Blogs

newsobserver.com blogs

Tuesday Top Five: Hurricanes coaching crises

Bookmark and Share

Only Carolina Hurricanes general manager Jim Rutherford knows if Peter Laviolette saved his job with Sunday’s 3-2 comeback, shootout win over the Tampa Bay Lightning, or if his job was even in danger.

This much is for certain: Laviolette’s seat has been pretty hot lately after a three-game losing streak that saw the Hurricanes outscored 13-5. Here’s another certainty, if Hurricanes history is any guide: Just because times are tough now doesn’t mean he can’t rally the team to the playoffs.

Whatever ends up happening, the Canes’ slide and Laviolette’s resulting uncertain position ranks among the five most significant coaching crises in the Hurricanes’ time in North Carolina — Tuesday’s Top Five.

5. November 2008: After consecutive embarrassing losses, Rutherford on Thursday issued a scathing critique of the team’s work ethic. In the end, that’s an area where the coach bears final responsibility. Coming off last season, when the Hurricanes missed the playoffs because of poor play at this time of year, Rutherford made it clear he would not countenance a repeat performance.

The Canes responded with a so-so 3-2 loss on Friday and a Sunday’s shootout win, coming back from two-goal deficits in both. There’s no question the Canes showed improvement. Only time will tell if it was enough.

4. December 2000: The atmosphere on the plane ride home from a 3-1 loss at the expansion Columbus Blue Jackets on Dec. 29, Carolina’s seventh in 11 games, was as frosty as the weather outside. Paul Maurice was the second longest-tenured coach in the NHL (and the youngest), but the situation was grim.

The Hurricanes ended up winning on New Year’s Eve to start a 7-0-2 run and made the playoffs as the eighth seed in the Eastern Conference.

3. Summer 2008: If the Hurricanes had fired Laviolette in January, when the Canes lost five of six and eight of 10, it might have made some sense. But after the Hurricanes rallied over the next three months, only to implode in the final week and miss the playoffs, Rutherford refused to guarantee Laviolette would be back.

It took six weeks and a meeting with owner Peter Karmanos to settle the issue. Only later would the reason for Rutherford’s unhappiness become clear: Despondent over the late collapse, Laviolette left town without conducting any exit meetings with players.

2. December 2001: A late-November swoon saw the Canes — optimistic about their chances to win the division after the previous year’s playoff appearance — go 2-6-4 and put Maurice back on the firing line.

After a 4-2 loss to the Buffalo Sabres on Dec. 4, Maurice put the Canes through a brutal practice at the RecZone and Rutherford traded for defenseman Sean Hill, who had left the team as a free agent that summer. Tensions were running high.

The Canes were down 2-0 at the Florida Panthers in their next game before Jeff O’Neill scored the goal that might have saved Carolina’s season. The Canes rallied for a 3-2 win that night, went 11-5-5 coming out of the Olympic break and advanced to the Stanley Cup finals.

1. December 2003: Carolina’s first-to-worst plunge in 2002-03 still lingered over the team when the next season started, and after a 2-3-4 start, Rutherford deemed November a “make-or-break month” for Maurice and the team. They broke.

The Canes went 5-7-3 in November, and while Rutherford was publicly guaranteeing Maurice’s job safety in early December, he already had been negotiating with Laviolette for a week.

The Canes went 1-2-1 on a road swing through Canada, but the decision to fire Maurice was made in the middle of the trip. When the Canes returned to Raleigh after a long overnight flight from Vancouver, Rutherford gave Maurice his walking papers.

Laviolette, who had been flown in from New York while the team was on the road, was introduced as the new coach that afternoon.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

A choice?

I wasn't aware the players were given a choice about the who the coach would be. As the players are plenty to blame for the inconsistent play that would be like the rat watching the cheese.

well...

I hear Barry Melrose is available!

Johnnyg

http://www.studyofsports.com/?cat=200

Ready Replacement

This ongoing case is perhaps the most interesting one yet, with Laviolette's replacement already sitting on the bench with him. The players have been given a choice - do you want Laviolette to be your coach? Or Tom Rowe? The choice is theirs and it won't be long before the answer comes, either way. Personally, I think it will be Rowe before long and I think he will do a good job.

I hope that something as

I hope that something as arbitrary as a shootout wasn't the decision point for firing or not firing Laviolette. But this team still needs a fire behind their collective behinds. A few guys seem up to the task, but that's not the case up an down the lineup. I'd like to see one or two of our top players (and by "top" I mean highest-paid) get benched when their effort is lacking. Double shift the guys that give consistent effort. Do *something* to send a message that lack of effort will not be tolerated.

"while Rutherford was publicly guaranteeing Maurice’s job safety in early December, he already had been negotiating with Laviolette for a week."

Things like this make me wonder why we even bother listening sometimes.

Cars View All
Find a Car
Go
Jobs View All
Find a Job
Go
Homes View All
Find a Home
Go

Want to post a comment?

In order to join the conversation, you must be a member of newsobserver.com. To register or to log in using your existing account, click here.
Advertisements