Blogs

newsobserver.com blogs

Crosstown Traffic

Crosstown Traffic

Crosstown Traffic is all about getting around in the Triangle. Bad drivers and traffic hassles. Gas taxes and transportation politics. Public transit and other auto alternatives.

The blog is maintained by N&O transportation reporter Bruce Siceloff, whose Road Worrier column is published each Tuesday.

This traffic is two-way. What do you think? Leave a comment or email Bruce with questions, links, tips or gripes.

No Parking: the Umstead unwelcome mat

Bookmark and Share

A bumper crop of “No Parking” signs is flourishing along Reedy Creek and Trenton roads at the southeast edge of Umstead State Park in West Raleigh.

Even in winter, they’re spreading like kudzu.

In the past two years, the state Department of Transportation has planted about 60 signs on a quarter-mile stretch around this quiet corner.

They stand barely 30 feet apart, closer than needed for a simple regulatory message. They’re dense enough to serve as crude barriers — to anyone who dares to park the car and indulge in the guilty pleasure of fresh air and exercise in a splendid state park.

On Tuesday, the Raleigh City Council will consider making a further extension of the Umstead unwelcome mat.

The council’s consent agenda — items to be approved without discussion — includes a parking ban on the streets of Trenton Woods, one of the nice new subdivisions springing up on Umstead’s outskirts. Homeowners there don’t like park users parking in front of their homes.

[Tuesday 2/3 update: The Trenton Woods proposal was pulled from the council agenda and sent to a committee for study.]

Danielle Rowland, a dental student who lives on Trenton Road, says on-street parking is the best way to provide for visitors who use the Reedy Creek Road entrance.

“It would cost the city nothing to allow people to park on those residential streets,” said Rowland, 29. “These are public streets, and our tax money goes for maintenance. There’s no reason people who live there can make them private streets.”

A parking ban in Trenton Woods would set a bad precedent, she said, for other subdivisions on Umstead’s border. Rowland wants City Council members to stop and think this through.

Think? First? That would be a new approach.

City and state officials have blundered through access issues around three neighborhood entrances to Umstead, which is North Carolina’s busiest urban state park.

Like both Graylyn Drive on the north side of the park and the similarly named Old Reedy Creek Road on the south side, Reedy Creek Road ends at the locked gate of an Umstead maintenance road.

When Rowland moved there five years ago, Reedy Creek and Trenton were quiet gravel roads that intersected at a stop sign. Other Raleigh residents enjoyed parking on the shoulders to slip inside Umstead for a morning bike ride or a weekend run.

Then progress happened. Two years ago, the state and the city extended a nice greenway trail along Reedy Creek to the park — for the most part, a terrific idea.

Trenton and Reedy Creek were paved. The stop sign vanished, and the “No Parking” signs appeared. The nearest parking lot is two miles away at the N.C. Museum of Art.

Although Rowland welcomes Umstead users who park their cars along Trenton Road, she worries about drivers speeding through the area.

Trenton and Reedy Creek have attracted cut-through traffic since they were paved, including commuters who hurry to work at nearby SAS Institute.

The speed limit is 45 mph on part of Trenton Road. It drops to 35 mph near the corner and on Reedy Creek Road. Rowland and neighbors have lobbied DOT, unsuccessfully, to drop it further.

The hilly, curving roads are lined with narrow shoulders, deep ditches, and “No Parking” signs interspersed — in good weather — with parked cars.

“When I’m walking my dogs on a pedestrian path a foot and a half wide, and cars come from both ways at 45 mph, there’ve been times I’ve had to jump in the ditch,” Rowland said.

“If someone opens their door and a car is flying around that corner, someone’s going to get hurt.”

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

You can't mess with money

Why only limit the speed limit down where the 600+k homes are? Oh that's right. The neighborhoods that have been there decades longer - such as Medfield, don't provide that type of tax base. If the bikers would stay on the bike path when it exists, and the DOT would widen the road to be "kind" to pedestrians, 35 should be VERY sufficient. 25 is within a neighborhood - on private streets. NOT on a main road that OUR tax money pays for! There are a hundred roads around the triangle that lower speed limits around corners and through curvy roads, and unless they are treacherous curves, none of them are decreased to this extent. It's ridiculous and should be brought up when re-elections come around for the council. Those that live there I'm sure appreciate it. Until they start getting tickets themselves!

 

Oh - and is the DOT the one responsible for those "drunken" juts of cement? Someone had to be drunk when they laid those center medians out. 

No I don't work at SAS - I live off of Trenton and I think it's insane how we cave, not fix the issues.

very interesting

"the developer of the new subdivision on Reedy Creek told me personally that he purchased and installed those signs during the dark of night after the COR and NCDOT refused. He went as far as to say that NCDOT told him that they would not enforce them."

 http://trianglemtb.com/yabbse/index.php?PHPSESSID=fbb57fd1dbf0bd85387007b74318445f&topic=15792.0

Neighborhood streets should remain open to parking

I live not far from Graylyn Drive and frequently drive on Reedy Creek and Trenton Roads. The "no parking" signs have frankly gotten out of hand. Umstead is a jewel, a green space that many enjoy. Walkers, hikers, bikers and runners need a place to park their cars in order to fully enjoy the Park. Yet, new homes go up, and a flood of "no parking" the signs follow. Reminds me of coastal communities that provide beach access points (as mandated by law), yet limit parking to a bare minimum. The lack of suitable parking at Park entrances (and near where people want to access the Park) needs to addressed. One way would be the city and state to buy some land off Reedy Creek for a parking lot. Another would be to allow on-street parking -- on Reedy Creek and Trenton, but also on Graylyn. Last I checked, the NC DOT worked for all the people of the state, and the Raleigh City Council for all the citizens of Raleigh, not just the homeowners who have purchased new homes very near a state park. Let's expand, not limit access. And let's ensure roadway improvements benefit all, not just a few.

uncelcome

Nice job Raleigh.

Come to Raleigh and we'll happily tow your car, you stupid out of town sucker. Hence, me and my dollars stay away.

Sounds kinda like stupid downtown Chapel Hill. Enjoy the vacancy signs in your businesses.

Cars View All
Find a Car
Go
Jobs View All
Find a Job
Go
Homes View All
Find a Home
Go

About the blogger

Bruce Siceloff reports on traffic and transportation. A News & Observer reporter and editor since 1976, he took over the Road Worrier column in 2003. Lately he drives I-40 with the cruise control set at 68 mph. You can e-mail Bruce, call him at 919-829-4527, or follow him (@Road_Worrier) on Twitter.

Want to post a comment?

In order to join the conversation, you must be a member of newsobserver.com. Click here to register or to log in.
Advertisements