Duke's Quinn Cook, right, tries to scoop up a loose ball from St. John's Malik Stith as Amir Garrett watches from the floor. CHUCK LIDDY-cliddy@newsobserver.com
Updated 4:44 p.m.
DURHAM -- After Duke finished going through the motions in the second half of its discomforting 83-76 win over St. John’s on Saturday afternoon, its locker room was almost as somber as it was last week when the Blue Devils lost to Florida State.
There are times when a win is not a win.
“We did enough to win, which almost makes me sick to say that,” Duke coach Mike Krzyzewski said. “I hate saying that we did enough to win. That’s not who I am, and it’s not who this program is. We don’t do enough to win – we play really good basketball, and then hopefully we win. …
“To me, it was like a loss. I didn’t like today.”
An argument could be made that the eighth-ranked Blue Devils (18-3) played good basketball in the first half against the Red Storm (9-12), building a 45-29 halftime lead that crested at 54-32 early in the second. If there were a script for Saturday -- Duke avenges last year's embarrassing loss to St. John's with a workmanlike effort against a Red Storm team that had lost six of its previous eight games -- the game seemed to be following it.
But the Blue Devils nodded off before reading to the end.
Moe Harkless and D’Angelo Harrison shredded the Duke defense, repeatedly getting good looks en route to scoring 30 and 21 points, respectively.
St. John’s took advantage of the Blue Devils’ lackadaisical defense to close within 63-56 with 9:12 remaining. The Red Storm didn’t get closer than that until the final minute, cutting Duke’s lead to four points when Harrison made a 3-pointer with 20.7 seconds left.
The Blue Devils made their free throws in the final seconds, and St. John’s essentially ran out of time.
The fact Duke held on did little to assuage the players' disappointment.
“Something has to change from the way we approach the game to the way we execute during the game,” said Ryan Kelly, who finished with 16 points and nine rebounds. Mason Plumlee also had a large hand in the win, finishing with 15 points and a career-high 17 rebounds.
The problem, Duke’s players said, was that the team coasted after it went up 22 points following Austin Rivers' made free throw with 17:09 remaining. There were a few good moments after that, but they can all be encompassed with one sentence: Rivers had a pair of nifty drives to the basket on consecutive possessions, and Seth Curry also got to the basket for nice layup.
“Guys weren’t aggressive on either end of the court,” Kelly said. “When that happens, we’re not that good of a basketball team. We showed that again tonight.”
Added Rivers, "We got comfortable, maybe. I just think our intensity wasn't there. Coach K was so angry with us because our intensity wasn't there."
Of course, Duke has been talking about defense and intensity ever since its blowout loss to Ohio State. The issue flared up again in its loss to Temple, and the Blue Devils have shown a habit of taking their foot off the gas in a couple of their ACC wins (Georgia Tech and Virginia, most notably).
Why Duke hasn’t been able to change its tendencies is something that has Krzyzewski perplexed.
“I’m going to read all my books and see what I’m missing because there’s something missing,” he said. “It’s not resonating with our team.”






Comments
Oh my God!! They let a 22
Sat, 01/28/2012 - 15:57 — duke_blueOh my God!! They let a 22 point lead go to their heads and got lazy and stupid. Turnovers and lack of effort on defense will be their demize. They were lucky to have a large enough lead to overcome SJ's comeback.
I have always been and always will be a Duke fan there is no doubting that. However, my views will always be honest and when they play like crap, I will speak up about it.