colleagues on the BOE in case you wish to vet their organizations as well. I am including my previous email to you below as additional information for them.
Your question/state noted to "prove that I work with diverse children" signifying disbelief or a witch hunt for some reason. This would also be another reason for me copying all BOE members from here on out pertaining to communication with you or your organization (should any attempt be made to misrepresent).
As to whether or not the children we at Big Brothers Big Sisters (BBBS) serve are diverse. This would depend on your measure of diverse. If it is to mirror the community population the answer would be no, since in 2008 (2009 numbers will be in at the end of this month) 96% of our children were children of poverty as established by the federal standards, and 84% of those were African Americans and 8% Hispanic (and growing). This information is audited annually by the National AIM database system of BBBS of America (recognized as THE National Standard in Youth Mentoring for At-Risk Youth), the US Department of Health and Human Services (ACYF in particular), Wake Co. Health and Human Services, and various local governments who provide funding and review of service delivery. We are also subject to provide this information to our numerous private funding partners for their review, groups like The Duke Endowment.
As for partner organization in the service delivery we currently have 42 formal partners (our Partnership Director can share more details) but they represent various cross sectors of the community including AME churches, The "Big 3" in African American Fraternities, HSBCUs, ALOT (Legacy of Tradition for African American Men) and numerous others. The partners in service delivery also include the NC Dept of Corrections, various public housing agencies and more.
As for pictures, I would be glad to send you numerous ones of our agency or me specifically working with hundreds of children in the AA community.
Below is a link to our senior (Diverse) management team. Mr. Damons bio and credentials are there as well and I am sure he would welcome your questions. http://www.bbbs.org/site/c.dfIMKYOAJsG/b.3929513/k.9F6F/Executive_Team.htm
I hope this addresses your serious concerns. Now let's talk about things like closing the achievement gap.
Date: Monday, January 4, 2010, 11:15 PM
Calla,
If you are concerned with our organization or wish to know more, you can simply ask me directly. Big Brothers Big Sisters is the nation's premiere youth mentoring organization for over 100 years working with a quarter million at-risk children annually. We are made up of regional affiliates around America . I work directly for our Triangle affiliate. But I also serve on our State Association Board developing resources and programs for all NC affiliates such as the Mentoring Children of Prisoners (MCP) program I spent the last two years developing - and just received the largest Federal Award in the country for a MCP. In addition, I am one of 4 Chief Development Officers in the nation to serve on our National Development Committee.
Locally, we have hundreds of children who are on our waiting lists as we attempt to recruit mentors for them. As we add 1,100 children annually to the local program we need all the mentors we can get - particularly in the AA community.
If you or your friends want to get involved with a young persons life directly and make a real difference below is a link to our volunteer application form - please forward. If you wish to make a donation to aid in the background checks, supportive services, mentor trainings, or youth activities, you can do that online as well. We have an upcoming Bowl 4 Kids Sake Event on Feb 27th and encourage you to put together a team of 5. If you simply want to know more about me, the organization, our management styles, program results,or direct info on the demographic breakdown of children served - just ask me directly next time.
http://www.bbbs.org/site/c.dfIMKYOAJsG/b.3929459/k.9E5A/Volunteering.htm
Thanks,
John Tedesco
Wake County School Board District 2
www.4wakekids.com
Date: Thursday, January 7, 2010, 6:48 PM
On behalf of the CCCAAC and Hank
So Mr. Tedesco, your website literature shows a lot of African American kids/adults on it.
Tell us about what organizations your organization has with formal written contracts; how many minorities and low-wealth kids are you actually working with vs white low-wealth kids and other white kids; prove that you serve minorities? HG
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Hank Graden wrote:
I agree that Mr. Tedesco does not give any information about how diverse the group of kids are who are getting mentors.
Hank Graden

Comments
Fun with google
Sat, 01/16/2010 - 23:02 — ApexterType in http://www. followed by newsobserver.com/news/columnists_blogs/faceoff/story/58792.html to see the following opinion piece:
"Regarding Matthew Eisley's "Unnecessary pain for parents" comments in your Aug. 31 Faceoff feature relating to the Wake County Public School System: His comment about "thousands more ride long bus routes" was recently refuted by a study done by the school system stating that "the vast majority of students live close to home. Ninety percent of elementary students live within 5 miles of their home."
Eisley said that the early release on Wednesdays causes "students [to be] idle for an hour." How could a study hall be a negative factor when students need all the time they can get to study?
Henry (Hank) Graden"
Well, this shows that he has no problem shooting off his mouth when he doesn't know anything about the situation. The early release is most certainly NOT a study hall, as students are required to leave the campus.
But I did enjoy his statement that a recent WCPSS study stated that "the vast majority of students live close to home. Ninety percent of elementary students live within 5 miles of their home." I certainly won't try to refute that one. Good job on that study, gang.
THE agenda
Sat, 01/16/2010 - 10:35 — nancyncAfter reading this email exchange, I shake my head at the clearly obvious bias and attempt to DEMAND Mr. Tedesco prove he's a true supporter of diversity.
Good Lord! How low can a group get to demand one explain such a personal conviction? And yet, to allay fears of this paranoid group, Mr. Tedesco takes the time to explain his personal life and involvement of THEIR concern to diversity.
I would not have been so patient or kind in my replies.
Mr. Tedesco has earned even more respect from me as a result of his obvious commitment to the education of all children, despite the attempt by this group to smear him.
They obviously didn't read the email volley with objectivity before sending it to the media thinking it exposes Mr. Tedesco as anything other than honest and sincere in everything he has said and done.
Shame on you Ms Calla Wright and your group, CCCAAC. Witch hunt away, you expose only yourself and your mean spirited self serving agenda.
I think this sad woman
Sat, 01/16/2010 - 10:44 — red_balloonI think this sad woman thought it projected John in poor light. A real shame indeed that the CCCAAC has got none better to champion its cause.
C Wright is the female
Sat, 01/16/2010 - 13:45 — changewcpssC Wright is the female equivalent of Rev. Barbor. Attention mongers who care nothing about the academic achievement of those they should be helping.
My only hope is
Fri, 01/15/2010 - 11:11 — Voice_of_Reason_John Tedesco doesn't leave the school board for a higher office, at least for now.
It actually nice to see a politician who doesn't pander and sticks with his stated convictions.
And still hopeful that all
Fri, 01/15/2010 - 00:58 — Duhhuh666And still hopeful that all of us on this board share some common ground: A concern for underprivileged kids in the Wake County system..
Festus, you will find that thier is concern for not only the underpriviledged kids but for all the kids in WCPSS. Continuing policies that do not improve the education of children, but mixed the failing in with the passing to create a statistical average for the school as a whole that hides the fact that so many kids are failing is not a policy that needs to be continued. The graduation rates for ED kids is falling not increasing, busing these kids to a school far from home will not solve the problem.
Always glad to read John Tedesco's nice words
Fri, 01/15/2010 - 00:15 — festusAnd still hopeful that all of us on this board share some common ground: A concern for underprivileged kids in the Wake County system.
That is what makes the intensely partisan and antidemocratic nature of the current board majority and the frequent venom displayed by their backers on these blogs so disappointing.
If the goal is IMPROVING the current school system to better serve underprivileged kids, then why DISMANTLE those elements that are aimed at helping them?
Are neighborhood schools PRIMARILY intended to help underprivileged kids? Or are they PRIMARILY intended to ensure that parents can send their kids to school with other kids from their neighborhood? Because most of us, with some exceptions such as in the downtown area, live in neighborhoods that are not very diverse. How does me sending my kids to school with kids who share most of the same beliefs and behaviors help my kids to experience this big world?
Please take this as a genuine question before you flame me. I really don't understand the disconnect between Mr. Tedesco's genuine rhetoric and Mr. Margiotta's (and many voices here) unwillingness to cooperate with my elected representative on the board.
Here is why
Fri, 01/15/2010 - 10:19 — stacy123As always I will present the factual rationale to show disptue your il-logical post
1) "And still hopeful that all of us on this board share some common ground: A concern for underprivileged kids in the Wake County system."
They do share this concern and will be addressing the academic needs of all kids and specific actions/ideas to help ED kids that will replace shuffling them around - which has not worked. This has been proven that it does not work -look at previous test results in WCPSS for this segment and compared to CMS. Based on the often reported factsa dn test score results - I really do not think this is deabtable anymore.
2) "That is what makes the intensely partisan and antidemocratic nature of the current board majority and the frequent venom displayed by their backers on these blogs so disappointing."
Partisan - only be the board members I believe. As we live in a highly democratic county and the new board members were elected by a large majority of voters in Nov. all with the same message of ending mandatory year round and nieghborhood schools defined as yur lcoal schools not cross county.
3) "If the goal is IMPROVING the current school system to better serve underprivileged kids, then why DISMANTLE those elements that are aimed at helping them?
Because it si not working and has not helped the - again refer to #1 for the proof
4) "Are neighborhood schools PRIMARILY intended to help underprivileged kids?
It is beneficial for all kids, not jut under-privileged. Less bussing should mean more alert kids, more time for homework, etc.
"Or are they PRIMARILY intended to ensure that parents can send their kids to school with other kids from their neighborhood?":
All factors being equal (calendar schedule, safety, adequate facilities, etc) .Parents like their kids to go to neighborhood schools with kids in their neighborhood
5) "Because most of us, with some exceptions such as in the downtown area, live in neighborhoods that are not very diverse."
Depends on your definition of diverse, my "neighborhood" is very diverse and N&O recently published an article (I believe in Dec) on how Nodes are diverse - racially and I think income as well. That being said - interesting that you believe storngly it seems in diversity in schools but you chose not to live in a diverse neighborhood which you seem to think is very important in our schools. Also, I believe the new board members are trying to balance diversity as wll by offering some sort of choice - but I have no exact details just their words.
6) How does me sending my kids to school with kids who share most of the same beliefs and behaviors help my kids to experience this big world?
So many ways to answer this one.
1) I think stereotyping all kids in your neighborhood as sharing your beliefs and behaviors is inaccurate - if a person outside your neighborhood documented what they felt these beliefs and behaviors were in your neighborhood you would probably find it very offensive to be judged so arbitrarily.
2) If you feel that strongly about big world experience, no doubt you will be providing this experience to your children.
3) There are many ways that a school can provide big world experience - and all parents want this. This cna be put int he same category of academic performance - all parents want it but bussing will not provide it.
7) "Please take this as a genuine question before you flame me. I really don't understand the disconnect between Mr. Tedesco's genuine rhetoric and Mr. Margiotta's (and many voices here) unwillingness to cooperate with my elected representative on the board. "
If this was a genuine question, I'll respond as such -
1) get informed - it seems you are lacking the facts 1) that bussing has not helped under-privileged kids academically
2) Noting John Tedesco's "genuine rhetoric" is really making him sound not genuine at all by saying it is rhetoric only.
3) John Tedesco and Ron Margiotta have similar ideas on the issues and changes to make WCPSS better. Your board member does not agree with their views and is diametrically opposed to all their changes - would suggest you ask your board rep. to work with them. As their ideas allowed them to win by a large majortiy of voters in November - they defeated the board members who had similar views as yours. So I think on this point you and your board member have views that are not consistent with the majority of the board. I think the onus is on the minority to try and work with the majority - although personally when I find I am in the minority as far as views and opinions it does not sit well and i usually end up saying "whatever" as my views is opposite and the only for them to satisfy me is by taking my view which really isn't cooperating.
sorry for any typos this is lengthy!
Elements
Fri, 01/15/2010 - 02:00 — TrailerParkGirlThere are those on both sides of the issues that have used rhetoric and shown an "unwillingness to cooperate" for some time. There are those on both sides that want to try to bridge the gap.
"If the goal is IMPROVING the current school system to better serve underprivileged kids, then why DISMANTLE those elements that are aimed at helping them?"
To which elements are you referring? (Honest question)
Current policies are aimed at the creation of "healthy schools" not "healthy students." These policies have not improved the achievement gap and achievement trends for poor and minority students have been declining relative to state average. The defination of insanity is continuing to do the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.
Performance is all over the board. There are magnet schools where only 25% of ED students pass EOGs and equally diverse non-magnets where 70% of ED students are passing EOGs. There are lower F&R schools with low passing rates for ED and lower F&R schools with higher passing rates. Why?
It is time to work together to get to the heart of these matters so to speak and start thinking outside the bus and start looking at innovative solutions to truly address the achievement gap. We need to get the focus on academic achievement for ALL students because education is the equalizer.
"How does me sending my kids to school with kids who share most of the same beliefs and behaviors help my kids to experience this big world?"
To which beliefs and behaviors are you referring and how do you perceive others differ? What experience of this big world do you believe will be missing? (Honest questions)
I've lived in a variety of socioeconomic circumstances. I wish the stereotypes and rhetoric could be put in check and people could sit down and talk with open minds. Any ideas how to make that happen?
John Tedesco TOWERS above
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 19:41 — woodstockJohn Tedesco TOWERS above the petty concerns of the CCCAAC. He is honorable, capable and every bit the gentleman. And, his passionate concern for at-risk children is real.
Very true. If a few more BOE
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 19:50 — red_balloonVery true. If a few more BOE members display this kind of energy and willingness to bridge the divide, I think WCPSS will transform itself for the better in the next few years.
The AA children have a more
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 19:42 — red_balloonThe AA children have a more committed and visionary leader in John Tedesco than in Ms Wright or Dr Barber. I suspect the likes of Ms Wright and Dr Barber will work to stall the progress of the BOE. Educated AA children armed with the knowledge and skill to do better in life are not in the best interests of demagogues like Ms Wright and Dr Barber.
Stooping low
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 18:42 — louiselee44I don't care who it is - to personally pursue someone like this is unconscionable. My hat is off to, and my prayers go with, anyone who reaches out to any children in need - period. Shame on these folks.
I admire John for even attempting to defend himself. That can wear a person out if they are dealing with people who turn a deaf ear. Low, low, LOW!
I read through this email
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 17:14 — shearertwI read through this email stream a couple of times and each time it sounded better for John and worse for the CCCAAC. What was their motivation for putting this out? If it was to discredit John T, I don't get it. It just looks like CCCAAC was on a witch hunt and found a Saint. If CCCAAC believes this press release is somehow helpful to their cause, it scares me how backward they think.
Jumping on the bandwagon
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 23:22 — ApexterI, too, read through this and was struck by how there was a clear delineation between the parties ---- one seemed to be respectful and presented well-considered points, and the other seemed petty and racist. I'm just wondering how CCCAAC felt it would reflect well on them to publicize this correspondence.
I read through this email
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 18:43 — shank56I read through this email stream a couple of times and each time it sounded better for John and worse for the CCCAAC.
Have to agree- I read this and thought, "What's your point CCCAAC ?"
Ha
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 23:13 — supportwcpssSounds like we all agree. Real organizations who help kids don't have spokespeople.
test
Fri, 01/15/2010 - 08:56 — louiselee44test
I'm glad that this is out in
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 17:39 — jenmanI'm glad that this is out in the open and that John isn't the one who initially put it out there.
This shows Mrs. Wright and her organization is an extremely bad light. John is a absolute saint for putting up with this BS. "Prove that you serve minorities?" Disgraceful.
Go Go Tedesco!
I was wondering the same
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 17:28 — Eric_BI was wondering the same thing. I don't get it.
?
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 17:09 — TrailerParkGirlAn organization that is concerned about A-A children did not know what Big Brothers Big Sisters is, what they do and who they primarily mentor?
I can't remember when I didn't know what BBBS was.
Have they also not heard of Boys and Girls Clubs?
Well said John
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 16:08 — stacy123John, I read the original post not youor connect the dots post yet. Well written responses. I admire your efforts to have a dialogue even tho it is clear they are unfairly implicating you or your organization as non-diverse. I am sorry you have to be subjected to this sort of thing.
thank you for your time and effort.
"I have had many more
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 15:28 — user12345"I have had many more lucrative job offers in less diverse settings and turned them down to work with the team I am with now. I chose to live in a very diverse community. I attend a diverse church at Victory Fellowship in Garner if you wish to vet that for is racial makeup as well"
John is still my hero ...
"they represent various cross sectors of the community including AME churches, The "Big 3" in African American Fraternities, HSBCUs, ALOT (Legacy of Tradition for African American Men) and numerous others. "
Attention WSCA ... here some NAACP alternatives ...
John is still my hero ...
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 18:55 — TrailerParkGirlIn that case a recent experience I had with his detractors would have left you as frustrated as I was.
Tedesco - UPDATE
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 15:25 — JTedescoLet me help you all out here a bit on this one, since there are some missingd ots to connect. And let me encourage others who read that long piece to d o so from the bottom up as it may flow better that way.
First this began as a chain of scrutiny of me on the organization's yahoo groups page (the same group page that has been known for removing members who may not share every single view of theirs and or a respect for their tactics). I became aware of it as it was forward ed to me.
I personally respond ed that they can simple ask me d irectly instead of hunting or vetting my so-called “street-cred s” as one noted . I have always been open – honest – and d irect – even if we d isagree. I have never shied away from going to any venue and attempting to build consensus. In an attempt to forge a greater working relationship between BOE members for some of our most significant challenges, I personally asked the Chair and Mr. Sutton if he (Keith) would join me in the lead ership efforts for the new task force.
Ms. Wright, failed to share all of the messages in the conversation – particularly the ones from her – such as the one where she informed me not to call her “Calla” anymore as we were not friend s, but instead I should always ad d ress her as Ms. Wright. Or the one copied below where she was expressing some tone in the fact that the message got out to me and blames “Wake Cares” folks for it.
Now why shed esired to send the selected pieces of the conversation out to the med ia – I d o not know. Quite frankly, I d o not care, as I stand by my statements, my com mitment to EVERY SINGLE CHILD, my professional organization 9and the wond erful work we d o), it’s quality lead ership, my personal background , my personal platform, and as they put it and I respond ed - my “alignments”.
JohnT ed esco
On Behalf Of Calla WrightT uesd ay, January 05, 2010 9:36 PM
T o: John T ed escod citizensforafricanamericanchild ren@yahoogroups.com d : [CoalitionofConcerned CitizensforAfricanAmericanChild ren] Question/FYI BOE Member T hank you to whoever forward ed the question to Mr. T ed esco that was submitted to the CCCAAC group on yesterd ay.
Sent:
Cc: coalitionofconcerne
Subject: Re: Fw
Mr.T ed esco has forward ed his response and we would like to thank him for respond ing to Sheila R. concern/question. I d o not think her question was answered after read ing his response.
I guess we still have Wake Cares Assoc. still listed on our email.
What's their point?
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 21:10 — loriacI read through the notes, and did not understand their point.
Instead of asking about BBBS 'diversity issues', why doesn' the CCCAC ask what it can do to help? Maybe help by finding more AA role models to volunteer?
Now that would be truly extending a hand to benefit the whole community - I'm not holding my breath.
While I commend JT for
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 14:25 — red_balloonWhile I commend JT for seeking to forge collaborations with the AA crowd, I am disappointed that we are yet to get everyone to understand that education should be about education. AA children will be served better the day CCCAAC, NAACP, etc. quit exploiting AA children for political gains and focus on getting them educated. They need to quit thinking they are the MLK's of this period. Times have changed and the problems are different. A decades old mindset doesn't help AA children (nor the other children) until schools quit being social engineering petri dishes.
Today
Fri, 01/15/2010 - 02:59 — SDR256Yes, on this weekend I would especially like to recognize that I think we all have a little more Martin Luther King within all of us. And we are blessed for it. On the other hand, I don't think Dr. King would vet someone for reaching out to help by asking what their credentials were. If that were the case, there would be a lot fewer moms, dads, and regular people volunteering and trying to reach across the community.
We need to change the model where normal people should fear they shouldb be scrutinized to the point of having their personal checks (tracking numbers included) shared with the media, or grilled for their motivation for volunteering their life's work for a bigger cause (as in John Tedesco's work). Really people. Do we really want to scare off this many 'regular folks'? Rewind 3 years ago and I would have run so hard in the other direction because of the nonsense on this blog lately. This has been really toxic..... assuming it is real people you want to connect with.
On the other hand, if its politicians and a power play you are interested in, - - now... that may be another story.