Choose a blog

Enquirer paid $50,000 for Edwards story?

Bookmark and Share

"You were scooped," one reader wrote, referring to the story about John Edwards' affair. "We pay you to find out." It never feels good to get beat on a story. It's true you pay us to find out. It's also true we don't pay sources for information, as The National Enquirer does.

ABC News' Brian Ross said that when reporting the story about John Edwards' affair, he came across sources who said The National Enquirer was offering $50,000 for information. The Enquirer's Steve Plamann confirmed that his publication pays for information but he didn't say how much it paid in the Edwards case. David Perel, the Enquirer's top editor, told David Carr of The New York Times that he has the best investigative team in the business. If that's true, The Enquirer shouldn't need to pay sources, should it, David? At the least, The Enquirer should come clean and say how much it paid sources in the Edwards case. Carr also points out: "The National Enquirer gets plenty wrong," including missing on Gary Condit and Elizabeth Smart.

Sharon Waxman, the former Hollywood correspondent for The New York Times, says tabloids pay big: "...Without a checkbook, the Raleigh News & Observer was not going to be let into the world of Rielle Hunter." We wanted to talk with Hunter. But we weren't willing to pay to talk with her. When you pay sources, they have incentive to lie or exaggerate. That's one reason why the Enquirer is wrong so often. They got this one right. But the next time they might be settling out of court, as they just did with a woman the Enquirer suggested had borne a child by Ted Kennedy.

 

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Great job!

Great job N&O.

Touche'

Now THAT's funny, in a sad sort of way, of course.
A tip o' the Cranky Cap to you, m'lady.

Sorry "Cranky".....

I do so very much regret having to demolish almost every single point of your response.....however, this stuff just writes itself.

Six degrees from Kevin Bacon, (as it were).

From the N&O:

CHAPEL HILL - Vincent Anania Sr., the father-in-law of onetime Democratic presidential contender and former Sen. John Edwards, died Saturday at the age of 87.Anania died in Chapel Hill of heart failure, the senator's wife, Elizabeth Edwards, said in a statement.Anania, a native of Marianna, Pa., was the first in his family to be born in the United States, Elizabeth Edwards said. He was raised in Brownsville, Pa., and attended the University of Pittsburgh. He later attended the U.S. Naval Academy, where he played football and was selected as an All-American in LACROSSE, she said.

Mr. Cranky "be gettin' busy"....

Dear man, you made this sentiment a huge feature of your post by ending with this:

"Keep fighting for what's important, not what titillates."

Many of us want this hammered home to the media daily.

And I have no illusions that anyone will be able to teach mental cases anything to the contrary whose lives and whose decisions revolve around race, class, and gender.

I do LOL!!! with fervor realizing that most of the people who went after the innocent lacrosse players---knowing that no evidence existed---will also be voting for Barack Obama in November.

One of few politicians who called for a federal investigation into the violation of the civil rights of the Duke students.

Article on Blogspot

 

No sweeter irony.

(Just recently, Dan Barkin presented a deeply flawed report on "perp walks" so that it would have a politically correct patina for readers.) 

Airbrushing article 

Such an agenda-filled, silly post of yours.

Stating the obvious as a joke requires a more creative punch line.

Try studying Dennis Miller.

When you talk about "titillation" by the media, you really need to know what you're talking about.

And yes, all such abuses in the future will have the Duke Lacrosse Hoax as their "Media Mama".

Get used to it.

And get used to the fact that the Edwards' abuses will be a story for some time to come.

He ran far too many good doctors out of business with his grits 'n bacon Vegas show of channeling fetuses for semi-literate juries for us not to pay attention to his next act.

Ho-hum, indeed.....

One must wonder where "Cranky Old Guy" was during the Duke Lacrosse Hoax a few years ago.

Wanted posters.....bogus and contrived perp walk which was nothing more than glaring racism on the front pages.....endless columns and op-eds written by the waddling race hustler Timothy Tyson and the stuck-inside-antebellum-blues Allan Gurganus.

About the only truth and reality to any of this mindless titillation was that it provided Gurganus another opportunity to fantasize about the muscular bodies of young men.

For months it was a feeding frenzy at the expense of truthful and investigative reporting.

They even went along with the sham of a story about Crystal Mangum's life as her criminal history and false rape charges against three men a decade earlier were swept under the rug.

All for the phony meta-narrative.

Regarding Edwards, of course his political career is over.

And of course he was no longer a candidate when this story was finally uncovered; however......

.......the issue is the long cover-up and continued lies while he was still clawing for the nomination.

This is a significant story for readers.

John and Elizabeth have used the N&O as a springboard into national politics since the late 1990's.

They were coddled and covered as the next political Ozzie and Harriet.

I strongly disagree with another commenter that Mrs. Edwards does not bear some responsibility.

My G/d, she often wore the pants and openly took on issues as she traveled around the country with her self-righteousness......attacking others (especially women) who criticized her husband.

She put herself out there and she has benefited in countless ways by playing the "professional woman who chose family first".....unlike Hillary Clinton, she always reminded everyone.

LOL!!!

The things she said about the relationship between Lynn Cheney and her gay daughter....(giving advice like some meddlesome loon), made me cringe.

This woman has been allowed to preach to others ad nauseum, all the while expecting a free pass and getting it, because of her illness.

It had become an insufferable sideshow.

If John or Elizabeth Edwards really had "service to their country" in mind they would have brought his living a secret life while wanting to be president to a screeching halt.

To this day, Elizabeth Edwards is on the cover of People talking about herself and how she is determined to "keep her family together".

As if anyone----no doubt including their loyal supporters---gives a flying fig.

Readers might recall the shocking encounter John Kerry said he had with Edwards when he met with him while considering him for VP.

Edwards pulled Kerry aside and in an emotional voice said he wanted to tell him something that he had never talked about with anyone before.

Kerry was braced for a revelation of some kind.

Then John Edwards proceeded to tell him what he had done when he saw his son's body---(his son was killed in an auto accident years ago)---as if it were the only time he had discussed such a personally emotional topic.

Only thing wrong was that he had told John Kerry the very same story two years before......using the exact same heart-tugging preface.

Kerry was among the first to witness first-hand the depths of Edwards' artificiality and cynicism.

And Elizabeth Edwards wonders why some people were accusing them of using their son's death as a political tool?

Even when they donate money or set up a program somewhere it's always with their name on it and publicized galore.

There is a story here and I would argue that the sanity of both the Edwards is in question.

Debrah

How silly of me. I clearly forgot that every story in the paper with which Debrah takes issue must be SOMEHOW related to the Duke LAX story.

Debra, no one involved in the steamy Edwards saga played lacrosse, attended Duke, was a stripper or a cop or a prosecutor. Different story, different cast of characters.

Move on, dear. It is not healthy or productive to be so obsessed about race. Besides, all of these people are so white they make your eyes water.

Cranky Old Guy

ho hum

Let's keep a little perspective here. IF John Edwards had become the democratic nominee, his dalliances would have been a big story worthy of investigative reporters Pat Stith's and Joe Neff's finest efforts.
BUT HE WASN'T!
He was just one more failed politician who was fading fast from the scene. VP? Not a chance since he didn't even carry NC for Kerry. Besides, his ego would not have let him take that humiliating role again. Attorney General, SCOTUS? Not likely after one less than stellar Senate term.
Edwards was a flash in the pan, the pretty face d' jour, who was already on that long, slow slide to becoming a trivia question. His personal life is not only his own business, but inconsequential locally or nationally.
The N&O handled it just right. I'm perfectly happy to have some rag like the National Enquirer wade in the muck while The N&O spends its precious resources on keeping North Carolina from being further trashed by the incompetent Mike Easley and his administration. They just let a man die in Cherry Hospital! That is a far more important story than who keeps John Edwards feet warm at night.
Jeez, people, you've got one of the finest mid-sized papers in the country doing battle for you every day. That they choose not to compete with trash is in their favor, not a fault.
Hat's off to the Drescher, et al., and thanks. Keep fighting for what's important, not what titillates.
Cranky Old Guy

paying for news

The MSM including the N&O are all "holier than thou" because they don't pay for news. Well someone does. They print stories that come from public relations firms almost word for word and those stories are paid for by the movie stars or political candidates involved. They pay unholy amounts to the paprazzi for pictures which accounts for the disgusting scramble of photographers taking "in your face" pictures. Get off your high horse and face reality. You were scooped, and scooped badly. Mainly because the National Enquirer used good judgment in sensing when a story was important. Perhaps you should start hiring some of their reporters. Then you might not be scooped next time.

Caught looking for excuses

N&O is now put in a position to excuse its lack of interest in the Edwards' affair story by whining "they paid for their information and we are so positive it was $50K we will quote a non-verifiable source". As much as you try almost daily to explain your actions on this story, you are admitting you are guilty by association with the lie lived by the Edwards' campaign since 2006 whether you hide it in the Triangle & State section of the paper or seek credibility with a blog listing. "When you lay down with a dog with fleas, you will have fleas when the dog leaves"

Adulterous Affairs

So having an adulterous affair should preclude anyone from running for President? Gee, half the Presidents this country has had should never have been elected then. And how did this get to be Elizabeth Edwards' fault?

Adulterous Affaird

Lying repeatedly (and continuing to lie) about said affair shows a complete lack of judgement and yes, that disqualifies him in my mind. This is his fault, not his wife's fault

$50,000 ?

What a coincidence. If only the National Enquirer had offered that sum to Edwards he might have told them the whole story right on the spot.

After all, that has been his going fee to speak to audiences about "poverty".

Does anyone breathing fresh air need anyone to tell them that John Edwards is a bad guy?

I mean, really.

In the past---(and right from the start, I'm proud to say)---I've always winced just to hear him speak.

How could anyone who's paying attention buy into his act?

I like John Drescher and think that he's a good guy. Beats the hell out of Melanie Sill. He and his colleagues should have pursued the story more aggressively in the beginning, but it's understandable that they would want to shy away from such a tawdry event unless they knew for sure what was going on.

I said it's understandable. Not excusable.

They didn't want to be embarrassed and go into the gutter the way the New York Times did using gossip and innuendo about McCain earlier this year which turned out to have placed them below the level of the National Enquirer. After all, the Enquirer doesn't pretend to be the paper of record. 

Just take a look at all the local "big boys" who were close friends with John and Elizabeth Edwards.  Did the N&O want to risk alienating a portion of their "movers and shakers" readership with such a story?

It's a sleazy story.....made unconscionable by the brazen, self-serving participation of Elizabeth Edwards. She had been told about this in 2006. Just think back how they both went about with their show.....accepting money and long volunteer hours from trusting supporters.

Edwards' now-defunct "make work" Poverty Center at the UNC-CH law school was set up for him by Gene Nichol, the dean at the time. Nichol, like Edwards, also faced demise at his subsequent job.

The N&O editorial editors used to publish Nichol's op-eds as if he owned the paper. Like clockwork, he was given huge spaces on their pages.

Much like the editorial editors now do for Duke's Gang of 88 professors in an effort to allow them a chance to rehabilitate themselves.

My advice to them:  For once, learn from your mistakes.

Try a panoramic view of life.

If you disagree with someone.....air their views.

Promote debate.

Don't help promote self-serving, narrow-minded demagogues. 

 

 

 

Marry me ....

Debrah ..... YOU ROCK GIRL!

..... Drescher - Yes .... Melanie Sill YUCK! .... Gene The Dean ..... Gang of 88 ..... I bet we hang out on the same websites. .... "The Apple Cheeked Fraud From Robbins" ???

Thoughtful and Informed

I'll be watching for more from Debrah.

The best investigative

The best investigative agencies in the world (the FBI ect. ) pay for information. You do have to verify the information.

Cars View All
Find a Car
Go
Jobs View All
Find a Job
Go
Homes View All
Find a Home
Go

Want to post a comment?

In order to join the conversation, you must be a member of newsobserver.com. Click here to register or to log in.

About the blogger

John Drescher was named executive editor of The N&O in 2007 and is the seventh person to hold that job since the paper was launched in 1894. Drescher, who grew up in Raleigh, started his journalism career as a summer intern at The N&O in 1981. He also has worked at The Charlotte Observer and The State newspaper in Columbia, SC.
Advertisements