Calling the Chapel Hill town manager’s report “one sided,” a committee voted tonight to seek an independent investigator to examine a November police raid that removed squatters from a vacant building downtown.
The new Community Policing Advisory Commitee, which the Chapel Hill Town Council asked the review the incident, said it could not make any conclusions without more facts about what happened Nov. 13 at the former Yates Motor Co.
“We will need the council to pay for it. It will not be cheap,” committee member Jessica Smith said of hiring a professional investigator. “How can we make recommendations as to policies and procedures unless we know what actually happened?”
Town Manager Roger Stancil’s report found the police raid, led by a Special Emergency Response Team pointing loaded weapons at unarmed people, “appropriate” given what police knew at the time. The police charged eight people with misdemeanors and found no weapons inside the building.
Committee members said the report spoke only to those affiliated with the town and omitted an encounter between an officer and some of the squatters the morning of the raid.
"You don't have facts from the other side of the coin," member Kevin Hicks said. "Was that an overboard approach to eight individuals in a building that had no weapons? And even if you thought it had weapons, the report does not show what investigation was done (to reach that conclusion). It's a very weak report."
Committee Chairman Ron Bogle said the Town Council needs to act quickly before memories fade and people who were there leave town. “The challenge for us is to determine what actually happened in this community,” he said. “If they want us to do the job they have to give us the tools.”
Smith estimated an investigator might want to talk to as many as 100 witnesses who were at or outside the building that day. She estimated the investigator could cost $15,000.
About 10 people spoke to the committee tonight, most praising the committee's seeking more information.
The committee will review the wording of its request at a special meeting next week and make its request to the Town Council on Jan. 23.
Comments
Crucial Questions?
Thu, 01/12/2012 - 15:27 — fhblackI am not a lawyer but I'm not sure people understand the legal issues at play with this recommendation. Suppose no member of the CHPD wants to talk to this individual? Can they be ordered to talk to the person? Even if private citizens came together to fund this, the legal issues remain. Can "getting the facts" as we hear over and over, really occur if the "investigator" has no authority to interview, examine records, and review other necessary documents?
Since the report of the Chief and his boss, Town Manager Stancil, has been called "unacceptable," how about telling them what more is wanted/needed. They have the authority to do what needs to be done. Are there others who have this authority under State law? The ADVISORY Committee has the authority to review the report and go back to the Town Council with their questions and concerns. Calling for an "independent" investigator who has no connection to our Town sounds like a solution to some, but to what end?
But you know what? No matter what is done or said about this legitimate use of police powers to deal with a breach of law and order, some will never be satisfied because they will never be satisfied.
GOOD!
Thu, 01/12/2012 - 01:05 — ProudlyUnaffiliatedWhen the independent study is established, I will send and post a list of questions that MUST be answered for this to have any credibility. We don't need a second whitewash.
Kudos to the committee
Wed, 01/11/2012 - 23:32 — tbucknerHopefully, the council will respect their recommendations and allocate the funds for the review.
Fantastic
Wed, 01/11/2012 - 23:23 — HerschelKeckI commend the vote by this committee to seek an independent investigation - exactly what Jim Neal had proposed months ago, and what many supporters had described to the Council last Monday. With independence, we will find justice.
Who will hire this investigator?
Wed, 01/11/2012 - 23:33 — HerschelKeckMost important is that the Town and the Police have no control over who is hired - that would defeat the purpose of an independent investigator.