Commentators are having a field day with Sarah Palin's use of "refudiate" in television appearance and in a Twitter post that has been deleted. Plenty of people are taking her to task for using a word that doesn't appear in any English dictionary. Some of those people are more concerned about her overall message than about that one word. But I write about language use, and I am more interested in the word than in the politics.
As Language Log points out, Palin should have been set straight by her friends or staff before she was ridiculed by blogs that, shall we say, do not have her best interests at heart. Palin defends herself in another tweet, pointing out that Shakespeare made up words and that "English is a living language."
Indeed, Palin is right: English does change all the time. New words come into the lexicon; other words drop out or take on different meanings. When I was younger, I rarely heard or read the word "disrepect" "disrespect" used as a verb. Now it's everywhere. It's an old usage that has taken on new life, and it serves a purpose. If it turns out that "refudiate" serves a purpose not served by other words, it has a good chance of becoming part of the language.
But what about the claim that Shakespeare made up words all the time? Matthew Biberman, an English professor, points out in this post that Shakespeare is credited with the use of words because his plays are such a rich source of language. Shakespeare was also mindful of the meter of his language, and sometimes he used words in a odd way just to get the rhythm right.
Biberman notes that some of the coinages that Shakespeare is credited with were malapropisms that he put in the mouths of his comic characters. Palin's "refudiate" is a classic malapropism. She combined refute and repudiate. I think "repudiate," to reject with disapproval and condemnation," is what she really meant to say.
I am eager to see what happens to "refudiate." Will its ironic use by commentators and others lead to its becoming widely accepted? Will it land with "misunderestimated" on the pile of malapropisms? Or will it become a useful word like "bloviate," an odd word popularized by President Warren Harding?
Postscript: Someone has started a ShakesPalin Twitter feed.
Comments
BO
Tue, 07/27/2010 - 10:20 — trishamiNot interested in politics eh? Prove it. Write up a little article making fun of how well Obama speaks when he is off of the TelePrompTer. Can't do that can you? Didn't think so, you value your job too much.
I would like to REFUDIATE
Sun, 07/25/2010 - 18:42 — dondaI would like to REFUDIATE the elitist LITTERAIRY JEANUOUS INSINUATION that COINJOININ two words REGULATES one to the EYEQUE level of DOOFUS. Thus, AUTOMECHANICALLY ALIMBANATING them from a position of SERVADUDE, e.g., Dan PHEASANT or one of them BYRDS. If this is the case, should PRESADENT OBOMBA RESIGNATE for implying that the U.S. Military was dead by saying that they were CORPSE? Or was this another clever STATMAT as to what his INTENSHUNS are for our honorable military, and then of course there is always our ELLUSTRUST VP, Joe BITE your word BEFORE they DEFLOWER you.
Would you care to REFUDIATE the implication that this flap, that the media has raised, is mainly an attempt to discredit Sara Palin and anyone that is not in their camp?
What, pray tell, does "disrepect" mean?
Tue, 07/20/2010 - 11:24 — NCBuff_CaniacIf you meant "disrespect", fine. Just use your spell checker. If "disrepect" is the word you meant to use, I refudiate you.
Thank you ...
Tue, 07/20/2010 - 12:15 — Pam_Nelson (author)... for your close reading! I have fixed my typo with a strikethrough.
Pam Nelson
Triangle Grammar Guide