News

newsobserver.com blogs

CanesNow

Rutherford's free pass for Maurice baffling

Bookmark and Share

You would think that with how awful the Hurricanes have been to start the season, there would be no shortage of blame to go around -- players, management, coaching staff, everyone.

So it’s interesting that in general manager Jim Rutherford’s surprisingly critical self-analysis with the N&O’s Chip Alexander on Monday that he second-guessed himself for nearly everything he did, or didn’t do, in the summer -- everything except bringing back Paul Maurice.

Even if keeping Maurice in charge was the right move for the long term, it bears mentioning that it hasn't helped in the short term, yet Rutherford defended the coach while pointing fingers at everyone else, including himself.

The fix the Hurricanes are in isn’t Maurice’s fault, not by a long shot, but he isn’t blameless, either. Maurice did a remarkable job fusing the aggression encouraged by former coach Peter Laviolette with structure and a sense of defensive responsibility last season. Coming into the new season, only the structure remained, and none of the aggression.

Players are too hesitant, more worried about making a mistake -- ending up on the “wrong side of a video session,” as Ray Whitney put it, memorably, on Sunday -- than making a play.

To Maurice’s credit, Tuesday’s practice was intended to rectify that situation. In his defense, not everyone is earning their paycheck, whether it was inflated last summer or could be this summer. In the end, however, the coach bears some of the responsibility for a 2-8-3 record, if not all, and there's no way to argue otherwise.

In other areas, Rutherford went too far with his criticism. That low-intensity training camp was a mistake, no question, but after all the injuries this team has suffered in September, there’s nothing wrong with trying something different. The idea was valid, the execution poor.

And there’s nothing wrong with the way this team is built. It’s still basically the same team that won two hard-fought playoff series. It’s still the same team that more than a few players said in camp was the best group they had ever been around. It’s still a team capable of making the playoffs, even if the Southeast Division title is a virtual impossibility at this point.

If fourth-liners Stephane Yelle and Tom Kostopoulos haven’t provided what they provided elsewhere, maybe it’s because they are playing five minutes less than they were with their former teams, one of which had a far better record than the Hurricanes. If the defense has been shoddy, perhaps it’s because Jay Harrison was signed to be an AHL cornerstone and emergency fill-in, not an NHL regular. If the Hurricanes have looked slow -- and they have -- it might not only be because they are old, but because they have spent too much time reacting and not enough initiating. And so on.

This isn't Maurice's fault, but Rutherford’s failure to acknowledge his role in the situation suggests Rutherford is either trying to take the pressure off Maurice or has been blinded by his personal fondness for the coach. Either way, it was an odd omission from an otherwise forthright assessment.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More Articles like this

This team seems to get a free pass around here because we are not Toronto. We need more articles telling it like it is.

Look at New York. Very similiar situation to ours. They had a coach come in midway through last year. He 'tweaked' the system, then spent this training camp instituting his own. The results are a solid hockey team with lots of potential.

Maurice came in and 'tweaked' the system halfway through the year with great success. He instituted his own during training camp with disastrous results.

Not Baffling at All...been there before...seen it all before!!!!

JR Loves Paul...he has said many times how hard it was to fire him the first time and that he really did not think Mo was to blame then...a change just had to be made! he has said this after Laviolette lead the Franchise to the Stanley Cup!

 

This may not be a popular thing to say but I would be willing to bet that if JR had kept Cullen and listened to Lavi a little more about player decisions the Canes would still be a top team every year. Laviolette did an amazing job keeping the team competitive with the injuries suffered during the 06-07 and 07-08 seasons just missing the playoffs both years despite having to use AHL players due to JR's Bargin bin shopping and PK self imposed budget. Now that Mo is back we are spending all the way to the cap as well as paying Laviolette...extending Mo's contract on top of that.

 

So where was all this willingness to spend in the 2 years after the cup when a couple of real players to replace injured players could have sent up back to playoffs rather than just missing? Anyone remember Anson Carter as the big move JR made in 07-08 at trade deadline with 2 top 6 forwards hurt and Belenger as the cullen replacement?

 

The only reason the team came apart in early 08-09 season was because JR spent all summer undermining Laviolette so he could fire him and bring back his best friend MO.

 

So NO I AM NOT BAFFLED AT ALL that he would go out of his way to not blame coaching in any way for 9....oh I mean 10 losses in a row and 12 losses out of 14 games. IT will take an empty RBC Center to get MO out of here...losing is just losing untill attendance starts falling to record low levels Mo is safe!

A BIG PART...

...of a coaches job is: preparation, inspiration and motivation. How's he doing?

GM Change

I've said it before and I'll say it again. "Friends don't make good business partners". Pony Tail Pete needs to learn that one day.

Kudos to Luke

Well said.

I'm glad Chip asked J.R. about motivation and the system put in place. Key requirements of the coach. But I felt the answers he gave were a little off base. Basically defending Mo.

I'm willing to give Mo a chance...but you are dead on with these comments.

I believe the greater

I believe the greater intent of JR's statements Monday were directed at the players and meant to serve as a verbal warning to put it mildly. A public statement berating management, coaches included, would not serve a positive purpose, the discussion is best done behind closed doors, after all the coaches are not the ones on the ice. The players have to step up and follow the management's lead, this is a basic guiding principle of any organization, successful or failed. In due time the management will be held accountable or reap the benefits for the end result. I am sure much has been discussed as of late on many levels behind closed doors at RBC. Now back to the play on the ice:
The players have to follow the system, but it needs to flow, playing instinctively. It seems to often they are unsure of themselves and their team mates. They have not been making the play, pass, hit, or moving without first looking up or stopping and thinking, the game played at this level is measured in milliseconds, a fraction of a second lost in thought or hesitation can be the difference between telegraphing the pass, play, getting caught out of position, or giving the goalie the reaction time they need to make the save.
The defense has been a mismatch since the preseason. Pitkanin hurt, Ward hurt, Gleason hurt. How many games have we actually had our top 4 D on the ice in the same game, for the entire game. They need to play together in their pairings as they were meant to be for some period of time so they can rely on one another and play the pairings and position the way it was drawn up, instinctively and confident of each other. Yes, they are professionals and should be able to switch up, but our defensive pairings have been different nearly every night out on the ice, if not nearly every period. From shift to shift it is hard to play this way when we do not have any consistency in our groupings.
The forwards also have been affected by the defensive mismatch. It is hard to press forward when you constantly are concerned about rotating back to help cover the D. I believe what the message to the team is that they need to begin again, a fresh start and just play the game, do your job and push forward. To much thought and hesitation on the ice has been killing us, they need to just play their game.
Yes, I have been critical of this teams effort and play in previous posts but after hearing JR's statement, the players statements, and coaches statements of late, and then taking time to reflect on it and the basic practice session held, I think I get the point that is trying to be made. Players just need to play their game as they were brought in to do. Play the system.
Now team please battle tonight, man the torpedoes and full speed ahead, CHARGE, and lets go Canes!

AND

the same can be said about the lines.  I know there had been injuries & a suspension...but players need to understand their role on their line.  Know their line mates.

Switching every shift contributes to the hesitation....should I play point, should I back-check, should I defend, should I get in the crease...make those assignments and stick with them.

Oh Luke...Jimmy is not going

Oh Luke...Jimmy is not going to appreciate your honesty and clarity, but you are bang on...the subject of Maurice and job security is almost taboo around these parts...heaven forbid that the Good Son Paulie Maurice is ever accountable for his actions behind the bench and in the locker room. MO has more lives than a cat, more free passes than a radio DJ, more job security than Raleigh Mayor Charles Meeker ...Im actually shocked that Paul Maurice did not run in yesterday's election...he is a winner!!!!!

Rutherford is right not to blame Mo

Maurice is not to blame for the horrible start. The players are, and ultimately the person responsible for stocking the team. I don't think the short pre-season is to blame either, at least not for the extended length of the losing streak. This team just doesn't seem to have the fire to play every night, until the season is on the line or the playoffs - if their slow start doesn't keep them out of the playoffs.
I too was shocked when Maurice was brought back, but clearly he's grown as a person and a coach during his time away, and the system changes he was able to implement in short order took the Canes to the Conference finals.
Rutherford giving Wallin a no trade is an example of how he's managed his team. If he had not then possibly Wallin could have been moved and Seidenberg resigned.
Wallin is a borderline NHL blueliner but has been treated like Rob Blake. In a way it's hard to argue with the teams success during the teams time in Raleigh- 2 appearances in the Cup finals, with a Cup victory, 3 appearances in the Eastern finals, 2 of which resulted in a finals berth. But in between it has been pretty ugly at times. The regular season is 82 games, and 6 months long, playoff heroics are great but can we not have as much misery before we hopefully get there?

Yes and No

The players are to blame, absolutely.  But if a team as a whole doesn't have the fire and motivation to go out and feel confident about themselves every game, it reflects back to coaching.  We aren't talking about a few select guys.  This whole team has been a stinker.  Their game plan stopped working and as a result they seemed to have given up.  It's up to the coaching staff to create a game plan that works and instill the confidence in the team.  The players don't seem to buy what Maurice is selling.  It shows in their lack of effort to execute.

 

As far as the extreme ups and downs, I'm one who would rather have it that way.  If you are going to produce a winning season, then go all the way.  If you are going to be terrible, then stink so bad that you secure the first overall selection in the draft.  I'd hate for us to be mediocre every year like some teams.  Nothing is more frustrating than winning the President's trophy and getting ousted in the first round of the playoffs, or barely making the playoffs every year and not being able to make a deep run.

A few guys

can bring a team down. While a coah does have some abilty to motivate players, the players should be motivated on their own. I am not going down the " they are paid to play" road, because we all are paid to do something  but that doesn't mean human nature doesn't get in the way.  I am talking about the motivation these players have had their entire lives to get to the NHL.   The mostly same core group lost it with Laviolette as well as Maurice. How many coaches must Rutherford try? Rutherford does a good job of getting "charactor" guys in the room, but this is no church league  softball team.  Can the guy play hockey every night, that is what I want.  Oh well, if the past is any indicator this team will start playing better hockey when their playoff lives are on the line and we'll all forget about this.  

One more thing

And to take it one step further, JR has always been good at bringing in character guys.  These aren't necessarily superstars, but guys who respect a team attitude and work together to win.  We don't have a bunch of star attitudes out there who are going to improvise, take their own chances, and ignore the coaching staffs schemes to attempt to create plays.  Some players are successful at being renegades, but we don't have any on this team.

 

In order to bring together what this team was built to accomplish, you have to have a coach who can provide a solid game plan.  Character players listen and execute what the coaching staff gives them to make a team successful.  That's what makes them character (team)  players.  If they have a flimsy scheme to run, then the wheels fall off faster than you can say "last place".

 

I still believe in our roster.  All we are missing is a bench general who can outthink the other teams, and put a process in place to actually execute it.

JR and Mo

"...or has been blinded by his personal fondness for the coach."

No! Really???

Paul Maurice

I can see Luke's points about Maurice sharing blame; but then again with the team's forwards missing from last season only Patrick Eaves (who has not exactly lit the NHL on fire with Detroit), and with the coaching by committee approach, I wonder how productive it would be to single out Maurice for criticism if indeed there are legitimate coaching concerns. Jim Rutherford is amazingly candid; so I doubt he would sugarcoat anything that was on his mind. As for me, I was stunned when Maurice was selected and he was far from my first choice. I thought he did a great job last season under trying and difficult circumstances. I would typically be inclined to blame the coach, but under the situation at present, I don't see Maurice as being a key component to the team's horrible performance thus far. I hate that the team started off playing amazingly uninspired hockey. Still, I think if I were Jim Rutherford, I wouldn't call out Paul Maurice in public; and if I were Paul Maurice, I would tell Jim Rutherford -- there's nothing wrong with this team that fore-checking, crashing the net, hounding the puck, winning battles in the corners one-on-one, and physical play in front of the net won't solve. I would also hand Jim Rutherford a report with glossy photos of some large framed agile, hostile, and mobile power forwards who don't have to be cajoled, begged, or persuaded into crashing the net and screening the goalie -- and ask for an early holiday present.

Agreed

From the outside looking in, it appears pretty clear. Maurice is the perfect "go along, get along" guy for Rutherford. He doesn't have an agent, he does exactly what he is told, he is a "yes" man when it comes to Rutherford. Laviolette wasn't, and Rutherford couldn't handle it. He didn't hold exit interviews as recommended and most likely stood up to his boss more than JR could tolerate. If you are faithful to Jim Rutherford, there is always a place for you with this franchise. If your agent plays ball and doesn't rock the boat in contract negotiations, have no fear, you'll always have a spot on the Hurricanes roster, even long after you have been traded or sign elsewhere. It's not all a bad thing. If you're a company man (player) this would be a great company (team) to work (play) for. Loyalty like Rutherford's doesn't exist often in professional sports. But, there comes a time when you have to cut your losses and perhaps tarnish a friendship for the sake of the business. The fans are a big part of this business, and I think they have had just about enough of the RBC Recycling Center.

Well said. I'd add that the

Well said. I'd add that the tone is not set only by JR but also by PK. It's the polar oppostite of the Oakland Raiders mentality set by Al Davis. Of course, that franchise has made the playoffs only 6 times in the last 20 years.

That said, I did not favor bringing Mo back. The longer he stays, the fuller a picture we get.

Good Point Luke

I don't always agree with what Luke has to say but he is right on here. This is a professional TEAM. Not one player, not one owner, not one GM. But everybody including the coaching staff has a hand in what has happened this year. So is something else being said behind closed doors that we can not hear? I have a hard time believing that Mr. Rutherford has not addressed this with Mo and Ronnie. Much is made of their personal relationship, but something is just not right here. Looks like we need to "stay tuned" for the next round. I have a feeling that the boys will come together tonight in Sunshine. GO CANES!!!!!

Cars View All
Find a Car
Go
Jobs View All
Find a Job
Go
Homes View All
Find a Home
Go

About the blogger

Luke has worked for The N&O since 2000. He covered the Carolina Hurricanes and the NHL before becoming a sports columnist in August 2008. A native of Evanston, Ill., he graduated from the University of Pennsylvania. He can be reached at 829-8947 or luke.decock@newsobserver.com.

Want to post a comment?

In order to join the conversation, you must be a member of newsobserver.com. To register or to log in using your existing account, click here.
Advertisements