The Canes' Rod Brind'Amour is minus-26 for the season, last in the league, after his minus-3 game Saturday in the 4-2 loss to Boston. He also is second in the NHL in faceoff percentage. He serves as team captain. He's played with a broken nose, with a sore knee.
Brind'Amour says the plus/minus can be a misleading stat. Coach Paul Maurice agrees. Sometimes, they say, the intangibles, on and off the ice, are as important as a tangible statistic.
What are your thoughts -- on the plus/minus, on Brind'Amour's play this season?
The floor is open.

A Raleigh native, Chip has worked at the N&O since 1979 and is the Canes beat writer. He can be reached at
Comments
Bench JR...
Tue, 12/30/2008 - 22:46 — CanesRBoringConsider this before you all want to side line a 2x Selke winner, an All-Star, an All-Rookie, and Stanley Cup Captain:
Ladd 14pts in last 10 games played vs. Ruutu 0pts in last 3gp.
Stillman 4pts in last 4gp vs. Eaves 1pt in last 3gp.
Cole 3pts in last 2gp vs. Pitkanen 2pts in last 3gp.
Bench JR because he is the reason the Canes are in this predicament, not just a single player who brings so much more to the team than any fan can understand [I tried to explain this in a post below].
The next chant along with "Mo must go", should be "Tar JR!"
Yeah
Wed, 12/31/2008 - 01:55 — uneksijaYeah, because we all know that 3, 4, and 2 games make a season and are statistically significant and comparing offensive players' goal production against a defensive players' makes sense.
You're not even using the same sample size in your direct comparisons.
Fail.
Hello...
Wed, 12/31/2008 - 05:01 — CanesRBoringHello, it was a direct comparison of the players JR traded
One example was cole a forward vs Pitkanen a defensemen. He traded those two for each other newb. And besides Pitky is an offensive defensemen like all these Canes D men. In other words he is supposed to put up points either through goals or assists (assists as well as goals count for points). For example, Pronger a well renowned D-man (in case you never heard of him) has 22pts so far. Compare that with Sammy's ( a winger just so you know) 16!
The stats are a reminder that u newbs are using stats to diss Brindy!! The numbers come from points that players put up in some type of consecutive play. Be it 2,3, or 10!
You didn't even scroll down to see my point when I replied to Allen...slacker!
It's a mis-guided guideline as to how much a player is contributing especially, just like using Plus/minus against Brindy.
Man you really need to get a grip on your lack of hockey knowledge!
You are an EPIC FAIL@!
I know I know your team is the absolute best. JR and MO are the best the NHL can buy...you are the exact reason why hockey fails in these specialized markets.
+/- for Rod...another thought
Tue, 12/30/2008 - 18:45 — groovinsmokeI was skimming the blogs and came across one saying to give him less minutes. I do agree, but take them away from where we are hurting the most....THE POWER PLAY. We are so much more capable with the team that we have. I think that other changes need to be made besides Roddy on the PP, but let's start there. I think that Mo really needs to light a fire under some of these guys to show them that they all have a chance. If you don't perform then you don't play, simple! I think that the Staal line has been improving with every game, and so has the Cullen line. So why not put a combination of those guys on the ice. If you want to chop away at Roddy's minutes, the PP or PK would be first, considering that is where we struggle the most thus far.
+/- for Roddy
Tue, 12/30/2008 - 18:31 — groovinsmokeAlthough I haven't ever really taken too much into consideration with the +/- stat, it is just that....a STAT. No one else on the team, or the league for that matter has a worse +/- stat. Look at Ray Whitney, with a -9, yet he still leads the team with 32 points so far and a 10 game streak. Look at last year, when Roddy got injured. Who took over??? Staal! Where did we go after that? A lot further than where our captain took us. I know that Roddy is approaching 700 career assists, good for any 38 year old hockey player. Not to mention that he has broken the top 50 marker in most points. I think that if retirement was coming, this would be the year to do it. If not, well......I don't think that you will see him wearing a canes jersey next season, if anyone will put a jersey on him at all. In fact this is the worst +/- that he has EVER had to date. Second came in 1999-2000 when we drafted him. I am not going to say that he isn't a beloved Cane, who we couldn't do without in the 06 run. Yet if he continues to show this performance, which is what this particular stat is for, we won't make it anywhere. I think that it also works to a opposing coaches advantage when making a line-up for a game. Put your toughest line against Roddy's line and you will score, do you really want that target on your back? I think of 2 possible scenario's. A). Put him on a line that he is more comfortable with...the fourth preferably. or B). Put him with Williams and Cullen, they seemed to have great chemistry in the 06 run, so why not now. I think that Mo needs to look more into him options within the team, instead of sticking him on the same line night in and night out. Roddy we love ya, but you may not last with these numbers.
I think we can all agree
Tue, 12/30/2008 - 15:50 — gbmethvenI think we can all agree that #17 has made a great contribution to the Canes over the years but we don't want to see a replay of Johnny Unitas playing for the Chargers at the end of his career. I think it is all political. If he were anyone else (except Staal) he would be on the fourth line right now. Stats can be misleading but when they are this far skewed... you know the saying"where there's smoke there's fire". Rod - go out with dignity!
+/- Tells A Lot
Tue, 12/30/2008 - 11:05 — smhockey+/- is skewed - negatively by playing against top lines or playing on a mediocre line, positively by short handed goals. RB's +/- is definitely a sign of poor overall performance.
Being a great face-off center doesn't overshadow a lack of: *speed *backchecking* *physicality or *neutral zone control. In all of these areas, regrettably, RB is playing 4th line level if not AHL. Even his passing is suffering because of poor timing - a result of greatly reduced speed and agility.
The bad sign is that he isn't getting a lot better. In a recent pre-game interview he conceded the knee wouldn't be the same.
Cullen hasn't been stong enough yet to take over the #2 center and Sutter is best left @ #4 for now.
NEED: strong #2 center with size who can skate, screen goalies, backcheck, take faceoffs, has good hands, and is physical. Hard to obtain and cost big$.
He's done
Tue, 12/30/2008 - 11:19 — slowmojumboLoses too many of the one-on-one battles for the puck. Most of the time he looks off balance and slow.
Sticks out like a sore thumb, especialy on PP.
nothing new
Tue, 12/30/2008 - 08:58 — mumsyb13#17 had a penchant for giving up the puck long before this season. BTW, Whitney has had his share of the same during the same time period, including this season. Williams the same. The latter two, though, seem to have a way of making up for the gaffs, but this season, Brindy has not. The team should trust the other players enough to give them more time and rest the players that are playing through injury or recovering or both. It couldn't hurt to put Sutter in a bit more-see if he can go longer minutes against other team's top lines. Or just play all lines = amount of time and stop leaning on 2 1/2 lines. Do you think the coaching staff reads this blog?
Roddy's +/-
Tue, 12/30/2008 - 18:38 — groovinsmokeI highly doubt that the coaching staff reads these blogs. In fact if they did, we may be seeing more results from them. I feel really bad for Roddy, but not that bad. I think that Cullen has more than proven himself to make a #2 line center, even if it's just for a couple of games. I think that it may be a reality check for Roddy if he were put on the #3 line. I know that he is one of the hardest working players on the team to, outside of the rink. Still no excuse for him to be posting such bad numbers. I think that Staal would take his place just fine, if not better. Not to mention, and sad to say, take RB off the PK and PP. Maybe he just needs a fire lit under him for a short period of time, who knows?
re: that's why I voted for
Tue, 12/30/2008 - 07:54 — wfbasserYou voted for a lawyer/politician so you will get the same bull^*(%. They are all the same!! That is the reality of it.
Back to hockey, I could not agree more that Brind'Amour needs to be given less minutes. Everyone can say what they want about the plus/minus and if Brind'Amour were a -10, closer to Whitney then maybe you could say that plus/minus is misleading. He is a -26 and he needs less minutes! If he is still injured then, come back when you are ready.
thats whyI voted for.....
Tue, 12/30/2008 - 01:38 — piratepike09Obama.....cause I didnt want the same old bulls@#% we get from the white house nowadays.....
this is in response to esteban's response to by post.
Brindy
Tue, 12/30/2008 - 00:50 — gillimusis the best player the canes have ever had. he deserves your respect for the effort he's put into this franchise. is he nearing the end of his career? yes. has he lost something since the knee injury? yes. but he's still 3rd on the team in points, he still makes a contribution. the +/- is skewed by how crappy the power play/pk has been. i think there's a consensus that cutting his ice time will help him in the long run, but how do u tell the lead dog on the sled team that he needs to slack off? coach mo has a difficult task in front of him, but if he uses #17 wisely, rod can continue to be a big contributor to the canes success.
skewed +/-
Tue, 12/30/2008 - 11:10 — beer210His plus/minus stat is not skewed by the crappy power play/pk. Points scored on the PP and points given up while SH do not get factored into a player's plus/minus. Which means that most of the damage is happening during even strength, or worse, giving up short handed goals.
Sigh...
Mon, 12/29/2008 - 16:59 — esteban1949As a fan of Hockey...from the " Sports Entertainment " side of life, I feel very blessed no one here owns or has "controling interest" in the Carolina Huricanes Hockey Club,LLC ABC-XYZ, cause yall would fire someone's dead grandmother for not getting your cold beer to you fast enough cause of her Storm squad costume was too tight & not sexy enough too for ya as well! If this all you have to complain about...then folks...get a life... if yall would pay as much attention to your kids and grandkids as yall do wanting to chop off Brind'Amours head, North carolina could have had 2 Nobel Peace Prize winners in the US Senate instead of the 2 chuckle heads we got now...Give the man a break folks...can any of you with his injuries do any better ?? if not then you know what to do... Down in front...your ego is blocking the view of the little peoples...
so.....
Mon, 12/29/2008 - 18:12 — piratepike09What you are saying is, as fans of the game, and this team, we are not allowed an opinion? You are on here as much as any of us, if not more, making MANY more comments than most of us. We can dislike the play of a certain player, ESPECIALLY if that player is our Captain, who has consistently been one of the bes, if not THE best, defensive forwards in the LEAGUE, much less this team, for the last few years, and all of a sudden has dropped off the face of the earth in terms of defensive play.
Why are we talking about NC Senators? off topic much?
You know well and good none of us could play anywhere near the level Brind'Amour is playing right now. And by that I mean we all suck WAY worse. But guess what, he is getting paid BIG bucks to play at the elite level, and to play as the CAPTAIN of an elite level team, and instead he is losing important faceoffs, giving up the puck in the offensive zone, not taking his defensive assignments, and really not showing hardly any heart or willingness to push himself on the ice at all. Granted, he may be recovering from an injury, so guess what....cut his minutes at LEAST. At the very least. Let someone who is actually performing well, like Cullen, or hell even Sutter, take his spot. Remember when they put Sutter out there to take faceoffs and play on the PK over Brind'Amour? He used to be our top PKer. Now look, getting replaced by a rookie.
The evidence is there. Now some action needs to be taken.
You want action Pike09
Tue, 12/30/2008 - 01:04 — esteban1949Then buy the team...fix it the way you want...but even if you were half as good as a George Stienbrenner you still couldn't turn the canes around at the snap of a finger...And yes fans have the right to opinions...but as i have said and stand on...if we fans were to pay more attention to what our elected officials at the state house...and in washington Dc were doing instead of flapping our jaws over what we can't control in the area of " sports entertainment" ( uhhh that is what you get when you attend a sporting event by the way)and just enjoy the show as much as we can...then the state of NC and the nation could be a wee bit better off...but to be honest...i aint gonna hold my breath...because we the people keep electing the same chuckle heads all the time...you know the ones...the liars, the crooks and thieves...who stand up and say In my humble opinion...instead of the people whom i work for says...but i am just a humble sports fan who has no vested intrest in any team ( meaning i don't have or own season tickets) what could i possibly know ?
have a happy & healthy new year !
Go Lethbridge Hurricanes...the future of the NHL is in your hands !!
Brind'Amour
Mon, 12/29/2008 - 15:40 — uneksijaRod Brind'Amour is one of my favorite players in all of sports, I have tremendous respect for him, and he's a big reason why I'm such a passionate Canes fan. I don't need to see the plus/minus stat, I can see it in his on-ice performance, especially late in the game and at the end of back-to-backs. He's slow, he's turning the puck over, even though his f/o percentage has remained high he's been lacking on key face-off situations. His body can't be willed to do what his mind wants it to do, so he isn't capitalizing on the ice-time opportunity he's being given. There is no way he should have been on the ice for the 6-on-4 at the end of the Bruins game. He needs to be rested and his ice time needs to be reduced, I have confidence that the other lines can absorb this and prevail. Oh, and go ahead and move Williams up too while you're at it.
+/- misleading?
Mon, 12/29/2008 - 14:02 — AllenHMaybe when it's plus or minus 1 or 2 or 3. When it's -26 it's pretty telling. And it's apparent Cap't Rod is both struggling and keeping us from winning games or at least scoring goals that should lead to wins. Yeah, this about entertainment but it's also about competitiveness, pride (team and civic), spirit, sport, it's about having two seasons of not even making the playoffs after winning the Cup. That just ain't right. It's also about MONEY, that stuff that allows the Canes and the NHL to exist.
I kinda digress. Yes the Captain brings leadership to the ice and he is the 2nd in faceoffs but neither of those directly translate to goals nor wins. The question I'd ask of the coach, assts., GM, owner, and each player is: "Is what the Cap'n is bringing to each game sufficient, is it worth having an important player causing turn-overs and poor play leading to goals against and losses? What would be the best for all involved?" "Can you point out what leadership examples he provides ON the ice?" Not just generalities but specifics.
What Brindy Brings...
Tue, 12/30/2008 - 22:34 — CanesRBoringFirst of all I don't see that Brindy is the thorn in the side of the Canes struggles. I believe it goes way deeper than a player who is struggling, really for the first time since he became a Cane.
But IMO I think Brindy brings so much more than just his points or lack there of.
He brings a steady hand of hockey knowledge and hockey sense that really can steady a team that is struggling and help the up and coming Rats. He is more to the organization than just a player. His work ethic and cagey hockey play is a subtle effective tool on the ice.
Think about it: a player sees his Captain struggling in points and health yet he never, never quits. He is a player that knows where the Puck is gonna be and where the puck should be. He brings pride and a work ethic second to none in this league full of hard working players.
One player a team does not break, but I believe one player a team can make. Yes he is probably playing hurt, but as a 3rd liner with very important face off skills [lets not forget that faceoffs are an integral and very important part of this game], I don't believe for one minute that reducing Brindy's play time will enhance the Canes.
In other words, if a GM or coach benches or greatly reduces his play time, they are effectively saying to the rest of the team that we care not of your hard work, all we care about is stats. They would be saying the opposite of what my nemisis JR is saying: team loyalty. And anyone in sports or the military knows how important loyalty is.
You must look beyond the shallow waters of the rough sea and peer deep below to see the hidden mines.
How about this for a monday
Mon, 12/29/2008 - 13:57 — CaniacforeverHow about this for a monday debate... why is it that this blog is constantly scooped by Leafs Lunch, TSN, and any other credible outlets when it comes to roster moves and things of that nature?
Why should the readers here be the last to know that Frantisek Kaberle, who scored the GWG in Game 7 of the NHL Finals for us, has been waived?
Get it together, please. I assume that is a reasonable request.
I agree!
Tue, 12/30/2008 - 01:44 — AN0NYM0USI fully agree with you! I've made the same request on several occasions. The N&O coverage has slipped more than Roddy's face off %. There has been a consistent lack of insightful reporting since the start of the season--Hockey coverage in the Triangle seems to have taken a huge step back after all the momentum we had after we won the Cup.
Also, I am one of those fans who is willing to put his money where his mouth is--I'll be at the game on Wednesday cheering my team--I'd like to see more of those out there who seem very willing to put their 2 cents into the converation on the Canes Now blog fork over a little more to make their presence known at the RBC Center.
not appropriate
Mon, 12/29/2008 - 15:06 — larikatThere is no need to post crap like that on here. Get a life.
So you don't find it the
Mon, 12/29/2008 - 15:16 — CaniacforeverSo you don't find it the least bit irritating that you wouldn't have known about Kaberle being waived without me coming here to tell you? Who the heck am I to be dishing out information to caniac nation?
This gentleman is getting paid, mind you, in these tough economic times to stay on top of the actions of the Carolina Hurricanes and is getting scooped by people who are 1,500 miles away from the action at his back door.
You know what that says? That says that there is no pride taken in being the one to inform the fanbase about the day to day actions of the franchise. He's only here to post game recaps and filler. Even to this exact moment it hasn't been mentioned on this blog.
If you want sub standard reporting then you can have it. But those of us that are critical are demanding more because Luke gave it. I don't recall of a single instance where Luke was scooped this way. Not to mention the several other times this year it has happened.
I'm with you!
Tue, 12/30/2008 - 01:48 — AN0NYM0USWe get the bare minimum--and we shouldn't have to apologize for wanting more!
Cullen's line
Mon, 12/29/2008 - 12:51 — piratepike09isn't what needs to be moved up. Cullen himself does, but you can't demote Whitney and Walker (ok, maybe put Williams in Walker's place) just because their center is grossly underachieving. Whitney leads the team in points and assists, and is 2nd on the team in goals, behind only Staal. There would be no reason to cut his minutes whatsoever.
Brindy on the other hand......i just dont know anymore what to think about him. I love the guy, just like every Caniac does, but I just can't get over his horrible play. Ok, the plus-minus is the statistical representation of his bad play, but those of you who watch the game like I do and can actually SEE what it is he is doing wrong to earn that -26 know exactly what I mean when I say he just isn't the same old Brindy we know and love.
Agree with this, Move Matty
Mon, 12/29/2008 - 13:44 — STFPAgree with this, Move Matty up and move Brind'Aminus down for a few games to see what happens.
Brind'Amour
Mon, 12/29/2008 - 13:02 — abramsdougWell said. I agree 100%.
Playing Hurt
Mon, 12/29/2008 - 12:04 — JRs_FaultI don't see how there can be any question about the fact that Rod is playing hurt. Remember the uproar here after the Friesen 5K? Do we think he just instantly healed? A back to back Selke winner doesn't just lose it overnight because he's aged a year or two. He's playing with a god-awful brace on his knee (you can clearly see it live) and will be for the rest of the year, if not his career. You can see the impact that has on his ability to protect the puck, hit and take hits.
Plus/Minus can be mis-leading in some cases, but when you have a player that's that far out of whack with the rest of his team (much less his line mates), it comes down to how that player is being mis/over-used.
There is plenty of anecdotal evidence out there that suggests that Rod didn't let himself heal as he should have (his dad claiming he was lifting a day or two after the initial surgery, Rod's admission that he pushed that last couple hundred yards of the 5K, on top of his general workout ethic).
In light of this, I think his minutes have to go down. I have no idea what his off-ice routine is, but that should be looked at as well. Limit his use on the power-play, make judicious use of him on the PK, and yes, play with a 3rd/4th line assignment to see how it goes. No way do you take away the 'C' though, that won't improve his play (or anyone else's) and would only be a distraction and a slap in the face to one of the classiest guys in the entire NHL.
play Brandon Sutter more minutes
Mon, 12/29/2008 - 11:40 — crazyjoedavolaIf the plus/minus is meaningless, why is the stat listed on the front stat page at NHL.com? Rod being (-26) is not all just bad luck, as evidenced by Saturday night's game. It is certainly not the first time this year that one of his turnovers had resulted in a goal against.
Stanley Cup winning coaches can be fired, so a Stanley Cup winning captain can be demoted if he is hurting the team. No one should be held sacred when the team is not winning, unless you want to keep on losing.
It's obvious to everyone except the genius's on Edwards Mill Road that Brind'Amour has lost a step or two and is prone to turnovers. Personally, I would rather see more of Brandon Sutter, even if he can't win a faceoff.
While the +/- might be
Mon, 12/29/2008 - 11:08 — SlapShotWhile the +/- might be misleading, it can't be that misleading if the former Selke winner is the worst in the league. The captain's gaffs have been very costly-- bad decisons with the puck which are resulting in advantages for the other team-- not to mention he's a step or two behind. It appears that time is catching up. Don't understand why Cullen's line hasn't moved up-- it appears to be time.
In the real world..
Mon, 12/29/2008 - 11:04 — HockeydogPlayers, even hall of fame worthy players have their ice time reduced when they get to a point of hurting the team. The fact is Brindy is not always hurting the team but his play has cost this team some points. We all love him and know what he has meant to this team. He can still be a leader on this club and play a 3rd line, or even a forth line. Kevyn Adams wore an "A" for this club. I don't think Brindy has lost his ability to play or think the game, so he is either hurt or is just slowing with age.
I firmly believe that resting him now by reducing his minutes will pay dividends later in the season/playoffs when the team really needs him. Look at Glenn Wesley, he had lost a couple of steps his last years but he found the extra gear in the post-season. The club should ensure that happens with Roddy. It's not about flaming the guy, it's about getting to the playoffs and putting Brindy in a position to succeed.
Rod Brind'Amour
Mon, 12/29/2008 - 09:44 — esteban1949Wears his battle scars well wether on the ice or off. Grant you he may NOT be a Wayne or Bobby Orr type of sanctified HOFer...but he will get to the HOF one day...as it was because of his ability to overcome and endure what many of us or other players from different sports could never ever do. Peronally and while no one here really gives a flying fig what I think or have to say...The Good Captain would love to have better stats,a few more goals and points on the books. But as a TEAM Player...the captain does his best with what he has, and isn't complaing ...is he ? But to we, the micro-wave pop corn, instant gratification,i want another Cup or else whiney & fickled sports fans...The captains efforts are no longer good enough...remember that when your boss or plant & company manager comes up to you and says....Sorry your + & - just aint cutting it no more...shape up or you're history...that just after you had major re-constructive knee surgery...but i forgot...in the reality of what have you done for me lately...i was toast and history 35 years ago...esteban goes for a webster's dictionary and looks up the words...Sports Entertainment...hmmm...
Brind'Amour
Mon, 12/29/2008 - 09:17 — abramsdougTHe +/- of -26, which is by a large margin the worst +/- by Brind'Amour in his career, is the tip of the iceberg. I remember clearly the Rod Brind'Amour of the 2006 Stanley Cup. He was amazing. He put the team on his shoulders and carried it. It was a remarkable performance by any standard. Unfortunately, that Rod Brind'Amour has not been present in 2007-2008 or 2008-2009. Instead, the present #17 has played without the relentlessness and intensity of the 2005-2006. We can look at the DVD of 2005-2006 if we want to see history; but showing opposing teams your video clips doesn't win hockey games. The face off percentage is helpful but has to be viewed objectively. In several games, including the Bruins game, Brind'Amour lost face-offs at the end of the game which wound up costing the Hurricanes the game. His turnovers at the end of games, including the Bruins game, have cost the Hurricanes games. Meanwhile, in the Bruins game, Cullen had a 69% face off success while Brind'Amour had a 71% face off success -- hardly a significant different. By the way, Sutter had a 67% face off success. The sad truth is that Brind'Amour is killing the Hurricanes. He has four goals since October 28, 2008. He is making critical mistakes that would get any other player benched. His lack of productivity is undermining the power play. There is no way he should be on the ice twenty minutes a game. Brind'Amour deserves to have his jersey retired and hung from the RBC Center and he deserves to be in the Hall of Fame; but he also has to face the reality of his poor performance. Given his stature he needs to go to Maurice and Francis and work out a way to reduce his time on ice until he can find whatever it is that inspired him to be the player he was in 2005-2006. In the meantime, he needs to let younger, healthier, more driven players carry the load.
I agree with everything you
Mon, 12/29/2008 - 10:44 — vortacI agree with everything you said.
You can't judge how a player is playing now based on what he did years ago. You have to base it on how they are currently playing. This reminds me of what Mike Maniscalco was saying when he was talking about playing Cullen's line more and taking time away from Brindy's. He said that it may be natural to play the stars who have performed well in the past, but if they are not getting it done and other lines are playing much better, you play those lines.
Right now, Brind'Amour is playing horrible and making poor turnovers. He may have won 69% of face offs. But how many of those were actually key face offs. The game against the Flyers on 12/6- Brindy was 61% in face offs. But when a face off mattered (as in the last face off of the game, in overtime, in the 'Canes defensive zone), he could not win it, and we know how that turned out.... Brindy may be winning a lot of face offs, but are the face offs he is winning actually helping the team win games? By the looks of it...no.
#17
Mon, 12/29/2008 - 08:42 — kpatenaude-26 and his play all year should tell us something. Whether he is hurt or has just lost a step, on the ice, its hurting the team over 60 minutes. Anyone that suggests that he is done is wrong. There will alwasy be a spot on the roster for him until he decides otherwise. The reality is that #8 should be up on the 2nd line and #17 on the 3rd. Mix the wings as it works best (11 and 13 on 2nd, 24 and 59/44 on 3rdwould be my choice). Regarding faceoffs he still the best there is but bring him out to win the big ones as a 2nd center for the bench side winger like they did in 05-06. Its a win win to maximize his utility and ice time.
Correction
Mon, 12/29/2008 - 07:14 — jenniwa30Rod leads the league in Face off %, Mike Richards is second in the league. His leadership and determination earn him a spot on the ice, not his +/-.
Heart isn't measured in numbers
Mon, 12/29/2008 - 06:17 — testarossa17I'm with ydb999. I couldn't have said it any better. Rod Brind'Amour is the reason I became a Canes fan in the first place.
Watch 2006 Stanley Cup DVD.
Mon, 12/29/2008 - 01:53 — ydb999Watch 2006 Stanley Cup DVD to remind yourselves what Brind'Amour means to this team's fans and organization. As long as Brindy plays for Canes he is a captain and a top 2 line center. Agree or disagree, it's a fact. I am OK with it, he deserves to retire when he is ready. He earned that right by leading this franchise to a Stanley Cup.
Why does his performance
Mon, 12/29/2008 - 15:21 — kahzarellaWhy does his performance during the Cup win guarantee him a a spot on the top two lines at this current moment? Sorry, but that makes no sense. What about his performance today? His -26 is the worst in the league and significantly worse than the next player on the team (Whitney with -9). That's not a "misleading" stat. The Hurricanes will not make the playoffs with him as a second line center. His minutes need to be cut drastically. He is a liability on the ice.