School board candidate Cathy Truitt is using her ample warchest to make another pitch in new ads running in weekly newspapers in Garner and Fuquay-Varina.
In this ad appearing this week in Fuquay-Varna and Garner, Truitt calls herself "the clear choice for Wake school board." The ad also says she's the only candidate who "has an independent voice without a hidden agenda."
The ad talks about how she will "oppose forced reassignment," "aggressively pursue a balanced approach to community schools and expanded magnet program options" and "bring better socio-economic balance to District 2 schools."
It's a follow-up to an earlier ad in which she called opponent John Tedesco a political pawn of school board member Ron Margiotta and Western Wake. She also said in the ad that supporting incumbent Horace Tart is a vote for the status quo.
In this other new ad, Truitt makes a direct pitch to voters in Garner with the help of Greater Garner Advocates, the group of business and civic leaders who've been pressing for years for changes in the demographics in the town's schools.
The ad urges voters to join them in one of the most important elections in 30 years. It says that voting for Truitt is "our chance to make major strides in positively affecting Garner and Wake County schools."
The ad lists several members of the group, including former school board member Amy White. Those people have been among Truitt's financial backers.
UPDATE
The Greater Garner Advocates ad was produced by that group, not by Truitt. But Truitt's campaign paid for it to run.



Comments
I was on my way home today
Thu, 10/01/2009 - 21:34 — thedudescousinI was on my way home today when I passed a corner where all 4 D2 candidates had signs and saw only John's sign still standing, while Carlene, Cathy, and Horace's signs were all thrown in a ditch behind trees. I have also heard rumors of other signs being tampered with apart from the Town of Garner removing signs because of violations. I picked up the other three signs and put them back up but Cathy's stand was gone from her sign. This is crazy. People should not be removing other people's signs. I remember posts on here saying that Tedesco's signs were being torn up but that shouldn't give anyone permission to go and tear down the other candidates signs. I just find it a little odd of people complaining about John's signs being torn up when I have only seen mainly the other candidates signs disappear and his remain. We need to move past those childish games.
Get Over It Dude!
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 06:34 — MamaLynnGet over it dude! I've put up signs for the non status quo candidates and now they are gone while the status quo candidates are still there. This is not a one sided issue. I'm not one or never will be a person that takes down an opposing candidates sign. Unfurtunately there is a segment of people on both sides that think this is a good thing or funny thing! The truth is it could also be kids doing it. We have plenty of teenagers in our area that do a lot worse..trust me! It's frustrating to those of us that 'play by the rules'. I believe in democracy and I always tell my kids..you don't have to agree with someone on an issue, but you have to respect them regardless. Let's agree to disagree is what I always say!
Tedesco Chimes IN
Wed, 09/30/2009 - 18:40 — JTedescoFirst, anyone who knows me, knows I am a strong individual guided by faith and passion. I have never been a pawn to anyone, ANYONE, except the children and parents of Wake County. That's a check you can take to the bank.
Second, as I said on air, as God's truth, and as Joe C. can attest, I never had private meetings with RON before being selected as a WSCA Candidate. I am starting to feel jealous and unloved (kidding). But with that said, I do value much of what he has supported, fiscal responsibility, parental choice, and increased quality in education.
Third, from day one I have been in support of the community schools model promoted by US Sec. of Ed. Arnie Duncan. WHY? Isn't that a Democrat plan? Aren't you the endorsed Republican? YES & YES
- So, Why? Because it's the right thing to do, and the only way to take our focus off this false sense of healthy schools and get to targeting students so we can save some of these children who are being swept under the rug or diluted among numbers of better socio-economic data that Wake is fortunate enough to have over all the other large districts. Then these children fall through the cracks at an alarming rate and then we usher them into prisons. WE can not continue to abandon these children.
As someone who lived this life and now lives it for thousands of our kids, why else would I support a move away from policy 6200? Unlike schools in the northeast where revenue is based on municipal tax we do have a county funded system. Thus we can ensure that every school receives equal funding regardless of the neighborhood is it in, and in some cases we can even prop up our most underserved schools with more resources and targeted strategies. This allows us to get to equity in education and raise these children up.
This safety net of the way we fund our schools is why I would not support breaking up the System and why I believe we can get great schools in ALL the communities where we ALL live. Along with the fact that our communities are more diverse than ever; a county wide central administration limited to coordinate funding, policy development, human resources and planning that is aligned with a community schools model that maintains regional controls and local assignment options would be a hybrid of the best of both worlds.
What if some of our schools have high poverty numbers? Then we may actually have to help them! The current 40% F&R number has nothing to do with diversity or success. This is a red herring. It is not a mirror of our county’s true poverty rate, our county’s true racial make-up, or a proven metric of student achievement that bests schools with 38% or 42%. SO why 40%? It’s the tail wagging the dog. This is a grant metric for federal funding models. The goal is to raise children out of poverty and get schools below that number. BUT WCPSS has used it in reverse for their own agenda. A decade ago we had 6 schools that crossed that threshold, today, over 50.
I thought we were such an affluent community and the policy was helping us attract a higher end growth?? Did we grow in so much poverty that fast? No, they shuffled our kids to dilute poor performance and chase dollars instead of targeting poverty with relevant educational tools and raising these kids up – thus condemning many of them for life. THIS must stop.
Next, what is this idea that we need to be divisive with our neighbors? District 2 is a large district and includes parts of Southeast Raleigh (where I was last night with parents upset that they were bussed away from Barwell to Westlake) , and parts of Holly Springs and even a small portion of Cary, as well as Garner and Fuquay. All my money, far less than that of the wealthy developers and real estate folks funding Cathy’s Campaign, came from those areas and in small increments. My effort to help our kids is funded by my neighbors, family, teachers, laborers, and stay at home moms, along with my personal investment. WSCA made a generous donation but it was raised in like manner. And all the people I have met from WSCA have been real parents who care – not power brokers. And I thank them all.
Cathy’s report is controlled by a small number of wealthy Garner folks who think they are power brokers and developers in our community; they think they can push us around with their money. They are joked about in Garner as the Garner Mafia, and tied to a variety of speculative dealings. They are the same power brokers that lost McHenry’s Campaign 4 years ago. They were mad, so they thought they recruited a ringer in Truitt’s 7 page pretentious resume, and she thought it would help her sell her consulting services to sit on the Board of the biggest system in the state. But they will lose again because our children and our communities deserve better.
Cathy, herself told me she promised her husband that she would only serve this one time and then move on to their other endeavors, as she told me how wonderful I was and asked me to wait a turn because I am young and can do it in 4 years after her turn. After she lost every single endorsement, she now claims she is Independent (that’s because no one will associate with her). And the reality is that this is a political board. The way she has escalated this will only marginalize her and hurt the people of District 2, because these people will not work with her now (it’s human nature) – they will box her in, shut her up, and make her completely ineffective. Garner and Fuquay will get passed over for 4 more years.
So to help her she has hired high dollar political guns and is losing to a young man knocking doors and shaking hands. How is this possible she says? Well, I was always taught that the eyes are the windows to your soul. So now she fumes and insults and makes false accusations – and then… wait, Brad Crone wrote a new script last week – she reads it close… and abracadabra. Now she is a sweet grandma with a lab who runs the house.
People just meet me, look me in the eyes, shake my hand and they can see the difference from Dr. Truitt. I am open, genuine, and accessible. My campaign cards have my number on it (919-701-9253, you will actually get Me - try it) and people say what if everyone calls you? I say, that is kind of the point as I am asking them to trust me with their children and their money. People are not looking for miracles out there; they just crave genuine leadership that understands them.
I am me. I am far from perfect and have made mistakes. But I will always be my own man according to God’s grace and my short-comings. I am running my own campaign. Say and write my own stuff (sometimes it’s not all that good, lol). I am using my funds more wisely to compete at the same level as my opponents and in that same manner that I would respect hard earned tax-dollars. I am committed to nothing more than our children. I ask every donor and supporter to pray for me. Those who know me, know I work tirelessly in this effort and am pressing hard for our families. And the bit of ego I do have is for my Steelers (because their number #1).
Ok, it is back to the Campaign trail for me. Press on bloggers – have fun. See you across the finish line on OCT. 6th.
John Tedesco
Thank you John
Wed, 09/30/2009 - 23:26 — SDR256There are so many people out there impressed with you and what you are doing. Keep it up. It can only bring good back.
We are pressing on, believe me. And we're not just blogging. ;)
School board candidate
Wed, 09/30/2009 - 21:23 — thedudescousinSchool board candidate doesn't know the difference between their and they're.
"And the bit of ego I do have is for my Steelers (because their number #1). "
And as for ego "So to help her she has hired high dollar political guns and is losing to a young man knocking doors and shaking hands." and "People just meet me, look me in the eyes, shake my hand and they can see the difference from Dr. Truitt." It sounds like you have a pretty big ego problem to me.
Also, what is with the negative politics? This election is only political because of candidates like John and groups like the Dems and GOP making endorsements.
Carlene is the only candidate not to seek the GOP endorsement because she REALLY is in it for the children and not interest groups. She is also the only one not to attack another candidate or play the political game.
Ms. Truitt wants people to
Wed, 09/30/2009 - 21:35 — CaryCurmudgeonMs. Truitt wants people to believe she is not a politician, but with the paid consulting she is getting she seems to have picked up on playing politics very quickly. She has a different message every time she speaks, depending on the audience. I think the other candidates have stayed on message, and have run clean campaigns other than when they have been forced to respond to Truitt's negative ads. Attacking John and Ron's character is no way to present oneself as a leader for positive change who can work with other board members to serve the best interests of District 2.
Once again John proves
Wed, 09/30/2009 - 20:30 — g88ky07why he is the ONLY choice for district 2. HE TRULY CARES!
Mrs. Truitt shouldn't receive one single vote based on her actions and the words she has chosen to use!
No one I know of has received a single piece of mail or a phone call from anyone in the Truitt or Tart camp, but many had messages and/or live calls today from Mr. Tedesco's team!
:c )
Still campaigning on
Wed, 09/30/2009 - 14:54 — CaryCurmudgeonStill campaigning on intrigue and empty promises, I do believe the people of Garner are smarter than she gives them credit for.