David King, Triangle Transit's general manager, spoke to the editorial board this week, answering questions about why there's still no transit stop planned for RDU and about how transit paths can shape growth in a good way, among other things.
Click "read more" to listen to some snippets from the interview. In the RDU soundbite, King is talking about John Brantley of RDU. Also, there's a blog post on transit written by editorial board member Allen Torrey.
Blog post from Torrey:
Things are finally moving, at least in a measured way, for mass transit in the Triangle.
On Wednesday a state House committee backed a bill that would allow Wake, Durham and Orange county officials to put a sales-tax-for-transit option before voters. An N&O news report notes that, "Two Triad and three Triangle counties would have the option to emulate Mecklenburg County, where voters twice have endorsed a half-cent sales tax that was spent to double the bus fleet and launch a popular light-rail line."
Speaking to N&O reporters and editors earlier in the week, David King, Triangle Transit's general manager, said that if voters do approve a funding plan, the initial focus would be on adding buses, some of which might run in special lanes. Light rail, which takes longer to plan and deliver, would be a few years down the road. The House bill, and a companion measure in the state Senate, would allow voters in any of the Triangle counties to say yes to a half-cent sales tax — a $3 hike in annual vehicle registration fees is also envisioned — and get transit improvements going in that county, even if other counties didn't go along.
For years, area residents struggled with the terminology involved in the Triangle Transit Authority's (note that it's no longer the Authority) previous rail system plan. It was often termed "light rail" but wasn't. Light rail involves relatively lightweight rail cars that are powered by overhead electric lines. The TTA's plan was for what it called commuter rail, involving heavier, diesel-powered units. That was because the designated rail line runs in the same corridor as Amtrak and freight trains. But a change may be brewing.
A special transportation committee last year advised that light rail lines be incorporated into the plans, in Wake County and between Chapel Hill and Durham. And King said the current thinking is that because the Triangle Transit rail line along the original rail corridor is 25 feet or so away from the heavy-duty rail lines, it would be safe to run light rail in that corridor, provided certain safety measures are put in place. The agency is exploring that possibility with railway and federal officials. Getting rid of the diesel-car part of the rail plan, and relying on light rail instead, would likely be a plus with voters.


Comments
Yeah, with less money, I can
Tue, 07/28/2009 - 01:45 — makemineYeah, with less money, I can transit now
Best Car
mess transit
Mon, 03/30/2009 - 15:14 — plusafthanks, camvillman... i thought that the number of mass transit systems that, world-wide, operated above breakeven was EXACTLY = zero. yep, could work in china, with about three times our population and much higher pop densities...
so, here's the thing... if you want mass transit, why charge fares at all? no fare anyone's ever used [except maybe those guys in china...] have ever covered the cost of running the service. so why pretend?
just subsidize the whole thing. that would move the entire financial burden off the users and onto the general public, and we're used to paying for things we don't ever use, right?
wouldn't surprise too many people.
or you could start with the bottoms-up approach. do not build ANY public transportation system that can't support itself. why buses or trains, when jitneys or taxis can provide a similar function? tradition? great answer.
it's so easy to put in a rail system, you know... all you have to do is decide where to put it, then take all the property for the right of way, tear down neighborhoods and private homes and roll! easy as that.
how about elevated monorails running down the medians of major highways? motorists watching trains zip overhead might try it if they thought they could get to their destinations faster, huh? stations near major intersections, shopping centers and park-and-ride lots .... what an idea?!
good luck.
Empty cars
Thu, 03/12/2009 - 17:53 — elandfriedI am for spending money on transit. The cars I see are almost empty so from my point of view it is a waste of money, and I think more lanes on the road would have a similar fate - few people would use them, and the expense would be too high.
Sorry, that was too easy.
empty cars
Wed, 03/25/2009 - 06:49 — camvillmanWhy doesn't Mr King stop begging the government for money? Oh yeah! He wants to line his pockets the easy way. No rail system in the entire world is profitable except in China, because of incredible density. Why don't you attempt to improve current public transport, so it is more attractive to riders? Better bus stops, more busses, alternative energy busses, and shorter wait times would be a good start. Oh yeah, and every public transport should go to the Fair grounds, airport, RBC center, Bulls athletic park, Dean Smith center, and downtown Raleigh. Without these you are delusional and dishonest.
I am for spending money on
Thu, 03/12/2009 - 15:04 — jesmyopinionI am for spending money on roads. The buses I see are almost empty so from my point of view is a waste of money, and I think trains would have a similiar fate - few people would ride them, and the expense would be too high. But I am glad to see that the government at least trusts us citizens enough to give us a choice to vote on this rather than having it shoved down our throat as some would like to do...