Choose a blog

Future downtown Raleigh high-rises will reduce wind

I've always thought that wind gusts seemed to be stronger in downtown Raleigh than in my neighborhood a few miles outside the city. I never quite knew for sure.

Turns out I was right. On windy winter days, we can blame Fayetteville Street's tall buildings for that extra blast of cold on the way to lunch. City planners point to the PNC Plaza building as one of the biggest culprits, since its 33 stories of glass and steel rise directly from the street front.

The winds might die down with future additions to Raleigh's skyline. Under the development code the city council adopted last week, new buildings' tallest sections will be stepped back from the street. That means the part of the building closest to the street will only be a few floors high.

The new code currently requires several of those step-backs, but developers are concerned that could cost them too much square footage on upper floors. The council will look at relaxing the requirement when they tweak the new code this summer.

"We’re looking at just having a step-back on the third floor," Planning Director Mitchell Silver said Monday.

That design would still help reduce the downtown wind tunnel effect, he added.

Raleigh council approves new development code

After three years of planning and 47 public meetings, the Raleigh City Council on Monday approved a new development code that promotes a walkable, transit-friendly city with high density, mixed-use districts.

The unanimous vote will make the new code – known officially as the Unified Development Ordinance, or UDO – effective Sept. 1. The 300-page document has guidelines governing everything from open spaces to bike parking, even determining how close buildings should be to the street.

But discussions on the code are far from over. It still must go through the mapping phase, when a host of new zoning designations will be matched to the appropriate commercial or mixed-use district (residential zoning won’t change). City staff and interested residents will get training on how the code works. And council members said they’d like to revisit certain guidelines and make tweaks if needed.

“Adoption is not the end of the UDO, it’s the beginning of the UDO,” Councilwoman Mary Ann Baldwin said of Monday’s vote.

Read more about the code in my article from Monday's paper: http://www.newsobserver.com/2013/02/18/2688290/new-development-code-aims-to-remake.html

Raleigh council mulls rooster ban

A discussion of animal control policies led to an unlikely topic for the Raleigh City Council on Tuesday: rooster regulations.

It turns out there’s nothing on the books that prevents Raleigh residents from keeping the birds. But an ill-timed “cock-a-doodle-doo” might run afoul of noise ordinances, and individual roosters could be declared a public nuisance, the city attorney said.

Councilman John Odom said he’s received three calls about noisy roosters in the past year. City staff also received a complaint from the Boylan Heights neighborhood, where the rooster’s owner was willing to work with neighbors and give up the bird.

Odom asked city staff to draft a rooster ban – already in effect in neighboring cities like Cary that allow backyard chickens.

Councilwoman Mary Ann Baldwin said she wasn’t sure new rules are needed. “Do you want to be the rooster killer in Raleigh?” she joked to Odom. “Don’t you think it’s a little extreme to ban roosters?”

“In a city, in close quarters?” responded Councilman Randy Stagner.

The council’s Law and Public Safety Committee will take up the issue again at a future meeting.

Mayor brokers compromise on controversial North Raleigh anti-speeding plan

The Raleigh City Council on Tuesday approved one traffic-calming project on Glascock Street while altering a similar North Raleigh project that divided neighbors.

Glascock’s $440,000 proposal for a narrower road and more sidewalks had widespread support, but that wasn’t the case on Rainwater Road from Spring Forest Road to Hunting Ridge Road, which serves as a shortcut around Millbrook High School.

The initial petition for $125,000 in curb extensions, mini roundabouts and other efforts to slow traffic on the residential street drew the city-mandated signatures from 75 percent of residents and homeowners. But many said Tuesday that they misunderstood the petition, thinking they were merely expressing interest in traffic calming.

By Tuesday’s hearing, opponents of the plan slightly outnumbered supporters. Some said they’d changed their mind when the design details were released and drawn on the pavement for reference. The neighborhood was divided on the final plan, with opponents wearing red to the city council meeting and supporters sporting green “please slow down” badges.

After a heated 90-minute hearing, Mayor Nancy McFarlane proposed a temporary approach as a compromise solution. The council approved her idea after garnering support from both sides of the debate.

“I would like to see us consider some sort of measure – either stop signs or an installation of signs that say ‘you’re going too fast,’ and see where we are in six months to a year,” McFarlane said. “I think this might be a good interim measure.”

Raleigh council approves resolution opposing military spending

The Raleigh City Council voted 5-3 Tuesday to approve a resolution urging the federal government to cut military spending.

The group Return Our War Dollars brought nearly 100 people to a recent council meeting in support of the resolution. The group’s leaders said $1.75 billion in tax revenues should be spent on domestic projects rather than military efforts.

The council didn’t debate the war in Afghanistan, discussing instead whether the issue merits city leaders’ two cents. Return Our War Dollars members said such resolutions offer a stronger message to federal officials, and city councils in Durham and Burlington have already approved the document.

“I’d rather focus on the things we actually have a say in – how we develop the city,” said Councilman Bonner Gaylord, who voted against the resolution. “Not that I’m against bringing war dollars home – I’m against the principle of voting for foreign policy suggestions from this board.”

The original resolution asks the federal government to “end our military presence in Iraq and Afghanistan, bring our troops and war dollars home and use those and other savings in military spending to meet vital human needs” and other domestic priorities.

The city council took out the phrase “our troops” because several military veterans on the board objected to the wording.

“Where I do have an issue is where you bring it on the backs of the guys that are downrange,” Councilman Randy Stagner said. “Do not involve the soldiers.”

But Councilman John Odom said he was against the revised text. "Leaving the troops there and taking the money out creates a problem for me," he said.

Endorsements: Raleigh City Council

Under departing Mayor Charles Meeker, Raleigh City Council meetings have been crisp, efficient and exhibited only occasional discord. That was positive in the eyes of most observers, although on occasion Meeker's critics thought he moved things along a little too quickly. But despite his soft-spoken nature, when it came to leading even the more independent-minded council members, he was strong.

Now that force will be absent, with Meeker giving the job up after a decade, and council members, many of whom worked closely with Meeker and understood his methods, will work under one of three candidates for the mayor's post - Billie Redmond, current council member Nancy McFarlane or Dr. Randall Williams.

That will change the dynamics on the next council. But it should not hinder the group from doing progressive, thoughtful and creative things for the city. The News & Observer's editorial endorsements today reflect a belief we think is shared by most in Raleigh, that the city has been generally well-run and should stay true to the direction it is on - one of looking forward and facing up to problems such as the need for jobs and more efficient transit, along with keeping an eye on the preservation of drinking water supplies and open space.

The city's debt, a concern to some office-seekers but relatively small compared with other cities', will nevertheless be on the minds of the next council's members. So will the debate over a proposed public safety center, and the future of the Dorothea Dix Hospital property. Most council members, and all three candidates for mayor, want those 306 prime acres preserved as a park, which is exactly what should happen. Let's hope that conviction holds.

And let's hope as well that the next council continues to remain open to input from ordinary citizens, something that's not the case everywhere. That's one "small-town" characteristic that Raleigh has retained even with the tremendous growth over the last decade.

Herewith, our choices for at-large and district council races. All terms are for two years.

At-Large

Mary-Ann Baldwin and Russ Stephenson are the incumbents in these positions, the occupants of which are charged with representing the interests of the entire city. That could mean taking care of details such as helping a constituent get attention for city services, or mustering support among fellow council members for citywide initiatives. Baldwin, 54, a marketing consultant, and Stephenson, 55, an architect, are seeking their third and fourth terms, respectively.

They've earned re-election. One reason, which applies to some of their colleagues as well, is that these council members have been part of what Mayor Meeker has sought to accomplish for the city, and they've supported progressive steps such as a convention center and the reopening of Fayetteville Street. They also understand the importance of transit improvements and are open to ideas for light rail and better bus service, for example.

In other words, they are positive people, not naysayers who find a reason to reject any idea that's a bit different.

The third candidate in the race is Paul Fitts, a 42-year-old mortgage lender. Fitts, who's a bit more conservative than Baldwin and Stephenson, has carried on a credible campaign. But he has, as so many new candidates do this year, a hard case to make for displacing a successful incumbent.

District A

This is the north Raleigh district seat given up by Nancy McFarlane so that she might seek the mayor's chair. She's being replaced by either Randall Stagner, 51, or Gail Wilkins, 55.

Stagner, a retired U.S. Army colonel, is our choice because of his progressive ideas and his administrative experience in the military. In candidate forums, he has been well-spoken, clear in his thoughts and objectives. They include economic development efforts to be stepped up at City Hall, and transit options that he believes are critically needed in his district in particular. He seems to be someone who would work well with other council members, while at the same time not allowing himself to be aligned with any single group of council compadres.

Wilkins, with a long record of involvement in the community, would focus her attention as a council member on bringing new jobs to the city. She'd also like to see improved bus service, which she vows she has used on a regular basis. It's hard to argue with either of her objectives.

District C

Incumbent Eugene Weeks, 71, gets our endorsement for a first elected term. Long involved in community work in this Southeast Raleigh district, Weeks is a retired military man and educator. He was appointed to fill the seat of James West, who left the council to become a county commissioner.

In the tradition of previous District C representatives including West, Brad Thompson and the late Ralph Campbell, Weeks has been on the ground in a variety of projects in the district. He's well-known and familiar with the issues in a district that includes a large number of lower-income residents.

Four candidates are challenging him, perhaps reflecting a feeling on the part of some in the district that new leaders need to be developed in a community that has relied on familiar names for public service. And in these four candidates there likely are some passionate future leaders to be sure. Corey Branch, 33, Shelia Jones, 48, and Racquel Williams, 36, have shown their familiarity with the district and its problems. So to some degree has Paul Terrell, 44, although his conservative take on many issues is well outside the mainstream.

Running unopposed

Three members of the council will be re-elected because no one in their districts has chosen to challenge them. All three have done a credible job, so while a little opposition sometimes brings good issues to the fore, these three incumbents are worthy of more time at City Hall.

District B's John Odom, 64, has served this northeast Raleigh district for six terms in two intervals. (He ran for mayor against Meeker once, and was the Republican nominee for state commissioner of insurance once.) This would be, therefore his seventh term, and the conservative Odom, a business owner, has sometimes pulled against the tide on matters of spending or other initiatives. But his popularity in his district indicates he does a good job for constituents, and his plain-spokenness is welcome.

District D's Thomas Crowder, 55, seeks his fifth council term, and he has earned it. He seems to be very popular in his southwest Raleigh district that includes N.C. State University. That's why he's unchallenged. Sometimes Crowder, an architect by profession, is a maverick, but at the end of the day he's been a progressive voice concerned about managed growth, water conservation and the development of light rail. He is a keeper.

District E includes northwest and west Raleigh. It has been represented well by Bonner Gaylord, 33, now seeking a second term. Gaylord is the general manager of North Hills, and holds an MBA degree from UNC-Chapel Hill. He leans a bit more toward the conservative political side, though he's unaffiliated in terms of political party. He's open-minded, energetic and seems able to work with colleagues in a conciliatory but firm way. While he spoke forcefully on occasion, Gaylord appeared to be spending some time in his first term listening and learning. There's nothing wrong with that.

Food trucks get approval in Raleigh

Food trucks have been approved in Raleigh in a 6-2 vote by the City Council.

The regulations will allow food truck operators to set up on private property in Raleigh as long as they are at least 100 feet from the main entrance or outdoor dining area of any restaurant, 50 feet from any food vending cart and 150 feet from the property line of any single-family home or duplex. 

They can operate from 6 a.m. to 3 a.m. daily unless they are near a single-family home, which will limit hours to 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. daily. 

The regulations will take effect Oct. 1. 

UPDATE: Go HERE to read city hall reporter Matt Garfield's full story.

Raleigh's new solid waste center gets OK to go solar

The Raleigh City Council has unanimously signed off on the city's plan to install two solar photovoltaic array systems at the new Wilders Grove Solid Waste Services Operations Center.

Meeker statement on Ralph Campbell Jr.

Ralph Campbell Jr., the first black person elected to a statewide Council of State office, died Tuesday of lung cancer at age 64. Before he was elected state auditor, Campbell served on the Raleigh City Council from 1985 to 1992.

Mayor Charles Meeker, who served with Campbell on the council, said this Wednesday about Campbell's death:

“Ralph Campbell, Jr., was a great friend to the City of Raleigh and served as our ambassador to our Sister City Compiegne.Ralph also worked on many public improvements including the renovation of Murphey School for senior housing. Raleigh is honored to have had Ralph be a life-long citizen and statesman. We will miss his contributions and humor greatly.”

Raleigh Republican to lobby for trial lawyers

Former Raleigh City Councilman Philip Isley, a Republican, is the new lobbyist for N.C. Advocates for Justice - a trial lawyers group largely associated with Democrats.

Isley, a 43-year-old attorney, represented northwest Raleigh on the City Council for eight years before opting not to seek re-election in 2009.

He's a partner with Blanchard, Miller, Lewis & Isley - a firm on Hillsborough Street - working on litigation and regulatory and local governmental issues.

"I’m excited to start lobbying," Isley said. "I think I can help them out with my relationships at the General Assembly. Partisan issues really don’t come into play with me right now."

Isley graduated cum laude from Washington & Lee University in 1989, and earned his law degree from the University of Mississippi in 1992.

Cars View All
Find a Car
Go
Jobs View All
Find a Job
Go
Homes View All
Find a Home
Go

Want to post a comment?

In order to join the conversation, you must be a member of newsobserver.com. Click here to register or to log in.
Advertisements