View Beltline @ Crabtree Creek in a larger map
While investigators study the weekend death of a Willow Spring man who fell through a gap between bridges on Raleigh’s Interstate 440 Beltline, state Department of Transportation officials have launched a wide-ranging study to figure out how to prevent similar deaths on 17,000 state-maintained bridges across North Carolina.
“We’re trying to determine the magnitude of this problem, not just with this bridge but statewide,” Terry Gibson, the state highway administrator, said today. “I’ve got our folks across the state ... studying every bridge in the state that has a gap like this.”
Carroll Lee Eames Jr. of Willow Spring had stopped his car on the Outer Beltline Friday night to help victims of a three-car accident on the bridge over Crabtree Creek, between Six Forks Road and Glenwood Avenue.
A Raleigh police report said the three cars were in the second lane from the inside median, which includes a breakdown lane on the median shoulder. Eames was in danger of being struck by oncoming cars that swerved to avoid the disabled cars, and he jumped over a low concrete barrier on the inside of the breakdown lane.
He fell through a gap about five feet wide, separating the twin bridges on the Inner and Outer Beltline, and dropped about 30 feet to his death on the rocky bank of Crabtree Creek.
DOT had erected a high fence on the other side of the Crabtree Creek bridges gap after a similar incident in 2005. That involved a driver, Todd Fletcher, who fell to his death after stopping on the Inner Beltline side to aid victims of a car crash.
Gibson said he did not know details of the 2005 case and could not explain why DOT had not installed fences on both sides of the gap.
But he said the gap may have been easier to see from the Outer Beltline side, where Eames was on Friday night, than on the Inner Beltline side, where the fence was erected after the fatal fall fall in 2005.
The Beltline is banked as it crosses Crabtree Creek, with the Inner Beltline lanes higher in elevation than the Outer Beltline. In the 2005 accident, Fletcher fell after climbing over the railing on the downhill side of the Inner Beltline bridge. Eames’ fall on Friday night came on the uphill side of the Outer Beltline bridge.
“This is a rare issue that occurs,” Gibson said. “This is not something that happens a lot. If I’m not mistaken, the accident in 2005 was on the high side of the bridge. To look over the edge it was not evident there was a gap there.
“This other [Outer Beltline] bridge is a totally different scenario as to what you can see,” he said. “From the lower side, you’re actually looking up at the side of the [Inner Beltline] bridge that shows you there is a gap there. “
Safety engineers and bridge inspectors across the state will analyze files on all DOT bridges, Gibson said, to find out whether there have been similar accidents elsewhere. Such falls often would not show up on police traffic accident reports.
DOT does not have uniform guidelines that make protective rails the same size on all bridges, he said.
In the past, DOT has erected similar fences after incidents on other bridges, where pedestrians fell or in one case where pedestrians threw bricks and bottles on cars and trucks passing underneath. On the Glenwood Avenue bridge over Crabtree Creek, not far from Friday’s crash scene, a similar fence was built after a pedestrian was hurt in a non-fatal fall in 2003.
“We have bike lanes or sidewalks on bridges, and oftentimes we might put a fence up. We don’t want the pedestrian to fall over, or the bike rider,” Gibson said.
He said it was too soon to say what changes will be made for the Beltline bridge or other bridges across the state.
“Safety is our number one priority, and it’s tops for us,” Gibson said. “We want to make sure what we do is the prudent thing.”

Bruce Siceloff reports on traffic and transportation. A News & Observer reporter, editor and blogger since 1976, he took over the
Comments
<a href="http://www.uggbootszone.info" target="_blank">UGG Boots
Fri, 01/08/2010 - 22:48 — yuying520sdfjodfh,xcvnnsdkfj
Study to determine effectiveness of study studying studies.
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 21:19 — ThoughtCrimesThe State plans to roll out a new study, studying the effectiveness of studies that study the effectiveness of studies.
The Governor announced that concurrently, a new study would study the effectiveness of the above mentioned studies.
If all the studies are conclusive (or not) we'll spend hundreds of millions to have union slackers lean on shovels for the next 10 years. The problems will still remain.
All funding will for the above studies will likely be paid for by a new tax, as soon as a new study determines the new tax's effectiveness -- I'm just kidding! -- Barbie Perdue doesn't need any studies to know that the stupid sheeple of NC need a new Tax!
You remember last year when you voted for 'change'? And you voted for the former lieutenant gov at the same time? The little dumpling of joy that's been writing the state budget for the last couple of decades?
When she won, she knew you were soooo stupid, you'd not only fall for anything, but you'd deserve all the taxes she can dish out.
well if this ain't a "feel
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 20:42 — TracyWwell if this ain't a "feel good" study then I don't know what is! The state will hire a consultant to do a multi-million dollar study that concludes that there is no way to predict where an accident will happen, therefore, the state can not afford to put fencing on all bridges. The state will organize a committee, which wil analize the study information, cause the creation of several upper-level positions along with another department or two, and then take over those said positions. The end result being that the state becomes less efficient.
Oh sorry, that was the result of the Mckenzie study. I am sure this one will be different.
Free advice
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 20:33 — GSingTell folks not to jump over interstate barriers in the dark. I'm sorry he died. It was his fault. As someone noted, are you going to fence in the other cars that could have hit him? Maybe damn creek he landed in. Don't forget about those nasty meteors. Damn global warming.
17,000 bridge inspections not necessary
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 20:05 — jimbomcIt was unfortunate the good Samaritan fell to his death assisting others. We will pray for his soul. However, this situation does NOT create a need to inspect 17,000 North Carolina bridges. Use the labor and time to fix the rural roads. Every single rural road in central and eastern North Carolina is RUT infected causing every "over-corrected" vehicle to catch the RUT and cross over the center line into oncoming traffic, a ditch, a tree or some other obstacle. I have written Mr. Bruce Siceloff as well as the DOT many, many time over the past five years only to find almost every week a car accident involving "a vehicle crossing over the center line" obviously after being caught in one of the thousands of right side RUTS. This bridge incident is but one of two happenings within the past five years. Over correcting incidents happen almost daily here in our area. Over-correcting wouldn't happen if the vehicle's front wheels would not come in contact with RUTS.
The 17,000 bridge inspections will only determine dangerous situations on a very few overpasses but the effort spent will not offset these far more dangerous happenings on our rural roads which are second in the country for total fatalities.
chain net is better
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 19:40 — SeafeverIf there is a fence and a pedestrian must jump out of traffic, he is blocked by a fence.
Why not run a chain net under the gap in the two bridges? That way, if a pedestrian must jump to safety, he will be caught by the net and not killed. It's a heck of a note that somebody who is trying to HELP people isn't safeguarded.
Beachbum3
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 18:47 — TerpInNCThere's this thing in the English language called a period.
BEACHBUM3
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 18:18 — beachbum3If the ncdot had not stripped an run off all the people that at one time ran the ncdots bridge an roadway design units perhaps this accident would not have had to happen at all. I do have one suggestion as to how to remedey this from happening again pour the bridge decks solid with concrete where practical an that way you will only have the expense of having to pour only one interior barrier rail system rather than two ( cheaper that way right for the taxpayers) but this isn't what the current design units are mainly concerned with they are instead concerned with just seeing how much that they can increase the cost of a construction project so that it benefits the road building contractors in this state this is their main objective these days thank you