Choose a blog

Tuesday Top Five: Oldest major winners

Bookmark and Share

We were all reminded during Tom Watson’s narrow, heartbreaking loss at the British Open that the oldest player to win a major in the modern era was Julius Boros, who won the 1968 PGA Championship at 48.

For many of us, that’s not nearly as resonant as Jack Nicklaus’ surprising resurgence at the 1986 Masters, with the big putter and floppy hair (even by Nicklaus standards) and plaid pants.

Watson, at 59, would have blown anyone else away. Here’s the five oldest to win a major since World War II, duly annotated as Tuesday’s Top Five:

5. Raymond Floyd, 1986 U.S. Open, 43 years, 9 months, 11 days – Only a few months after Nicklaus wowed the crowds at Augusta, Floyd turned back the clock at Shinnecock, firing a final-round 66 to move past Hal Sutton, Lee Trevino and Ben Crenshaw.

4. Roberto De Vicenzo, 1967 British Open, 44 years, 3 months, 2 days – De Vicenzo might have appeared on this list twice had he not famously signed an incorrect scorecard at the 1968 Masters, dropping out of a playoff and into second place.

3. Hale Irwin, 1990 U.S. Open, 45 years, 15 days – Irwin’s third Open title, and a victory best remembered for Irwin’s lap around the 18th green at Medinah, high-fiving fans as he forced a 19-hole playoff with Mike Donald.

2. Nicklaus, 1986 Masters, 46 years, 2 months, 23 days – With that monstrous putter like a flashlight tied to a string, Nicklaus came from behind to surpass a flailing Greg Norman, rolling in a birdie at 17 to take the lead. For kids, their parents and grandparents alike, it was a Sunday of sheer magic.

1. Boros, 1968 PGA Championship, 48 years, 4 months, 18 days – Not only the oldest winner of a major, but nearly became the PGA Tour’s oldest winner overall when he lost in a playoff to Gene Littler at the 1975 Westchester Classic. Boros, who died in 1994, was 55.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I'm sorry, but I'm not sure

I'm sorry, but I'm not sure how describing Watson's loss as "narrow and disappointing" reflects negatively on Cink in any way. In sports, there are winners and losers, and sometimes the loser is as noteworthy as the winner.

Perspective

Heartbreak and utter disappointment? I can assure you that Stewart Cink, his family and friends are not at all disappointed. As for Tom Watson, it is a truly remarkable and positively inspirational story that he competed at such a high level for 72 holes at age 59. No one beat him in regulation; it took extra holes to bring him down. I respect and admire his grit.

Leave it to today's media to put such a negative spin on this outcome. In true class, Watson reminded everyone to keep things in perspective. In the interview following his playoff collapse, he joked that no one was at a funeral. Perhaps with age comes such wisdom! The main headline on the sports page of our local paper touted "Cink Steals The Open". Such rubbish. Congratulations, Stewart Cink, for winning your first major. Thank you, Tom Watson, for bringing us along throughout your thrilling Open experience and showing us how to maintain some dignity and class under duress.

Cars View All
Find a Car
Go
Jobs View All
Find a Job
Go
Homes View All
Find a Home
Go

Want to post a comment?

In order to join the conversation, you must be a member of newsobserver.com. Click here to register or to log in.

About the blogger

Luke has worked for The N&O since 2000. He covered the Carolina Hurricanes and the NHL before becoming a sports columnist in August 2008. A native of Evanston, Ill., he graduated from the University of Pennsylvania. He can be reached at (919) 829-8947, @LukeDeCock on Twitter or luke.decock@newsobserver.com.
Advertisements