OrangeChat

How are we doing? If you have a question, complaint or suggestion about coverage of Orange and Chatham counties in The News & Observer and The Chapel Hill News, post your comments in this blog or e-mail us. Comments here may be reprinted in The News & Observer or Chapel Hill News.

Choose a blog

Dwight Bassett on growth, economic development and Rams Plaza

Bookmark and Share

I tell people that IP3 is our office annex, but it's true. It's the best place for a quick conversation. Last week, Dwight Bassett ordered a cheese slice and talked with me about growth, taxes and driving in from Graham.

Yes, the Chapel Hill economic development officer lives in Alamance County. He couldn't afford what he wanted in Chapel Hill, which meant a lot with room for his woodshop. That's his wooden arm holding up a basketball outside Spanky's. (And yes, he's just as surprised it's still there -- after NCAA tourneys and Halloweens -- as you and I probably are.)

Bassett is concerned because the town and many citizens are now participating in the Chapel Hill 2020 planning process "and there are people in 2020 who think it's an option not to grow the tax base."  He means the commercial tax base, mostly: the kind that gives back to town and county coffers more than it takes in government services. 

Last week I reported how developer Carol Ann Zinn had sold her Aydan Court site to UNC for $410,000 after buying it for just over $1 million four years ago. Zinn was seething in a guest column  Sunday that has generated several responses (see more on that later this week). But her point is shared by many: the town's arduous development review process drives the cost of doing business here up and turns opportunities. Two weeks ago we reported how Walmart may come to Chatham County and kill plans for commercial activity in the southern part of town. When I suggested to Bassett it was another New Hope Commons in the making, his eyes widened. "Exactly," he said. 

But why do we need to grow? Doesn't the devlopment review process guarantee everyone has a voice and protect our trees and fragile ecosystems?  Yes, but without more businesses paying taxes, the cost falls on homeowners. And Bassett repeats what Town Manager Roger Stancil has been saying: Chapel Hill has reached the point where it can't ask homeowners to pay more. That's why you see the debate over swimming pool hours being cut and fears the town is building a state of the art library it may not be able to afford.

"We've got to cut services just to not have a tax increase next year," Bassett said.

Bassett's job is to bring business here. And he's not asking for an open door. He does think the town can do a better job telling developers what it wants early on so that they can have a surer chance of succeeding later. "There are many, many cities that have the same values as Chapel Hill but place the expectations on the front end," he says.

Which brings us to Rams Plaza. Katelyn Ferral reports in tomorrow's Chapel Hill News that the new owners will be seeking town approval for renovations. But even if the 30-year old shopping center is redeveloped as part of a new Ephesus Church Road-Fordham Boulevard hotspot, Bassett says it will only increase the town's commercial tax base from 16 to 18 percent. Without more business, the burden will still fall disproportionately on homeowners.

Bassett hopes Chapel Hill 2020 will lead to new and better rules, and on this he agrees with Zinn: the development review process does not always give the town what it needs.

"If 100 people show up at a meeting, they can sway things," he says. "But that's 100 people out of how many voters? I truly believe in the democratic process; we should be represeting the common good. ... (But) If we really do believe in a sustainable community, it's not just about saving a tree, it's not (just) about stormwater. "

"When you say maybe to something (as the town said to Zinn and has said other developers) you extend the life of something. It would be less painful to turn it down." 

There are reasons beside lot size that Bassett, other town employees and newspaper reporters live outside town limits. In Alamance, commercial property accounts for 40 percent of the tax base.  (And don't forget sales tax generated by Tanger Outlets, which pretty much killed Orange County developers' plans for Buckhorn Road.)

"It's an hour of my life," Bassett says, "27 miles a day (each way) I would rather give up"  if he could find he could afford in Chapel Hill. It's a tradeoff many making, and more may contemplate in what town and others government leaders  call "the new normal."                      

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Residential vs Commercial

It's not clear to me what Carol Ann Zinn's unhappiness with the development review process has to do with economic growth. She wanted to build more residential--which is how we got into so much trouble to begin with. Sustainability is about balance, balancing residential growth with economic viability and environmental protection. Residential growth is out of proportion to commercial growth in this area; more residential development, even if it's mixed use, simply exacerbates the problem. 

Sustainable community....

 

Sustainable community....
Well there is 50% of what stifles development; the other half from what I can tell is taxation.
The county and CH partnerships w/ ICLEI and thus the UN Agenda 21, have combined w/ the overt progressive eco mentality to create barriers to Development. 
The list of large companies and developments opting to build just outside of the county line screams to be addressed. These counties recoup all the revenue. Not....that Orange County or CH would be frugal in the proceeds...No, that course is for the lightheaded. The tail that wags the dog has a penchant for spending. If 3 Walmarts, a Cabelas, and a Factory outlet mall landed in Orange overnight the odds are there would be a revenue shortage in short order and prior to that there certainly would be no relief to the property owner. Bankruptcies have increased and well as foreclosures on Orange. Things are not looking good and the slight of hand gang may be angling to place another Giddy Agenda 21 derived Transit tax on the May ballots (to once again bank on the low turn outs).

Orange will not become stabilized until the Tail (CH/BOCC) comes out of it's eco stupor and starts embracing American values instead of the UN’s and their eco plans to limit American growth. 

Good luck to Dwight Basset....but he must realize that where he lives is symptomatic of the Orange conundrum. Interestingly as Alamance becomes more economically stronger by embracing development...His home value will increase. The job he has is to essentially increase the value of Orange...but if the history of liberalism remains true...it will not matter what he tries...his house in Alamance will increase in value and he soon be able afford a larger house in Orange as citizens flee taxes and devaluation and regulation.
Think of his reduced carbon foot print not driving 27 miles one way....makes you warm and fuzzy right?
Chris Weaver



 

Cars View All
Find a Car
Go
Jobs View All
Find a Job
Go
Homes View All
Find a Home
Go

Want to post a comment?

In order to join the conversation, you must be a member of newsobserver.com. Click here to register or to log in.

About the blogger

Mark Schultz is the editor of The Chapel Hill News and The Durham News.
Advertisements