Mayor Charles Meeker opened yesterday's City Council meeting by discussing the Wake County Board of Commissioner's recent rejection of stricter development rules in the Little River Watershed. "It's not a situation where all is lost," Meeker told the council.

But he also said that it is not at all clear that adopting the minimum requirements in Little River will be adequate. Meeker proposed a 3-step plan to try to persuade county commissioners to reconsider their recent decision, which was unanimous.

Basically, the plan involves reminding Wake County folks of the years of cooperation between Raleigh and the county to get the Little River project this far; a discussion between City Manager Russell Allen and his county counterpart, David Cooke; and a meeting between the county commissioners and Meeker, Councilor James West and the mayors of Wake Forest and Garner.

What's striking about these steps is how easily they could have been taken before the county commissioners voted on the tougher restrictions.

All told, last week was a bad week for Raleigh's interests in the surrounding watersheds. In addition to the Little River vote, the state Environmental Management Commission last week issued the city a notice of violation for failing to adopt tougher rules in the Richland Creek Watershed in North Raleigh. (Scroll down to the 5th action item on the EMC's agenda.) The city now has 120 days to get in compliance. Getting in compliance means adopting stricter development rules that will impact 4,994 property owners located in Northeast Raleigh, including neighborhoods like Wakefield and Falls River. The rules would make it harder for those owners to add a deck or build an addition.

Raleigh has been trying to convince the state for four years that the tougher restrictions are not necessary, but their long struggle appears over. The new rules are designed to protect a possible source of drinking water on the Neuse River at the old Burlington Mills textile plant off Capital Boulevard. Nobody is using the water now, though Franklin County has expressed interest in tapping it.

A WakePol reader asked about the background of the property at the south end of Fayetteville Street that could soon be the cause of a lawsuit. Raleigh could file a condemnation suit against The Simpson Organization as early as next week as it tries to get the easements it needs to build the City Plaza. We asked City Attorney Thomas McCormick about the history of the City Plaza area. His response is below. Hope this helps.

"Yes, the city once owned the plaza area as well as the parcels where the BB&T building and the Bank of America Building now stand. The land was assembled as part of the property acquisition for the now demolished civic center building. The city sold the two parcels to York-Hannover Development, a New York Developer. The same developer also did the current Sheraton Hotel although it opened as a Radisson. The city entered into a joint agreement with York-Hannover to build the deck now lying beneath the plaza area. That deal contained a provision that allowed York-Hannover to buy out the city’s interest through a lump sum payment and the city’s retention of a surface easement for park purposes. The plaza area was once a part of the Fayetteville Street right of way."

Raleigh Mayor Charles Meeker said today he's worried about the Wake County Board of Commissioners decision to not adopt stricter development restrictions along the Little River. The commissioners unanimously voted down those restrictions during their meeting Monday.

"That’s a matter of real concern in terms of the permitting of the next water resource for Raleigh," Meeker said. "I’m hopeful they will study that issue further."

Meeker said he'd spoken to one commissioner about this issue. But, given that the vote was unanimous, it seems unlikely that the commissioners will change their minds anytime soon. The lopsided nature of yesterday's vote raises questions about whether Raleigh did enough to make its case for the tougher restrictions. No Raleigh City Council members spoke in favor of the proposal at yesterday's meeting, instead a consultant and Public Utilities Director Dale Crisp spoke. The city really can't afford to not gain approval to build the Little River Reservoir, and Raleigh officials clearly feel the new restrictions give them a much stronger case with regulators.

Does this show a lack of involvement or leadership on the part of Raleigh officials? Or were these restrictions bound to be voted down by a county board that is clearly worried about unnecessarily stepping on residents property rights?

As my colleague Jack Hagel reported today, the City Council gave Greg Hatem and Empire Properties until Nov. 1 to file new site plans for The Lafayette, the project proposed for a city-owned piece of property across from the new convention center. Although most council members went out of their way to lavish Hatem and Empire with praise, the council also included in its action a mandate that this be the last extension given.

This issue of the city giving developers extensions is an interesting one. The City Council can play hardball with developers who've agreed to build on property Raleigh owns, but that tactic doesn't have any effect on the capital markets. Nor is it likely to change the landscape for these projects getting funding. Yesterday, City Manager Russell Allen said other developers besides Empire have expressed interest in the land bordered by Salisbury, Lenoir and South streets. Allen's argument to the council was that there's no point in having Empire sit on a project it can't get money for. Allen admitted rebidding the project could just end up delaying the project further, but he thinks it's worth that risk.

In essence, the city (and the City Council) is acting like a bank. Empire's agreement with the city has certain terms, and once those aren't met the city can move in and take it away. Raleigh adopted this approach to developing city-owned property after several previous projects languished or never got built. The problem with the City Council playing hardball is that it's not like these developers don't want to build downtown, they just can't get the money at the moment. That isn't going to change just because council members beat their chest and say they're frustrated and fed up with delays.

It's all very reminiscient of a line from a Simpsons episode titled "Homer Bad Man." In the scene, Homer begins opening all the Krusty Klump Bar wrappers in the Kwik-E-Mart. Apu, the Kwik-E-Mart's owner, responds:

"Hey. Hey! Hey! I have asked you nicely not to mangle my merchandise. You leave me no choice but to...ask you nicely again."

Sort of. At Tuesday's City Council meeting, Dean Penny with the consultant Kimley Horn, provided an update on The City Plaza, Raleigh's much ballyhooed high-tech gathering place planned for the south end of Fayetteville Street. The update culminated with the council voting to pursue condemnation action against The Simpson Group, owner of the Bank of America building and the parking deck located under Fayetteville Street.

Before that, however, Penny ran through all the bells and whistles planned for the plaza. One of the elements will be a fountain with motion-sensor activated jets. Penny said people have been referring to this feature as Raleigh's "mini-Bellagio." Essentially, the fountains will rise and fall depending on what's happening around them. With a mini-Bellagio fountain and a "Shimmer Wall," downtown Raleigh visitors may soon have to be warned about overstimulating themselves. (Particularly those visitors brave enough to tool around on Segways.)

One other City Plaza note: In order to save money the city has decided to ditch the "torchiere" light fixtures that had been designed by artist Jim Gallucci. Gallucci's fixtures will be replaced by an "off-the-shelf" product. (Ikea?????). Gallucci fans can take some solace in the fact that his bollard designs and designs for the City of Oaks light towers will remain in the plans. There's nothing worse than off-the-shelf bollards.

The Raleigh City Council is likely to pass a budget next week, perhaps as early as Monday. The council continues its budget deliberations Monday at 5 p.m. If they don't pass a budget on Monday night, the council must meet each day after that until they do.

The biggest question remaining is whether the council will pass the 5 cent property tax increase proposed by City Manager Russell Allen. Several council members have already expressed an interest in reducing that number. There's also been a lot of talk about trying to reduce the proposed 15 percent increase in the water and sewer rate that Allen put forward.

Any reductions in the proposed increases will likely require the council to delay moving forward on one or more capital projects.