Choose a blog

About this blog

UNC Now is your place for Tar Heel sports. Beat writer Andrew Carter has up-to-the-minute news and analysis. Columnist Luke DeCock also contributes. Follow us on Twitter at @_andrewcarter or @accnow.

ACC publicly reprimands UNC football program

Bookmark and Share

The ACC issued to the University of North Carolina a public reprimand for violations that occurrerd within the Tar Heels' football program. PHOTO: News & Observer file.

CHAPEL HILL — The ACC on Friday issued a public reprimand to the University of North Carolina for violations that occurred in the Tar Heels’ football program. Here’s a story about the reprimand.

No, this isn’t a drastic penalty – if it can even be considered a penalty at all (though the NCAA and college athletic conferences view public reprimands as a “penalty” for violations) – but the public reprimand is significant when you consider that the ACC’s Penalty and Infractions Committee hasn’t done this type of thing since 1990. Back then, the committee ruled that Maryland would have to repay lost television revenue while the Terrapins’ men’s basketball program served a television ban.

Since then, the ACC’s Penalty and Infractions Committee had not taken additional action in any NCAA infractions case. So on one hand, yes – a public reprimand isn’t the kind of penalty that comes with too many consequences. But on the other, it is something. And more, in fact, than what the ACC’s Penalty and Infractions Committee has offered in any infractions case in the past 21 years.

Here are some statements:

From Richard Carmichael, the chair of the ACC Penalty and Infractions Committee, and the faculty athletic representative at Wake Forest: “The Atlantic Coast Conference has been built on its ability to balance academics and athletics. The committee believes that the University of North Carolina has and will continue to strive toward this balance; however, the committee agreed that a public reprimand was appropriate in this specific case in addition to the other penalties already in place.”
 
From ACC Commissioner John Swofford: “The ACC’s balance of academics, athletics and integrity will continue to be the cornerstones by which this league operates. As I have said previously, it is disturbing anytime one of our member institutions has NCAA infractions issues. Such issues are counter to the goals and aspirations of our conference.”

And, from UNC: “As a charter member of the Atlantic Coast Conference, the University of North Carolina is proud of its long and rich history in what we believe is the ultimate blend of academic and athletics in the country. The unfortunate and regrettable experiences of the last few years have been difficult for the University community to endure, but we believe UNC will be a better and stronger member of the conference going forward.”

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Swoffford should lose his

Swoffford should lose his job because it is clear he is unable to put personal loyalties aside and do his job in an objective manner.  When other teams in the ACC have gotten into trouble for far fewer and less severe problems the ACC has added their own more aggressive penalties to those handed down by the NCAA.  Not so in this case.  Not only did the NCAA fail to give a "lose of institutional control" to Carolina, but the ACC gave them a free pass also.  Any Tarheels wonder why everyone hates them ..... They act like they are above the rules and apparantly they are.  

This is incorrect. Since

This is incorrect.

Since 1990, the ACC committee that discusses penalties and infractions cases has rarely recommended additional action beyond what the NCAA's Committee on Infractions already imposed. In fact, the public reprimand of UNC is just the second time that the ACC's penalty and infractions committee has added onto NCAA sanctions. (Granted, a reprimand is indeed symbolic in nature and not really a tangible penalty.)

The only other time the ACC's penalty and infractions committee took additional action was in 1990, when it ruled that Maryland had to repay lost TV revenue while the Terrapins men's basketball program was banned from playing on TV. 

tar heels

What rules? Feel better? haha, Sorry, things are just a little slow these days. BTW, it's Tar Heels ; )

Reprimand

This is symbolism, no substance. There are no consequences at all! UNC has arrived at big time football.

Cars View All
Find a Car
Go
Jobs View All
Find a Job
Go
Homes View All
Find a Home
Go

Want to post a comment?

In order to join the conversation, you must be a member of newsobserver.com. Click here to register or to log in.

About the blogger

Andrew Carter is the University of North Carolina beat writer for the News & Observer.
Advertisements