'); } -->
So you're Canes coach Peter Laviolette and you have a decision to make with the Washington Capitals coming in Wednesday.
In short, who starts in goal: Cam Ward or Michael Leighton?
Ward made some spectacular saves against the Caps on Thursday but Washington did score the two goals in the last 2:43 to win 3-2. Ward also was the loser Sunday in the 5-2 loss to Atlanta. Leighton was the winner Friday in the 2-1 victory over Ottawa.
So who should it be? The floor is open.
Comments
Ward has struggled with
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 18:18 — redblackhockeyWard has struggled with rebound control most of this young season, he's given up a handful of "soft" goals and he's had a few manageable pucks trickle through his equipment. Additionally, he has lost the "zen Cam" thing that he had during the Cup run where he would let that stuff roll off his back. These days, he's letting pucks roll off his back (and into the net).
All of those things happened on Sunday, and I was surprised to see him on the ice for the third period.
For now, I'm solidly in the Leighton camp. If nothing else, it'll get Cam fired up if he has to sit on the bench. It'll fire him up even more if he sits for two straight.
Use the 2 Goalie System
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 17:40 — scomilLeighton should probably shoulder the heavier load. Ward can have some incredible games when he is completely rested. Ward is young and he needs to bulk up a bit. Other teams have learned to crash the net more when Ward is in there. It wears him down and he doesn't handle that as well as Leighton does. But I don't think it should be just one or the other. They compliment each other well. Use them both but Leighton should probably be in there at least 60 percent of the time.
Ward should play
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 16:25 — ward30All your points are valid but I have not seen a game up until yesterday where Cam has faced less than 30 shots over a 4 game spread. Has Leighton had to face that many shots??? No - not even close. Has Leighton already had 3 years to try and be a starter for different teams??? Yes. Has Leighton on any other team ever proven to be anything more than a good backup??? No. So, now that he is with Carolina we forget about his past and think he is the answer to all our problems, yet all the while holding Cam's last 2 years against Cam? I think Cam should play and I think that as fans we need to be fair to both goalies - meaning if we are going to old Cam's years in the NHL as levarge when seeing how good Cam is then we need to do the same for Leighton. Might I also add that Leighton is 3 years older than Cam meaning he has had 3 years more to develop and become the starter but never made it there.
I watched Leighton face 101
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 21:05 — sandpiper214I watched Leighton face 101 shots and stop 98 of them last season in Albany. In one night he played 142:58 minutes (three regulation and 5 periods of overtime) of hockey and was stellar for every single one of them.
Oh, and your shots stats...
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 17:23 — penaltykiller74When facing 30 or more goals:
6 games (3-3-0)
When facing less than 30:
4 games (1-1-2)
Maybe we should let him face more shots? That kinda blows the whole, "It's the defense's fault" theory.
Please...
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 17:17 — CanarseWard made the fast rise to the NHL because he was a first round pick for a goaltending deprived organization. Does that mean he is more talented than Leighton? Probably, but that doesn't mean he is playing better than Leighton. Ward hasn't gotten it done consistently for more than 2 years. Leighton deserves a shot. Start him this week and see how it goes. If he is no better Ward goes back in the net and the merry-go-round continues
Hold it against him?
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 17:17 — penaltykiller74He's only been in the league four seasons (including this one, and the one he was backup for Gerber). So to hold it against him - yes. Gerber got us to the playoffs in 2006, and Ward got us through. Gerber went away, and so did the playoffs.
See a pattern?
As for whether Leighton has been tested, he has played plenty of games where he was tested game after game. Wasn't he the AHL Goalie of the Year last year?
Yes, he's had more opportunities than Ward, but that's exactly the point. There are very few goalies who are good when they are young.
I'm not saying he won't get better, but at what price do we pay to watch his development?
I say put some fire under his @$$ to get in the game by starting Leighton, and make Cam "earn" the starting job, instead of having it handed to him.
Leighton rocks
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 15:33 — toddcaseyI realy do think that Leighton is way better than Ward. I actually think leighton should be the starting goalie for a while and see how that works out.
Leighton
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 15:02 — pdub66Let's see what ML can do against the Caps.
That being said, I agree with some of the other comments that the team needs to gets its head out of its collective butt. I've seen inconsistent effort, lots of missed passes, and just lackadaisical defensive play far too often this season.
One thing we have to keep in
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 14:53 — figaroOne thing we have to keep in mind is how young Cam still is. NHL goalies take time to develop. I think JR and Coach L. would be the first to admit that Cam's development has been "fast-tracked". He is going to have his bad goals, and his bad games - it's part of the NHL learning curve. The problem we currently face is that a couple of the recent bad goals have cost us games. Now we question his abilities. Is that fair? My answer is yes. Cam, although young, knows he was handed the gauntlet this season to carry this team as the number one goaltender. In general, he has handled it well, but the chink in his armor has been the frustrating "soft" goal at critical times. For a number one NHL goalie, this simply can't happen. I'm sure this topic has been broached by the coaching staff, but again, only time and experience will be the certain cure. Right now, we have to expect this to happen with Cam. As far as Leighton, I feel he should play more. Maybe split this tandem 50-50. Ease the reigns back on Cam to let him develop more slowly. Take some of the pressure off. Leighton has proven to be an able back-up so give him more of an opportunity to spell Cam. I think in the long run, we will all be rewarded with more wins. And not only this season, but in seasons to come.
agreed
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 15:02 — caniacgirl30I definitely think that he has the potential to be a great goaltender. But just like any position, it takes a while for that potential to be turned into success. His first national level attention was from winning the Cup and unless he wins the Cup every season from now until the day he retires, people will say that he hasn't "lived up to expectations" or "his play isn't where it should be for a number one goalie". To accomplish that right out of the gate maybe set the bar a little too high too early in his career. We have to patient with him, just like we have to be with all of the young guys on the team.
Leighton
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 14:13 — mumsyb13Leighton has more experience and did not play badly for us when Grahame was sent down to the minors last year. I just think back to that good start taken away from him on a back and forth game at TO last season-they put in Ward for no apparent reason and we were guaranteed a loss. Then they sent Leighton back to the minors. Somehow I don't think JR put that idea into the Coach's head. Everytime Ward has a stinker of a game, 99.9 and their guests say the loss isn't on Ward (or that Staal isn't a high calibre player like Ovechkin, so blame Staal). When Ward is great and our team just can't get on the scoreboard, then they blame Ward. Sometimes I wonder if I am watching the same game. p.s. to Gretchen who called in to 99.9 after Sunday's loss-the organization wasn't duped by Staal after we won the Cup. Eric signed a contract with the Canes 2 seasons before 2005-2006 and played well during those 2 seasons (not his fault he was playing in Lowell for one of them, along with Ward). He has been a good player for this team and I'm glad that he didn't think that he was above coming to the "Deep South" to play. Did you ever attend/watch a Canes game before the '06 playoffs?
Has to be Leighton
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 13:04 — CanarseWard is certainly JRs boy so Laviolette has to give him his chances. He had to start Ward yesterday even though he choked away points in his last two starts. Now that he has performed poorly again Laviolette should be able to give Leighton a shot. Hopefully he makes the most of it.
Everyone talks about how talented Ward is. He's supposedly unbeatable in practice. What gives? It has to be between his ears. Call the sports shrinks!
Goalies
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 11:58 — MR (not verified)Regardless of who's in net. The team needs to be more competitive, more exciting, and more entertaining. Boring, disappointing games are not going to cut it. You don't have to win, but you have to entertain. Other than Ray's breakaway and Brookbank's fight, there was little entertainment in that lame snoozefest. I think we only threw one solid bodycheck the whole game.
Ward since the cup...
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 12:08 — penaltykiller74Since the Canes won the Cup, and Ward was the Conn Smythe winner, he hasn't played like he deserved either. He actually has gotten gradually better, but that is all.
The season they won the Cup, he stopped 88.2% of what he faced in 28 games (25 he started). Then he got hot for the playoffs, 92.1% for 23 games (21 he started) with 2 shutouts.
The next season, 89.7% in 60 games (59 started) with 2 shutouts. Obviously no playoff stats.
Last season, 90.4% in 69 games (67 started) with 4 shutouts. Again no playoff stats.
In my honest opinion, and I'm sure I'll get roasted for this one, Ward is just your average goalie, but due to his brief success in the 2006 Playoffs, he is viewed as more. His stats don't make him elite. He is currently raked 15th among goalies by save percentage (31st last year, and 32nd the year before). There were better goalies on teams that had worse records than the Canes.
I think this is the year for us to "wheel and deal" for a better goalie.
They are out there - Free Agent Goalies Summer 2009
http://www.nhlnumbers.com/freeagents.php?team=none&pos=G&summer=2009&status=none
Or we will be stuck with "Ward of the 'open' Crease" until the 2010/11 season.
Now, bring on the hate! lol
Gotta go with Leighton!
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 11:14 — ruutufan (not verified)While I will always admire Ward for his stellar play during the '06 playoffs, he has done nothing in recent seasons to prove he should be our #1 goalie. Letting Gerber walk was our biggest mistake in the summer of '06. Don't get me wrong, Ward has flashes of brilliance in net, but he is so inconsistent. Allowing 5 goals in 22 shots against Atlanta is clearly unacceptable. I can't be the only one who cringes everytime an opposing player manages a breakaway. Or even worse...going to a shootout! Have we EVER won a shootout with Ward in goal?!?!?
That being said, there is plenty of blame to go around. The defense could have played better yesterday. The forwards were abysmal after our second goal. I am so tired of this team playing without intensity. To put it mildly, I have been far less than pleased with the team since winning the Cup. That was three seasons ago! How long does this team expect to ride the wave of past success? It is time to move on already. The players, in general, need to start playing like the professionals they are. Maybe it is time to bench the underachievers, and reassign the "C" and "A"s to those who are more worthy. I love this team, but it is becoming increasingly difficult to watch them self-destruct year after year.
Have we EVER won a shootout with Ward in goal?!?!?
Tue, 11/11/2008 - 12:03 — NCBuff_CaniacYes. The very first game he started in the NHL back in 05 against Pittsburgh. He stopped Mario Lemieux, Sid the Kid and I admit I don't remember the 3rd shooter. He also won a SO on March 20 of last year against the Panthers. So he has won 2 of the 8 he has played in (according to the NHL website stats). Not sterling, but he has won.
On the bigger issue of who should the Canes use to carry the load, I think we have to go with whomever is the hot goalie, which right now is Leighton. I think the workload should be about even over the course of the next month or so and let whichever one really steps up get most of the starts.
Right on
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 10:31 — Hockeydog""Lavi really needs to start making coaching decisions based on the actual performance of his players instead of giving them leeway because of things they've done in the past.""
Absolutely right on.
Ward is not getting it done with any kind of consistency.
Leighton has more than earned the #1 job for the time being, it should be his to lose because Ward has lost it in my opinion.
Playing players in certain roles because of their name is kind of necessary right now with some of the injuries, but as the team gets a center or two back I'd like to see some roles changed at that position.
Leighton
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 10:20 — Anonymous (not verified)Just make sure he covers the puck!!!!! Cam seems to be struggling!!
Cam Ward's performances in
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 10:05 — Anonymous (not verified)Cam Ward's performances in his past 2 games haven't been good-- infact, they'be been downright awful. Has Leighton been better? yeah, but so what. I think if it's any other team on Wednesday night, put Leighton in there-- but the fact that it's the Capitals, Ward needs to play. He should be extra focused if he wants to right what happened thursday. If he and the team come to play, I think that it will boost his confidence, and he'll start to play better. Maybe us fans should start praying for Cam--
Fans and Media need to quit talking about this though. It's so old it smells bad....
give Michael a shot
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 10:00 — caniacgirl30I don't know why this happens, but the team plays harder in front of Leighton. I don't think that it's all Cam's fault-maybe the team tries to cover up more for Michael since he is "new". As much as I love Cam, I think that he needs some time to get his confidence back-whether it's in his own ability or in the guys playing in front of him. Let Michael Leighton start the Washington game, see how it goes, and then make decisions that are more long-term. But with that being said, I think that Cam is outstanding at times and has won games for this team that they didn't deserve to win. To me, he is the number one guy. He just needs to remember the way he played to earn that spot and the TEAM needs to get their act together. And that means everyone.
Wardo
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 10:24 — Dan the Crazy Canes fan (not verified)They don't play harder in front of Leighton. No hockey player plays harder or less for a goalie.
He is better positioned and his rebound control is much superior to Cam's
Leighton v Ward
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 09:51 — dabrams (not verified)Leighton should start. The same defensive team and same forwards play for Leighton as play for Ward. It is illogical to put all the blame on the defense when Ward loses and give them no credit when Leighton wins. An inconsistent goalie with streaks of genius is far more deadly to the morale of a team than a steady goalie. With a streaky goalie, the team never knows whether or when swiss cheese goalkeeping will surface. At yesterday's game, when the Atlanta evened the game at 2-2, it felt like air going out of tire. I was on the fourth row next to the Atlanta bench. The Atlanta players were psyched up. Our team looked like, "Oh, no, another day where Cam couldn't stop the dancing Granny."
Ward should be playing....
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 09:36 — Anonymous (not verified)Ward should be playing.... IN ALBANY!!!!
Leighton
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 09:27 — schelle92 (not verified)I think that Leighton should be in goal. Cam seems to be fighting the puck lately, even when he makes the saves. Perhaps Cam needs to know there is true competition for the #1 spot this year and his performance will be better. That being said, certain people need to not be double-shifted when they aren't performing. That just makes for double the screw ups. I won't mention any names but there were certain people who basically just called in the game yesterday and didn't bother to show up.
leighton
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 08:59 — Anonymous (not verified)Leighton should start Wed night. I feel the team plays better when he is at goal. Cam needs to sit a couple of games to get his focus back. He is not the #1 goalie right now. JR messed up getting rid of Gerber.
Ward/Leighton?
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 08:47 — Goalieman (not verified)Wardo IS the number one goalie but he has played the last two games and lost. Leighton IS the number two goalie but in his last game he did win. Now, we all know these facts but you have to look at the defense too. A goalie can only stop shots that the can see so the defense needs to clear the lanes and keep people out of the crease. Also, a goalies reaction has to be sharp but it is also up to the defense to not allow the other team in to pick up rebounds. There is a lot of things that have to happen that many people do not understand so they quickly blame the goalie.
The team has not be playing up to their profession status for the last two games so they were beaten. We need more shots on goal, more crashing the net, and less fancy passing. We need to stop dumping the puck, playing the boards so much, and more movement in front of the net. If we accomplish these things we will win more games!!!
With that said, I say play Ward against the Caps, get the team to pull their weight, and we will win. BUT, if we do not play well, they Caps get two goals in one period, put Leighton in to try. It certainly couldn't hurt!!!
Good points but . .
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 10:57 — C-Leaguer (not verified)You make a good point about defense, but where was the poor defense on the late goal the Oilers scored? Where was the poor defense in the last five minutes of the previous Washington game? It wasn't there. Those three goals can all be hung on Ward, with maybe the exception of the first third period goal which was a hard shot be Semin, but better stick positioning and that puck goes forward and not in to the net.
I'm not going to say that the defense has played great every game for all 60 minutes. We know that's just not true. But, when the defense plays well Leighton gives the team a chance to win. Ward has not proved as adept at doing that so far this season.
Leighton
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 08:42 — galatians220I agree that Leighton deserves to start on Wed. We've seen this before with Cam- he plays well for a few games & gets everyone excited, then his play falls off again. Until he establishes consistency, Peter should go with whoever's playing better at the time. Right now, based on stats, that's Leighton. As an aside, I think it should be very concerning to management that this team is having a great deal of trouble finding a consistent effort over the course of a single game, not to mention over a string of games. It was a horrible time for the organization to raise ticket prices, & somebody needs to learn how to motivate this group. Otherwise, changes in leadership must be made soon before the market loses interest.
Wrong Question
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 08:36 — Richie7Qustion should be who will start a forward and when will this team play a complete game....then we can talk about maybe playing 2 complete games in a row....the whole team was horrible yesterday not just the goalie. Seems to me maybe Wardo has lost confidence in the team not vice versa....after all they seem to like to take time off when he is between the pipes.
the main excuse for Cam Ward
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 08:29 — dbhenrythe main excuse for Cam Ward is the defense in front of him...well if the defense in front of Leighton is playing good enough to win, then Keep him in until things change
That's bull...
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 11:15 — penaltykiller74The defense only allowed 22 shots on Ward yesterday, while there were 37 on Hedberg. Yet, we lost. The defense doesn't keep the pucks from going in, it keeps them from getting to the goalie. 22 shots on goal is not a defensive breakdown.
Stopping 77% of the shots you face is the problem. Hedberg stopped 95%.
Even the one game Leighton lost he still stopped 91% of the goals.
So looking at averages of Save percentage per wins and losses:
Ward
Games Won - 93.2%
Games Lost - 88.1%
Leighton
Games Won - 92.75%
Games Lost - 91.2%
And to be honest, the game that Leighton lost in Pittsburg, can be blamed on bad defense, and poor passing on the offense.
Leighton on average faced 30.4 shots on goal, and Ward faced 32.4.
So, you still think the defense makes Wards stats worse than Leighton?
I'm saying that's what cane
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 12:28 — dbhenryI'm saying that's what cane kiss __ Mike Maniscalco says, I think our defense is not as good as it needs to be but when Cam Ward has a bad game fans and biased postgame hosts are blaming it on the defense, Michael Leighton hasn't had a bad game yet with the exception of pittsburgh and don't blame that loss on the defense...that's a cop out, but in Leighton to show cam ward he's gonna have to play playoff caliber to be a number 1
Were you at the game or just reading stats?
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 11:55 — MR (not verified)The Canes may have 37 shots, but 75% were bad angle wristers from outside the circle or straight on shots with no traffic.
Ward on the other hand, was facing tap-ins from the opposite side of the net and one-timers from players left wide open.
Both Ward and the D are to blame. On Kovalchuk's goal, Wallin was standing next to Ward with his freakin' back to Kovalchuk, oblivious that someone was breaking toward the net.
Ward needs to be better. Leighton is not the answer. If he needs to play a few games to get the most out of Ward, then fine, but if we are pinning are hopes on Michale Leighton to win the Division and go far in the playoffs, we are in real trouble.
Leighton should start, no doubt
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 08:27 — ruutufan (not verified)Since winning the Cup, Ward's performance has fluctuated. His inconsistency is killing this team. Allowing 5 goals on 22 shots in the Atlanta game was clearly unacceptable. I love the Hurricanes, but honestly, I have grown tired of watching their lackluster performances. I am convinced that Ward is fully unable to stop breakaways. If the game comes down to a shoot-out with Ward in net, it is certain we will lose. This organization needs to punish those who are underperforming, and reward those who are bringing it on a nightly basis. Bench those who aren't playing up to their potential, and strip the "C" or "A" off a few sweaters and redistribute them to those more worthy. In this weakened economy, the Canes realistically cannot expect to fill the arena 41 times/year with incredibly dismal performances like yesterday's. This is really the third consecutive season that fans are being subjected to poor effort.
Mike get my vote
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 07:43 — esteban1949while "experience is and can be a good thing...but if we look at the over all stats thus far, Leighton needs to be in goal.
I am glad i was too sick to listen to the game...i would have gotten worse...
esteban skates off heads for the men's room, tummy is acting up yet again...Bummer...
Another vote for Leighton.
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 07:42 — FuquayCaniacAnother vote for Leighton. I think he needs to play in every back-to-back series and everytime Wardo plays a stinkbomb of a game like yesterday.
And the Ruutu-Helminen-LaRose line needs to be put back together. :)
Leighton
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 07:37 — LainiencLeighton should be in goal until he loses a couple of games. It's painfully obvious Ward doesn't seem to have the attention span to focus for 60 minutes. In this economy, if the management wants to maintain attendance they'd better put a better, consistent product on the ice. As a full season ticketholder, I'm reconsidering investing in this team for next season. People don't invest in financial instruments that don't perform, and they will not invest in a team that doesn't either. Whatever changes are warranted to ice a better product, need to be made, and soon.
Leighton. But given JR's
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 07:25 — ctillLeighton. But given JR's long-term commitment to Ward, I wouldn't be surprised to see Ward in nearly every game that's not a back-to-back. Let's not over-rotate on Leighton... he has been on the NHL/AHL edge for years, and I wonder if he is really good enough to a #1 in the NHL.
To me, though, the more interesting questions are (1) who will lose ice-time when Cullen and Sutter return, (2) will Eaves get any ice-time when he has recovered, and (3) what becomes of the Brind'amour/Samsonov line.
Leighton
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 06:48 — Lainienc (not verified)Leighton should have started yesterday's game and should start every game until he loses 2 in a row. Play the hot goalie. Ward doesn't seem to have the attention span to focus 60 minutes on the ice.
If the 'Canes expect to be able to draw fans in this economy, they'd better pick up the effort, put a better product on the ice and win. As a full STH, I'm reconsidering renewing my investment in the team next year. I wouldn't put my money in a financial instrument that doesn't perform, and I sure wont put it on a team that doesn't.
Leighton
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 04:58 — Anonymous (not verified)Ward - 10 games, 4-4-2, GAA 2.86, SV% .910 Leighton-5 games, 4-1-0 GAA 2.36, SV% .926
I think it should be
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 04:39 — Portisfreak (not verified)I think it should be Leighton. He's got the hot glove right now, and that should be used.
Leighton
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 01:49 — penaltykiller74Let Leighton run with it for a couple games to see if he can handle the load of games. Leighton did better in the pre-season, and has a tendency to appear more calm during games, even recovering after letting in a goal, where it seems at times Ward gets flustered easily.
i agree with you bud!
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 04:59 — Anonymous (not verified)Leighton
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 00:51 — Anonymous (not verified)Michael Leighton should start. I don't think there's any question about it. Ward hasn't gotten it done for 2 seasons. If he wants to be a #1 goalie, he needs to earn it, and right now he just doesn't deserve it.
Lavi really needs to start making coaching decisions based on the actual performance of his players instead of giving them leeway because of things they've done in the past.
Leighton v Ward
Mon, 11/10/2008 - 09:56 — dabrams (not verified)Really well said. I agree. Ward was great at the end of 2005-2006. Since then, based on his performances, he's wavered between great and awful. Unless and until he develops consistency, he's too risky to start as a #1 goalie.