In the wake of former Gov. Mike Easley’s felony plea, there’s been a good deal of discussion about The News & Observer’s role in the case.
Easley’s attorney, Joseph Cheshire V, took us on after Easley’s plea. N&O Executive Editor John Drescher responded in a column. Now comes D.G. Martin, a former political candidate, former UNC official and now a columnist for newspapers around North Carolina, with this column.
Martin is, of course, entitled to his own opinion. But he isn’t entitled to his own facts. And when he writes about our story about Easley’s free golf membership, he leaves a false impression about Easley’s membership and he makes an error about our coverage.
First, Martin writes that it’s customary for some clubs and organizations to give honorary non-dues paying memberships to high officials. (That may be so, although we’d be interested in that story as well.) But the fact, as J. Andrew Curliss laid out in his story in August 2009, is that Easley joined the ritzy Old Chatham Golf Club before he was governor and paid the $50,000 initiation fee.
After he was elected, he accepted the club’s offer of free dues, worth a minimum of $50,000 over eight years. And he didn’t report the gift, as his own executive order required. The same goes for the $137,000 discount Easley accepted when he bought a coastal lot in development that had gotten permits quickly from the Easley administration.
Second, the column asserts that the membership really might not have been worth much if Easley didn’t use the club often. (That seems beside the point, since all other members presumably were paying their dues regardless of the frequency of their appearances.) But then Mr. Martin errs, writing that “the Easley story did not tell whether he used the club daily, weekly, occasionally, rarely, or not at all.”
Not true. Curliss' story said, both in the body of the story and in a separate box, that Easley had used the club at least 22 times over eight years. Curliss had to piece those numbers together using records from the Highway Patrol, which provided security for the governor. Those records, by the way, are incomplete, given that many from 2005 were lost by the Patrol.
To his credit, when we notified Martin of the error, he says he notified the papers that carry his column and asked them to take out the incorrect information before publication. Those that had already published will publish a correction with his next column, he says.
-- Steve Riley


