Holy Smoke! A Road Worrier column on the risk of hurting our cars with ethanol drew bushels of rebuttals from corn country, and from local ethanol admirers. (See the column with online comments, and a letter from an ethanol industry rep.)
I wrote the column simply to warn drivers of non-flex-fuel cars about the risk of putting E85 fuel (85 percent ethanol) in their tanks by mistake. Be careful!
But it was read differently by ethanol boosters. Here's one of a few dozen responses, from Bob Rice:
I can’t believe anyone at this period in time would produce such a negative opinion piece regarding bio-fuels. While ethanol from corn may have some efficiency issues vs. ethanol from other bio-mass sources it is still in fact represents a physical net gain in available BTU’s and a smaller overall carbon foot print. ... I really think the News and Observer owes its reader an apology for such an inaccurate and misleading headline.
Why the fuss? This little issue – avoiding accidental damage to cars – should have nothing to do with the pros and cons of ethanol.
Nothing to do with energy independence, carbon footprints and clean air, ... [MORE]


