Transfer requests are up this year and the expanded grandfathering options are being cited for much of the cause.

Through Aug. 5, Asst. Supt. Chuck Dulaney said that more than 7,800 transfers had been requested with 68 percent being approved. He said that's compared to around 5,500 requests at the same time last year.

Dulaney told school board members on Tuesday that the greater publicity reassignment received this year and the expanded grandfathering led to the increase.

Transfer appeal season is off and running.

As noted in today's article, the school board heard more than 200 appeals on Monday. It's the first of several hearings scheduled for this month.

The board is dealing with the first group of people whose transfer requests were rejected by staff.

It looks like a small number of families who take advantage of grandfathering this year will be able to still receive bus service.

School board members signalled support today for a new process that would allow families who would normally be ineligible for bus service to file paperwork to request transportation. This new method would likely be approved next month in time for this year's transfer requests.

Under the process, staff would consider the requests. If rejected, parents could file a student grievance request to the school board.

UPDATE

Criteria for transportation requests now at end of blog post. 

Families weighing whether to take advantage of their right to be grandfathered to avoid being reassigned this fall should have a lot of interest in today's school board discussion.

The facilities committee is slated to discuss a policy on who can use school transportation. One aspect likely to get a lot of discussion is whether Wake should continue to automatically deny bus service to any students who are grandfathered.

School officials have estimated that more than 11,000 of the 24,654 students who are in the three-year reassignment plan adopted in February are eligible for grandfathering. (School supporters have used that figure to argue that few families are being reassigned without a choice.)

It looks like school board members and county commissioners are going to have to settle for being disappointed with today's media coverage of the joint meeting.

During Wednesday's joint meeting, school board member Horace Tart brought up an argument that's increasingly being used by the district and its supporters. He complained that the media reporting that nearly 25,000 students being reassigned over the next three years "isn't the whole story."

Tart argued that the "real number" being moved is 10,000 students.

Is the new reassignment plan unfriendly to families?

As noted in today's article, yesterday's vote on the plan was far from unanimous. In what's become an annual event for him, Ron Margiotta voted against the plan as he accused his colleagues of not listening to parents.

"Reassignment should be used solely for the purpose of filling new schools," Margiotta said. "I can’t vote for a plan that’s so family unfriendly.”

Here's some numbers on the latest version of the reassignment plan.

The plan would move 24,654 students over the next three years, down from 25,486 students in the proposal released to the school board in December.

The breakdown works out to 9,547 students for this upcoming school year, 10,489 students in 2010-11 and 4,618 kids in 2011-12.

It's time for the school board to start on high school reassignments.

Starting at 1 p.m. today n the board conference room at Wake Forest Road, the board will look at assignments that could result in more than 8,000 high school students being moved over the next three years.

Among the issues the board will deal with are are whether to move the MacGregor Downs students to Athens Drive High and the Bedford students to Heritage High. They'll also go through whether they're taking too many students out of Millbrook High.

The school board has approved a pair of grandfathering changes recommended today by staff, including a big one parents have been asking to get for years.

The big grandfathering change would allow more families to keep siblings together in the same school. If a family gets a transfer for a child to stay at a school, it will also extend to younger siblings already at the school.

For instance, a transfer granted to a rising fourth-grader would be given to a sibling who is also a rising first-grader. It would not, however, apply if the younger siblings have not yet begun attending the school.

Here are a few general takeaways from Monday's CEM meeting at Broughton High School.

First, staff still plans on presenting a revised reassignment plan to the school board on Dec. 16. But it will be more of an overview with the plan probably not being posted online for the public to review until Dec. 20.

Second, Asst. Supt. Chuck Dulaney confirmed that staff will recommend keeping the grandfathering guidelines from last year. This will be welcome news to parents of rising 10th-graders who were worried about being reassigned to an existing high school.